Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 56 references

Gate-tuned rhombohedral graphene hosts adjacent zero-resistance superconductivity and finite-resistance anomalous metal pockets with the same sharp critical transitions.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-31 07:45 UTC pith:B34NPZD2

load-bearing objection Clean, systematic map of adjacent zero-R SC and finite-R AM pockets in rhombohedral graphene; data package is strong, microscopic claim stays open. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.28425 v1 pith:B34NPZD2 submitted 2026-07-30 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con

Anomalous metal and superconducting phases in rhombohedral graphene

Anna Okounkova , Abigail Sohm , Tobias Faehndrich , Manish Kumar , Derek Waleffe , Jiaqiang Yan , Kenji Watanabe , Takashi Taniguchi
show 2 more authors
Joshua Folk Matthew Yankowitz
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con
keywords rhombohedral grapheneanomalous metaltwo-dimensional superconductivitygate-tuned superconductivityspin-triplet pairingWSe2 proximitycritical field hierarchy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

In ultra-clean eight-layer rhombohedral graphene on WSe2, electrostatic gates can select either true zero-resistance superconductivity or a neighboring state whose resistance drops sharply below a critical temperature yet saturates at a finite value. Both pockets show the same abrupt transitions out of the low-resistance regime when temperature, perpendicular field, or current is raised, and a small in-plane field expands and merges them while leaving a sharp boundary between zero and finite resistance at base temperature. The finite-resistance state matches the long-standing anomalous-metal phenomenology seen in thin-film superconductors, yet here the normal-state sheet resistance is far below the pair quantum and disorder is low, so standard fluctuation theories struggle to explain it. Distinct critical-field scales (roughly an order of magnitude larger perpendicular field for the anomalous metal) and a non-monotonic current response further suggest the two paired states are not simply the same condensate with and without phase coherence. Because the platform is continuously tunable and the SC/AM boundary reproduces across voltage probes and a second device, the work supplies tight experimental constraints that any microscopic theory of the anomalous metal must satisfy.

Core claim

Rhombohedral graphene on WSe2 supports isolated gate-tuned pockets of zero-resistance superconductivity adjacent to pockets that exhibit essentially identical superconducting-like critical behavior in temperature, perpendicular field, and current yet saturate at finite low-temperature resistance; a small in-plane field merges the pockets into a contiguous region with an abrupt zero/finite-resistance boundary, and the finite-resistance state reproduces anomalous-metal phenomenology while remaining difficult to attribute to extrinsic noise or inhomogeneity.

What carries the argument

Gate-tuned SC and AM pockets in the (n, D) plane of dual-gated rhombohedral graphene, distinguished by whether low-T resistance reaches zero or saturates, and characterized by nested critical-current and critical-field domes whose characteristic perpendicular-field scales differ by roughly an order of magnitude.

Load-bearing premise

That stray high-frequency noise and mesoscopic inhomogeneity can be ruled out as the source of the finite saturation resistance, because neighboring zero- and finite-resistance pockets share similar critical temperatures at the same base temperature and because any normal strips should become dissipationless as temperature goes to zero.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that the finite-resistance pockets ultimately reach true zero resistance at still lower temperature or lower excitation, or a local probe that finds a reproducible ~30 nm superconducting texture whose size matches the anomalous-metal coherence length extracted from the perpendicular critical field.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Any viable theory of the anomalous metal must operate in a clean, highly conducting 2D metal whose normal-state resistance is far below the pair quantum.
  • The order-of-magnitude difference in perpendicular critical field between adjacent SC and AM pockets implies distinct orbital or spin structure of the paired states rather than simple phase disorder of one condensate.
  • The non-monotonic current response (moderate dc current sometimes restoring zero differential resistance) becomes a required signature that microscopic models must reproduce.
  • Rhombohedral graphene supplies a continuously tunable platform in which the SC/AM boundary can be crossed by gate voltage, in-plane field, or temperature while holding other parameters fixed.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the anomalous metal is a Bose metal of uncondensed pairs, stiffness or gap measurements should show finite pairing amplitude without long-range phase coherence precisely inside the finite-resistance pockets.
  • The adjacency of the SC pocket to the half-metal and the AM pocket to the unpolarized metal suggests valley or spin polarization may tip the balance between coherent and fluctuating paired states.
  • The same gate-space footprint appearing in a second, less homogeneous device implies the SC/AM distinction is set by band filling and displacement field rather than sample-specific disorder landscapes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a systematic transport study of eight-layer rhombohedral graphene on WSe2, mapping isolated gate-tuned pockets that exhibit either true zero-resistance superconductivity (SC) or finite low-T resistance saturation (anomalous metal, AM). Both classes show sharp transitions versus T, B⊥, and Idc; a small in-plane field expands and merges the pockets while preserving a sharp SC/AM boundary at base temperature. The AM reproduces classic anomalous-metal phenomenology (finite saturation resistance, critical fields/currents) but with roughly an order-of-magnitude larger perpendicular critical field and a factor-of-four larger in-plane critical field than the adjacent SC, plus a non-monotonic current response. Multi-contact consistency and a second device reproduce the phase boundaries and hierarchy. The authors argue that extrinsic origins (noise, contacts, percolation, SNS domain walls) are strongly constrained, and that the platform’s cleanliness and tunability make it a useful setting for the long-standing anomalous-metal problem.

