Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 46 references

IGR: Improving Diffusion Model for Garment Restoration from Person Image

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A diffusion model restores the exact garment from a person photo by fusing low-level and high-level garment features into the denoising process.

desk verdict Solid paired VITON-HD gains and clearly explained architecture; the unpaired StreetTryOn metric cannot carry the generalization claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.11513 v1 pith:BIWPETFL submitted 2024-12-16 cs.CV

Le Shen , Rong Huang , Zhijie Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords garmentrestorationvirtualtry-oninverselatentdiffusionmodelfeaturefusionattentionmechanismcoarse-to-finetrainingpersonimageocclusionhandling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that a diffusion-based model can restore a clean, standard garment image from a photo of a person wearing that garment, even when the garment is partially occluded or complex. The proposed IGR model builds on Stable Diffusion and adds two garment extractors: IP-Adapter for low-level features and GarmNet for high-level semantics. These are merged into the denoiser through attention-based GarmFus blocks. The authors argue that this design, together with a coarse-to-fine training strategy, outperforms prior garment-restoration and try-on-based baselines on both studio and street images. If true, the method would make garment restoration accurate enough for practical virtual try-on pipelines and e-commerce.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the Garment Fusion (GarmFus) block, an attention module that combines two feature streams in the Stable Diffusion UNet. Low-level garment features from IP-Adapter are injected via an additional cross-attention layer computed alongside the text-conditioned cross-attention; high-level semantics from GarmNet are concatenated spatially with the denoiser's intermediate features before self-attention, and only the fused half is returned. GarmNet itself is a copy of the denoiser's structure taking the person-image latent plus a resized mask as a 5-channel input, avoiding error-prone cropping. The coarse-to-fine training strategy is the second critical component: initial training on VITON-HD and a self-collected paired set, then fine-tuning on a filtered 20% subset with only front-facing, well-proportioned, properly visible garments.

What would settle it

Collect a paired evaluation set of in-the-wild person photos alongside clean standard garment ground truths, and compute LPIPS and DISTS between IGR outputs and those true garments; if IGR does not beat TryOffDiff on those paired metrics, the claimed generalization advantage is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that garment restoration quality is determined by how completely garment features are extracted from the person image and how faithfully they are injected into the latent diffusion denoiser. IGR therefore uses two complementary extractors: IP-Adapter captures low-level attributes, while GarmNet, which shares the denoiser's U-Net structure, encodes high-level semantics from the person image concatenated with a garment mask. In the GarmFus blocks, low-level features enter through an extra cross-attention layer, and high-level features are appended to the self-attention keys and values, with only the latter half retained. A coarse-to-fine training schedule first exploits standard VITON datasets, then fine-tunes on a manually curated subset that excludes occluded, truncated, or side-view garments. On VITON-HD and StreetTryOn tests, the paper reports consistent improvement over CFLD, OOTD, IDM, and TryOffDiff across SSIM, LPIPS, DISTS, FID, CLIP-FID, and KID.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that computing FID, CLIP-FID, and KID for unpaired StreetTryOn generations against VITON-HD ground-truth garments is a valid measure of garment restoration quality.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If IGR works as claimed, garment restoration can be plugged into virtual try-on systems to produce standard garment images that faithfully match a reference person, improving downstream try-on realism.
  • The design shows that separating low-level and high-level garment features and fusing them at different attention layers is an effective recipe for inverse try-on, pointing the way for similar restoration tasks.
  • The coarse-to-fine training strategy demonstrates that naively training on VITON datasets harms garment-restoration models; curated data matters as much as architecture.
  • The method's success on StreetTryOn, if valid, implies reasonable generalization from studio to in-the-wild images, as long as occlusions are handled by the mask input.
  • Improvements in the base diffusion model would likely translate directly into better restoration, since IGR is built on Stable Diffusion.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the StreetTryOn evaluation is unpaired, the reported FID, CLIP-FID, and KID numbers likely mix domain shift with restoration error; a paired street-photo benchmark would give a stricter test of generalization.
  • The ablation attributes most detail gains to GarmNet, but a lighter high-level encoder or a second high-resolution IP-Adapter might achieve similar improvements at lower training cost.
  • Since IGR is built on Stable Diffusion, the same GarmFus and coarse-to-fine recipe should transfer directly to newer base models, so restoring quality should improve without re-designing the fusion blocks.
  • The manual curation of the fine-tuning subset, while effective, may not scale; an automatic filter that detects occluded, truncated, or side-view garments could make the training strategy practical for larger datasets.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper addresses garment restoration: given a person image and an agnostic mask, the goal is to produce a clean, standard garment that matches the garment worn in the image. The proposed IGR method builds on Stable Diffusion v1.5 and combines two feature extractors: IP-Adapter, which provides low-level garment features from a cropped masked region, and GarmNet, a UNet-shaped network that takes the person latent and mask as input and provides high-level garment semantics. These features are injected into the denoising UNet via additional cross-attention layers (low-level features) and modified self-attention layers (high-level features). Training is coarse-to-fine: the model is first trained on VITON-HD plus a self-collected in-shop dataset, then fine-tuned on a manually curated 20% subset. Experiments compare IGR against CFLD, OOTD, IDM, and TryOffDiff on paired VITON-HD metrics (SSIM, LPIPS, DISTS, FID, CLIP-FID, KID) and on unpaired StreetTryOn distribution metrics, with ablations of GarmNet, the fine-tuning strategy, and the guidance scale.

