Fermionic CFTs from topological boundaries in abelian Chern-Simons theories

Kohki Kawabata; Shinichiro Yahagi; Takuya Okuda; Tatsuma Nishioka

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 86 references

Fermionic CFTs from topological boundaries in abelian Chern-Simons theories

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Fermionic CFTs arise from odd Lagrangian subgroups of abelian Chern-Simons theories.

desk verdict The fermionic code CFT construction in Section 4 is genuinely new and checks out; Section 5's classification tables are conditional on an unproven completeness assumption, but the listed examples stand. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.08084 v2 pith:BTZADWHH submitted 2025-02-12 hep-th cond-mat.str-elquant-ph

Kohki Kawabata , Tatsuma Nishioka , Takuya Okuda , Shinichiro Yahagi This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-thcond-mat.str-elquant-ph

keywords fermionicCFTabelianChern-SimonstheorytopologicalboundaryconditionoddLagrangiansubgroupself-duallatticeshadowofacodelevel-oneaffineLiealgebrasymmetry

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that two-dimensional fermionic conformal field theories can be generated from bosonic abelian Chern-Simons theories by choosing a fermionic topological boundary condition. Each such boundary is specified by an odd Lagrangian subgroup $C$ of the discriminant group $\Gamma^*/\Gamma$, and it determines a fermionic CFT $T[C]$ whose Neveu-Schwarz spectrum is the odd self-dual lattice $\Lambda(C) = \{\gamma \in \Gamma^* : \gamma+\Gamma \in C\}$ and whose Ramond spectrum is the shadow $S = \Lambda(C)+s$. The torus partition functions on the four spin structures are given by formula (2.52) in terms of lattice $\theta$ functions. This makes the construction a fermionic generalization of code CFTs, and when the bulk is the root-lattice Chern-Simons theory of a simply laced Lie algebra it produces CFTs with level-one affine symmetry. Classifying the odd Lagrangian subgroups that contain the supercurrent representations yields full supersymmetric CFT completions, tabulated for a class of supersymmetric vertex operator algebras.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is an odd Lagrangian subgroup $C$ of the discriminant group $D = \Gamma^*/\Gamma$, meaning a subgroup equal to its own orthogonal complement under the braiding pairing ($C = C^\perp$) that contains at least one Wilson-line charge of half-integer spin. From $C$ one builds the odd self-dual lattice $\Lambda(C) = \{\gamma \in \Gamma^* : \gamma+\Gamma \in C\}$, whose even sublattice $\Lambda_0$ has index two; the shadow $S = \Lambda(C)+s$ completes the dual $\Lambda_0^* \setminus \Lambda(C)$, and the spin-structure-dependent condensation rule (2.33) turns lattice $\theta$ sums into the four torus partition functions (2.52). This machinery carries the argument because $C$ encodes both the spectrum (NS $= \Lambda(C)$, R $= S$) and the spin-structure phases.

