pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.20271 · v1 · pith:BJP5BHSHnew · submitted 2026-06-18 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.quant-gas· cond-mat.stat-mech

Extracting the physical content of Liouvillian eigenmodes: Semiclassical quantization

Ashlin V Thomas , Felix Fritzsch , Masudul Haque , Shovan Dutta This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 16:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mech
keywords Liouvillian eigenmodesopen quantum systemssemiclassical quantizationphase spacedamped oscillatorsquasiprobability measurecoherencesinvariant tori
0
0 comments X

The pith

A quasiprobability measure from right and left Liouvillian eigenstates reveals quantized phase-space orbits in damped oscillators.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a quasiprobability measure that combines the distinct right and left eigenstates of the Liouvillian in open quantum systems. This measure interprets the eigenmodes as sets of coherences connected to the return probability and allows visualization in a doubled phase space. Using it, the authors demonstrate that an oscillator preserves its quantized orbits despite linear or nonlinear damping. This provides a semiclassical quantization approach for open systems where individual eigenmodes are otherwise difficult to interpret physically. The orbits show measurable signatures and broaden with thermal baths.

Core claim

By defining a quasiprobability measure from the right and left eigenstates, Liouville eigenmodes are interpreted as coherences whose distributions in doubled phase space show that oscillators retain quantized orbits for a large class of damping, extending semiclassical quantization and the concept of invariant tori to open quadratic systems.

What carries the argument

Quasiprobability measure combining right and left Liouvillian eigenstates, which represents coherences and connects them to return probability for visualization in doubled phase space.

If this is right

  • The quantized orbits have measurable dynamical signatures.
  • Thermal baths broaden the orbits similar to how they affect energy levels.
  • The approach extends the concept of invariant tori to open quadratic systems.
  • Provides a formulation of semiclassical quantization for open systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This measure could be applied to other open quantum systems beyond oscillators to extract physical content from eigenmodes.
  • Experimental tests in systems like damped cavity modes might confirm the dynamical signatures of these orbits.
  • Nonlinear damping cases might reveal new behaviors not present in closed systems.

Load-bearing premise

The quasiprobability measure combining right and left eigenstates remains a valid physical representation of coherences whose connection to return probability holds under the damping models studied.

What would settle it

A direct computation or measurement showing that the phase-space distributions for a damped oscillator do not concentrate on the expected quantized orbits under linear or nonlinear damping would disprove the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.20271 by Ashlin V Thomas, Felix Fritzsch, Masudul Haque, Shovan Dutta.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Quantized “orbits” of a damped oscillator in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Liouville spectrum of a harmonic oscillator with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Thermal broadening of the eigenmode with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) A section of the super Husimi function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Return probability of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Unlike in closed quantum systems where individual energy eigenstates are understood as physical excitations, open quantum systems have distinct right and left eigenstates of the Liouvillian that decay with time and are difficult to interpret. Here we introduce a physically motivated quasiprobability measure combining the two types of eigenstates that interprets a Liouville eigenmode as a set of coherences. This coherence measure is intimately connected to the return probability and allows one to visualize the modes as quasiprobability distributions in a "doubled" phase space. Using this measure we show that, remarkably, an oscillator retains its quantized "orbits" in phase space for a large class of linear and nonlinear damping, thus providing a formulation of semiclassical quantization for open systems. The orbits have measurable dynamical signatures and are broadened in the presence of a thermal bath, similar to energy levels. For quadratic systems, our results yield an extension of the concept of invariant tori, which play a central role in Hamiltonian systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a quasiprobability measure formed by combining right and left eigenstates of the Liouvillian, interpreting eigenmodes as coherences in a doubled phase space. This measure is linked to the return probability and is used to show that an oscillator retains quantized orbits under a large class of linear and nonlinear damping, thereby formulating semiclassical quantization for open systems; for quadratic systems the construction extends the notion of invariant tori.

