Benchmarking State-of-the-Art Theory and Empirical Models of Pionless Neutrino-Argon Scattering in GENIE

Liang Liu; Steven Dytman; Steven Gardiner

arxiv: 2605.14196 · v2 · pith:B2RSFVDBnew · submitted 2026-05-13 · ✦ hep-ph

Benchmarking State-of-the-Art Theory and Empirical Models of Pionless Neutrino-Argon Scattering in GENIE

Liang Liu , Steven Gardiner , Steven Dytman This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 16:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph

keywords neutrino-argon scatteringpionless interactionsGENIE event generatorMicroBooNE dataquasielastic scatteringfinal-state interactionsnuclear modelscharged-current interactions

0 comments

The pith

GENIE's model interchange capability allows direct benchmarking of sophisticated theoretical components against empirical alternatives for pionless neutrino-argon scattering using MicroBooNE data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tests a range of neutrino interaction models inside the GENIE event generator against recent MicroBooNE measurements of pionless charged-current interactions on argon. The code allows easy interchange of components such as nucleon form factor parameterizations, quasielastic cross-section calculations, nuclear ground state treatments, and hadronic final-state interactions. By comparing the performance of theoretically advanced models with more empirically driven ones, the work provides guidance for improving simulations needed by upcoming neutrino experiments. A sympathetic reader would care because accurate modeling of these interactions is essential for interpreting data from liquid argon detectors.

Core claim

The central claim is that by leveraging GENIE's ability to interchange individual model components, direct comparisons with MicroBooNE data on pionless charged-current neutrino-argon scattering reveal the relative performance of state-of-the-art theoretical models versus empirical alternatives in reproducing observed event distributions.

What carries the argument

GENIE's software capability to interchange model components including nucleon form factors, quasielastic calculations, nuclear ground state, and final-state interactions, which carries the benchmarking argument by enabling isolated tests against data.

If this is right

Upcoming neutrino experiments using argon targets can select or refine GENIE configurations based on which model combinations better match MicroBooNE data.
Theoretical models showing larger deviations from data may require adjustments to nuclear physics inputs such as ground state or final-state interaction treatments.
Empirical model alternatives can serve as reliable baselines where advanced theoretical components exhibit poorer agreement with observations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The benchmarking approach could be applied to other neutrino energies or target materials to check if performance differences persist across regimes.
Unaccounted correlations between interchanged components might limit how confidently individual model strengths can be isolated in future studies.

Load-bearing premise

Interchanging individual model components within GENIE produces physically consistent simulations without introducing unaccounted-for correlations or inconsistencies between the swapped pieces.

What would settle it

A new measurement of pionless charged-current cross sections or muon kinematic distributions on argon that deviates systematically from all tested GENIE model combinations in ways not explained by current uncertainties would challenge the benchmarking conclusions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.14196 by Liang Liu, Steven Dytman, Steven Gardiner.

read the original abstract

Upcoming experiments need improved simulations of neutrino scattering. This work uses the popular GENIE event generator to test a variety of neutrino interaction models against recent MicroBooNE measurements of pionless charged-current interactions. The GENIE code can easily interchange model components, including nucleon form factor parameterizations, quasielastic cross-section calculations, treatments of the nuclear ground state and hadronic final-state interactions. Leveraging this software capability in comparisons with MicroBooNE data, the performance of some of GENIE's most theoretically sophisticated model components is evaluated and contrasted with more empirically-driven alternatives.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a practical GENIE benchmarking exercise on MicroBooNE pionless data that highlights model swaps but leaves consistency of interchanges unverified.