Significance. If the reported SC/AM adjacency, field hierarchy, and reproducibility hold, this is a substantial experimental contribution. Anomalous metals have been studied for decades without consensus; most prior systems are disordered thin films near RQ, whereas here the normal-state sheet conductivity reaches ~1000 e²/h in an ultra-clean, continuously gate-tunable platform. The ability to place zero-resistance SC and finite-resistance AM side-by-side under nearly identical external conditions, with distinct Bc scales and a non-monotonic Idc response, supplies concrete constraints that any microscopic theory must satisfy. Strengths include the multi-probe and two-device reproducibility, Landau-fan placement relative to half-metal vs unpolarized metal, BKT comparison, and an explicit Methods treatment of extrinsic alternatives. The work does not solve the microscopic origin of the AM, but it meaningfully reframes the problem in a cleaner setting.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods; Discussion; Fig. 4] Methods, “Considerations of extrinsic origins of the finite resistance”: the argument that residual non-equilibrium excitation (e.g. stray photons) should affect adjacent SC and AM pockets comparably rests on their similar Tc as a proxy for pairing robustness. This sits in mild tension with the Discussion and Fig. 4, which conclude from the ~10× B⊥c and ~4× B∥c hierarchy that the paired states are “not identical in their orbital and/or spin structure.” If gap structure, DOS available for pair-breaking, or vortex pinning differ, external pair-breaking need not hit both pockets equally. Please either (i) qualify the similar-Tc argument explicitly in light of the distinct critical-field scales, or (ii) add a concrete control (e.g. excitation-amplitude / filtering dependence comparing SC vs AM at matched Tc) that closes this loophole. This does not overturn the phenomenology, but it is load-
  2. [Distinct magnetic field scales; Discussion] Main text and Methods on the AM orbital length ξ_AM ≈ 30 nm (from B⊥c ≈ 300 mT via ξ = √(Φ0/2πB⊥c)): the manuscript correctly notes that an inhomogeneous SC/normal texture of this scale cannot be fully excluded, and that simple percolation is hard to reconcile with multi-probe and two-device reproducibility. Given that this length is the main quantitative handle distinguishing AM from SC, the paper should state more clearly what future measurement (superfluid stiffness, gap spectroscopy, or real-space imaging) would falsify a ~30 nm electronic texture versus a homogeneous Bose-metal-like state. A short, explicit falsification criterion would strengthen the Discussion without requiring new data in this manuscript.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 1] Fig. 1a inset and device schematic: layer stack order is stated in Methods but a labeled cross-section in the main figure would help readers unfamiliar with the dual-graphite-gated WSe2 geometry.
  2. [Methods, BKT analysis; Extended Data Fig. 6] Extended Data Fig. 6 and Methods BKT analysis: the authors already note that BKT is of questionable validity for micron-scale samples. Consider moving that caveat into the main-text sentence that introduces the BKT comparison, so readers do not over-interpret α→3 in the SC pocket.
  3. [Methods; Figs. 2–4] Estimation of key superconducting parameters: the 90% normal-state resistance criterion for Tc and Bc is standard but should be stated once in the main text (or figure captions) where Tc ≈ 100 mK and the Bc hierarchy are quoted, not only in Methods.
  4. [Throughout] Typographical/spacing issues in the compiled text (e.g. “regionsappearasisolatedpockets”, “differenceintheirlow-temperatureresistance”, “superconductingstateisfullysuppressed”) should be cleaned in production; they do not affect substance but reduce readability.
  5. [Fig. 2] Fig. 2c: light vs dark traces (single vs averaged) are useful; a one-line note in the caption that averaging is over nine adjacent Vt would make the figure self-contained.
  6. [Discussion] References to related rhombohedral-graphene SC work are thorough; a brief pointer in the Discussion to how the present AM differs from finite-resistance reports in those works (beyond the WSe2 substrate) would help non-specialists.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: experimental phenomenology with operational SC/AM labels and standard textbook estimates

