REVIEW 1 cited by
Event Extraction by Answering (Almost) Natural Questions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The problem of event extraction requires detecting the event trigger and extracting its corresponding arguments. Existing work in event argument extraction typically relies heavily on entity recognition as a preprocessing/concurrent step, causing the well-known problem of error propagation. To avoid this issue, we introduce a new paradigm for event extraction by formulating it as a question answering (QA) task that extracts the event arguments in an end-to-end manner. Empirical results demonstrate that our framework outperforms prior methods substantially; in addition, it is capable of extracting event arguments for roles not seen at training time (zero-shot learning setting).
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Keyword-Centric Prompting for One-Shot Event Detection with Self-Generated Rationale Enhancements
A keyword-centric prompting method with self-generated propose-and-judge rationales improves one-shot event detection F1 by up to 12.8 points over prior in-context learning baselines.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.