Significance. If the claims hold, the paper offers a practical and relatively simple recipe for garment restoration, with consistent quantitative gains over TryOffDiff on the paired VITON-HD benchmark (e.g., SSIM 0.7895 vs 0.7576, LPIPS 0.2946 vs 0.4288). The use of public components (Stable Diffusion, IP-Adapter), independent baselines, and ablations that isolate GarmNet and the fine-tuning data make the core engineering contribution transparent and reproducible in principle. The main weakness is that the headline generalization claim for complex or occluded scenarios rests on unpaired distribution metrics that cannot measure per-sample identity preservation, and two recent garment-restoration baselines discussed in the paper are absent from the quantitative comparison.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4.2, Table 1] The unpaired StreetTryOn evaluation uses VITON-HD real garments as the reference distribution for FID, CLIP-FID, and KID. These are distribution-level metrics and do not establish that the generated garment preserves the identity of the garment actually worn by the corresponding street person; a model that emits generic VITON-HD-like garments can score well while ignoring the input identity. Since the abstract's claim about 'challenging scenarios such as complex garments or those with occlusions' is supported only by this unpaired evaluation plus qualitative examples, that generalization claim is not quantitatively supported. Please add a paired or per-sample identity metric for StreetTryOn (e.g., using manually annotated garment crops or a user study), or restrict the generalization claim to the VITON-HD setting.
  2. [§2.2, Table 1] TryOffAnyone and RAGDiffusion are discussed in Related Work as recent garment-restoration methods, but neither appears in Table 1. Because the paper claims to surpass existing methods and motivates IGR specifically against these approaches, the quantitative comparison is incomplete. Please add these baselines or explicitly justify their exclusion.
  3. [§4.3, Table 2] The ablation results do not fully support the text: adding GarmNet and HQFT lowers SSIM (0.7931 without GarmNet and 0.7984 without HQFT versus 0.7895 for the full model) while improving LPIPS, DISTS, and FID. The statement that GarmNet achieves 'higher scores in both reconstruction accuracy and authenticity' is therefore inaccurate for SSIM. Please explain this trade-off or revise the claim.
  4. [§4.3, Table 3] The guidance scale s=1.5 is selected based on performance on the same VITON-HD and StreetTryOn test sets that produce Table 1. Since the differences between s=1.5 and s=2.0 are small and not consistently in one direction (e.g., VITON-HD FID is better at s=2.0: 12.2856 versus 13.1425, while StreetTryOn CLIP-FID is slightly better at s=1.5: 10.0137 versus 10.3480), the choice of s affects the headline numbers. Please report the selection on a validation split or provide significance or variance information.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§3.2, Eq. (4)] In Eq. (4), 'Qf con, Qf con and Vf con' should read 'Qf con, Kf con and Vf con'.
  2. [§4.1] The self-collected paired dataset of in-shop models and garments is not described or released, which limits reproducibility; please provide details about its size, collection protocol, and license, or release the curated subset.
  3. [§4.2] CFLD, OOTD, and IDM are not designed for garment restoration and are evaluated via SAM2 segmentation of try-on outputs; this can introduce artifacts that unfairly disadvantage these baselines. Please state this limitation explicitly and, if possible, include a garment-restoration-specific baseline other than TryOffDiff.
  4. [General] No code or trained weights are released; given the engineering nature of the contribution, providing code and weights would substantially strengthen the paper.
  5. [§1] The phrase 'a Improved diffusion-based Garment Restoration method' contains a grammatical error; it should be 'an Improved'.
