Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

A Survey of Real-World Recommender Systems: Challenges, Constraints, and Industrial Perspectives

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Industrial recommender systems split into two goal-driven classes—transaction-oriented and content-oriented—and the split exposes constraints that academic offline research mostly ignores.

desk verdict Useful survey of industrial RecSys practice with a plausible transaction/content taxonomy; needs corpus transparency before I'd call it systematic. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.06002 v1 pith:BRX567ZH submitted 2025-09-07 cs.IR

Kuan Zou , Aixin Sun This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.IR
keywords industrialrecommendersystemstransaction-orientedrecommendationcontent-orientedA/Btestingmulti-objectiveoptimizationreal-timecold-startgenerative
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The survey claims that real-world recommender systems are best understood through a dichotomy: transaction-oriented systems (e-commerce, travel, food delivery) that optimize for conversion, revenue, or GMV, and content-oriented systems (video, news, audio) that optimize for engagement, dwell time, and satisfaction. Based on 228 papers from 2020–2024 with industry authorship and online A/B validation, the authors argue that this split reveals challenges academia usually misses: serving latency, system cost, real-time interest shifts, multi-objective trade-offs, and long-term user value. If the classification holds, it gives academic researchers a map of what actually matters in production and points toward under-explored research directions such as user decision-making and theory-guided multi-objective optimization.

What carries the argument

The central object is the dual classification of recommender systems by business objective: Transaction-Oriented RecSys versus Content-Oriented RecSys. This dichotomy, paired with a strict inclusion filter (industry authorship plus online A/B testing), organizes the entire survey and drives the claim that distinct item characteristics produce distinct industrial challenges. The multi-stage production pipeline—recall, coarse ranking, fine ranking, re-ranking—serves as the recurring industrial mechanism that balances effectiveness with latency and cost.

What would settle it

Collect all industry-authored recommender-system papers at the same six venues from 2020 to 2024 that report deployment but no online A/B testing; if a large share of those papers exhibit the same latency, cost, and multi-objective constraints as the A/B-validated set, the survey's selection criterion misses a substantial part of industrial practice.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes a new organizing framework for industrial recommender systems rather than a new algorithm or dataset. It defines Transaction-Oriented RecSys as systems whose primary goal is prompting transactional actions—conversion, revenue, purchase likelihood—and Content-Oriented RecSys as systems whose primary goal is facilitating consumption and engagement, measured by dwell time, clicks, or satisfaction. It then reviews 228 A/B-validated industrial papers from major venues (2020–2024) under this split, showing that the two classes face different data characteristics, real-time requirements, evaluation metrics, and cost constraints. The survey further claims that

Load-bearing premise

The survey counts a paper as industrial only if at least one author is from industry and the method was validated through online A/B testing; if A/B testing is not a necessary condition for capturing production practice, the reviewed corpus and the academic–industrial contrast rest on an incomplete sample.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the dichotomy is accurate, academic results measured only by precision, recall, or NDCG cannot be assumed to transfer to production, because the optimization target differs by system type.
  • Cost and latency become first-class objectives: methods that ignore embedding-layer resource consumption, inference time, or serving budgets will be impractical even if offline metrics improve.
  • Real-time interest modeling—responding to triggers, scrolling, inventory, and price changes within milliseconds—becomes a core research problem rather than an engineering footnote.
  • Multi-objective optimization is the norm in industry; balancing CTR, CVR, GMV, dwell time, and long-term retention requires frameworks beyond single-metric tuning.
  • Generative and foundation-model recommender systems are emerging as a unified paradigm, with evidence that scaling laws hold for recommendation models up to trillion-parameter scale.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The transaction/content split could plausibly extend to other A/B-validated domains not covered by the corpus, such as job marketplaces, point-of-interest services, and live streaming, once enough production studies accumulate.
  • Relaxing the A/B-testing inclusion filter might substantially change the map: companies that cannot run large-scale online experiments still operate production systems, so the survey's industrial picture is biased toward firms with mature experimentation infrastructure.
  • The survey's call for offline–online consistency suggests a concrete test: building shared simulation environments benchmarked against known A/B outcomes could let academic groups validate deployment-relevant claims without industrial infrastructure.
  • User decision-making states—hesitation before clicks, tolerance after consumption—are named as underused signals; modeling them could turn psychological constructs into measurable features for long-term retention optimization.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper surveys industrial recommender systems research published 2020–2024, selecting papers from major conferences with at least one industry author and online A/B validation (272 papers, 228 after excluding advertising). It introduces a taxonomy with two main classes—Transaction-Oriented RecSys (e-commerce, travel, food delivery, insurance) and Content-Oriented RecSys (video, news, audio)—reviews solution themes per class, contrasts academic and industrial evaluation and constraints, and proposes future research directions centered on user decision-making, theory-guided multi-objective optimization, and realistic problem definitions.

Significance. The survey addresses a real gap: much academic RecSys research is evaluated offline, and there is little organized synthesis of industrial practice. Its strengths are a recent, clearly delimited corpus, a simple and teachable taxonomy, and an unusually explicit set of caveats about coverage (POI, games, live streaming, social, jobs are excluded) and about the scarcity of public cost/performance work. If the corpus is representative and the taxonomy is reliably applied, the paper offers a useful map for academics entering industrial research. The main contribution is conceptual and descriptive rather than empirical; its value depends on corpus transparency and on the strength of the selection rules.

major comments (3)
  1. [§1.2] The corpus selection is under-specified, and this is load-bearing for the survey's claims. The paper reports that the filters produced 272 papers, and 228 after excluding advertising, but gives no list of the included papers, no per-domain or per-venue counts, and no PRISMA-style flow diagram. Since every section's synthesis is built on this corpus, readers cannot verify that the taxonomy was applied consistently, or assess sampling bias. Please provide a complete list or searchable appendix of the 228 papers, the number excluded at each step (no industry author, no A/B validation, advertising), and a breakdown across the two proposed classes and the three content subdomains.
  2. [§1.2 and §1.3] The A/B-testing filter biases the corpus toward large platforms and undercuts the unqualified 'real-world' framing. Requiring online A/B validation as 'a necessary component of applied recommender systems' selects for organizations with experimentation infrastructure. The paper itself acknowledges in §1.3 that POI, games, live streaming, social community, and job opportunities are excluded because too few A/B-validated papers exist, and §5.4 notes that much cost/performance work is 'rarely publicly available.' Thus the 228-paper corpus cannot support the abstract's claim that the taxonomy captures 'real-world recommender systems' at large; it describes A/B-validated practice in e-commerce, video, news, and audio at relatively large platforms. Please narrow the generality claims or include and analyze non-A/B industrial papers to test for selection bias.
  3. [§1.3, Definitions 1 and 2] The 'new classification' is not operationalized as claimed. The two definitions are stated solely in terms of the system's primary objective (prompting transactional actions vs. facilitating consumption), but the abstract says the classification is 'grounded in item characteristics and recommendation objectives.' No item-characteristic dimensions are defined, and the later assignment rule—'the sole criterion ... is the business context' in which a method was A/B-tested—does not address hybrids (e.g., video platforms with purchases or subscriptions, e-commerce recommenders optimizing engagement). Without explicit coding rules, or at least a description of how borderline cases were resolved, the dichotomy risks being a post-hoc labeling scheme. Specify the item-characteristic axes, define boundary cases, and state whether the categorization was done independently.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'grounded in item characteristics and recommendation objectives' is stronger than what Definitions 1 and 2 support; align the abstract with the actual operationalization.
  2. [§1.2] The count progression is confusing: 272 papers are mentioned after the A/B filter, then 228 after excluding advertising. Clarify which number corresponds to which filtering stage, and report how many papers were excluded for advertising.
  3. [§1.3/Figure 1] The text says the real-world systems are classified into 'two main categories,' but Figure 1 includes an 'Other Recommendation Systems' box. Acknowledge explicitly that the dichotomy is not exhaustive and describe how the 'other' domains relate to the two classes.
  4. [References] Reference [51] contains duplicated author names (e.g., Gong-Duo Zhang, Lihong Gu, Zhiqiang Zhang appear twice); clean up the reference list. Also, several arXiv preprints from 2025 are cited for a survey covering 2020–2024; please confirm they are part of the corpus or mark them as outlook material.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the survey is a transparent taxonomy and corpus review; self-citations are peripheral and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper is a survey/taxonomy, not a derivation chain with predictions. Definitions 1 and 2 in Section 1.3 are stipulative classifications based on stated objectives (transactional vs. engagement), and the challenge summaries in Sections 3-4 are drawn from the 228-paper corpus selected in Section 1.2, not derived from the definitions by construction. The selection rule (industry author + online A/B testing) is explicitly stated and transparent; the later observation that industry emphasizes A/B evaluation is a corpus-design consequence, but the paper does not present it as a fitted prediction, and it is not hidden. Section 1.3 itself acknowledges the limit that POI/games/live streaming/social/jobs are excluded due to few A/B-validated papers, which is a scope limitation, not circularity. The self-citations ([54], [128], [176], [193]) appear in discussions of offline evaluation and future directions; none is load-bearing for the central taxonomy or the empirical summaries. No equation or claim is shown to reduce to its own input, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey has no free parameters or invented entities. Its central claims rest on two assumptions: that A/B testing defines industrial practice, and that the two-category taxonomy is a useful way to organize the field. The first is a methodological choice; the second is a framing device introduced in this paper.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption A paper counts as industrial recommender-system work only if at least one author is from industry and the method is validated through online A/B testing.
    Section 1.2 filters the corpus to papers with online A/B testing, assuming this captures 'real-world production' systems and excludes papers that are industrial but only offline.
  • ad hoc to paper Transaction-oriented vs. content-oriented classification is a meaningful and comprehensive way to organize industrial recommender systems.
    Definitions 1 and 2 in Section 1.3 are introduced by the authors and used as the organizing structure. The paper itself acknowledges that other domains (POI, games, live streaming, social, jobs) are excluded, so the taxonomy is not exhaustive.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Survey of Real-World Recommender Systems: Challenges, Constraints, and Industrial Perspectives." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BRX567ZH

