Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Financial News-Driven LLM Reinforcement Learning for Portfolio Management

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.11059 v1 pith:BJ7FMX3E submitted 2024-11-17 q-fin.CP

classification q-fin.CP
keywords tradingportfoliofinancialmodelslearninglexcxqualitativereinforcement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a transformative approach for financial trading, enabling dynamic strategy optimization in complex markets. This study explores the integration of sentiment analysis, derived from large language models (LLMs), into RL frameworks to enhance trading performance. Experiments were conducted on single-stock trading with Apple Inc. (AAPL) and portfolio trading with the ING Corporate Leaders Trust Series B (LEXCX). The sentiment-enhanced RL models demonstrated superior net worth and cumulative profit compared to RL models without sentiment and, in the portfolio experiment, outperformed the actual LEXCX portfolio's buy-and-hold strategy. These results highlight the potential of incorporating qualitative market signals to improve decision-making, bridging the gap between quantitative and qualitative approaches in financial trading.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. FinRL-DeepSeek: LLM-Infused Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning for Trading Agents

    q-fin.TR 2025-02 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    An LLM risk score and recommendation score are multiplied into CVaR-PPO trading actions and returns, with backtests showing mixed, statistically unsupported improvements.

Pith tools