What would settle it

For a fixed bosonic abelian Chern-Simons theory, enumerate all spin-structure-dependent boundary states satisfying the consistency relation (2.49); if any such state has an NS spectrum that is not the odd self-dual lattice $\Lambda(C)$ of an odd Lagrangian subgroup, the classification is incomplete. A concrete place to look is the level-one chiral SU(12) theory, where the paper finds no Lagrangian subgroup and therefore predicts no chiral fermionic completion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the data of a fermionic boundary condition in a bosonic abelian Chern-Simons theory is exactly an odd Lagrangian subgroup $C$ of the discriminant group $D = \Gamma^*/\Gamma$, and that this subgroup alone determines the full fermionic CFT $T[C]$. The NS spectrum is the odd self-dual lattice $\Lambda(C) = \{\gamma \in \Gamma^* : \gamma+\Gamma \in C\}$, while the R spectrum is its shadow $S = \Lambda(C)+s$; the spin-structure dependence is carried by the condensation rule $W_{[\gamma]}(C)|_{\Sigma_{\mathrm{top}}} = \rho(C)^{\gamma\cdot\gamma}$ for $\gamma+\Gamma \in C$, producing the four torus partition functions (2.52). When the Chern-Simons theory is built from the root lattice of a simply laced Lie algebra, $T[C]$ is a fermionic CFT with level-one affine symmetry, and enumerating odd Lagrangian subgroups containing the representations that carry supercurrents classifies the modular covariant supersymmetric completions (tables 4 and 8), with the $\mathrm{eR}$ partition function acting as a Witten index that detects unbroken supersymmetry.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that fermionic topological boundary conditions of the Chern-Simons theory are completely classified by odd Lagrangian subgroups together with the condensation rule (2.33), so no extra boundary degrees of freedom or phases are needed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The torus partition function of any bosonic abelian Chern-Simons theory with an odd Lagrangian boundary is fixed by the lattice $\Lambda(C)$ and its shadow on all four spin structures.
The construction yields fermionic code CFTs from odd self-dual codes over $\mathbb{Z}_{2k}$, with $c=1$ examples reproducing massless Thirring models at specific couplings.
For root-lattice Chern-Simons theories of simply laced Lie algebras, the resulting CFTs have level-one affine symmetry, and the classification tables give the bosonic and fermionic chiral and non-chiral completions for the listed groups.
Enumerating odd Lagrangian subgroups that contain the supercurrent representations classifies full supersymmetric fermionic CFT completions; a nonzero Witten index signals unbroken supersymmetry, while a zero index indicates possible spontaneous breaking.
Different Lagrangian subgroups of the same bulk theory are related by orbifolding or gauging, and in the bosonic case different lifts of the same orbifold action produce discrete torsion phases.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Because the construction packages all modular data into one odd self-dual lattice, it suggests that modular covariant fermionic partition functions with a momentum-lattice interpretation can be classified by enumerating odd Lagrangian subgroups, including cases outside the code constructions.
The same odd Lagrangian subgroup data should extend from the torus to higher-genus surfaces with spin structure, since the boundary state is a topological object; the paper only works out the genus-one case explicitly.
The relation sketched in the discussion between boundary condensation and bulk anyon condensation suggests a dictionary in which a fermionic CFT completion corresponds to gauging a one-form symmetry in the bulk, which could be tested on the tabulated examples.
One could test the completeness of the classification by scanning all Lagrangian subgroups for higher-rank level-one affine algebras and checking whether the resulting partition functions exhaust the modular covariant combinations of affine characters.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things to know. First, Section 4's fermionic generalization of non-chiral Narain code CFTs—odd self-dual codes over Z_{2k}, their shadows, and the partition functions written as weight enumerator polynomials—is the genuinely new core, and it is in good shape. The explicit theta-function expressions check out, and the c=1 examples land on the massless Thirring model as claimed. Second, the classification claims in Section 5 are real but conditional. The paper classifies supersymmetric CFT completions by enumerating odd Lagrangian subgroups containing the supercurrent, using Johnson-Freyd's SVOA classification as the external benchmark. That enumeration is the weak link: the paper gives generator matrices but no proof of exhaustiveness, and the underlying assumption that every fermionic boundary condition is captured by a Lagrangian subgroup with the condensation rule (2.33) is argued, not proven. If there are extra boundary data, the tables would be incomplete—though the constructions that are listed would still stand on their own.

What the paper does well: the partition functions are explicit, modular covariance is checked, and the examples recover known objects (free fermions, E8, supermoonshine module V f♮, lattice CFTs Λ18, Λ24). There are no fitted parameters; the input from Johnson-Freyd is used as a benchmark, which is honest. The chiral classification is explicitly flagged as not new, which is correct and good practice.

Soft spots, in proportion: the orbifold argument in Section 2.4.2 is heuristic—the claim that any symmetry operation should be realizable by a topological boundary of the SymTFT is plausible but not demonstrated. That matters for the claim that all fermionic orbifolds are captured, but it does not touch the validity of the constructed examples. The larger soft spot is the unproven exhaustiveness of the Lagrangian subgroup enumeration in Section 5; the authors should either prove it or soften the claims to 'completions arising from odd Lagrangian subgroups.' This is a completeness gap, not a validity gap.

The paper is for CFT/code theorists and SymTFT people. It deserves a serious referee; send it to review. The referee should press on the completeness questions but should not block on them—the new construction in Section 4 is solid and sufficient for publication.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper constructs two-dimensional bosonic and fermionic CFTs from bosonic abelian Chern-Simons theories by imposing topological boundary conditions in the SymTFT sandwich. For an even Lagrangian subgroup C of the discriminant group, the torus partition function is a lattice sum over the even self-dual lattice Lambda(C); for an odd Lagrangian subgroup, the construction yields a fermionic CFT whose NS spectrum is the odd self-dual lattice Lambda(C) and whose R spectrum is its shadow S = Lambda(C)+s, with spin-structure-dependent torus partition functions given by Eq. (2.52). The framework is applied to fermionic code CFTs and to CFTs with level-one affine Lie algebra symmetries, and the paper enumerates the odd Lagrangian subgroups containing the supercurrents identified by Johnson-Freyd, producing classification tables (notably Tables 4 and 8) of supersymmetric chiral and non-chiral CFT completions.