read the letter

The key takeaway is that this paper uses GENIE to benchmark different model combinations for pionless neutrino scattering on argon against MicroBooNE data, but the modularity might hide consistency problems that affect the conclusions. What is new here is the application of GENIE's interchangeable components to the most recent MicroBooNE pionless charged-current measurements. The authors swap things like nucleon form factor parameterizations, quasielastic cross-section calculations, nuclear ground state treatments, and hadronic final-state interactions. They then compare how these setups perform against the data. The paper does a solid job of exploiting the software's flexibility to run these contrasts. It brings out where the more theoretically sophisticated models hold up or lag behind empirical alternatives in a real experimental context. This kind of exercise is practical and can inform tuning decisions for neutrino event generators. The main concern is whether the swapped configurations remain physically consistent. When you change the nuclear ground state, for example, it needs to supply the right inputs for the chosen final-state interaction model. Without explicit checks on four-momentum conservation or matching nuclear densities across the full simulation chain, differences in data agreement could be artifacts of the swap rather than genuine model quality. The abstract does not detail any such validation steps, so I would want to see that addressed in the full text. This paper is for people working on neutrino-nucleus interaction modeling and for experimental collaborations like DUNE that rely on accurate simulations. A reader interested in practical improvements to argon-based detectors would get value from the comparisons. It deserves a serious referee because the subject is timely and the approach is straightforward, even with the open questions around consistency. I recommend sending it to peer review.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper benchmarks state-of-the-art theoretical and empirical models for pionless charged-current neutrino-argon scattering by using GENIE's modularity to interchange components including nucleon form factor parameterizations, quasielastic cross-section calculations, nuclear ground-state treatments, and final-state interaction models, then comparing the resulting predictions against MicroBooNE pionless CC data.

Significance. If the interchanged configurations remain internally consistent, the work provides a useful systematic evaluation of how sophisticated theoretical components perform relative to empirical alternatives within a standard neutrino event generator. This directly supports model selection for upcoming experiments and leverages GENIE's software architecture as a strength for isolating component effects.

major comments (1)

The central claim requires that swapping model components (e.g., nuclear ground state with a chosen FSI treatment) produces physically consistent event samples. The manuscript does not appear to verify basic consistency conditions such as four-momentum conservation across the full event or compatibility between the spectral function supplied by the nuclear model and the assumptions of the FSI cascade. Any mismatch would produce artifacts misattributed to model quality rather than the interchange itself.

minor comments (1)

The description of quantitative comparison methods (goodness-of-fit metrics, data selection cuts, and uncertainty treatment) should be expanded with explicit formulas or references to standard GENIE analysis tools to allow readers to reproduce the robustness assessment.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comment point by point below, providing clarifications and indicating revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The central claim requires that swapping model components (e.g., nuclear ground state with a chosen FSI treatment) produces physically consistent event samples. The manuscript does not appear to verify basic consistency conditions such as four-momentum conservation across the full event or compatibility between the spectral function supplied by the nuclear model and the assumptions of the FSI cascade. Any mismatch would produce artifacts misattributed to model quality rather than the interchange itself.

Authors: We agree with the referee that ensuring physical consistency when interchanging model components is crucial for the validity of our comparisons. GENIE's design incorporates mechanisms to maintain four-momentum conservation throughout the event generation, as the primary interaction and FSI are handled sequentially with appropriate kinematics adjustments. Regarding compatibility between the nuclear ground state model (such as the spectral function) and the FSI cascade, the models selected in our study are standard combinations within GENIE that have been validated by the collaboration for internal consistency. However, to make this explicit and address the referee's concern directly, we have revised the manuscript to include a dedicated subsection on consistency verification. This includes reporting on checks for four-momentum conservation in generated events and compatibility assessments for the chosen configurations. We believe this addition will reassure readers that the observed differences are attributable to the model components themselves. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct comparisons to external MicroBooNE data

full rationale

The paper benchmarks interchangeable GENIE model components (form factors, quasielastic calculations, nuclear ground states, FSI) by generating predictions and comparing them to independent MicroBooNE pionless CC data. No derivation chain, fitted parameter, or self-citation is used to produce the reported performance metrics; results are obtained from external experimental benchmarks. The analysis is therefore self-contained against outside data and exhibits none of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central comparisons rest on the validity of the MicroBooNE measurements and on the assumption that GENIE's modular structure preserves physical consistency when components are exchanged. No new free parameters are introduced by the benchmarking itself.