@misc{pith2026250906002,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Survey of Real-World Recommender Systems: Challenges, Constraints, and Industrial Perspectives},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BRX567ZH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.06002}
}
read the original abstract

Recommender systems have generated tremendous value for both users and businesses, drawing significant attention from academia and industry alike. However, due to practical constraints, academic research remains largely confined to offline dataset optimizations, lacking access to real user data and large-scale recommendation platforms. This limitation reduces practical relevance, slows technological progress, and hampers a full understanding of the key challenges in recommender systems. In this survey, we provide a systematic review of industrial recommender systems and contrast them with their academic counterparts. We highlight key differences in data scale, real-time requirements, and evaluation methodologies, and we summarize major real-world recommendation scenarios along with their associated challenges. We then examine how industry practitioners address these challenges in Transaction-Oriented Recommender Systems and Content-Oriented Recommender Systems, a new classification grounded in item characteristics and recommendation objectives. Finally, we outline promising research directions, including the often-overlooked role of user decision-making, the integration of economic and psychological theories, and concrete suggestions for advancing academic research. Our goal is to enhance academia's understanding of practical recommender systems, bridge the growing development gap, and foster stronger collaboration between industry and academia.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.06002 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of shared challenges/tasks across recommender platforms and the objectives of two main [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. An illustration of the development of recommender systems in light of the increasing growth of both [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Grevo: A Unified Generative Recommendation Framework with Evolutionary Item Indexing

    cs.IR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Grevo lets a generative recommender evolve item identifier codes through budgeted posterior-guided search instead of training a separate tokenizer.

  2. Self-EvolveRec: Self-Evolving Recommender Systems with LLM-based Directional Feedback

    cs.IR 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An LLM-driven recommender evolution loop that combines simulated-user critiques with co-evolving diagnostic probes outperforms scalar-metric-only evolution baselines on standard ranking metrics.

  3. A Position Paper on Recommender Systems in the Era of Autonomous Agents

    cs.IR 2026-07 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

    A position paper proposes that transaction-oriented recommender systems be redesigned around client-side autonomous agents that query, compare, and verify options across platforms.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

200 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Saurabh Agrawal, John Trenkle, and Jaya Kawale. 2023. Beyond labels: Leveraging deep learning and llms for content metadata. InProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 1–1

    2023

  2. [2]

    Zhicheng An, Zhexu Gu, Li Yu, Ke Tu, Zhengwei Wu, Binbin Hu, Zhiqiang Zhang, Lihong Gu, and Jinjie Gu. 2024. DDCDR: A Disentangle-based Distillation Framework for Cross-Domain Recommendation. InProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 4764–4773

    2024

  3. [3]

    Anirudhan Badrinath, Prabhat Agarwal, Laksh Bhasin, Jaewon Yang, Jiajing Xu, and Charles Rosenberg. 2025. PinRec: Outcome-Conditioned, Multi-Token Generative Retrieval for Industry-Scale Recommendation Systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.10507(2025)

    arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Ting Bai, Yudong Xiao, Bin Wu, Guojun Yang, Hongyong Yu, and Jian-Yun Nie. 2022. A contrastive sharing model for multi-task recommendation. InProceedings of the ACM web conference 2022. 3239–3247

    2022

  5. [5]

    Yimeng Bai, Yang Zhang, Fuli Feng, Jing Lu, Xiaoxue Zang, Chenyi Lei, and Yang Song. 2024. GradCraft: Elevating Multi-task Recommendations through Holistic Gradient Crafting. InProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 4774–4783

    2024

  6. [6]

    Paul Baltescu, Haoyu Chen, Nikil Pancha, Andrew Zhai, Jure Leskovec, and Charles Rosenberg. 2022. Itemsage: Learning product embeddings for shopping recommendations at pinterest. InProceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2703–2711

    2022

  7. [7]

    Buket Baran, Guilherme Dinis Junior, Antonina Danylenko, Olayinka S Folorunso, Gösta Forsum, Maksym Lefarov, Lucas Maystre, and Yu Zhao. 2023. Accelerating creator audience building through centralized exploration. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 70–73

    2023

  8. [8]

    Christine Bauer, Eva Zangerle, and Alan Said. 2024. Exploring the Landscape of Recommender Systems Evaluation: Practices and Perspectives.ACM Trans. Recomm. Syst.2, 1, Article 11 (March 2024), 31 pages. doi:10.1145/3629170

    doi:10.1145/3629170 2024

Show all 200 references
  1. [9]

    Walid Bendada, Guillaume Salha-Galvan, Thomas Bouabça, and Tristan Cazenave. 2023. A scalable framework for automatic playlist continuation on music streaming services. InProceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retr...

    2023

  2. [10]

    Ye Bi, Liqiang Song, Mengqiu Yao, Zhenyu Wu, Jianming Wang, and Jing Xiao. 2020. A heterogeneous information network based cross domain insurance recommendation system for cold start users. InProceedings of the 43rd international ACM SIGIR conference on research and developmen...

    2020

  3. [11]

    Léa Briand, Guillaume Salha-Galvan, Walid Bendada, Mathieu Morlon, and Viet-Anh Tran. 2021. A semi-personalized system for user cold start recommendation on music streaming apps. InProceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery & data mining. 2601–2609

    2021

  4. [12]

    Guohao Cai, Jieming Zhu, Quanyu Dai, Zhenhua Dong, Xiuqiang He, Ruiming Tang, and Rui Zhang. 2022. Reloop: A self-correction continual learning loop for recommender systems. InProceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information...

    2022

  5. [13]

    Tianchi Cai, Shenliao Bao, Jiyan Jiang, Shiji Zhou, Wenpeng Zhang, Lihong Gu, Jinjie Gu, and Guannan Zhang. 2023. Model-free Reinforcement Learning with Stochastic Reward Stabilization for Recommender Systems. InProceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Res...

    2023

  6. [14]

    Marjan Celikik, Ana Peleteiro Ramallo, and Jacek Wasilewski. 2022. Reusable Self-Attention Recommender Systems in Fashion Industry Applications. InProceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 448–451

    2022

  7. [15]

    Zheng Chai, Zhihong Chen, Chenliang Li, Rong Xiao, Houyi Li, Jiawei Wu, Jingxu Chen, and Haihong Tang. 2022. User-aware multi-interest learning for candidate matching in recommenders. InProceedings of the 45th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in i...