full rationale

This is an experimental transport paper. The SC vs AM distinction is an operational classification (zero vs finite low-T saturation resistance) applied to measured ρxx(T,B,I,n,D), not a quantity derived from a model that is then re-predicted. Coherence-length estimates use the standard mean-field formula ξ=√(Φ0/2πB⊥c) on measured critical fields; Pauli-limit comparisons use the textbook BP≈1.25 kBTc/μB. Arguments against extrinsic origins (noise, contacts, percolation, SNS domain walls) are qualitative constraints from multi-probe and two-device reproducibility, not self-referential derivations. Prior self-citations document related rhombohedral-graphene superconductivity but do not supply uniqueness theorems or ansätze that force the present claims. No fitted input is relabeled a prediction, and no central result reduces to its inputs by construction. Score 0 is the appropriate honest finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 6 axioms · 1 invented entities

Load-bearing content is experimental. The claim rests on standard 2D superconductivity diagnostics, operational definitions of SC vs AM, and the judgment that listed extrinsic mechanisms are inadequate. No new particles or forces are introduced. A few interpretive length-scale and pairing-symmetry inferences use conventional formulas and prior spin-triplet context.

free parameters (4)
  • Geometric factor W/L for resistivity conversion = device geometry; few-percent uncertainty
    Measured resistance is multiplied by W/L; a few-percent systematic uncertainty is stated. Affects absolute ρ but not zero vs finite classification.
  • Gate capacitances Ct, Cb = from QH fan slopes
    Estimated from Landau-fan slopes to convert (Vt,Vb) into (n,D). Standard but device-specific calibration.
  • 90% normal-state resistance criterion for Tc and Bc = 90% threshold
    Critical temperatures and fields defined where resistance falls to 90% of a fitted normal-state reference. Conventional but choice-dependent at the margins.
  • Residual B⊥ nulling at finite B∥ = ≲10 mT possible offset
    In-plane field alignment chosen to maximize Ic; reported B∥ may be offset ≲10 mT by trapped flux. Affects quantitative B∥c, not qualitative merger.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Vanishing four-terminal ρxx below noise, with critical T/B/I, indicates a superconducting state; finite low-T saturation with similar critical phenomenology indicates an anomalous metal.
    Operational definition used throughout Results and Discussion; standard in the AM literature the paper cites.
  • domain assumption Mean-field orbital scale ξ ≈ √(Φ0/2πB⊥c) meaningfully compares SC and AM paired states.
    Used in “Distinct magnetic field scales” to argue ~300 nm vs ~30 nm scales and non-identical orbital/spin structure.
  • domain assumption Standard dissipative/Caldeira-Leggett models predict quantum phase fluctuations are strongly suppressed when R□ ≪ RQ ≈ 6.45 kΩ.
    Invoked in Discussion to frame the puzzle that AM appears at ~1000 e²/h normal-state conductivity.
  • domain assumption In the clean BCS limit, normal-state coherence length ξN diverges as T→0, so wide SNS domain-wall junctions should become dissipationless rather than show extended resistance saturation.
    Key step in Methods excluding stacking-domain SNS artifacts.
  • domain assumption Superconductivity in this n–D regime is likely spin-triplet (or otherwise protected), consistent with large Pauli-limit violation.
    Used to interpret B∥ enhancement/expansion of pockets; drawn from cited prior rhombohedral-graphene experiments.
  • domain assumption Four-terminal lock-in transport at 0.5–1 nA and base sensor T≈11–14 mK reflects electron temperature low enough to expose intrinsic saturation.
    Supported by prior Coulomb-blockade and nanowire thermometry on the same wiring, but not re-measured in situ on this device.
invented entities (1)
  • Anomalous-metal phase as a distinct neighboring state to SC in rhombohedral graphene (vs intermediate regime on a SIT) no independent evidence
    purpose: Frame finite-resistance pockets as a phase-diagram neighbor rather than only a crossover while tuning through a superconductor-insulator transition.
    The paper does not introduce a new microscopic order parameter; it applies the existing AM concept to a sharper gate-tuned geometry. independent_evidence is only the transport phenomenology reported here.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-daily-grok45 · 22529 in / 3834 out tokens · 71461 ms · 2026-07-31T07:45:15.544754+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Two-dimensional superconductivity is now well established in graphene-based systems, with many such realizations showing evidence for unconventional pairing. Yet in several of the gate-tuned phases that otherwise exhibit clear signatures of superconductivity, the resistance does not vanish as temperature is lowered, instead saturating at a finite value. Here we report a systematic study of this behavior in rhombohedral graphene on a WSe$_2$ substrate, finding regions of gate space with zero-resistance superconductivity alongside others with finite saturation resistance. At zero magnetic field, these regions appear as isolated pockets in gate space that otherwise exhibit strikingly similar phenomenology, including abrupt transitions to the normal state as temperature, perpendicular magnetic field, and current are raised above critical values. A small in-plane field expands and merges these pockets without qualitatively altering their behavior, producing a sharp boundary at millikelvin base temperature between states of zero or finite resistance. The finite-resistance state reproduces key phenomenology associated with the anomalous metal, a state that has been observed in thin-film superconductors for decades but lacks an accepted theoretical explanation. The tunability and reproducibility of ultra-clean rhombohedral graphene place strong constraints on extrinsic explanations and provide a new platform for understanding this behavior.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.28425 by Abigail Sohm, Anna Okounkova, Derek Waleffe, Jiaqiang Yan, Joshua Folk, Kenji Watanabe, Manish Kumar, Matthew Yankowitz, Takashi Taniguchi, Tobias Faehndrich.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: a shows a longitudinal resistivity (ρxx) map of an eight-layer rhombohedral graphene device as a func￾tion of the bottom and top gate voltages (Vb, Vt) ac￾quired at a nominal base temperature of T ≈ 11 mK, converted to charge doping n and displacement field D (see Methods and Extended Data [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 5 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Cao, Y.et al.Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices.Nature556, 43–50 (2018)

