Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Intermediate redshift calibration of Gamma-ray Bursts and cosmic constraints in non-flat cosmology

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2207.00440 v1 pith:BNTL7K6D submitted 2022-07-01 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.HE

classification astro-ph.COastro-ph.HE
keywords constraintscorrelationscosmiccurvaturedatagamma-rayhubbleintermediate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We propose how to calibrate long gamma-ray burst (GRB) correlations employing intermediate redshift data sets, instead of limiting to $z\simeq0$ catalogs. To do so, we examine the most updated observational Hubble data (OHD) and baryonic acoustic oscillations (BAO). We exploit the model-independent technique of B\'ezier polynomial interpolation, alleviating de facto the well-known circularity problem affecting GRB correlations. To get constraints on cosmic parameters, using Markov chain Monte Carlo Metropolis algorithm, we distinguish the influence on BAO scale, $r_{\rm s}$, Hubble constant $H_0$, luminosity distance $D_{\rm L}(z)$ and spatial curvature $\Omega_k$. Inspired by the fact that a few 0.4$\%$ error on $r_{\rm s}$ is got from Planck results, utterly small compared with current BAO measurement errors, we discern two main cases, namely $(r_{\rm s}/r_{\rm s}^{\rm fid})=1$ and $(r_{\rm s}/r_{\rm s}^{\rm fid})\neq1$. For each occurrence, we first fix and then leave free the Universe's spatial curvature. In all our treatments, we make use of the well-consolidated \textit{Amati} correlation, furnishing tighter constraints on the mass density than previous literature. In particular, our findings turn out to be highly more compatible with those got, adopting the $\Lambda$CDM paradigm, with standard candle indicators. Finally, we critically re-examine the recent $H_0$ tension in view of our outcomes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Do we really need alternatives to the $\omega_0\omega_a$CDM parameterization after the DESI DR2?

    astro-ph.CO 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In a common physically motivated pivot basis, the standard CPL parameterization is mildly preferred over the fafbCDM density expansion and reproduces quintessence backgrounds at least as well.

  2. Investigating the cosmic distance duality relation with gamma-ray bursts

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Combined gamma-ray burst and multi-probe data show no significant violation of the cosmic distance duality relation and prefer a Planck-like Hubble constant.

Pith tools