    2022

  8. [16]

    Gaode Chen, Yuezihan Jiang, Rui Huang, Kuo Cai, Yunze Luo, Ruina Sun, Qi Zhang, Han Li, and Kun Gai. 2024. Missing Interest Modeling with Lifelong User Behavior Data for Retrieval Recommendation. InProceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowled...

    2024

  9. [17]

    Gaode Chen, Ruina Sun, Yuezihan Jiang, Jiangxia Cao, Qi Zhang, Jingjian Lin, Han Li, Kun Gai, and Xinghua Zhang

  10. [18]

    Hao Chen, Yuanchen Bei, Qijie Shen, Yue Xu, Sheng Zhou, Wenbing Huang, Feiran Huang, Senzhang Wang, and Xiao Huang. 2024. Macro graph neural networks for online billion-scale recommender systems. InProceedings of the ACM web conference 2024. 3598–3608. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article...

    2024

  11. [19]

    Suming J Chen, Zhen Qin, Zac Wilson, Brian Calaci, Michael Rose, Ryan Evans, Sean Abraham, Donald Metzler, Sandeep Tata, and Michael Colagrosso. 2020. Improving recommendation quality in google drive. InProceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge d...

    2020

  12. [21]

    Yankai Chen, Quoc-Tuan Truong, Xin Shen, Jin Li, and Irwin King. 2024. Shopping trajectory representation learning with pre-training for e-commerce customer understanding and recommendation. InProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining...

    2024

  13. [22]

    Yan Chen, Emilian Vankov, Linas Baltrunas, Preston Donovan, Akash Mehta, Benjamin Schroeder, and Matthew Herman. 2023. Contextual multi-armed bandit for email layout recommendation. InProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 400–402

    2023

  14. [23]

    Yudong Chen, Xin Wang, Miao Fan, Jizhou Huang, Shengwen Yang, and Wenwu Zhu. 2021. Curriculum meta-learning for next POI recommendation. InProceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 2692–2702

    2021

  15. [24]

    Zhihong Chen, Jiawei Wu, Chenliang Li, Jingxu Chen, Rong Xiao, and Binqiang Zhao. 2022. Co-training disentangled domain adaptation network for leveraging popularity bias in recommenders. InProceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR conference on research and development i...

    2022

  16. [26]

    Jiaxin Deng, Shiyao Wang, Kuo Cai, Lejian Ren, Qigen Hu, Weifeng Ding, Qiang Luo, and Guorui Zhou. 2025. Onerec: Unifying retrieve and rank with generative recommender and iterative preference alignment.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.18965(2025)

    2025 arXiv

  17. [27]

    Jiaxin Deng, Shiyao Wang, Yuchen Wang, Jiansong Qi, Liqin Zhao, Guorui Zhou, and Gaofeng Meng. 2024. MMBee: Live Streaming Gift-Sending Recommendations via Multi-Modal Fusion and Behaviour Expansion. InProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Da...

    2024

  18. [28]

    Bora Edizel, Tim Sweetser, Ashok Chandrashekar, Kamilia Ahmadi, and Puja Das. 2024. Towards understanding the gaps of offline and online evaluation metrics: Impact of series vs. movie recommendations. InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 844–846

    2024

  19. [29]

    Yu-Chen Fan, Yitong Ji, Jie Zhang, and Aixin Sun. 2024. Our Model Achieves Excellent Performance on MovieLens: What Does It Mean?ACM Trans. Inf. Syst.42, 6, Article 159 (Oct. 2024), 25 pages. doi:10.1145/3675163

    2024 doi

  20. [30]

    Junpeng Fang, Qing Cui, Gongduo Zhang, Caizhi Tang, Lihong Gu, Longfei Li, Jinjie Gu, Jun Zhou, and Fei Wu

  21. [31]

    Vivek Farias, Hao Li, Tianyi Peng, Xinyuyang Ren, Huawei Zhang, and Andrew Zheng. 2023. Correcting for interference in experiments: A case study at douyin. InProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 455–466

    2023

  22. [32]

    Philip J Feng, Pingjun Pan, Tingting Zhou, Hongxiang Chen, and Chuanjiang Luo. 2021. Zero shot on the cold-start problem: Model-agnostic interest learning for recommender systems. InProceedings of the 30th ACM international conference on information & knowledge management. 474–483

    2021

  23. [33]

    Yufei Feng, Binbin Hu, Fuyu Lv, Qingwen Liu, Zhiqiang Zhang, and Wenwu Ou. 2020. Atbrg: Adaptive target-behavior relational graph network for effective recommendation. InProceedings of the 43rd international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retri...

    2020

  24. [34]

    Hamed Firooz, Maziar Sanjabi, Adrian Englhardt, Aman Gupta, Ben Levine, Dre Olgiati, Gungor Polatkan, Iuliia Melnychuk, Karthik Ramgopal, Kirill Talanine, et al. 2025. 360brew: A decoder-only foundation model for personalized ranking and recommendation.arXiv preprint arXiv:250...

    2025

  25. [35]

    Weihao Gao, Xiangjun Fan, Chong Wang, Jiankai Sun, Kai Jia, Wenzi Xiao, Ruofan Ding, Xingyan Bin, Hui Yang, and Xiaobing Liu. 2021. Learning an end-to-end structure for retrieval in large-scale recommendations. InProceedings of the 30th ACM international conference on informat...

    2021

  26. [36]

    Xudong Gong, Qinlin Feng, Yuan Zhang, Jiangling Qin, Weijie Ding, Biao Li, Peng Jiang, and Kun Gai. 2022. Real-time short video recommendation on mobile devices. InProceedings of the 31st ACM international conference on information & knowledge management. 3103–3112

    2022

  27. [37]

    Yuqi Gong, Xichen Ding, Yehui Su, Kaiming Shen, Zhongyi Liu, and Guannan Zhang. 2023. An unified search and recommendation foundation model for cold-start scenario. InProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: September 20...

    2023

  28. [38]

    Yanjie Gou, Yuanzhou Yao, Zhao Zhang, Yiqing Wu, Yi Hu, Fuzhen Zhuang, Jiangming Liu, and Yongjun Xu. 2024. Controllable multi-behavior recommendation for in-game skins with large sequential model. InProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data...

    2024

  29. [39]

    Andreas Grün and Xenija Neufeld. 2023. Transparently serving the public: Enhancing public service media values through exploration. InProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 1045–1048

    2023

  30. [40]

    Viet Ha-Thuc, Matthew Wood, Yunli Liu, and Jagadeesan Sundaresan. 2021. From producer success to retention: A new role of search and recommendation systems on marketplaces. InProceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information ...

    2021

  31. [41]

    Ruidong Han, Qianzhong Li, He Jiang, Rui Li, Yurou Zhao, Xiang Li, and Wei Lin. 2024. Enhancing CTR Prediction through Sequential Recommendation Pre-training: Introducing the SRP4CTR framework. InProceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge...

    2024

  32. [42]

    Ruidong Han, Bin Yin, Shangyu Chen, He Jiang, Fei Jiang, Xiang Li, Chi Ma, Mincong Huang, Xiaoguang Li, Chunzhen Jing, et al. 2025. MTGR: Industrial-Scale Generative Recommendation Framework in Meituan.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.18654(2025)

    2025 arXiv

  33. [43]

    Xu He, Bo An, Yanghua Li, Haikai Chen, Qingyu Guo, Xin Li, and Zhirong Wang. 2020. Contextual user browsing bandits for large-scale online mobile recommendation. InProceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 63–72

    2020

  34. [44]

    More to Read

    Franklin Horn, Aurelia Alston, and Won J You. 2024. " More to Read" at the Los Angeles Times: Solving a Cold Start Problem with LLMs to Improve Story Discovery. InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 742–744

    2024

  35. [45]

    Xiao Hu, Yuan Cheng, Zhi Zheng, Yue Wang, Xinxin Chi, and Hengshu Zhu. 2023. BOSS: A bilateral occupational- suitability-aware recommender system for online recruitment. InProceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 4146–4155

    2023

  36. [46]

    Zepeng Huai, Yuji Yang, Mengdi Zhang, Zhongyi Zhang, Yichun Li, and Wei Wu. 2023. M2GNN: Metapath and multi-interest aggregated graph neural network for tag-based cross-domain recommendation. InProceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Developm...