axioms (1)

domain assumption MicroBooNE pionless charged-current data provide a reliable benchmark for argon neutrino interactions
All model performance claims depend on the accuracy and representativeness of the experimental dataset.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5626 in / 1318 out tokens · 52141 ms · 2026-05-19T16:50:20.965481+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

GENIE code can easily interchange model components, including nucleon form factor parameterizations, quasielastic cross-section calculations, treatments of the nuclear ground state and hadronic final-state interactions.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The more empirical FSI and the LQCD axial form factor give the best results in most cases.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · 16 internal anchors

[1]

Alvarez-Rusoet al.(NuSTEC), Prog

L. Alvarez-Rusoet al.(NuSTEC), Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.100, 1 (2018)

work page 2018
[2]

Abi et al

B. Abiet al.(DUNE), JINST15(08), T08008, arXiv:2002.02967 [physics.ins-det]

work page arXiv 2002
[3]

Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE), Far Detector Technical Design Report, Volume II: DUNE Physics,

B. Abiet al.(DUNE), Deep Underground Neutrino Ex- periment (DUNE), Far Detector Technical Design Re- port, Volume II: DUNE Physics (2020), arXiv:2002.03005 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2020
[4]

Hyper-Kamiokande Design Report

K. Abeet al.(Hyper-Kamiokande), Hyper-Kamiokande Design Report (2018), arXiv:1805.04163 [physics.ins- det]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[5]

Abuslemeet al.(JUNO), Prog

A. Abuslemeet al.(JUNO), Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.123, 103927 (2022), arXiv:2104.02565 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2022
[6]

Acciarri et al

R. Acciarriet al.(MicroBooNE), JINST12(02), P02017, arXiv:1612.05824 [physics.ins-det]

work page arXiv
[7]

R. Acciarriet al.(MicroBooNE, LAr1-ND, ICARUS- WA104), A Proposal for a Three Detector Short-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Program in the Fermilab Booster Neutrino Beam (2015), arXiv:1503.01520 [physics.ins- det]

work page arXiv 2015
[8]

D. S. Ayreset al.(NOvA), The NOvA Technical Design Report (2007)

work page 2007
[9]

Abeet al.(T2K), Nucl

K. Abeet al.(T2K), Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A659, 106 (2011), arXiv:1106.1238 [physics.ins-det]

work page arXiv 2011
[10]

The GENIE Neutrino Monte Carlo Generator: Physics and User Manual

C. Andreopoulos, C. Barry, S. Dytman, H. Gallagher, T. Golan, R. Hatcher, G. Perdue, and J. Yarba, The GENIE Neutrino Monte Carlo Generator: Physics and User Manual (2015), arXiv:1510.05494 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[11]

The GENIE Neutrino Monte Carlo Generator

C. Andreopouloset al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A614, 87 (2010), arXiv:0905.2517 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[12]

Alvarez-Rusoet al.(GENIE), Eur

L. Alvarez-Rusoet al.(GENIE), Eur. Phys. J. ST230, 4449 (2021), arXiv:2106.09381 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[16]

Filali, L

W. Filali, L. Munteanu, and S. Dolan, Phys. Rev. D111, 032009 (2025), arXiv:2407.10962 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[17]

The NEUT neutrino interaction simulation program library,

Y. Hayato and L. Pickering, Eur. Phys. J. ST230, 4469 (2021), arXiv:2106.15809 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[18]

Golan, J

T. Golan, J. T. Sobczyk, and J. Zmuda, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.229-232, 499 (2012)

work page 2012
[19]

X. G. Lu, D. Coplowe, R. Shah, G. Barr, D. Wark, and A. Weber, Phys. Rev. D92, 051302 (2015), arXiv:1507.00967 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[20]

Nikolakopoulos, A

A. Nikolakopoulos, A. Ershova, R. Gonz´ alez-Jim´ enez, J. Isaacson, A. M. Kelly, K. Niewczas, N. Rocco, and F. S´ anchez, Phys. Rev. C110, 054611 (2024), arXiv:2406.09244 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[21]