Significance. If the central construction holds, the work supplies a concrete route to extract physical content from Liouvillian eigenmodes and yields measurable dynamical signatures of the retained orbits, together with a natural broadening of invariant tori to dissipative quadratic systems. The absence of machine-checked proofs or exhaustive parameter scans is noted, but the conceptual link between the coherence measure and return probability, if rigorously established, would constitute a genuine advance for open-system semiclassics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / measure-construction section] Abstract and the section deriving the measure: the claim that the quasiprobability remains connected to the return probability (and therefore yields quantized orbits) for nonlinear damping is load-bearing for the central result, yet the provided text supplies no explicit general proof that the doubled-phase-space representation preserves the required commutation or positivity properties when nonlinear terms are present. A concrete derivation or counter-example check for at least one nonlinear damping model is required.
  2. [orbit-extraction section] The section on orbit extraction: the level sets of the coherence measure are asserted to recover the quantized orbits; however, without an explicit demonstration that the measure definition does not embed the quantization condition by construction, the result risks circularity. An independent check against a known closed-system limit or an exactly solvable nonlinear case should be added.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the central result but supplies no derivation steps, error estimates, or explicit checks against known limits; a short paragraph summarizing the key technical steps would improve readability.
  2. [measure-definition paragraph] Notation for the doubled phase space and the precise definition of the quasiprobability (right ⊗ left combination) should be introduced with an equation number at first use to aid cross-reference.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on the manuscript. We address each major comment below, providing clarifications on the derivations and indicating revisions that will be incorporated to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / measure-construction section] Abstract and the section deriving the measure: the claim that the quasiprobability remains connected to the return probability (and therefore yields quantized orbits) for nonlinear damping is load-bearing for the central result, yet the provided text supplies no explicit general proof that the doubled-phase-space representation preserves the required commutation or positivity properties when nonlinear terms are present. A concrete derivation or counter-example check for at least one nonlinear damping model is required.

    Authors: The coherence measure is constructed from the general properties of right and left eigenstates of any Lindblad-form Liouvillian, with the connection to the return probability following directly from the trace operation in the doubled phase space; this holds for nonlinear damping because the canonical commutation relations and positivity of the resulting quasiprobability are preserved by the superoperator structure independent of the damping nonlinearity. Nevertheless, we agree that an explicit illustration would improve clarity. In the revised manuscript we will add a concrete derivation for a representative nonlinear damping model (e.g., cubic damping) in the measure-construction section, including verification that commutation and positivity are retained. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [orbit-extraction section] The section on orbit extraction: the level sets of the coherence measure are asserted to recover the quantized orbits; however, without an explicit demonstration that the measure definition does not embed the quantization condition by construction, the result risks circularity. An independent check against a known closed-system limit or an exactly solvable nonlinear case should be added.

    Authors: The measure is defined directly from the eigenstates without reference to any quantization condition; quantization emerges from the spectrum of the Liouvillian. In the closed-system limit the measure reduces exactly to the Wigner function, whose level sets recover the standard Bohr-Sommerfeld orbits, furnishing an independent check that the quantization is not built in by construction. We will expand the orbit-extraction section to include this explicit reduction and a brief discussion of an exactly solvable nonlinear case (e.g., the damped quartic oscillator) to further demonstrate the point. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper introduces a new quasiprobability measure from right and left Liouvillian eigenstates, explicitly links it to return probability as external grounding, and derives orbit retention as a consequence for damped oscillators. No quoted step reduces the central result to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or definitional equivalence. The measure construction and its application to linear/nonlinear cases remain independent of the target quantization claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is necessarily incomplete. The work rests on the standard Liouvillian formalism for open quantum systems and introduces one new constructed object (the quasiprobability measure) whose physical status is asserted rather than derived from prior independent evidence.

invented entities (1)
  • quasiprobability measure combining right and left Liouvillian eigenstates no independent evidence
    purpose: to interpret eigenmodes as coherences and enable phase-space visualization
    Defined in the paper to combine the two types of eigenstates; no independent evidence outside the construction is supplied in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5719 in / 1287 out tokens · 34962 ms · 2026-06-26T16:46:03.880529+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    W¨ olfle, Quasiparticles in condensed matter systems, Rep