  6. [§4.3] The paper reports single-run metrics without confidence intervals; adding multiple seeds or bootstrap intervals would make the comparisons in Tables 1-3 more reliable.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: IGR's architecture, training, and baselines are externally grounded; only evaluation-transparency concerns remain.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is empirical and external. The method fine-tunes Stable Diffusion (external, cited [29]), uses IP-Adapter (external, cited [40]) for low-level garment features, and introduces a new GarmNet/GarmFus design whose components are defined constructively in Eqs. (3)-(4) rather than in terms of the outputs they are claimed to predict. Quantitative claims are tested against independent baselines (CFLD, OOTD, IDM, TryOffDiff) on VITON-HD paired data and StreetTryOn. Neither of the two potential concerns is a circularity. (1) The choice of guidance scale s=1.5 in Section 4.3 is made by inspecting performance on the VITON-HD and StreetTryOn test sets, and the same test sets produce the headline numbers in Table 1; this is test-set hyperparameter selection or an evaluation-transparency issue, not a parameter fitted by construction to the reported quantity, so it does not reduce the model's claim to its inputs. (2) The unpaired StreetTryOn evaluation in Section 4.2 uses VITON-HD real garments as the reference distribution for FID/CLIP-FID/KID because StreetTryOn lacks paired ground truth; this weakens the identity-preservation evidence for occluded/complex garments but is a measurement-validity limitation, not a self-referential derivation. There are no load-bearing self-citations: none of the cited prior works is by the present authors, no uniqueness theorem is imported, and no ansatz is smuggled in via a same-author citation. GarmNet is ablated against an IP-Adapter-only variant, and the coarse-to-fine training is ablated with and without HQFT, so the reported contributions have independent support within the paper's own controlled comparisons.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is empirical, so no mathematical axioms are introduced. The method assumes the Stable Diffusion prior transfers, that a person plus mask determines the garment, and that the authors' manual curation does not bias results. The only genuine free parameter selected on evaluation data is the guidance scale; the 20% fine-tuning split is a hand-chosen design choice. No invented physical or conceptual entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Guidance scale s = 1.5 (swept over 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 in Table 3)
    Selected on the basis of test-set metrics in Table 3; the headline numbers therefore depend on a hyperparameter chosen on the same evaluation sets.
  • Fine-tuning subset proportion = 20% of the coarse dataset
    Hand-chosen without sensitivity analysis; the fine-tuning data is also manually curated, so the effect of this exact proportion is unknown.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Stable Diffusion v1.5 pretrained weights provide a transferable prior for garment appearance.
    Used as the foundation in Sections 3.1 and 3.2; only qualitative cosplay and unreal-person examples support transfer, with no quantitative evidence.
  • domain assumption A person image plus an agnostic mask contains enough information to reconstruct the complete standard garment.
    In Section 3.2, GarmNet inputs the person latent plus mask and is asked to recover occluded or truncated parts; the training-set curation in Section 4.1 explicitly removes pairs where this assumption fails.
  • ad hoc to paper Manually removing 'defective' training pairs improves generalization instead of overfitting to the benchmark distribution.
    The curation criteria in Section 4.1 and Figure 2 were authored by the paper's authors and applied before fine-tuning; this assumption is plausible but unvalidated outside VITON-HD-like data.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of IGR: Improving Diffusion Model for Garment Restoration from Person Image." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BIWPETFL