Isaacson, W

J. Isaacson, W. I. Jay, A. Lovato, P. A. N. Machado, and N. Rocco, Phys. Rev. D107, 033007 (2023), arXiv:2205.06378 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[22]

This configuration is available in code versions from v3.4.0 up to the current v3.6.2 re- 6 lease

AR23 is an abbreviation of the full GENIE model set specifier AR23 20i 00 000. This configuration is available in code versions from v3.4.0 up to the current v3.6.2 re- 6 lease

work page
[25]

A. S. Meyer, M. Betancourt, R. Gran, and R. J. Hill, Phys. Rev. D93, 113015 (2016), arXiv:1603.03048 [hep- ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[26]

Benhar, A

O. Benhar, A. Fabrocini, and S. Fantoni, Nucl. Phys. A 505, 267 (1989)

work page 1989
[27]

Benhar, A

O. Benhar, A. Fabrocini, S. Fantoni, and I. Sick, Nucl. Phys. A579, 493 (1994)

work page 1994
[28]

Lepton Mass Effects in Single Pion Production by Neutrinos

C. Berger and L. M. Sehgal, Phys. Rev. D76, 113004 (2007), arXiv:0709.4378 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[29]

A Unified Model for inelastic e-N and nu-N cross sections at all Q2

A. Bodek and U. K. Yang, AIP Conf. Proc.792, 257 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0508007

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[30]

S. A. Dytman and A. S. Meyer, AIP Conf. Proc.1405, 213 (2011)

work page 2011
[31]

Betancourt, S

M. Betancourt, S. Gardiner, N. Rocco, and N. Stein- berg, Phys. Rev. D108, 113009 (2023), arXiv:2308.15524 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[32]

E. J. Moniz, I. Sick, R. R. Whitney, J. R. Ficenec, R. D. Kephart, and W. P. Trower, Phys. Rev. Lett.26, 445 (1971)

work page 1971
[33]

Jianget al.(Jefferson Lab Hall A), Phys

L. Jianget al.(Jefferson Lab Hall A), Phys. Rev. D105, 112002 (2022), arXiv:2203.01748 [nucl-ex]

work page arXiv 2022
[34]

Jianget al.(Jefferson Lab Hall A), Phys

L. Jianget al.(Jefferson Lab Hall A), Phys. Rev. D107, 012005 (2023), arXiv:2209.14108 [nucl-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[35]

A. S. Meyer, The Nucleon Axial Form Factor from Av- eraging Lattice QCD Results (2026), arXiv:2601.02676 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2026
[36]

G. D. Megias, M. B. Barbaro, J. A. Caballero, and S. Dolan, Phys. Rev. D99, 113002 (2019), arXiv:1807.10532 [nucl-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[37]

Cugnon, A

J. Cugnon, A. Boudard, J. C. David, S. Leray, and D. Mancusi, Eur. Phys. J. Plus131, 169 (2016)

work page 2016
[38]

Improving proton-induced one-nucleon removal in intranuclear cascade

D. Mancusi, A. Boudard, J. Carbonell, J. Cugnon, J.-C. David, and S. Leray, Phys. Rev. C91, 034602 (2015), arXiv:1411.4562 [nucl-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[39]

Ershovaet al., Phys

A. Ershovaet al., Phys. Rev. D108, 112008 (2023), arXiv:2309.05410 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[41]

Measurement of double-differential muon neutrino charged-current interactions on C$_8$H$_8$ without pions in the final state using the T2K off-axis beam

K. Abeet al.(T2K), Phys. Rev. D93, 112012 (2016), arXiv:1602.03652 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[42]

Supplemental material is provided at

work page
[44]

Neutrino and antineutrino quasielastic interactions with nuclei

M. Martini, M. Ericson, G. Chanfray, and J. Marteau, Phys. Rev. C81, 045502 (2010), arXiv:1002.4538 [hep- ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[45]

