REVIEW 2 cited by
FORML: Learning to Reweight Data for Fairness
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Machine learning models are trained to minimize the mean loss for a single metric, and thus typically do not consider fairness and robustness. Neglecting such metrics in training can make these models prone to fairness violations when training data are imbalanced or test distributions differ. This work introduces Fairness Optimized Reweighting via Meta-Learning (FORML), a training algorithm that balances fairness and robustness with accuracy by jointly learning training sample weights and neural network parameters. The approach increases model fairness by learning to balance the contributions from both over- and under-represented sub-groups through dynamic reweighting of the data learned from a user-specified held-out set representative of the distribution under which fairness is desired. FORML improves equality of opportunity fairness criteria on image classification tasks, reduces bias of corrupted labels, and facilitates building more fair datasets via data condensation. These improvements are achieved without pre-processing data or post-processing model outputs, without learning an additional weighting function, without changing model architecture, and while maintaining accuracy on the original predictive metric.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Variational Model Merging for Pareto Front Estimation in Multitask Finetuning
Using more flexible Bayesian posterior approximations in model merging gives better previews of multitask finetuning weightings on vision and language transformers.
-
CaTE Data Curation for Trustworthy AI
A synthesis of data curation practices for trustworthy AI, framed around an actionable definition of trustworthiness and a decision tree.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.