Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Sub-Exponential Lower Bounds for Branch-and-Bound with General Disjunctions via Interpolation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.04320 v2 pith:ATJYUN5U submitted 2023-08-08 math.OC

classification math.OC
keywords branch-and-boundgeneralintegerinteger-freenessinterpolationmonotonerealshowing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

This paper investigates linear programming based branch-and-bound using general disjunctions, also known as stabbing planes, for solving integer programs. We derive the first sub-exponential lower bound (in the encoding length $L$ of the integer program) for the size of a general branch-and-bound tree for a particular class of (compact) integer programs, namely $\smash{2^{\Omega(L^{1/12 -\epsilon})}}$ for every $\epsilon >0$. This is achieved by showing that general branch-and-bound admits quasi-feasible monotone real interpolation, which allows us to utilize sub-exponential lower-bounds for monotone real circuits separating the so-called clique-coloring pair. Moreover, this also implies that refuting $\Theta(\log(n))$-CNFs requires size $2^{n^{\Omega(1)}}$ branch-and-bound trees with high probability by considering the closely related notion of infeasibility certificates introduced by Hrubes and Pudl\'ak. One important ingredient of the proof of our interpolation result is that for every general branch-and-bound tree proving integer-freeness of a product $P\times Q$ of two polytopes $P$ and $Q$, there exists a closely related branch-and-bound tree for showing integer-freeness of $P$ or one showing integer-freeness of $Q$. Moreover, we prove that monotone real circuits can perform binary search efficiently.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools