pith. sign in

arxiv: 2411.17661 · v3 · pith:ASAWZVEVnew · submitted 2024-11-26 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.LG

Non-Contextual BERT or FastText? A Comparative Analysis

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.LG
keywords embeddingsbertnon-contextualcontextualfasttextlow-resourceanalysislanguage
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Natural Language Processing (NLP) for low-resource languages, which lack large annotated datasets, faces significant challenges due to limited high-quality data and linguistic resources. The selection of embeddings plays a critical role in achieving strong performance in NLP tasks. While contextual BERT embeddings require a full forward pass, non-contextual BERT embeddings rely only on table lookup. Existing research has primarily focused on contextual BERT embeddings, leaving non-contextual embeddings largely unexplored. In this study, we analyze the effectiveness of non-contextual embeddings from BERT models (MuRIL and MahaBERT) and FastText models (IndicFT and MahaFT) for tasks such as news classification, sentiment analysis, and hate speech detection in one such low-resource language Marathi. We compare these embeddings with their contextual and compressed variants. Our findings indicate that non-contextual BERT embeddings extracted from the model's first embedding layer outperform FastText embeddings, presenting a promising alternative for low-resource NLP.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.