@misc{pith2026241211513,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: IGR: Improving Diffusion Model for Garment Restoration from Person Image},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BIWPETFL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.11513}
}
read the original abstract

Garment restoration, the inverse of virtual try-on task, focuses on restoring standard garment from a person image, requiring accurate capture of garment details. However, existing methods often fail to preserve the identity of the garment or rely on complex processes. To address these limitations, we propose an improved diffusion model for restoring authentic garments. Our approach employs two garment extractors to independently capture low-level features and high-level semantics from the person image. Leveraging a pretrained latent diffusion model, these features are integrated into the denoising process through garment fusion blocks, which combine self-attention and cross-attention layers to align the restored garment with the person image. Furthermore, a coarse-to-fine training strategy is introduced to enhance the fidelity and authenticity of the generated garments. Experimental results demonstrate that our model effectively preserves garment identity and generates high-quality restorations, even in challenging scenarios such as complex garments or those with occlusions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.11513 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Several pairs of reference person image and our restored standard garment. From top to bottom, the pairs demonstrate the restoration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Training data for GarmRe. The left part displays three [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overview of our proposed IGR. The GarmNet and GarmDenoiser share the same structural design. The reference person image, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Qualitative comparison. The first three rows are tested on the VITON-HD dataset, while the remaining rows are tested on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative ablations for guidance scale. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Qualitative ablations for structure and training strategy. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Demystifying mmd gans

    Mikołaj Bi´nkowski, Danica J Sutherland, Michael Arbel, and Arthur Gretton. Demystifying mmd gans. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.01401, 2018. 5

    arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    Flux.1-dev

    black-forest labs. Flux.1-dev. https://github.com/ black-forest-labs/flux, 2024. Accessed: 2024-12-

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Improving language models by retriev- ing from trillions of tokens

    Sebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Mensch, Jordan Hoffmann, Trevor Cai, Eliza Rutherford, Katie Millican, George Bm Van Den Driessche, Jean-Baptiste Lespiau, Bogdan Damoc, Aidan Clark, et al. Improving language models by retriev- ing from trillions of tokens. In International conference on machine learning, pages 2206–2240. PMLR, 2022. 2, 3

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Viton-hd: High-resolution virtual try-on via misalignment-aware normalization

    Seunghwan Choi, Sunghyun Park, Minsoo Lee, and Jaegul Choo. Viton-hd: High-resolution virtual try-on via misalignment-aware normalization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recog- nition, pages 14131–14140, 2021. 1, 2, 3, 5

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Improving diffusion models for vir- tual try-on

    Yisol Choi, Sangkyung Kwak, Kyungmin Lee, Hyungwon Choi, and Jinwoo Shin. Improving diffusion models for vir- tual try-on. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05139, 2024. 3, 5

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Street tryon: Learning in-the-wild virtual try-on from unpaired person images

    Aiyu Cui, Jay Mahajan, Viraj Shah, Preeti Gomathinayagam, Chang Liu, and Svetlana Lazebnik. Street tryon: Learning in-the-wild virtual try-on from unpaired person images. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vi- sion and Pattern Recognition, pages 8235–8239, 2024. 1, 3, 5

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Image quality assessment: Unifying structure and texture similarity

    Keyan Ding, Kede Ma, Shiqi Wang, and Eero P Simoncelli. Image quality assessment: Unifying structure and texture similarity. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 44(5):2567–2581, 2020. 6

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Scaling rectified flow trans- formers for high-resolution image synthesis

    Patrick Esser, Sumith Kulal, Andreas Blattmann, Rahim En- tezari, Jonas M¨uller, Harry Saini, Yam Levi, Dominik Lorenz, Axel Sauer, Frederic Boesel, et al. Scaling rectified flow trans- formers for high-resolution image synthesis. In Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, 2024. 3

    work page 2024

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Generative adversarial nets

    Ian Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. Generative adversarial nets. Advances in neural information processing systems, 27, 2014. 2, 3

    2014

  2. [10]

    Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium

    Martin Heusel, Hubert Ramsauer, Thomas Unterthiner, Bern- hard Nessler, and Sepp Hochreiter. Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017. 5

    2017

  3. [11]

    Classifier-free diffusion guidance

    Jonathan Ho and Tim Salimans. Classifier-free diffusion guidance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.12598, 2022. 3

    2022 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Denoising diffu- sion probabilistic models

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising diffu- sion probabilistic models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020. 1, 2

    2020

  5. [13]

    Animate anyone: Consistent and controllable image- to-video synthesis for character animation

    Li Hu. Animate anyone: Consistent and controllable image- to-video synthesis for character animation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8153–8163, 2024. 3, 4

    2024

  6. [14]

    Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial net- works

    Phillip Isola, Jun-Yan Zhu, Tinghui Zhou, and Alexei A Efros. Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial net- works. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1125–1134, 2017. 2, 3

    2017

  7. [15]

