Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

FuseChat: Knowledge Fusion of Chat Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.07990 v1 pith:B46B3LAU submitted 2024-08-15 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords llmschatfusionknowledgefusechatmodelsarchitecturescapabilities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

While training large language models (LLMs) from scratch can indeed lead to models with distinct capabilities and strengths, it incurs substantial costs and may lead to redundancy in competencies. Knowledge fusion aims to integrate existing LLMs of diverse architectures and capabilities into a more potent LLM through lightweight continual training, thereby reducing the need for costly LLM development. In this work, we propose a new framework for the knowledge fusion of chat LLMs through two main stages, resulting in FuseChat. Firstly, we conduct pairwise knowledge fusion on source chat LLMs of varying structures and scales to create multiple target LLMs with identical structure and size via lightweight fine-tuning. During this process, a statistics-based token alignment approach is introduced as the cornerstone for fusing LLMs with different structures. Secondly, we merge these target LLMs within the parameter space, where we propose a novel method for determining the merging coefficients based on the magnitude of parameter updates before and after fine-tuning. We implement and validate FuseChat using six prominent chat LLMs with diverse architectures and scales, including OpenChat-3.5-7B, Starling-LM-7B-alpha, NH2-SOLAR-10.7B, InternLM2-Chat-20B, Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct, and Qwen-1.5-Chat-72B. Experimental results on two instruction-following benchmarks, AlpacaEval 2.0 and MT-Bench, demonstrate the superiority of FuseChat-7B over baselines of various sizes. Our model is even comparable to the larger Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct and approaches GPT-3.5-Turbo-1106 on MT-Bench. Our code, model weights, and data are public at \url{https://github.com/fanqiwan/FuseAI}.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Making Open-Source Text LLM Watermarks Durable Against Merging

    cs.CL 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new training method, Merge-Adversarial Training, makes watermarks embedded in open-source LLMs survive model merging, boosting post-merge detection by up to 51 percentage points.

  2. GenRecal: Generation after Recalibration from Large to Small Vision-Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A learnable Recalibrator bridges different tokenizers so that small VLMs can distill knowledge from any large VLM, improving their benchmark scores.

  3. Rethinking Heterogeneous LLM Merging: A Weighted Model Averaging Perspective

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    After truncating or expanding checkpoints to a shared shape, small-ratio weight averaging slightly improves average benchmark scores over strong Qwen sources, but headline gains are inflated by per-task best-ratio selection.

  4. Unlocking Speech Instruction Data Potential with Query Rewriting

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A multi-LLM rewriting and multi-agent validation pipeline makes text-to-speech synthesized speech instruction data far more usable and improves downstream speech instruction following.

  5. CortexDebate: Debating Sparsely and Equally for Multi-Agent Debate

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CortexDebate prunes the multi-agent debate graph every round using a McKinsey-style trust score per directed link, reporting accuracy gains over full-debate baselines on eight datasets with shorter per-agent contexts.

Pith tools