    2023

  37. [47]

    Zhaoxin Huan, Gongduo Zhang, Xiaolu Zhang, Jun Zhou, Qintong Wu, Lihong Gu, Jinjie Gu, Yong He, Yue Zhu, and Linjian Mo. 2022. An industrial framework for cold-start recommendation in zero-shot scenarios. InProceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research...

    2022

  38. [49]

    Yanhua Huang, Yuqi Chen, Xiong Cao, Rui Yang, Mingliang Qi, Yinghao Zhu, Qingchang Han, Yaowei Liu, Zhaoyu Liu, Xuefeng Yao, et al. 2025. Towards Large-scale Generative Ranking.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.04180(2025)

    2025 arXiv

  39. [50]

    Yanhua Huang, Weikun Wang, Lei Zhang, and Ruiwen Xu. 2021. Sliding spectrum decomposition for diversified recommendation. InProceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery & data mining. 3041–3049

    2021

  40. [52]

    Olivier Jeunen, Jatin Mandav, Ivan Potapov, Nakul Agarwal, Sourabh Vaid, Wenzhe Shi, and Aleksei Ustimenko

  41. [53]

    Luo Ji, Qi Qin, Bingqing Han, and Hongxia Yang. 2021. Reinforcement Learning to Optimize Lifetime Value in Cold-Start Recommendation. InProceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management(Virtual Event, Queensland, Australia)(CIKM ’21). A...

    2021

  42. [54]

    Yitong Ji, Aixin Sun, Jie Zhang, and Chenliang Li. 2023. A Critical Study on Data Leakage in Recommender System Offline Evaluation.ACM Trans. Inf. Syst.41, 3 (2023), 75:1–75:27. doi:10.1145/3569930

    2023 doi

  43. [55]

    InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems

    Multi-objective recommendation via multivariate policy learning. InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 712–721

  44. [56]

    Wensen Jiang, Yizhu Jiao, Qingqin Wang, Chuanming Liang, Lijie Guo, Yao Zhang, Zhijun Sun, Yun Xiong, and Yangyong Zhu. 2022. Triangle graph interest network for click-through rate prediction. InProceedings of the fifteenth ACM international conference on web search and data m...

    2022

  45. [57]

    Yuezihan Jiang, Gaode Chen, Wenhan Zhang, Jingchi Wang, Yinjie Jiang, Qi Zhang, Jingjian Lin, Peng Jiang, and Kaigui Bian. 2024. Prompt Tuning for Item Cold-start Recommendation. InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 411–421

    2024

  46. [58]

    Daohong Jian, Yang Bao, Jun Zhou, and Hua Wu. 2023. A Practical Online Allocation Framework at Industry-scale in Constrained Recommendation. InProceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 3270–3274. , Vol. 1, ...

    2023

  47. [59]

    Manas R Joglekar, Cong Li, Mei Chen, Taibai Xu, Xiaoming Wang, Jay K Adams, Pranav Khaitan, Jiahui Liu, and Quoc V Le. 2020. Neural input search for large scale recommendation models. InProceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data M...

    2020

  48. [60]

    Akshay Kekuda, Yuyang Zhang, and Arun Udayashankar. 2024. Embedding based retrieval for long tail search queries in ecommerce. InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 771–774

    2024

  49. [61]

    Yuezihan Jiang, Changyu Li, Gaode Chen, Peiyi Li, Qi Zhang, Jingjian Lin, Peng Jiang, Fei Sun, and Wentao Zhang. 2024. MMGCL: Meta Knowledge-Enhanced Multi-view Graph Contrastive Learning for Recommendations. InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 538–548

    2024

  50. [62]

    Anastasiia Klimashevskaia, Mehdi Elahi, Dietmar Jannach, Lars Skjærven, Astrid Tessem, and Christoph Trattner

  51. [63]

    Venkata Harshit Koneru, Xenija Neufeld, Sebastian Loth, and Andreas Grün. 2024. Enhancing Recommendation Quality of the SASRec Model by Mitigating Popularity Bias. InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 781–783

    2024

  52. [64]

    Kirill Khrylchenko, Artem Matveev, Sergei Makeev, and Vladimir Baikalov. 2025. Scaling Recommender Transformers to One Billion Parameters.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.15994(2025)

    2025

  53. [65]

    Johannes Kruse, Kasper Lindskow, Michael Riis Andersen, and Jes Frellsen. 2023. Creating the next generation of news experience on ekstrabladet. dk with recommender systems. InProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 1067–1070

    2023

  54. [66]

    InProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems

    Evaluating the effects of calibrated popularity bias mitigation: a field study. InProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 1084–1089

  55. [67]

    Yu-Ting Lan, Yang Huo, Yi Shen, Xiao Yang, and Zuotao Liu. 2025. Next-User Retrieval: Enhancing Cold-Start Recommendations via Generative Next-User Modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.15267(2025)

    2025 arXiv

  56. [68]

    Pigi Kouki, Ilias Fountalis, Nikolaos Vasiloglou, Xiquan Cui, Edo Liberty, and Khalifeh Al Jadda. 2020. From the lab to production: A case study of session-based recommendations in the home-improvement domain. InProceedings of the 14th ACM conference on recommender systems. 140–149

    2020

  57. [69]

    Ran Le, Guo-qing Jiang, Xiufeng Shu, Ruidong Han, Qianzhong Li, Yacheng Li, Xiang Li, and Wei Lin. 2023. CEC: Towards Learning Global Optimized Recommendation through Causality Enhanced Conversion Model. InProceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research ...

    2023

  58. [70]

    Pau Perng-Hwa Kung, Zihao Fan, Tong Zhao, Yozen Liu, Zhixin Lai, Jiahui Shi, Yan Wu, Jun Yu, Neil Shah, and Ganesh Venkataraman. 2024. Improving embedding-based retrieval in friend recommendation with ann query expansion. In Proceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conf...

    2024

  59. [71]

    Fan Li, Xu Si, Shisong Tang, Dingmin Wang, Kunyan Han, Bing Han, Guorui Zhou, Yang Song, and Hechang Chen

  60. [72]

    Lang Lang, Zhenlong Zhu, Xuanye Liu, Jianxin Zhao, Jixing Xu, and Minghui Shan. 2021. Architecture and operation adaptive network for online recommendations. InProceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery & data mining. 3139–3149

    2021

  61. [73]

    Jiang Li, Zhen Zhang, Xiang Feng, Muyang Li, Yongqi Liu, and Lantao Hu. 2024. MODEM: Decoupling User Behavior for Shared-Account Video Recommendations on Large Screen Devices. InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 907–911

    2024

  62. [74]

    Chenyi Lei, Yong Liu, Lingzi Zhang, Guoxin Wang, Haihong Tang, Houqiang Li, and Chunyan Miao. 2021. Semi: A sequential multi-modal information transfer network for e-commerce micro-video recommendations. InProceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & ...

    2021

  63. [75]

    Pan Li, Maofei Que, Zhichao Jiang, Yao Hu, and Alexander Tuzhilin. 2020. PURS: personalized unexpected recom- mender system for improving user satisfaction. InProceedings of the 14th ACM conference on recommender systems. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: September ...