    Fashion-vdm: Video diffusion model for virtual try-on

    Johanna Karras, Yingwei Li, Nan Liu, Luyang Zhu, Innfarn Yoo, Andreas Lugmayr, Chris Lee, and Ira Kemelmacher- Shlizerman. Fashion-vdm: Video diffusion model for virtual try-on. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Conference Papers, pages 1–11, 2024. 1

    2024

  8. [16]

    Stableviton: Learning semantic correspondence with latent diffusion model for virtual try-on

    Jeongho Kim, Guojung Gu, Minho Park, Sunghyun Park, and Jaegul Choo. Stableviton: Learning semantic correspondence with latent diffusion model for virtual try-on. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8176–8185, 2024. 1, 3

    2024

  9. [17]

    Auto-encoding variational bayes

    Diederik P Kingma. Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114, 2013. 3

    2013 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Segment any- thing

    Alexander Kirillov, Eric Mintun, Nikhila Ravi, Hanzi Mao, Chloe Rolland, Laura Gustafson, Tete Xiao, Spencer White- head, Alexander C Berg, Wan-Yen Lo, et al. Segment any- thing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Confer- ence on Computer Vision, pages 4015–4026, 2023. 1

    2023

  11. [19]

    The role of imagenet classes in fr´echet inception distance

    Tuomas Kynk¨a¨anniemi, Tero Karras, Miika Aittala, Timo Aila, and Jaakko Lehtinen. The role of imagenet classes in fr´echet inception distance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.06026,

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    Decoupled weight decay regularization

    Ilya Loshchilov and Frank Hutter. Decoupled weight decay regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101, 2017. 5 8

    2017 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Coarse-to-fine latent diffusion for pose-guided person image synthesis

    Yanzuo Lu, Manlin Zhang, Andy J Ma, Xiaohua Xie, and Jianhuang Lai. Coarse-to-fine latent diffusion for pose-guided person image synthesis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 6420–6429, 2024. 3, 5

    2024

  14. [22]

    T2i-adapter: Learning adapters to dig out more controllable ability for text-to-image diffusion models

    Chong Mou, Xintao Wang, Liangbin Xie, Yanze Wu, Jian Zhang, Zhongang Qi, and Ying Shan. T2i-adapter: Learning adapters to dig out more controllable ability for text-to-image diffusion models. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 4296–4304, 2024. 3

    2024

  15. [23]

    Anydesign: Versatile area fashion editing via mask-free diffusion

    Yunfang Niu, Lingxiang Wu, Dong Yi, Jie Peng, Ning Jiang, Haiying Wu, and Jinqiao Wang. Anydesign: Versatile area fashion editing via mask-free diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.11553, 2024. 1

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis

    Dustin Podell, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Jonas M¨uller, Joe Penna, and Robin Rombach. Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01952, 2023. 3

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervi- sion

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervi- sion. In International conference on machine learning, ...

    2021

  18. [26]

    Zero: Memory optimizations toward training trillion parameter models

    Samyam Rajbhandari, Jeff Rasley, Olatunji Ruwase, and Yux- iong He. Zero: Memory optimizations toward training trillion parameter models. In SC20: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Anal- ysis, pages 1–16. IEEE, 2020. 5

    2020

  19. [27]

    In- context retrieval-augmented language models

    Ori Ram, Yoav Levine, Itay Dalmedigos, Dor Muhlgay, Am- non Shashua, Kevin Leyton-Brown, and Yoav Shoham. In- context retrieval-augmented language models. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 11:1316– 1331, 2023. 2, 3

    2023

  20. [28]

    Sam 2: Segment any- thing in images and videos

    Nikhila Ravi, Valentin Gabeur, Yuan-Ting Hu, Ronghang Hu, Chaitanya Ryali, Tengyu Ma, Haitham Khedr, Roman R¨adle, Chloe Rolland, Laura Gustafson, et al. Sam 2: Segment any- thing in images and videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.00714,

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Bj ¨orn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022. 1, 2, 3, 5

    2022

  22. [30]

    U- net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmen- tation

    Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. U- net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmen- tation. In Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th international conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, proceedings, pa...