Dytmanet al.(CLAS), Proton Transparency and Neutrino Physics: New Methods and Modeling (2025), arXiv:2508.01905 [hep-ex]

S. Dytmanet al.(CLAS), Proton Transparency and Neutrino Physics: New Methods and Modeling (2025), arXiv:2508.01905 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[46]

Tena-Vidalet al.(GENIE), Phys

J. Tena-Vidalet al.(GENIE), Phys. Rev. D106, 112001 (2022), arXiv:2206.11050 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[47]

J. M. Nieves, I. Ruiz Simo, and M. J. Vicente Vacas, Phys. Rev. C83, 045501 (2011), arXiv:1102.2777 [hep- ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[48]

Extensions of Superscaling from Relativistic Mean Field Theory: the SuSAv2 Model

R. Gonz´ alez-Jim´ enez, G. D. Megias, M. B. Barbaro, J. A. Caballero, and T. W. Donnelly, Phys. Rev. C90, 035501 (2014), arXiv:1407.8346 [nucl-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[49]

A. S. Meyeret al.(MINERvA), The Nucleon Ax- ial Form Factor from Elementary Target Data (2025), arXiv:2512.14097 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[50]

S. G. Mashnik, A. J. Sierk, K. K. Gudima, and M. I. Baznat, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.41, 340 (2006), arXiv:nucl- th/0510070

work page arXiv 2006
[51]

Ershovaet al., Phys

A. Ershovaet al., Phys. Rev. D106, 032009 (2022), arXiv:2202.10402 [hep-ph]. Supplemental Materials for Benchmarking State-of-the-Art Theory and Empirical Models of Pionless Neutrino-Argon Scattering in GENIE CORRECTION TO GENIE IMPLEMENT A TION OF THE NIEVES QE MODEL The Nieveset al. quasielastic (QE) cross-section model [1] was first implemented in GENI...

work page arXiv 2022
[52]

Inclusive Quasi-Elastic Charged-Current Neutrino-Nucleus Reactions

J. Nieves, J. E. Amaro, and M. Valverde, Phys. Rev. C70, 055503 (2004), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 72, 019902 (2005)], arXiv:nucl-th/0408005

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[53]

Abratenko et al

P. Abratenkoet al.(MicroBooNE), Phys. Rev. D105, 072001 (2022), arXiv:2110.14028 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2022
[54]

Dolan, G

S. Dolan, G. D. Megias, and S. Bolognesi, Phys. Rev. D101, 033003 (2020), arXiv:1905.08556 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2020
[55]

R. Gran, J. Nieves, F. Sanchez, and M. J. Vicente Vacas, Phys. Rev. D88, 113007 (2013), arXiv:1307.8105 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[56]

Russo, M

L. Russo, M. Martini, S. Dolan, L. Munteanu, B. Popov, and C. Giganti, Phys. Rev. D113, 012006 (2026), arXiv:2508.13939 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2026
[57]

Meson Exchange Current (MEC) Models in Neutrino Interaction Generators

T. Katori, AIP Conf. Proc.1663, 030001 (2015), arXiv:1304.6014 [nucl-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[58]

Nikolakopoulos, S

A. Nikolakopoulos, S. Gardiner, A. Papadopoulou, S. Dolan, and R. Gonz´ alez-Jim´ enez, Phys. Sci. Forum8, 10 (2023), arXiv:2302.12182 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[59]

Abratenkoet al.(MicroBooNE), Phys

P. Abratenkoet al.(MicroBooNE), Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 101802 (2023), arXiv:2301.03706 [hep-ex]. 5

work page arXiv 2023
[60]

Abratenkoet al.(MicroBooNE), Phys

P. Abratenkoet al.(MicroBooNE), Phys. Rev. D108, 053002 (2023), arXiv:2301.03700 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[61]

Abratenkoet al.(MicroBooNE), Phys

P. Abratenkoet al.(MicroBooNE), Phys. Rev. D112, 112004 (2025), arXiv:2403.19574 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025