    2020

  64. [76]

    InProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining

    Contextual distillation model for diversified recommendation. InProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 5307–5316

  65. [77]

    Houyi Li, Zhihong Chen, Chenliang Li, Rong Xiao, Hongbo Deng, Peng Zhang, Yongchao Liu, and Haihong Tang

  66. [78]

    Yang Li, Kangbo Liu, Ranjan Satapathy, Suhang Wang, and Erik Cambria. 2024. Recent developments in recommender systems: A survey.IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine19, 2 (2024), 78–95

    2024

  67. [79]

    Yujun Li, Xing Tang, Bo Chen, Yimin Huang, Ruiming Tang, and Zhenguo Li. 2023. AutoOpt: automatic hyperparameter scheduling and optimization for deep click-through rate prediction. InProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 183–194

    2023

  68. [80]

    Nian Li, Xin Ban, Cheng Ling, Chen Gao, Lantao Hu, Peng Jiang, Kun Gai, Yong Li, and Qingmin Liao. 2024. Modeling user fatigue for sequential recommendation. InProceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 996–1005

    2024

  69. [81]

    Jan Malte Lichtenberg, Giuseppe Di Benedetto, and Matteo Ruffini. 2024. Ranking across different content types: The robust beauty of multinomial blending. InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 823–825

    2024

  70. [82]

    Wanda Li, Wenhao Zheng, Xuanji Xiao, and Suhang Wang. 2023. Stan: stage-adaptive network for multi-task recommendation by learning user lifecycle-based representation. InProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 602–612

    2023

  71. [83]

    Wenhao Li, Jie Zhou, Chuan Luo, Chao Tang, Kun Zhang, and Shixiong Zhao. 2024. Scene-wise Adaptive Network for Dynamic Cold-start Scenes Optimization in CTR Prediction. InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 370–379

    2024

  72. [84]

    Xiao Lin, Xiaokai Chen, Linfeng Song, Jingwei Liu, Biao Li, and Peng Jiang. 2023. Tree based progressive regression model for watch-time prediction in short-video recommendation. InProceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 4497–4506

    2023

  73. [85]

    Zihan Lin, Hui Wang, Jingshu Mao, Wayne Xin Zhao, Cheng Wang, Peng Jiang, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2022. Feature-aware diversified re-ranking with disentangled representations for relevant recommendation. InProceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data ...

    2022

  74. [87]

    Bin Liu, Niannan Xue, Huifeng Guo, Ruiming Tang, Stefanos Zafeiriou, Xiuqiang He, and Zhenguo Li. 2020. AutoGroup: Automatic feature grouping for modelling explicit high-order feature interactions in CTR prediction. InProceedings of the 43rd international ACM SIGIR conference ...

    2020

  75. [88]

    Hongtao Lin, Haoyu Chen, Jaewon Yang, and Jiajing Xu. 2024. Bootstrapping Conditional Retrieval for User-to-Item Recommendations. InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 755–757

    2024

  76. [89]

    Shaochuan Lin, Jiayan Pei, Taotao Zhou, Hengxu He, Jia Jia, and Ning Hu. 2023. Exploring the spatiotemporal features of online food recommendation service. InProceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 3354–3358

    2023

  77. [90]

    Qingyun Liu, Zhe Zhao, Liang Liu, Zhen Zhang, Junjie Shan, Yuening Li, Shuchao Bi, Lichan Hong, and Ed H Chi. 2023. Multitask Ranking System for Immersive Feed and No More Clicks: A Case Study of Short-Form Video Recommendation. InProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conf...

    2023

  78. [91]

    Shaohua Liu, Yu Qi, Gen Li, Mingjian Chen, Teng Zhang, Jia Cheng, and Jun Lei. 2023. STGIN: Spatial-Temporal Graph Interaction Network for Large-scale POI Recommendation. InProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management(Birmingham,...

    2023

  79. [92]

    Henrik Lindstrom, Humberto Jesus Corona Pampin, Enrico Palumbo, and Alva Liu. 2024. Encouraging Exploration in Spotify Search through Query Recommendations. InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 775–777

    2024

  80. [93]

    Chengqiang Lu, Mingyang Yin, Shuheng Shen, Luo Ji, Qi Liu, and Hongxia Yang. 2022. Deep unified representation for heterogeneous recommendation. InProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022. 2141–2152

    2022

  81. [94]

    Jinhan Liu, Qiyu Chen, Junjie Xu, Junjie Li, Baoli Li, and Sulong Xu. 2024. A Unified Search and Recommendation Framework Based on Multi-Scenario Learning for Ranking in E-commerce. InProceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Inf...

    2024

  82. [95]

    Junning Liu, Xinjian Li, Bo An, Zijie Xia, and Xu Wang. 2022. Multi-faceted hierarchical multi-task learning for recommender systems. InProceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 3332–3341

    2022

  83. [96]

    Jianxing Ma, Zhibo Xiao, Luwei Yang, Hansheng Xue, Xuanzhou Liu, Wen Jiang, Wei Ning, and Guannan Zhang

  84. [97]

    Siyong Ma, Puja Das, Sofia Maria Nikolakaki, Qifeng Chen, and Humeyra Topcu Altintas. 2022. Two-layer bandit optimization for recommendations. InProceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 509–511

    2022

  85. [98]

    Zhiqiang Liu, Xiaoxiao Xu, Jiaqi Yu, Han Xu, Lantao Hu, Han Li, and Kun Gai. 2024. A Self-Adaptive Fairness Constraint Framework for Industrial Recommender System. InProceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 4726–4733

    2024

  86. [99]

    M Jeffrey Mei, Cole Zuber, and Yasaman Khazaeni. 2022. A lightweight transformer for next-item product recommen- dation. InProceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 546–549

    2022

  87. [100]

    Jie Lu, Dianshuang Wu, Mingsong Mao, Wei Wang, and Guangquan Zhang. 2015. Recommender system application developments: a survey.Decision support systems74 (2015), 12–32. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: September 2025. A Survey of Real-World Recommender Systems: Ch...

    2015

  88. [101]

    Yimin Lv, Shuli Wang, Beihong Jin, Yisong Yu, Yapeng Zhang, Jian Dong, Yongkang Wang, Xingxing Wang, and Dong Wang. 2023. Deep situation-aware interaction network for click-through rate prediction. InProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 171–182

    2023

  89. [102]

    Zahra Nazari, Praveen Chandar, Ghazal Fazelnia, Catherine M Edwards, Benjamin Carterette, and Mounia Lalmas

  90. [104]

    Ping Nie, Yujie Lu, Shengyu Zhang, Ming Zhao, Ruobing Xie, William Yang Wang, and Yi Ren. 2022. MIC: model- agnostic integrated cross-channel recommender. InProceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 3400–3409

    2022

  91. [105]

    James McInerney, Brian Brost, Praveen Chandar, Rishabh Mehrotra, and Benjamin Carterette. 2020. Counterfactual evaluation of slate recommendations with sequential reward interactions. InProceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data M...

    2020

  92. [106]

    Yunzhu Pan, Nian Li, Chen Gao, Jianxin Chang, Yanan Niu, Yang Song, Depeng Jin, and Yong Li. 2023. Learning and optimization of implicit negative feedback for industrial short-video recommender system. InProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and K...

    2023

  93. [107]

    Nicholas Meisburger, Vihan Lakshman, Benito Geordie, Joshua Engels, David Torres Ramos, Pratik Pranav, Benjamin Coleman, Benjamin Meisburger, Shubh Gupta, Yashwanth Adunukota, et al . 2023. BOLT: An Automated Deep Learning Framework for Training and Deploying Large-Scale Searc...

    2023

  94. [108]

    Abhirup Mondal, Anirban Majumder, and Vineet Chaoji. 2022. Aspire: Air shipping recommendation for e-commerce products via causal inference framework. InProceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 3584–3592

    2022

  95. [109]

    Ploshkin, V

    A. Ploshkin, V. Tytskiy, A. Pismenny, V. Baikalov, E. Taychinov, A. Permiakov, D. Burlakov, E. Krofto, and N. Savushkin

  96. [110]

    Xufeng Qian, Yue Xu, Fuyu Lv, Shengyu Zhang, Ziwen Jiang, Qingwen Liu, Xiaoyi Zeng, Tat-Seng Chua, and Fei Wu

  97. [111]

    Guangtao Nie, Rong Zhi, Xiaofan Yan, Yufan Du, Xiangyang Zhang, Jianwei Chen, Mi Zhou, Hongshen Chen, Tianhao Li, Ziguang Cheng, et al. 2024. A hybrid multi-agent conversational recommender system with llm and search engine in e-commerce. InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conferen...