    2018

  2. [2]

    & Young, A

    Zhou, H., Xie, T., Taniguchi, T., Watanabe, K. & Young, A. F. Superconductivity in rhombohedral trilayer graphene.Nature598, 434–438 (2021)

    2021

  3. [3]

    Zhou, H.et al.Isospin magnetism and spin-polarized superconductivity in bernal bilayer graphene.Science 375, 774–778 (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    Zhang, Y.et al.Enhanced superconductivity in spin- orbit proximitized bilayer graphene.Nature613, 268– 273 (2023)

    2023

  5. [5]

    Han, T.et al.Signatures of chiral superconductivity in rhombohedral graphene.Nature643, 654–661 (2025)

    2025

  6. [6]

    Kumar, M.et al.Superconductivity from dual-surface carriers in rhombohedral graphene.arXiv:2507.18598 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    & Doniach, S

    Das, D. & Doniach, S. Existence of a Bose metal at T= 0.Physical Review B60, 1261 (1999)

    1999

  8. [8]

    Kapitulnik, A., Kivelson, S. A. & Spivak, B. Colloquium: Anomalous metals: Failed superconductors.Reviews of Modern Physics91, 011002 (2019)

    2019

  9. [9]

    Holleis, L.et al.Nematicity and orbital depairing in superconducting bernal bilayer graphene.Nature Physics 21, 444–450 (2025)

    2025

  10. [10]

    Li, C.et al.Tunable superconductivity in electron- and hole-doped bernal bilayer graphene.Nature631, 300– 306 (2024)

    2024

  11. [11]

    Yang, J.et al.Impact of spin-orbit coupling on supercon- ductivity in rhombohedral graphene.Nature Materials (2025)

    2025

  12. [12]

    L.et al.Superconductivity and spin cant- ing in spin-orbit-coupled trilayer graphene.Nature641, 632–638 (2025)

    Patterson, C. L.et al.Superconductivity and spin cant- ing in spin-orbit-coupled trilayer graphene.Nature641, 632–638 (2025)

    2025

  13. [13]

    Zhang, Y.et al.Twist-programmable superconductivity in spin-orbit-coupled bilayer graphene.Nature641, 625– 631 (2025)

    2025

  14. [14]

    Choi, Y.et al.Superconductivity and quantized anoma- lous hall effect in rhombohedral graphene.Nature639, 342–347 (2025). 10

    2025

  15. [15]