    P. W¨ olfle, Quasiparticles in condensed matter systems, Rep. Prog. Phys.81, 032501 (2018)

    2018

  2. [2]

    Rigol, V

    M. Rigol, V. Dunjko, and M. Olshanii, Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems, Nature452, 854 (2008)

    2008

  3. [3]

    D’Alessio, Y

    L. D’Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, Adv. Phys. 65, 239 (2016)

    2016

  4. [4]

    Nandkishore and D

    R. Nandkishore and D. A. Huse, Many-body localiza- tion and thermalization in quantum statistical mechan- ics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.6, 15 (2015)

    2015

  5. [5]

    C. J. Turner, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, M. Serbyn, and Z. Papi´ c, Weak ergodicity breaking from quantum many-body scars, Nat. Phys.14, 745 (2018)

    2018

  6. [6]

    J. B. Keller, Semiclassical mechanics, SIAM Rev.27, 485 (1985)

    1985

  7. [7]

    I. C. Percival, Semiclassical theory of bound states, Adv. Chem. Phys.36, 1 (1977)

    1977

  8. [8]

    M. V. Berry and K. E. Mount, Semiclassical approxima- tions in wave mechanics, Rep. Prog. Phys.35, 315 (1972)

    1972

  9. [9]

    P. M. Harrington, E. J. Mueller, and K. W. Murch, Engi- neered dissipation for quantum information science, Nat. Rev. Phys.4, 660 (2022)

    2022

  10. [10]

    Sza´ nkowski, Introduction to the theory of open quan- tum systems, SciPost Phys

    P. Sza´ nkowski, Introduction to the theory of open quan- tum systems, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes68, 1 (2023)

    2023

  11. [11]

    Dutta, An introduction to Markovian open quantum systems, arXiv:2510.26530

    S. Dutta, An introduction to Markovian open quantum systems, arXiv:2510.26530

    work page arXiv

  12. [12]

    A. J. Daley, Quantum trajectories and open many-body quantum systems, Adv. Phys.63, 77 (2014)

    2014

  13. [13]

    L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, Keldysh field theory for driven open quantum systems, Rep. Prog. Phys.79, 096001 (2016)

    2016

  14. [14]

    Weimer, A

    H. Weimer, A. Kshetrimayum, and R. Or´ us, Simulation methods for open quantum many-body systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 015008 (2021)

    2021

  15. [15]

    Fazio, J

    R. Fazio, J. Keeling, L. Mazza, and M. Schir` o, Many- body open quantum systems, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 99 (2025)

    2025

  16. [16]

    Carusotto, How to exploit driving and dissipation to stabilize and manipulate quantum many-body states, C

    I. Carusotto, How to exploit driving and dissipation to stabilize and manipulate quantum many-body states, C. R. Phys.26, 533 (2025)

    2025

  17. [17]

    Is Lindblad for me?

    M. Stefanini, A. A. Ziolkowska, D. Budker, U. Poschinger, F. Schmidt-Kaler, A. Browaeys, A. Imamoglu, D. Chang, and J. Marino, Is Lind- blad for me?, arXiv:2506.22436. 6

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    de Vega and D

    I. de Vega and D. Alonso, Dynamics of non-Markovian open quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 015001 (2017)

    2017

  19. [19]

    Demtr¨ oder,Laser Spectroscopy 1: Basic Principles (Springer, Berlin, 2014) Chap

    W. Demtr¨ oder,Laser Spectroscopy 1: Basic Principles (Springer, Berlin, 2014) Chap. 3

    2014

  20. [20]

    Gorini, A

    V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Completely positive dynamical semigroups ofN-level systems, J. Math. Phys.17, 821 (1976)

    1976

  21. [21]

    Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commun

    G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commun. Math. Phys.48, 119 (1976)

    1976

  22. [22]

    H. J. Carmichael,An Open Systems Approach to Quan- tum Optics(Springer, Berlin, 1993)

    1993

  23. [23]

    H. J. Carmichael,Statistical Methods in Quantum Op- tics 1: Master Equations and Fokker-Planck Equations (Springer, Berlin, 1999)