[1] [1]

Alvarez-Rusoet al.(NuSTEC), Prog

L. Alvarez-Rusoet al.(NuSTEC), Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.100, 1 (2018)

work page 2018

[2] [2]

Abi et al

B. Abiet al.(DUNE), JINST15(08), T08008, arXiv:2002.02967 [physics.ins-det]

work page arXiv 2002

[3] [3]

Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE), Far Detector Technical Design Report, Volume II: DUNE Physics,

B. Abiet al.(DUNE), Deep Underground Neutrino Ex- periment (DUNE), Far Detector Technical Design Re- port, Volume II: DUNE Physics (2020), arXiv:2002.03005 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2020

[4] [4]

Hyper-Kamiokande Design Report

K. Abeet al.(Hyper-Kamiokande), Hyper-Kamiokande Design Report (2018), arXiv:1805.04163 [physics.ins- det]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[5] [5]

Abuslemeet al.(JUNO), Prog

A. Abuslemeet al.(JUNO), Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.123, 103927 (2022), arXiv:2104.02565 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2022

[6] [6]

Acciarri et al

R. Acciarriet al.(MicroBooNE), JINST12(02), P02017, arXiv:1612.05824 [physics.ins-det]

work page arXiv

[7] [7]

R. Acciarriet al.(MicroBooNE, LAr1-ND, ICARUS- WA104), A Proposal for a Three Detector Short-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Program in the Fermilab Booster Neutrino Beam (2015), arXiv:1503.01520 [physics.ins- det]

work page arXiv 2015

[8] [8]

D. S. Ayreset al.(NOvA), The NOvA Technical Design Report (2007)

work page 2007

[9] [9]

Abeet al.(T2K), Nucl

K. Abeet al.(T2K), Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A659, 106 (2011), arXiv:1106.1238 [physics.ins-det]

work page arXiv 2011

[10] [10]

The GENIE Neutrino Monte Carlo Generator: Physics and User Manual

C. Andreopoulos, C. Barry, S. Dytman, H. Gallagher, T. Golan, R. Hatcher, G. Perdue, and J. Yarba, The GENIE Neutrino Monte Carlo Generator: Physics and User Manual (2015), arXiv:1510.05494 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[11] [11]

The GENIE Neutrino Monte Carlo Generator

C. Andreopouloset al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A614, 87 (2010), arXiv:0905.2517 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

[12] [12]

Alvarez-Rusoet al.(GENIE), Eur

L. Alvarez-Rusoet al.(GENIE), Eur. Phys. J. ST230, 4449 (2021), arXiv:2106.09381 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021

[13] [16]

Filali, L

W. Filali, L. Munteanu, and S. Dolan, Phys. Rev. D111, 032009 (2025), arXiv:2407.10962 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025

[14] [17]

The NEUT neutrino interaction simulation program library,

Y. Hayato and L. Pickering, Eur. Phys. J. ST230, 4469 (2021), arXiv:2106.15809 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021

[15] [18]

Golan, J

T. Golan, J. T. Sobczyk, and J. Zmuda, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.229-232, 499 (2012)

work page 2012

[16] [19]

X. G. Lu, D. Coplowe, R. Shah, G. Barr, D. Wark, and A. Weber, Phys. Rev. D92, 051302 (2015), arXiv:1507.00967 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[17] [20]

Nikolakopoulos, A

A. Nikolakopoulos, A. Ershova, R. Gonz´ alez-Jim´ enez, J. Isaacson, A. M. Kelly, K. Niewczas, N. Rocco, and F. S´ anchez, Phys. Rev. C110, 054611 (2024), arXiv:2406.09244 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2024

[18] [21]

Isaacson, W

J. Isaacson, W. I. Jay, A. Lovato, P. A. N. Machado, and N. Rocco, Phys. Rev. D107, 033007 (2023), arXiv:2205.06378 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023

[19] [22]

This configuration is available in code versions from v3.4.0 up to the current v3.6.2 re- 6 lease