    Morisette, E.et al.Superconductivity, anomalous hall effect, and stripe order in rhombohedral hexalayer graphene.arXiv:2504.05129(2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Nguyen, R.Q.et al.Ahierarchyofsuperconductivityand topological charge density wave states in rhombohedral graphene.arXiv:2507.22026(2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Deng, J.et al.Superconductivity and ferroelectric or- bital magnetism in semimetallic rhombohedral hexalayer graphene.arXiv:2508.15909(2025)

    arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Seo, J.et al.Family of unconventional superconductivi- ties in crystalline graphene.arXiv:2509.03295(2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    arXiv:2510.10873(2025)

    Yang, J.et al.Magnetic field-enhanced graphene superconductivity with record pauli-limit violation. arXiv:2510.10873(2025)

    arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Kumar, M.et al.Pervasivespin-tripletsuperconductivity in rhombohedral graphene.arXiv:2511.16578(2025)

    arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Guo, Y.et al.Flat band surface state superconductiv- ity in thick rhombohedral graphene.arXiv:2511.17423 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    arXiv:2512.24306(2025)

    Xie, J.et al.Magnetic-field-driven insulator- superconductor transition in rhombohedral graphene. arXiv:2512.24306(2025)

    arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Deng, J.et al.Magnetic-field-induced superconductivity in hexalayer rhombohedral graphene.arXiv:2603.13498 (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  24. [24]

    E., Dynes, R

    White, A. E., Dynes, R. C. & Garno, J. P. Destruction of superconductivity in quench-condensed two-dimensional films.Physical Review B33, 3549 (1986)

    1986

  25. [25]

    M., Haviland, D

    Jaeger, H. M., Haviland, D. B., Orr, B. G. & Goldman, A. M. Onset of superconductivity in ultrathin granular metal films.Physical Review B40, 182–196 (1989)

    1989

  26. [26]

    Merchant, L., Ostrick, J., Barber, R. P., Jr. & Dynes, R. C. Crossover from phase fluctuation to amplitude- dominated superconductivity: A model system.Physical Review B63, 134508 (2001)

    2001

  27. [27]

    Observation of quantum dissipation in the vortex state of a highly disordered superconducting thin film.Physical Review Letters76, 1529 (1996)

    Ephron, D., Yazdani, A., Kapitulnik, A.&Beasley, M.R. Observation of quantum dissipation in the vortex state of a highly disordered superconducting thin film.Physical Review Letters76, 1529 (1996)

    1996

  28. [28]

    & Kapitulnik, A

    Mason, N. & Kapitulnik, A. True superconductivity in a two-dimensional superconducting-insulating system. Physical Review B64, 060504(R) (2001)

    2001

  29. [29]

    Breznay, N. P. & Kapitulnik, A. Particle-hole symme- try reveals failed superconductivity in the metallic phase of two-dimensional superconducting films.Science Ad- vances3, e1700612 (2017)

    2017

  30. [30]

    Garcia-Barriocanal, J.et al.Electronically driven superconductor-insulator transition in electrostatically doped La2CuO4+δ thin films.Physical Review B87, 024509 (2013)

    2013

  31. [31]

    T.et al.Superconducting dome in a gate-tuned band insulator.Science338, 1193–1196 (2012)

    Ye, J. T.et al.Superconducting dome in a gate-tuned band insulator.Science338, 1193–1196 (2012)

    2012

  32. [32]

    & Nojima, T

    Saito, Y., Kasahara, Y., Ye, J., Iwasa, Y. & Nojima, T. Metallic ground state in an ion-gated two-dimensional superconductor.Science350, 409–413 (2015)

    2015

  33. [33]

    J.et al.Dissipation-driven superconductor- insulator transition in a two-dimensional Josephson- junction array.Physical Review Letters78, 2632 (1997)

    Rimberg, A. J.et al.Dissipation-driven superconductor- insulator transition in a two-dimensional Josephson- junction array.Physical Review Letters78, 2632 (1997)

    1997

  34. [34]

    Eley, S., Gopalakrishnan, S., Goldbart, P. M. & Ma- son, N. Approaching zero-temperature metallic states in mesoscopic superconductor-normal-superconductor ar- rays.Nature Physics8, 59–62 (2012)

    2012

  35. [35]

    Han, Z.et al.Collapse of superconductivity in a hybrid tin-graphene Josephson junction array.Nature Physics 10, 380–386 (2014)

    2014

  36. [36]