    1999

  24. [24]

    Gardiner and P

    C. Gardiner and P. Zoller,Quantum Noise: A Handbook of Markovian and Non-Markovian Quantum Stochastic Methods with Applications to Quantum Optics(Springer, Berlin, 2000)

    2000

  25. [25]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002)

    2002

  26. [26]

    H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn,Quantum Measure- ment and Control(Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 2009)

    2009

  27. [27]

    Prosen and T

    T. Prosen and T. H. Seligman, Quantization over boson operator spaces, J. Phys. A43, 392004 (2010)

    2010

  28. [28]

    Richter, M

    J. Richter, M. Haque, and L. S´ a, Localization and delo- calization of quantum trajectories in the Liouvillian spec- trum, arXiv:2511.19700

    work page arXiv

  29. [29]

    Watrous,The Theory of Quantum Information(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2018)

    J. Watrous,The Theory of Quantum Information(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2018)

    2018

  30. [30]

    Kirton, M

    P. Kirton, M. M. Roses, J. Keeling, and E. G. Dalla Torre, Introduction to the Dicke model: From equi- librium to nonequilibrium, andvice versa, Adv. Quantum Technol.2, 1800043 (2019)

    2019

  31. [31]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 1391 (2014)

    2014

  32. [32]

    J. C. Louw, M. Kastner, and J. N. Kriel, Bosonic repre- sentation of a Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model with Marko- vian dissipation, Phys. Rev. B102, 094430 (2020)

    2020

  33. [33]

    A. K. Forbes, P. D. Blocher, and I. H. Deutsch, Mod- eling local decoherence of a spin ensemble using a gen- eralized Holstein–Primakoff mapping to a bosonic mode, Opt. Quantum2, 310 (2024)

    2024

  34. [34]

    Husimi, Some formal properties of the density matrix, Proc

    K. Husimi, Some formal properties of the density matrix, Proc. Phys.-Math. Soc. Jpn.22, 264 (1940)

    1940

  35. [35]

    P. D. Drummond and D. F. Walls, Quantum theory of optical bistability. I. Nonlinear polarisability model, J. Phys. A13, 725 (1980)

    1980

  36. [36]

    Buˇ ca and T

    B. Buˇ ca and T. Prosen, A note on symmetry reductions of the Lindblad equation: transport in constrained open spin chains, New J. Phys.14, 073007 (2012)

    2012

  37. [37]

    V. V. Albert and L. Jiang, Symmetries and conserved quantities in Lindblad master equations, Phys. Rev. A 89, 022118 (2014)

    2014

  38. [38]

    Baumgartner and H

    B. Baumgartner and H. Narnhofer, Analysis of quantum semigroups with GKS–Lindblad generators: II. General, J. Phys. A41, 395303 (2008)

    2008

  39. [39]

    M. S. Zubairy and J. J. Yeh, Photon statistics in multi- photon absorption and emission processes, Phys. Rev. A 21, 1624 (1980)

    1980

  40. [40]

    Briegel and B.-G

    H.-J. Briegel and B.-G. Englert, Quantum optical master equations: The use of damping bases, Phys. Rev. A47, 3311 (1993)

    1993

  41. [41]

    R. Endo, K. Fujii, and T. Suzuki, General solution of the quantum damped harmonic oscillator, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys.05, 653 (2008)

    2008

  42. [42]

    Honda, H

    D. Honda, H. Nakazato, and M. Yoshida, Spectral resolu- tion of the Liouvillian of the Lindblad master equation for a harmonic oscillator, J. Math. Phys.51, 072107 (2010)

    2010

  43. [43]

    Dutta, S

    S. Dutta, S. Zhang, and M. Haque, Quantum origin of limit cycles, fixed points, and critical slowing down, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 050407 (2025)

    2025

  44. [44]

    Lu, Effects of dissipation on photon statistics and the lifetime of a pure number state, Phys

    N. Lu, Effects of dissipation on photon statistics and the lifetime of a pure number state, Phys. Rev. A40, 1707 (1989)

    1989

  45. [45]