    2015

  23. [31]

    Denoising diffusion implicit models

    Jiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, and Stefano Ermon. Denoising diffusion implicit models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502,

    2010 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Ragdiffusion: Faithful cloth generation via external knowl- edge assimilation

    Xianfeng Tan, Yuhan Li, Wenxiang Shang, Yubo Wu, Jian Wang, Xuanhong Chen, Yi Zhang, Ran Lin, and Bingbing Ni. Ragdiffusion: Faithful cloth generation via external knowl- edge assimilation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.19528, 2024. 2, 3

    2024

  25. [33]

    Attention is all you need

    Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszko- reit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017. 2, 3, 4

    2017

  26. [34]

    Tryoffdiff: Virtual-try-off via high-fidelity gar- ment reconstruction using diffusion models

    Riza Velioglu, Petra Bevandic, Robin Chan, and Barbara Hammer. Tryoffdiff: Virtual-try-off via high-fidelity gar- ment reconstruction using diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.18350, 2024. 2, 3, 5

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity

    Zhou Wang, Alan C Bovik, Hamid R Sheikh, and Eero P Simoncelli. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE transactions on image processing, 13(4):600–612, 2004. 6

    2004

  28. [36]

    Tryoffany- one: Tiled cloth generation from a dressed person, 2024

    Ioannis Xarchakos and Theodoros Koukopoulos. Tryoffany- one: Tiled cloth generation from a dressed person, 2024. 2, 3

    2024

  29. [37]

    Oot- diffusion: Outfitting fusion based latent diffusion for control- lable virtual try-on

    Yuhao Xu, Tao Gu, Weifeng Chen, and Chengcai Chen. Oot- diffusion: Outfitting fusion based latent diffusion for control- lable virtual try-on. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.01779, 2024. 1, 3, 5

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Tunnel try-on: Excavating spatial-temporal tunnels for high-quality virtual try-on in videos

    Zhengze Xu, Mengting Chen, Zhao Wang, Linyu Xing, Zhonghua Zhai, Nong Sang, Jinsong Lan, Shuai Xiao, and Changxin Gao. Tunnel try-on: Excavating spatial-temporal tunnels for high-quality virtual try-on in videos. In Proceed- ings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Mul...

    2024

  31. [39]

    Magicanimate: Temporally consistent human im- age animation using diffusion model

    Zhongcong Xu, Jianfeng Zhang, Jun Hao Liew, Hanshu Yan, Jia-Wei Liu, Chenxu Zhang, Jiashi Feng, and Mike Zheng Shou. Magicanimate: Temporally consistent human im- age animation using diffusion model. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Reco...

    2024

  32. [40]

    Ip- adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to- image diffusion models

    Hu Ye, Jun Zhang, Sibo Liu, Xiao Han, and Wei Yang. Ip- adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to- image diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06721,

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    Zalando enhances its virtual fitting room by enabling customers to create a 3d avatar with their body measure- ments

    Zalando. Zalando enhances its virtual fitting room by enabling customers to create a 3d avatar with their body measure- ments. https://corporate.zalando.com/en/ technology/zalando-enhances-its-virtual- fitting- room- enabling- customers- create- 3d-avatar-their-body , 2024. Ac...

    2024

  34. [42]

    Ti- legan: Category-oriented attention-based high-quality tiled clothes generation from dressed person

    Wei Zeng, Mingbo Zhao, Yuan Gao, and Zhao Zhang. Ti- legan: Category-oriented attention-based high-quality tiled clothes generation from dressed person. Neural Computing and Applications, 32:17587–17600, 2020. 2, 3

    2020

  35. [43]

    Sigmoid loss for language image pre-training

    Xiaohua Zhai, Basil Mustafa, Alexander Kolesnikov, and Lucas Beyer. Sigmoid loss for language image pre-training. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 11975–11986, 2023. 2, 3

    2023

  36. [44]

    Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models

    Lvmin Zhang, Anyi Rao, and Maneesh Agrawala. Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 3836–3847, 2023. 3

    2023

  37. [45]

    The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric

    Richard Zhang, Phillip Isola, Alexei A Efros, Eli Shechtman, and Oliver Wang. The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric. In Proceedings of the IEEE 9 conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 586–595, 2018. 6

    2018

  38. [46]

    Garmentaligner: Text-to-garment generation via retrieval-augmented multi- level corrections

    Shiyue Zhang, Zheng Chong, Xujie Zhang, Hanhui Li, Yuhao Cheng, Yiqiang Yan, and Xiaodan Liang. Garmentaligner: Text-to-garment generation via retrieval-augmented multi- level corrections. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 148–164. Springer, 2025. 1 10

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.