    2024

  98. [112]

    Zhen Qin, Honglei Zhuang, Rolf Jagerman, Xinyu Qian, Po Hu, Dan Chary Chen, Xuanhui Wang, Michael Bendersky, and Marc Najork. 2021. Bootstrapping recommendations at chrome web store. InProceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 3483–3491

    2021

  99. [114]

    Kaushik Rangadurai, Yiqun Liu, Siddarth Malreddy, Xiaoyi Liu, Piyush Maheshwari, Vishwanath Sangale, and Fedor Borisyuk. 2022. Nxtpost: User to post recommendations in facebook groups. InProceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 3792–3800

    2022

  100. [115]

    Amit Pande, Kunal Ghosh, and Rankyung Park. 2023. Personalized Category Frequency prediction for Buy It Again recommendations. InProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 730–736

    2023

  101. [116]

    Rankyung Park, Amit Pande, David Relyea, Pushkar Chennu, and Prathyusha Kanmanth Reddy. 2024. SLH-BIA: Short-Long Hawkes Process for Buy It Again Recommendations at Scale. InProceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information R...

    2024

  102. [117]

    Hitesh Sagtani, Madan Gopal Jhawar, Akshat Gupta, and Rishabh Mehrotra. 2023. Quantifying and leveraging user fatigue for interventions in recommender systems. InProceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2293–2297

    2023

  103. [118]

    Yuan Shao, Bibang Liu, Sourabh Bansod, Arnab Bhadury, Mingyan Gao, and Yaping Zhang. 2024. Optimizing for Participation in Recommender System. InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 806–808

    2024

  104. [120]

    InProceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining

    Intelligent request strategy design in recommender system. InProceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 3772–3782

  105. [121]

    Jiarui Qin, Jiachen Zhu, Yankai Liu, Junchao Gao, Jianjie Ying, Chaoxiong Liu, Ding Wang, Junlan Feng, Chao Deng, Xiaozheng Wang, et al. 2023. Learning to distinguish multi-user coupling behaviors for tv recommendation. In Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM international confere...

    2023

  106. [122]

    Shaoyun Shi, Weizhi Ma, Zhen Wang, Min Zhang, Kun Fang, Jingfang Xu, Yiqun Liu, and Shaoping Ma. 2021. Wg4rec: Modeling textual content with word graph for news recommendation. InProceedings of the 30th ACM international conference on information & knowledge management. 1651–1660

    2021

  107. [123]

    Liang Qu, Yonghong Ye, Ningzhi Tang, Lixin Zhang, Yuhui Shi, and Hongzhi Yin. 2022. Single-shot embedding dimension search in recommender system. InProceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR conference on research , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: September 202...

    2022

  108. [124]

    Dirk Sierag and Kevin Zielnicki. 2022. Client Time Series Model: a Multi-Target Recommender System based on Temporally-Masked Encoders. InProceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 512–515

    2022

  109. [125]

    Yuxin Ren, Qiya Yang, Yichun Wu, Wei Xu, Yalong Wang, and Zhiqiang Zhang. 2024. Non-autoregressive generative models for reranking recommendation. InProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 5625–5634

    2024

  110. [126]

    Yankun Ren, Xinxing Yang, Xingyu Lu, Longfei Li, Jun Zhou, Jinjie Gu, and Guannan Zhang. 2023. GreenSeq: automatic design of green networks for sequential recommendation systems. InProceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Inform...

    2023

  111. [127]

    Shuo Su, Xiaoshuang Chen, Yao Wang, Yulin Wu, Ziqiang Zhang, Kaiqiao Zhan, Ben Wang, and Kun Gai. 2024. RPAF: A Reinforcement Prediction-Allocation Framework for Cache Allocation in Large-Scale Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Syste...

    2024

  112. [128]

    Aixin Sun. 2023. Take a Fresh Look at Recommender Systems from an Evaluation Standpoint. InProceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2023, Taipei, Taiwan, July 23-27, 2023, Hsin-Hsi Chen, Wei-Jou (Edw...

    2023

  113. [129]

    Jianing Sun, Yingxue Zhang, Wei Guo, Huifeng Guo, Ruiming Tang, Xiuqiang He, Chen Ma, and Mark Coates. 2020. Neighbor interaction aware graph convolution networks for recommendation. InProceedings of the 43rd international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in in...

    2020

  114. [130]

    Qijie Shen, Hong Wen, Wanjie Tao, Jing Zhang, Fuyu Lv, Zulong Chen, and Zhao Li. 2022. Deep interest highlight network for click-through rate prediction in trigger-induced recommendation. InProceedings of the ACM web conference 2022. 422–430

    2022

  115. [131]

    Jiahui Shi, Vivek Chaurasiya, Yozen Liu, Shubham Vij, Yan Wu, Satya Kanduri, Neil Shah, Peicheng Yu, Nik Srivastava, Lei Shi, et al. 2023. Embedding based retrieval in friend recommendation. InProceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Developme...

    2023

  116. [132]

    Changxin Tian, Binbin Hu, Chunjing Gan, Haoyu Chen, Zhuo Zhang, Li Yu, Ziqi Liu, Zhiqiang Zhang, Jun Zhou, and Jiawei Chen. 2024. ReLand: Integrating Large Language Models’ Insights into Industrial Recommenders via a Controllable Reasoning Pool. InProceedings of the 18th ACM C...

    2024

  117. [133]

    Zihua Si, Lin Guan, ZhongXiang Sun, Xiaoxue Zang, Jing Lu, Yiqun Hui, Xingchao Cao, Zeyu Yang, Yichen Zheng, Dewei Leng, et al. 2024. Twin v2: Scaling ultra-long user behavior sequence modeling for enhanced ctr prediction at kuaishou. InProceedings of the 33rd ACM Internationa...

    2024

  118. [134]

    Ke Tu, Wei Qu, Zhengwei Wu, Zhiqiang Zhang, Zhongyi Liu, Yiming Zhao, Le Wu, Jun Zhou, and Guannan Zhang

  119. [135]

    Xiran Song, Jianxun Lian, Hong Huang, Mingqi Wu, Hai Jin, and Xing Xie. 2022. Friend recommendations with self-rescaling graph neural networks. InProceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. 3909–3919

    2022

  120. [136]

    Martin Spišák, Radek Bartyzal, Antonín Hoskovec, and Ladislav Peška. 2024. On Interpretability of Linear Autoen- coders. InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems(Bari, Italy)(RecSys ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 975–980. d...

    2024

  121. [137]

    Menghan Wang, Yujie Lin, Guli Lin, Keping Yang, and Xiao-ming Wu. 2020. M2GRL: A multi-task multi-view graph representation learning framework for web-scale recommender systems. InProceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining....

    2020

  122. [138]

    Xiaobei Wang, Shuchang Liu, Xueliang Wang, Qingpeng Cai, Lantao Hu, Han Li, Peng Jiang, Kun Gai, and Guangming Xie. 2024. Future impact decomposition in request-level recommendations. InProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 5905–5916

    2024

  123. [139]

    Yuan Wang, Zhiyu Li, Changshuo Zhang, Sirui Chen, Xiao Zhang, Jun Xu, and Quan Lin. 2024. Do Not Wait: Learning Re-Ranking Model Without User Feedback At Serving Time in E-Commerce. InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 896–901

    2024

  124. [140]

    Hongyan Tang, Junning Liu, Ming Zhao, and Xudong Gong. 2020. Progressive layered extraction (ple): A novel multi-task learning (mtl) model for personalized recommendations. InProceedings of the 14th ACM conference on recommender systems. 269–278

    2020

  125. [141]

    Xing Tang, Yang Qiao, Fuyuan Lyu, Dugang Liu, and Xiuqiang He. 2024. Touch the core: Exploring task dependence among hybrid targets for recommendation. InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 329–339. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: Septem...