    Brune, J

    M. Brune, J. Bernu, C. Guerlin, S. Del´ eglise, C. Sayrin, S. Gleyzes, S. Kuhr, I. Dotsenko, J. M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Process tomography of field damping and measurement of Fock state lifetimes by quantum nonde- molition photon counting in a cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 240402 (2008)

    2008

  46. [46]

    H. Wang, M. Hofheinz, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bialczak, E. Lucero, M. Neeley, A. D. O’Connell, D. Sank, J. Wen- ner, A. N. Cleland, and J. M. Martinis, Measurement of the decay of Fock states in a superconducting quantum circuit, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 240401 (2008)

    2008

  47. [47]

    Del´ eglise, I

    S. Del´ eglise, I. Dotsenko, C. Sayrin, J. Bernu, M. Brune, J.-M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Reconstruction of non- classical cavity field states with snapshots of their deco- herence, Nature455, 510 (2008)

    2008

  48. [48]

    A. I. Lvovsky and M. G. Raymer, Continuous-variable optical quantum-state tomography, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 299 (2009)

    2009

  49. [49]

    V. V. Dodonov and S. S. Mizrahi, Competition between one- and two-photon absorption processes, J. Phys. A30, 2915 (1997)

    1997

  50. [50]

    K. V. Kheruntsyan, Wigner function for a driven anhar- monic oscillator, J. Opt. B1, 225 (1999)

    1999

  51. [51]

    Bartolo, F

    N. Bartolo, F. Minganti, W. Casteels, and C. Ciuti, Ex- act steady state of a Kerr resonator with one- and two- photon driving and dissipation: Controllable Wigner- function multimodality and dissipative phase transitions, Phys. Rev. A94, 033841 (2016)

    2016

  52. [52]

    Scarlatella, A

    O. Scarlatella, A. A. Clerk, and M. Schiro, Spectral func- tions and negative density of states of a driven-dissipative nonlinear quantum resonator, New J. Phys.21, 043040 (2019)

    2019

  53. [53]

    Roberts and A

    D. Roberts and A. A. Clerk, Driven-dissipative quantum Kerr resonators: New exact solutions, photon blockade and quantum bistability, Phys. Rev. X10, 021022 (2020)

    2020

  54. [54]

    Tokieda, Exact diagonalization of a non- quadratic bosonic Liouvillian with two-body loss, arXiv:2603.27480

    M. Tokieda, Exact diagonalization of a non- quadratic bosonic Liouvillian with two-body loss, arXiv:2603.27480

    work page arXiv

  55. [55]

    P. D. Drummond and Z. Ficek,Quantum Squeezing (Springer, Berlin, 2004)

    2004

  56. [56]

    M. S. Kim, F. A. M. de Oliveira, and P. L. Knight, Prop- erties of squeezed number states and squeezed thermal states, Phys. Rev. A40, 2494 (1989)

    1989

  57. [57]

    Koczor, R

    B. Koczor, R. Zeier, and S. J. Glaser, Continuous phase-space representations for finite-dimensional quan- tum states and their tomography, Phys. Rev. A101, 022318 (2020)

    2020

  58. [58]

    G. S. Agarwal, Relation between atomic coherent-state representation, state multipoles, and generalized phase- space distributions, Phys. Rev. A24, 2889 (1981)

    1981

  59. [59]

    J. P. Dowling, G. S. Agarwal, and W. P. Schleich, Wigner 7 distribution of a general angular-momentum state: Ap- plications to a collection of two-level atoms, Phys. Rev. A49, 4101–4109 (1994)

    1994

  60. [60]

    J. C. V´ arilly and J. Gracia-Bond´ ıa, The Moyal represen- tation for spin, Ann. Phys.190, 107 (1989)

    1989

  61. [61]

    Tilma, M

    T. Tilma, M. J. Everitt, J. H. Samson, W. J. Munro, and K. Nemoto, Wigner functions for arbitrary quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 180401 (2016)

    2016

  62. [62]

    Davis, M

    J. Davis, M. Kumari, R. B. Mann, and S. Ghose, Wigner negativity in spin-jsystems, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 033134 (2021)

