Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

On the Convergence of Adam under Non-uniform Smoothness: Separability from SGDM and Beyond

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.15146 v1 pith:AXLJAR7O submitted 2024-03-22 cs.LG math.OC

classification cs.LGmath.OC
keywords convergenceadamratesgdmgradientlowerstochasticbound
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper aims to clearly distinguish between Stochastic Gradient Descent with Momentum (SGDM) and Adam in terms of their convergence rates. We demonstrate that Adam achieves a faster convergence compared to SGDM under the condition of non-uniformly bounded smoothness. Our findings reveal that: (1) in deterministic environments, Adam can attain the known lower bound for the convergence rate of deterministic first-order optimizers, whereas the convergence rate of Gradient Descent with Momentum (GDM) has higher order dependence on the initial function value; (2) in stochastic setting, Adam's convergence rate upper bound matches the lower bounds of stochastic first-order optimizers, considering both the initial function value and the final error, whereas there are instances where SGDM fails to converge with any learning rate. These insights distinctly differentiate Adam and SGDM regarding their convergence rates. Additionally, by introducing a novel stopping-time based technique, we further prove that if we consider the minimum gradient norm during iterations, the corresponding convergence rate can match the lower bounds across all problem hyperparameters. The technique can also help proving that Adam with a specific hyperparameter scheduler is parameter-agnostic, which hence can be of independent interest.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Sign Operator for Coping with Heavy-Tailed Noise in Non-Convex Optimization: High Probability Bounds Under $(L_0, L_1)$-Smoothness

    math.OC 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    First high-probability bounds for SignSGD with batching or majority voting under (L0, L1)-smoothness and heavy-tailed noise, with near-optimal epsilon-dependencies.

  2. Simple Convergence Proof of Adam From a Sign-like Descent Perspective

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Adam's O(1/T^1/4) convergence is proven from a sign-like descent perspective, but the dimension-free claim depends on restrictive coordinate-wise assumptions.

  3. LightSAM: Parameter-Agnostic Sharpness-Aware Minimization

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    An adaptive SAM variant using AdaGrad and Adam steps for both perturbation and update is claimed to converge at O(ln T / T^{1/4}) without tuning, but the Adam version still needs decaying hyperparameters and the proof...

Pith tools