    2024

  126. [142]

    Zongyi Wang, Yanyan Zou, Anyu Dai, Linfang Hou, Nan Qiao, Luobao Zou, Mian Ma, Zhuoye Ding, and Sulong Xu

  127. [143]

    Ding Tong, Qifeng Qiao, Ting-Po Lee, James McInerney, and Justin Basilico. 2023. Navigating the feedback loop in recommender systems: Insights and strategies from industry practice. InProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 1058–1061

    2023

  128. [144]

    Timo Wilm, Philipp Normann, and Felix Stepprath. 2024. Pareto Front Approximation for Multi-Objective Session- Based Recommender Systems. InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 809–812

    2024

  129. [145]

    In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management

    Disentangled Interest importance aware Knowledge Graph Neural Network for Fund Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2482–2491

  130. [146]

    Zhizhong Wan, Bin Yin, Junjie Xie, Fei Jiang, Xiang Li, and Wei Lin. 2024. LARR: Large Language Model Aided Real-time Scene Recommendation with Semantic Understanding. InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 23–32

    2024

  131. [147]

    Haishuai Wang, Zhao Li, Xuanwu Liu, Donghui Ding, Zehong Hu, Peng Zhang, Chuan Zhou, and Jiajun Bu. 2021. Fulfillment-Time-Aware Personalized Ranking for On-Demand Food Recommendation. InProceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management...

    2021

  132. [148]

    Yi Wu, Daryl Chang, Jennifer She, Zhe Zhao, Li Wei, and Lukasz Heldt. 2024. Learned Ranking Function: From Short-term Behavior Predictions to Long-term User Satisfaction. InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 1004–1009

    2024

  133. [149]

    Yunjia Xi, Weiwen Liu, Jianghao Lin, Xiaoling Cai, Hong Zhu, Jieming Zhu, Bo Chen, Ruiming Tang, Weinan Zhang, and Yong Yu. 2024. Towards open-world recommendation with knowledge augmentation from large language models. InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender S...

    2024

  134. [150]

    Yikun Xian, Tong Zhao, Jin Li, Jim Chan, Andrey Kan, Jun Ma, Xin Luna Dong, Christos Faloutsos, George Karypis, Shan Muthukrishnan, et al. 2021. Ex3: Explainable attribute-aware item-set recommendations. InProceedings of the 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 484–494....

    2021

  135. [151]

    Yuyan Wang, Long Tao, and Xian Xing Zhang. 2022. Recommending for a multi-sided marketplace with heterogeneous contents. InProceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 456–459

    2022

  136. [152]

    Zihong Wang, Yingxia Shao, Jiyuan He, Jinbao Liu, Shitao Xiao, Tao Feng, and Ming Liu. 2023. Diversity-aware deep ranking network for recommendation. InProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2564–2573

    2023

  137. [153]

    Ruobing Xie, Rui Wang, Shaoliang Zhang, Zhihong Yang, Feng Xia, and Leyu Lin. 2021. Real-time relevant rec- ommendation suggestion. InProceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 112–120

    2021

  138. [154]

    InProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems

    An industrial framework for personalized serendipitous recommendation in E-commerce. InProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 1015–1018

  139. [155]

    Timo Wilm, Philipp Normann, Sophie Baumeister, and Paul-Vincent Kobow. 2023. Scaling session-based transformer recommendations using optimized negative sampling and loss functions. InProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 1023–1026

    2023

  140. [156]

    Jixing Xu, Zhenlong Zhu, Jianxin Zhao, Xuanye Liu, Minghui Shan, and Jiecheng Guo. 2020. Gemini: A novel and universal heterogeneous graph information fusing framework for online recommendations. InProceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discov...

    2020

  141. [157]

    Fangzhao Wu, Ying Qiao, Jiun-Hung Chen, Chuhan Wu, Tao Qi, Jianxun Lian, Danyang Liu, Xing Xie, Jianfeng Gao, Winnie Wu, and Ming Zhou. 2020. MIND: A Large-scale Dataset for News Recommendation. InProceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Ling...

    2020 doi

  142. [158]

    Liang Wu and Mihajlo Grbovic. 2020. How Airbnb tells you will enjoy sunset sailing in Barcelona? Recommendation in a two-sided travel marketplace. InProceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2387–2396

    2020

  143. [159]

    Ning Wu, Ming Gong, Linjun Shou, Jian Pei, and Daxin Jiang. 2023. Ruel: Retrieval-augmented user representation with edge browser logs for sequential recommendation. InProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 4871–4878

    2023

  144. [160]

    Zhe Xu, Chang Men, Peng Li, Bicheng Jin, Ge Li, Yue Yang, Chunyang Liu, Ben Wang, and Xiaohu Qie. 2020. When recommender systems meet fleet management: Practical study in online driver repositioning system. InProceedings of the web conference 2020. 2220–2229

    2020

  145. [161]

    Shuai Yang, Lixin Zhang, Feng Xia, and Leyu Lin. 2023. Graph exploration matters: improving both individual-level and system-level diversity in wechat feed recommendation. InProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 4901–4908

    2023

  146. [162]

    Yunfei Yang, Zhenghao Qi, Honghuan Wu, Qi Song, Tieyao Zhang, Hao Li, Yimin Tu, Kaiqiao Zhan, and Ben Wang

  147. [163]

    Shitao Xiao, Zheng Liu, Yingxia Shao, Tao Di, Bhuvan Middha, Fangzhao Wu, and Xing Xie. 2022. Training large-scale news recommenders with pretrained language models in the loop. InProceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 4215–4225

    2022

  148. [164]

    Zhibo Xiao, Luwei Yang, Tao Zhang, Wen Jiang, Wei Ning, and Yujiu Yang. 2024. Deep evolutional instant interest network for ctr prediction in trigger-induced recommendation. InProceedings of the 17th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 846–854

    2024

  149. [165]

    Wenting Ye, Hongfei Yang, Shuai Zhao, Haoyang Fang, Xingjian Shi, and Naveen Neppalli. 2023. A Transformer-Based Substitute Recommendation Model Incorporating Weakly Supervised Customer Behavior Data. InProceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and...

    2023

  150. [166]

    Xu Xie, Zhaoyang Liu, Shiwen Wu, Fei Sun, Cihang Liu, Jiawei Chen, Jinyang Gao, Bin Cui, and Bolin Ding

  151. [167]

    InProceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management

    CausCF: Causal collaborative filtering for recommendation effect estimation. InProceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 4253–4263

  152. [168]

    Chen Xu, Quan Li, Junfeng Ge, Jinyang Gao, Xiaoyong Yang, Changhua Pei, Fei Sun, Jian Wu, Hanxiao Sun, and Wenwu Ou. 2020. Privileged features distillation at taobao recommendations. InProceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mi...

    2020

  153. [169]

    Jiaqi Zhai, Lucy Liao, Xing Liu, Yueming Wang, Rui Li, Xuan Cao, Leon Gao, Zhaojie Gong, Fangda Gu, Michael He, et al

  154. [171]

    Ruiyang Xu, Jalaj Bhandari, Dmytro Korenkevych, Fan Liu, Yuchen He, Alex Nikulkov, and Zheqing Zhu. 2023. Optimizing long-term value for auction-based recommender systems via on-policy reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 955–962

    2023

  155. [172]

    Wujiang Xu, Qitian Wu, Runzhong Wang, Mingming Ha, Qiongxu Ma, Linxun Chen, Bing Han, and Junchi Yan. 2024. Rethinking cross-domain sequential recommendation under open-world assumptions. InProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024. 3173–3184

    2024

  156. [173]

    Feng Zhang, Yulin Xu, Hongjie Chen, Xu Yuan, QingWen Liu, and YuNing Jiang. 2024. Effective Utilization of Large-scale Unobserved Data in Recommendation Systems. InProceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management(Boise, ID, USA)(CIKM...

    2024

  157. [174]

    Qihua Zhang, Junning Liu, Yuzhuo Dai, Yiyan Qi, Yifan Yuan, Kunlun Zheng, Fan Huang, and Xianfeng Tan. 2022. Multi-task fusion via reinforcement learning for long-term user satisfaction in recommender systems. InProceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discov...

    2022

  158. [175]

    Qiang Zhang, Zhipeng Teng, Disheng Wu, and Jiayin Wang. 2024. An enhanced batch query architecture in real-time recommendation. InProceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 5078–5085

    2024

  159. [176]

    InProceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management

    Enhancing Playback Performance in Video Recommender Systems with an On-Device Gating and Ranking Framework. InProceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 5031–5037

  160. [177]

    Zhiming Yang, Haining Gao, Dehong Gao, Luwei Yang, Libin Yang, Xiaoyan Cai, Wei Ning, and Guannan Zhang

  161. [178]

    InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems

    Mlora: Multi-domain low-rank adaptive network for ctr prediction. InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 287–297

  162. [179]

    Fan Yao, Yiming Liao, Mingzhe Wu, Chuanhao Li, Yan Zhu, James Yang, Jingzhou Liu, Qifan Wang, Haifeng Xu, and Hongning Wang. 2024. User welfare optimization in recommender systems with competing content creators. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Di...