    Böttcher, C. G. L.et al.Superconducting, insulating and anomalous metallic regimes in a gated two-dimensional semiconductor-superconductor array.Nature Physics14, 1138–1144 (2018)

    2018

  37. [37]

    Bøttcher, C. G. L., Nichele, F., Shabani, J., Palm- strøm, C. J. & Marcus, C. M. Berezinskii-kosterlitz- thouless transition and anomalous metallic phase in a hybrid josephson junction array.Physical Review B110, L180502 (2024)

    2024

  38. [38]

    Sasmal, S.et al.Voltage-tunedanomalous-metaltometal transition in hybrid josephson junction arrays.Physical Review Letters135, 156301 (2025)

    2025

  39. [39]

    B., Liu, Y

    Haviland, D. B., Liu, Y. & Goldman, A. M. Onset of superconductivity in the two-dimensional limit.Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 2180–2183 (1989)

    1989

  40. [40]

    & Kapitulnik, A

    Yazdani, A. & Kapitulnik, A. Superconducting- insulating transition in two-dimensional a-MoGe thin films.Physical Review Letters74, 3037 (1995)

    1995

  41. [41]

    & Kapitulnik, A

    Mason, N. & Kapitulnik, A. Dissipation effects on the superconductor-insulator transition in 2D superconduc- tors.Physical Review Letters82, 5341 (1999)

    1999

  42. [42]

    Chen, Z.et al.Carrier density and disorder tuned superconductor-metal transition in a two-dimensional electron system.Nature Communications9, 4008 (2018)

    2018

  43. [43]

    Couëdo, F.et al.Dissipative phases across the superconductor-to-insulator transition.Scientific Re- ports6, 35834 (2016)

    2016

  44. [44]

    & Dalidovich, D

    Phillips, P. & Dalidovich, D. The elusive Bose metal. Science302, 243–247 (2003)

    2003

  45. [45]

    Tamir, I.et al.Sensitivity of the superconducting state in thin films.Science Advances5, eaau3826 (2019)

    2019

  46. [46]

    Sacépé, B., Feigel’man, M. V. & Klapwijk, T. M. Quan- tum breakdown of superconductivity in low-dimensional materials.Nature Physics16, 734–746 (2020)

    2020

  47. [47]

    Aslamazov, L. G. & Larkin, A. I. The influence of fluctu- ation pairing of electrons on the conductivity of normal metal.Phys. Lett. A26, 238–239 (1968)

    1968

  48. [48]

    & Varlamov, A.Theory of Fluctuations in Superconductors(Oxford University Press, 2005)

    Larkin, A. & Varlamov, A.Theory of Fluctuations in Superconductors(Oxford University Press, 2005)

    2005

  49. [49]

    Caldeira, A. O. & Leggett, A. J. Influence of dissipation on quantum tunneling in macroscopic systems.Phys. Rev. Lett.46, 211 (1981)

    1981

  50. [50]

    Kapitulnik, A., Mason, N., Kivelson, S. A. & Chakravarty, S. Effects of dissipation on quantum phase transitions.Physical Review B63, 125322 (2001)

    2001

  51. [51]

    & Kivelson, S

    Spivak, B., Oreto, P. & Kivelson, S. A. Theory of quan- tum metal to superconductor transitions in highly con- ducting systems.Physical Review B77, 214523 (2008)

    2008

  52. [52]

    Benyamini, A.et al.Fragility of the dissipationless state in clean two-dimensional superconductors.Nature Physics15, 947–953 (2019)

    2019

  53. [53]

    Waters, D.et al.Chern insulators at integer and frac- tional filling in moiré pentalayer graphene.Phys. Rev. X 15, 011045 (2025)

    2025

  54. [54]

    Li, H.et al.Electrode-free anodic oxidation nanolithog- raphy of low-dimensional materials.Nano Letters18, 8011–8015 (2018)

    2018

  55. [55]

    Xia, L.-Q.et al.Magic continuum in multi-moiré twisted trilayer graphene.arXiv:2509.03583(2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    S.et al.Quantum criticality and tun- able griffiths phase in superconducting twisted trilayer graphene.arXiv:2507.10687(2025)

    Mahapatra, P. S.et al.Quantum criticality and tun- able griffiths phase in superconducting twisted trilayer graphene.arXiv:2507.10687(2025). 11 EXTENDED DATA Extended Data Fig. 1.Device image and reproduction of selected measurements across contact pairs. a, Optical micrograph of the device from the main text with the source, drain, and voltage probes lab...

    arXiv 2025