Significance. If the completeness assumptions are granted, the paper gives a natural and useful unification: it generalizes Narain code CFTs to fermionic theories, gives a SymTFT interpretation of the shadow of an odd self-dual lattice, and produces concrete classification tables that match known theories (massless Thirring model, free Majorana fermions, E8, the N=1 supermoonshine module, and odd self-dual lattice CFTs). The construction is explicit and parameter-free: the only input is the level matrix and the chosen Lagrangian subgroup, and the partition functions are written as lattice theta sums with modular covariance checked in the bosonic case and verified in examples. The classification tables are concrete and falsifiable, and the agreement with independent known results at small central charge is a genuine strength.

major comments (2)

[Sec. 2.2.2, Eq. (2.33); used in Sec. 5] The paper assumes that every fermionic topological boundary condition of the abelian Chern-Simons theory is specified by an odd Lagrangian subgroup C together with the spin-structure-dependent condensation rule W[gamma](C)|_{Sigma_top} = rho(C)^{gamma.gamma}. This assumption is load-bearing for the classification claims in Section 5, where the paper states it classifies the fermionic topological boundary conditions giving supersymmetric CFTs. However, no proof or reference is given for exhaustiveness, and the bosonic case reviewed in Section 2.2.1 carries additional data (discrete torsion in H^2(H,U(1))), so the fermionic analogue could in principle have extra phases or non-subgroup data. If such data exist, Tables 4 and 8 would be incomplete. I recommend either supplying a classification theorem with proof or reference, or explicitly restating the claims as classifications of boundaries of the form (2.33), and cross-checking the resulting lists against the independent fermionic CFT classifications in refs. [77-79] at central charges 12 and 16.
[Sec. 5.4 and Appendix B] The classification in Section 5.4 is presented as a list of generator matrices in Appendix B, with assertions such as 'there are 15 Lagrangian subgroups' for Spin(4m)^3, but the enumeration procedure is not described and no completeness argument is given. Since the central claim is to classify all supersymmetric completions of the relevant SVOAs, the reader cannot check that no Lagrangian subgroup has been missed. Please specify the finite enumeration method (for example, by searching over subgroups of the stated discriminant group and checking the isotropic/Lagrangian conditions on generators), and state how the equivalence relations used in Section 5.4 (swapping Weyl vector labels, permuting simple factors, exchanging left- and right-moving sectors) are implemented.

minor comments (3)

[Eq. (2.68)] The displayed equality appears to contain a typo: the last term should presumably be -c'_2.gamma.c''_1 rather than -c'_2.gamma.c'_2. As printed, the claimed antisymmetry property (2.64) does not follow from the preceding lines; the corrected expansion gives -c'_1.gamma.c''_2 - c'_2.gamma.c''_1 = 0, which is what is needed for (2.64).
[End of Sec. 2.4.2] In the sentence 'the NS spectrum Lambda(C') determines the Lagrangian subgroup C' = Lambda(C')/Gamma and hence also R spectrum Lambda(C)+s', the final expression should be Lambda(C')+s' rather than Lambda(C)+s; the text as written refers to the wrong lattice.
[Table 3 caption] The symbol Vf^natural is used in Table 3 without a definition in the caption; please identify it as the N=1 supermoonshine module, which is named in the text but not in the table caption.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Chern-Simons-to-lattice dictionary is derived from stated quantization and boundary rules, and the supersymmetric classification imports an external SVOA classification.

