REVIEW 3 cited by
Meta-Task Prompting Elicits Embeddings from Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We introduce a new unsupervised text embedding method, Meta-Task Prompting with Explicit One-Word Limitation (MetaEOL), for generating high-quality sentence embeddings from Large Language Models (LLMs) without the need for model fine-tuning. Leveraging meta-task prompting, MetaEOL guides LLMs to produce embeddings through a series of carefully designed prompts that address multiple representational aspects. Our comprehensive experiments demonstrate that embeddings averaged from various meta-tasks are versatile embeddings that yield competitive performance on Semantic Textual Similarity (STS) benchmarks and excel in downstream tasks, surpassing contrastive-trained models. Our findings suggest a new scaling law, offering a versatile and resource-efficient approach for embedding generation across diverse scenarios.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
FreeRet: MLLMs as Training-Free Retrievers
FreeRet enables pretrained MLLMs to act as training-free retrievers via semantically grounded embeddings and reasoning-based reranking, outperforming models trained on millions of pairs on MMEB benchmarks.
-
DeepRTL2: A Versatile Model for RTL-Related Tasks
DeepRTL2 claims state-of-the-art results across RTL generation, understanding, code search, equivalence checking, and performance prediction, but the evidence is weakened by benchmark construction issues and a contrad...
-
Adapting Pretrained Language Models for Citation Classification via Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning
Citss combines sentence-level cropping and keyphrase perturbation with contrastive learning to fine-tune both encoder and decoder language models for citation classification.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.