    2024

  163. [180]

    Yin Zhang, Ruoxi Wang, Xiang Li, Tiansheng Yao, Andrew Evdokimov, Jonathan Valverde, Yuan Gao, Jerry Zhang, Evan Ettinger, Ed H Chi, et al . 2024. Self-Auxiliary Distillation for Sample Efficient Learning in Google-Scale Recommenders. InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference o...

    2024

  164. [181]

    Xinyang Yi, Shao-Chuan Wang, Ruining He, Hariharan Chandrasekaran, Charles Wu, Lukasz Heldt, Lichan Hong, Minmin Chen, and Ed H Chi. 2023. Online matching: A real-time bandit system for large-scale recommendations. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Syste...

    2023

  165. [182]

    Bin Yin, Junjie Xie, Yu Qin, Zixiang Ding, Zhichao Feng, Xiang Li, and Wei Lin. 2023. Heterogeneous knowledge fusion: A novel approach for personalized recommendation via llm. InProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 599–601

    2023

  166. [183]

    Zhiyu Yuan, Kai Ren, Gang Wang, and Xin Miao. 2023. Hydrus: Improving Personalized Quality of Experience in Short-form Video Services. InProceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 1127–1136. , Vol. 1, No. 1,...

    2023

  167. [184]

    Zhen Zhang, Qingyun Liu, Yuening Li, Sourabh Bansod, Mingyan Gao, Yaping Zhang, Zhe Zhao, Lichan Hong, Ed H Chi, Shuchao Bi, et al . 2024. Co-optimize Content Generation and Consumption in a Large Scale Video Recommendation System. InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on R...

    2024

  168. [185]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.17152(2024)

    Actions speak louder than words: Trillion-parameter sequential transducers for generative recommendations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.17152(2024)

    2024 arXiv

  169. [186]

    Ruohan Zhan, Changhua Pei, Qiang Su, Jianfeng Wen, Xueliang Wang, Guanyu Mu, Dong Zheng, Peng Jiang, and Kun Gai. 2022. Deconfounding duration bias in watch-time prediction for video recommendation. InProceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery and dat...

    2022

  170. [187]

    Beichuan Zhang, Chenggen Sun, Jianchao Tan, Xinjun Cai, Jun Zhao, Mengqi Miao, Kang Yin, Chengru Song, Na Mou, and Yang Song. 2023. Shark: A lightweight model compression approach for large-scale recommender systems. InProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on In...

    2023

  171. [188]

    Cong Zhang, Dongyang Liu, Lin Zuo, Junlan Feng, Chao Deng, Jian Sun, Haitao Zeng, and Yaohong Zhao. 2023. Multi- gate Mixture-of-Contrastive-Experts with Graph-based Gating Mechanism for TV Recommendation. InProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information a...

    2023

  172. [189]

    Zhi Zheng, Xiao Hu, Shanshan Gao, Hengshu Zhu, and Hui Xiong. 2024. Mirror: A multi-view reciprocal recommender system for online recruitment. InProceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 543–552

    2024

  173. [190]

    Fanwei Zhu, Zulong Chen, Fan Zhang, Jiazhen Lou, Hong Wen, Shui Liu, Qi Rao, Tengfei Yuan, Shenghua Ni, Jinxin Hu, Fuzhen Sun, and Quan Lu. 2022. SASNet: Stage-aware Sequential Matching for Online Travel Recommendation. InProceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on...

    2022

  174. [191]

    Wenqiao Zhu, Yesheng Xu, Xin Huang, Qiyang Min, and Xun Zhou. 2022. Spherical Graph Embedding for Item Retrieval in Recommendation System. InProceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 4752–4756

    2022

  175. [192]

    Shuai Zhang, Lina Yao, Aixin Sun, and Yi Tay. 2019. Deep learning based recommender system: A survey and new perspectives.ACM computing surveys (CSUR)52, 1 (2019), 1–38

    2019

  176. [193]

    Wei Zhang, Pengye Zhang, Bo Zhang, Xingxing Wang, and Dong Wang. 2023. A collaborative transfer learning framework for cross-domain recommendation. InProceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 5576–5585

    2023

  177. [194]

    Xingyi Zhang, Shuliang Xu, Wenqing Lin, and Sibo Wang. 2023. Constrained social community recommendation. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. 5586–5596

    2023

  178. [195]

    Yang Zhang, Yimeng Bai, Jianxin Chang, Xiaoxue Zang, Song Lu, Jing Lu, Fuli Feng, Yanan Niu, and Yang Song. 2023. Leveraging watch-time feedback for short-video recommendations: A causal labeling framework. InProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information ...

    2023

  179. [197]

    Yuanliang Zhang, Xiaofeng Wang, Jinxin Hu, Ke Gao, Chenyi Lei, and Fei Fang. 2022. Scenario-adaptive and self- supervised model for multi-scenario personalized recommendation. InProceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 3674–3683

    2022

  180. [198]

    Yuting Zhang, Yiqing Wu, Ruidong Han, Ying Sun, Yongchun Zhu, Xiang Li, Wei Lin, Fuzhen Zhuang, Zhulin An, and Yongjun Xu. 2024. Unified Dual-Intent Translation for Joint Modeling of Search and Recommendation. InProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discov...

    2024

  181. [199]

    Yuting Zhang, Yiqing Wu, Ran Le, Yongchun Zhu, Fuzhen Zhuang, Ruidong Han, Xiang Li, Wei Lin, Zhulin An, and Yongjun Xu. 2023. Modeling dual period-varying preferences for takeaway recommendation. InProceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data ...

    2023

  182. [201]

    Haiyuan Zhao, Lei Zhang, Jun Xu, Guohao Cai, Zhenhua Dong, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2023. Uncovering user interest from biased and noised watch time in video recommendation. InProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 528–539

    2023

  183. [202]

    Pengyu Zhao, Xin Gao, Chunxu Xu, and Liang Chen. 2023. M5: Multi-Modal Multi-Interest Multi-Scenario Matching for Over-the-Top Recommendation. InProceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 5650–5659

    2023

  184. [203]

    Qian Zhao, Hao Qian, Ziqi Liu, Gong-Duo Zhang, and Lihong Gu. 2024. Breaking the barrier: utilizing large language models for industrial recommendation systems through an inferential knowledge graph. InProceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Kno...

    2024

  185. [204]

    Xu Zhao, Yi Ren, Ying Du, Shenzheng Zhang, and Nian Wang. 2022. Improving item cold-start recommendation via model-agnostic conditional variational autoencoder. InProceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2595–2600

    2022

  186. [208]

    Yongchun Zhu, Jingwu Chen, Ling Chen, Yitan Li, Feng Zhang, and Zuotao Liu. 2024. Interest clock: Time perception in real-time streaming recommendation system. InProceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2915–2919

    2024

  187. [209]

    Kuan Zou, Aixin Sun, Xuemeng Jiang, Yitong Ji, Hao Zhang, Jing Wang, and Ruijie Guo. 2024. Hesitation and Tolerance in Recommender Systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.09950(2024). , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: September 2025

    2024

  188. [2021]

    InProceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval

    Path-based deep network for candidate item matching in recommenders. InProceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 1493–1502

  189. [2022]

    InProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022

    Choice of implicit signal matters: Accounting for user aspirations in podcast recommendations. InProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022. 2433–2441

    2022

  190. [2023]

    InProceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval

    Alleviating Matching Bias in Marketing Recommendations. InProceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 3359–3363

  191. [2024]

    InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems

    A Multi-modal Modeling Framework for Cold-start Short-video Recommendation. InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 391–400

  192. [2025]

    arXiv:2505.22238 doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2505.22238

    Yambda-5B - A Large-Scale Multi-modal Dataset for Ranking And Retrieval.CoRRabs/2505.22238 (2025). arXiv:2505.22238 doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2505.22238

    2025 doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.