full rationale

The paper's central construction is self-contained: for an odd Lagrangian subgroup C, the NS spectrum is defined as the odd self-dual lattice Λ(C), the R spectrum as its shadow, and the torus partition functions in eq. (2.52) are obtained by canonical quantization of abelian Chern-Simons theory together with the spin-structure-dependent condensation rule (2.33). This is a derivation from explicit boundary conditions and Wilson-line operator actions, not a restatement of the input. No parameters are fitted to the outputs, and the results are checked against independent known objects such as the massless Thirring model and the Conway-Sloane lattice classification. The supersymmetric classification in Section 5 uses Johnson-Freyd [49] as an external source for which representations contain supercurrents; the paper's contribution is then the enumeration of odd Lagrangian subgroups containing those elements and the computation of the resulting absolute partition functions. That is a legitimate use of an external classification theorem, not circularity: [49] supplies the relative SVOA data, while the present paper supplies the modular-covariant completions. The paper also cites several of the authors' previous works, e.g., [19,35,38,39], but these are background and generalization context rather than load-bearing justifications of the main claim. The main structural assumption—that fermionic topological boundary conditions are fully captured by odd Lagrangian subgroups and the rule (2.33)—is an assumption about completeness of the classification, not a circular step. If that assumption fails, the tables could be incomplete, but the derivation itself does not reduce to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The construction rests on the standard SymTFT dictionary between Lagrangian subgroups and topological boundaries, on the Kaehler quantization of abelian Chern-Simons theory, and on external classifications (Johnson-Freyd SVOAs, Conway-Sloane lattices). No free parameters are fitted to data; the moduli r in Section 3 are genuine CFT moduli, not ad hoc parameters. No new physical entities are postulated.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Topological boundary conditions of abelian Chern-Simons theory are classified by Lagrangian subgroups of the discriminant group; even subgroups give bosonic boundaries and odd subgroups give fermionic boundaries with the spin-structure-dependent rule (2.33).
Invoked throughout Section 2.2 and used to construct all CFTs; cites [7] and lecture notes [61].
domain assumption The partition function of the 3d CS theory on an interval with physical and topological boundaries equals the torus partition function of a 2d CFT, with conformal blocks from Kaehler quantization given by (2.14).
The core sandwich/SymTFT identification used in eqs. (2.37) and (2.48).
domain assumption The classification of N=1 supersymmetric SVOAs without free fermions and bosonic subalgebra a product of level-one simply laced affine algebras (Table 2) is complete.
Section 5.3 relies on this from [49] to select the representations containing supercurrents.
standard math The lattice classifications (Conway-Sloane tables) correctly identify the odd self-dual lattices used for Lambda18 and Lambda24.
Used in Section 5.3 to name the lattice CFTs; external reference [59].

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fermionic CFTs from topological boundaries in abelian Chern-Simons theories." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BTZADWHH

@misc{pith2026250208084,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fermionic CFTs from topological boundaries in abelian Chern-Simons theories},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BTZADWHH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.08084}
}

read the original abstract

A quantum field theory is referred to as bosonic (non-spin) if its physical quantities are independent of the spacetime spin structure, and as fermionic (spin) if they depend on it. We explore fermionic conformal field theories (CFTs) that emerge from bosonic abelian Chern-Simons theories, playing the role of a symmetry topological field theory, by imposing topological boundary conditions. Our construction includes the fermionic generalization of code CFTs. When the Chern-Simons theory is associated with the root lattice of a simply laced Lie algebra, this approach yields a fermionic CFT with a level-one affine Lie algebra symmetry. As an application, we consider the Chern-Simons theories corresponding to a class of supersymmetric vertex operator algebras studied by Johnson-Freyd and classify their fermionic topological boundary conditions that give rise to supersymmetric CFTs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

[1]

Dijkgraaf and E

R. Dijkgraaf and E. Witten, Topological Gauge Theories and Group Cohomology , Commun. Math. Phys. 129 (1990) 393

1990
[2]

Belov and G

D. Belov and G. W. Moore, Classification of Abelian spin Chern-Simons theories , hep-th/0505235

arXiv
[3]

Gaiotto and J

D. Gaiotto and J. Kulp, Orbifold groupoids, JHEP 02 (2021) 132, [ arXiv:2008.05960]

arXiv 2021
[4]

Apruzzi, F

F. Apruzzi, F. Bonetti, I. Garcia Etxebarria, S. S. Hosseini, and S. Schafer-Nameki, Symmetry TFTs from String Theory , Commun. Math. Phys. 402 (2023), no. 1 895–949, [arXiv:2112.02092]

arXiv 2023
[5]

D. S. Freed, G. W. Moore, and C. Teleman, Topological symmetry in quantum field theory , arXiv:2209.07471

arXiv
[6]

Kaidi, K

J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, and Y. Zheng, Symmetry TFTs for Non-invertible Defects , Communications in Mathematical Physics 404 (Dec., 2023) 1021–1124, [ arXiv:2209.11062]

arXiv 2023
[7]

Kapustin and N

A. Kapustin and N. Saulina, Topological boundary conditions in abelian Chern-Simons theory , Nucl. Phys. B 845 (2011) 393–435, [ arXiv:1008.0654]

arXiv 2011
[8]

Kapustin and N

A. Kapustin and N. Saulina, Surface operators in 3d Topological Field Theory and 2d Rational Conformal Field Theory , arXiv:1012.0911

arXiv

Show all 86 references

[9]

Kaidi, Z

J. Kaidi, Z. Komargodski, K. Ohmori, S. Seifnashri, and S.-H. Shao, Higher central charges and topological boundaries in 2+1-dimensional TQFTs , SciPost Phys. 13 (2022), no. 3 067, [arXiv:2107.13091]