AR23 is an abbreviation of the full GENIE model set specifier AR23 20i 00 000. This configuration is available in code versions from v3.4.0 up to the current v3.6.2 re- 6 lease

work page

[20] [25]

A. S. Meyer, M. Betancourt, R. Gran, and R. J. Hill, Phys. Rev. D93, 113015 (2016), arXiv:1603.03048 [hep- ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[21] [26]

Benhar, A

O. Benhar, A. Fabrocini, and S. Fantoni, Nucl. Phys. A 505, 267 (1989)

work page 1989

[22] [27]

Benhar, A

O. Benhar, A. Fabrocini, S. Fantoni, and I. Sick, Nucl. Phys. A579, 493 (1994)

work page 1994

[23] [28]

Lepton Mass Effects in Single Pion Production by Neutrinos

C. Berger and L. M. Sehgal, Phys. Rev. D76, 113004 (2007), arXiv:0709.4378 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

[24] [29]

A Unified Model for inelastic e-N and nu-N cross sections at all Q2

A. Bodek and U. K. Yang, AIP Conf. Proc.792, 257 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0508007

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

[25] [30]

S. A. Dytman and A. S. Meyer, AIP Conf. Proc.1405, 213 (2011)

work page 2011

[26] [31]

Betancourt, S

M. Betancourt, S. Gardiner, N. Rocco, and N. Stein- berg, Phys. Rev. D108, 113009 (2023), arXiv:2308.15524 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2023

[27] [32]

E. J. Moniz, I. Sick, R. R. Whitney, J. R. Ficenec, R. D. Kephart, and W. P. Trower, Phys. Rev. Lett.26, 445 (1971)

work page 1971

[28] [33]

Jianget al.(Jefferson Lab Hall A), Phys

L. Jianget al.(Jefferson Lab Hall A), Phys. Rev. D105, 112002 (2022), arXiv:2203.01748 [nucl-ex]

work page arXiv 2022

[29] [34]

Jianget al.(Jefferson Lab Hall A), Phys

L. Jianget al.(Jefferson Lab Hall A), Phys. Rev. D107, 012005 (2023), arXiv:2209.14108 [nucl-ex]

work page arXiv 2023

[30] [35]

A. S. Meyer, The Nucleon Axial Form Factor from Av- eraging Lattice QCD Results (2026), arXiv:2601.02676 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2026

[31] [36]

G. D. Megias, M. B. Barbaro, J. A. Caballero, and S. Dolan, Phys. Rev. D99, 113002 (2019), arXiv:1807.10532 [nucl-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

[32] [37]

Cugnon, A

J. Cugnon, A. Boudard, J. C. David, S. Leray, and D. Mancusi, Eur. Phys. J. Plus131, 169 (2016)

work page 2016

[33] [38]

Improving proton-induced one-nucleon removal in intranuclear cascade

D. Mancusi, A. Boudard, J. Carbonell, J. Cugnon, J.-C. David, and S. Leray, Phys. Rev. C91, 034602 (2015), arXiv:1411.4562 [nucl-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[34] [39]

Ershovaet al., Phys

A. Ershovaet al., Phys. Rev. D108, 112008 (2023), arXiv:2309.05410 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023

[35] [41]

Measurement of double-differential muon neutrino charged-current interactions on C$_8$H$_8$ without pions in the final state using the T2K off-axis beam

K. Abeet al.(T2K), Phys. Rev. D93, 112012 (2016), arXiv:1602.03652 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[36] [42]

Supplemental material is provided at

work page

[37] [44]

Neutrino and antineutrino quasielastic interactions with nuclei

M. Martini, M. Ericson, G. Chanfray, and J. Marteau, Phys. Rev. C81, 045502 (2010), arXiv:1002.4538 [hep- ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

[38] [45]

Dytmanet al.(CLAS), Proton Transparency and Neutrino Physics: New Methods and Modeling (2025), arXiv:2508.01905 [hep-ex]