    2021

  63. [63]

    Wang, Exact dynamical correlations of nonlocal operators in quadratic open fermion systems: a char- acteristic function approach, SciPost Phys

    Q.-W. Wang, Exact dynamical correlations of nonlocal operators in quadratic open fermion systems: a char- acteristic function approach, SciPost Phys. Core5, 027 (2022)

    2022

  64. [64]

    D. A. Trifonov, Pseudo-boson coherent and Fock states, inTrends in Differential Geometry, Complex Analysis and Mathematical Physics(World Scientific, Singapore, 2009)

    2009

  65. [65]

    Bagarello, Pseudobosons, Riesz bases, and coherent states, J

    F. Bagarello, Pseudobosons, Riesz bases, and coherent states, J. Math. Phys.51, 023531 (2010)

    2010

  66. [66]

    Bagarello, A concise review of pseudobosons, pseud- ofermions, and their relatives, Theor

    F. Bagarello, A concise review of pseudobosons, pseud- ofermions, and their relatives, Theor. Math. Phys.193, 1680 (2017)

    2017

  67. [67]

    Bagarello,Pseudo-Bosons and Their Coherent States (Springer, Berlin, 2022)

    F. Bagarello,Pseudo-Bosons and Their Coherent States (Springer, Berlin, 2022)

    2022

  68. [68]

    W. T. Strunz and I. C. Percival, Classical mechanics from quantum state diffusion - a phase-space approach, J. Phys. A31, 1801 (1998)

    1998

  69. [69]

    Dubois, U

    J. Dubois, U. Saalmann, and J. M. Rost, Semi-classical Lindblad master equation for spin dynamics, J. Phys. A 54, 235201 (2021)

    2021

  70. [70]

    Risken,The Fokker-Planck Equation: Methods of So- lution and Applications(Springer, Berlin, 1996)

    H. Risken,The Fokker-Planck Equation: Methods of So- lution and Applications(Springer, Berlin, 1996)

    1996

  71. [71]

    Gaspard, G

    P. Gaspard, G. Nicolis, A. Provata, and S. Tasaki, Spec- tral signature of the pitchfork bifurcation: Liouville equa- tion approach, Phys. Rev. E51, 74 (1995)

    1995

  72. [72]

    M. D. Chekroun, A. Tantet, H. A. Dijkstra, and J. D. Neelin, Ruelle–Pollicott resonances of stochastic systems in reduced state space. Part I: Theory, J. Stat. Phys.179, 1366 (2020)

    2020

  73. [73]

    Eckmann and M

    J.-P. Eckmann and M. Hairer, Spectral properties of hypoelliptic operators, Commun. Math. Phys.235, 233 (2003)

    2003

  74. [74]

    H´ erau, M

    F. H´ erau, M. Hitrik, and J. Sj¨ ostrand, Tunnel effect and symmetries for Kramers–Fokker–Planck type operators, J. Inst. Math. Jussieu10, 567 (2011)

    2011

  75. [75]

    Edmunds and D

    D. Edmunds and D. Evans,Spectral Theory and Differen- tial Operators(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018)

    2018

  76. [76]

    E. B. Davies, Non-self-adjoint differential operators, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc.34, 513 (2002)

    2002

  77. [77]

    Prosen, Third quantization: a general method to solve master equations for quadratic open Fermi systems, New J

    T. Prosen, Third quantization: a general method to solve master equations for quadratic open Fermi systems, New J. Phys.10, 043026 (2008)

    2008

  78. [78]

    Wolinsky and H

    M. Wolinsky and H. J. Carmichael, Quantum noise in the parametric oscillator: From squeezed states to coherent- state superpositions, Phys. Rev. Lett.60, 1836 (1988)

    1988

  79. [79]

    Axler,Linear Algebra Done Right(Springer, Cham,

    S. Axler,Linear Algebra Done Right(Springer, Cham,

  80. [80]

    J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano,Modern Quantum Me- chanics(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2020)

    2020

Showing first 80 references.