S. Dytmanet al.(CLAS), Proton Transparency and Neutrino Physics: New Methods and Modeling (2025), arXiv:2508.01905 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025

[39] [46]

Tena-Vidalet al.(GENIE), Phys

J. Tena-Vidalet al.(GENIE), Phys. Rev. D106, 112001 (2022), arXiv:2206.11050 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022

[40] [47]

J. M. Nieves, I. Ruiz Simo, and M. J. Vicente Vacas, Phys. Rev. C83, 045501 (2011), arXiv:1102.2777 [hep- ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

[41] [48]

Extensions of Superscaling from Relativistic Mean Field Theory: the SuSAv2 Model

R. Gonz´ alez-Jim´ enez, G. D. Megias, M. B. Barbaro, J. A. Caballero, and T. W. Donnelly, Phys. Rev. C90, 035501 (2014), arXiv:1407.8346 [nucl-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

[42] [49]

A. S. Meyeret al.(MINERvA), The Nucleon Ax- ial Form Factor from Elementary Target Data (2025), arXiv:2512.14097 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025

[43] [50]

S. G. Mashnik, A. J. Sierk, K. K. Gudima, and M. I. Baznat, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.41, 340 (2006), arXiv:nucl- th/0510070

work page arXiv 2006

[44] [51]

Ershovaet al., Phys

A. Ershovaet al., Phys. Rev. D106, 032009 (2022), arXiv:2202.10402 [hep-ph]. Supplemental Materials for Benchmarking State-of-the-Art Theory and Empirical Models of Pionless Neutrino-Argon Scattering in GENIE CORRECTION TO GENIE IMPLEMENT A TION OF THE NIEVES QE MODEL The Nieveset al. quasielastic (QE) cross-section model [1] was first implemented in GENI...

work page arXiv 2022

[45] [52]

Inclusive Quasi-Elastic Charged-Current Neutrino-Nucleus Reactions

J. Nieves, J. E. Amaro, and M. Valverde, Phys. Rev. C70, 055503 (2004), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 72, 019902 (2005)], arXiv:nucl-th/0408005

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

[46] [53]

Abratenko et al

P. Abratenkoet al.(MicroBooNE), Phys. Rev. D105, 072001 (2022), arXiv:2110.14028 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2022

[47] [54]

Dolan, G

S. Dolan, G. D. Megias, and S. Bolognesi, Phys. Rev. D101, 033003 (2020), arXiv:1905.08556 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2020

[48] [55]

R. Gran, J. Nieves, F. Sanchez, and M. J. Vicente Vacas, Phys. Rev. D88, 113007 (2013), arXiv:1307.8105 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[49] [56]

Russo, M

L. Russo, M. Martini, S. Dolan, L. Munteanu, B. Popov, and C. Giganti, Phys. Rev. D113, 012006 (2026), arXiv:2508.13939 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2026

[50] [57]

Meson Exchange Current (MEC) Models in Neutrino Interaction Generators

T. Katori, AIP Conf. Proc.1663, 030001 (2015), arXiv:1304.6014 [nucl-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[51] [58]

Nikolakopoulos, S

A. Nikolakopoulos, S. Gardiner, A. Papadopoulou, S. Dolan, and R. Gonz´ alez-Jim´ enez, Phys. Sci. Forum8, 10 (2023), arXiv:2302.12182 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2023

[52] [59]

Abratenkoet al.(MicroBooNE), Phys

P. Abratenkoet al.(MicroBooNE), Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 101802 (2023), arXiv:2301.03706 [hep-ex]. 5

work page arXiv 2023

[53] [60]

Abratenkoet al.(MicroBooNE), Phys

P. Abratenkoet al.(MicroBooNE), Phys. Rev. D108, 053002 (2023), arXiv:2301.03700 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023

[54] [61]

Abratenkoet al.(MicroBooNE), Phys

P. Abratenkoet al.(MicroBooNE), Phys. Rev. D112, 112004 (2025), arXiv:2403.19574 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025