2022 arXiv
[10]

Y. Fukusumi, Fusion rule in conformal field theories and topological orders: A unified view of correspondence and (fractional) supersymmetry and their relation to topological holography , arXiv:2405.05178
[11]

R. Wen, W. Ye, and A. C. Potter, Topological holography for fermions, arXiv:2404.19004

arXiv
[12]

Huang, Fermionic quantum criticality through the lens of topological holography , arXiv:2405.09611

S.-J. Huang, Fermionic quantum criticality through the lens of topological holography , arXiv:2405.09611

arXiv
[13]

Bhardwaj, K

L. Bhardwaj, K. Inamura, and A. Tiwari, Fermionic Non-Invertible Symmetries in (1+1)d: Gapped and Gapless Phases, Transitions, and Symmetry TFTs , arXiv:2405.09754

arXiv
[14]

Chen and Q

J. Chen and Q. Jia, SymTFT Approach to 2D Orbifold Groupoids: ‘t Hooft Anomalies, Gauging, and Partition Functions , arXiv:2411.18056

arXiv
[15]

I. B. Frenkel, J. Lepowsky, and A. Meurman, A natural representation of the fischer-griess monster with the modular function j as character , Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 81 (1984), no. 10 3256–3260

1984
[16]

Frenkel, J

I. Frenkel, J. Lepowsky, and A. Meurman, Vertex operator algebras and the Monster . Academic press, 1989

1989
[17]

Dolan, P

L. Dolan, P. Goddard, and P. Montague, Conformal field theories, representations and lattice constructions, Commun. Math. Phys. 179 (1996) 61–120, [ hep-th/9410029]

1996 arXiv
[18]

Gaiotto and T

D. Gaiotto and T. Johnson-Freyd, Holomorphic SCFTs with small index , Can. J. Math. 74 (2022), no. 2 573–601, [ arXiv:1811.00589]. – 67 –

2022 arXiv
[19]

Kawabata and S

K. Kawabata and S. Yahagi, Fermionic CFTs from classical codes over finite fields , JHEP 05 (2023) 096, [ arXiv:2303.11613]

2023 arXiv
[20]

Kawabata and S

K. Kawabata and S. Yahagi, Elliptic genera from classical error-correcting codes , JHEP 01 (2024) 130, [ arXiv:2308.12592]

2024 arXiv
[21]

Kawabata and S

K. Kawabata and S. Yahagi, Orbifolds of chiral fermionic CFTs and their duality , arXiv:2409.12527

arXiv
[22]

Okada, On the Symmetry of Odd Leech Lattice CFT , arXiv:2412.19430

M. Okada, On the Symmetry of Odd Leech Lattice CFT , arXiv:2412.19430

arXiv
[23]

Dymarsky and A

A. Dymarsky and A. Shapere, Solutions of modular bootstrap constraints from quantum codes , Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021), no. 16 161602, [ arXiv:2009.01236]

2021 arXiv
[24]

Dymarsky and A

A. Dymarsky and A. Shapere, Quantum stabilizer codes, lattices, and CFTs , JHEP 21 (2020) 160, [arXiv:2009.01244]

2020 arXiv
[25]

Dymarsky and A

A. Dymarsky and A. Shapere, Comments on the holographic description of Narain theories , JHEP 10 (2021) 197, [ arXiv:2012.15830]

2021 arXiv
[26]

Dymarsky and A

A. Dymarsky and A. Sharon, Non-rational Narain CFTs from codes over F 4, JHEP 11 (2021) 016, [arXiv:2107.02816]

2021 arXiv
[27]

Henriksson, A

J. Henriksson, A. Kakkar, and B. McPeak, Classical codes and chiral CFTs at higher genus , JHEP 05 (2022) 159, [ arXiv:2112.05168]

2022 arXiv
[28]

Buican, A

M. Buican, A. Dymarsky, and R. Radhakrishnan, Quantum codes, CFTs, and defects , JHEP 03 (2023) 017, [ arXiv:2112.12162]

2023 arXiv
[29]

Yahagi, Narain CFTs and error-correcting codes on finite fields , JHEP 08 (2022) 058, [arXiv:2203.10848]

S. Yahagi, Narain CFTs and error-correcting codes on finite fields , JHEP 08 (2022) 058, [arXiv:2203.10848]

2022 arXiv
[30]

Furuta, Relation between spectra of Narain CFTs and properties of associated boolean functions, JHEP 09 (2022) 146, [ arXiv:2203.11643]

Y. Furuta, Relation between spectra of Narain CFTs and properties of associated boolean functions, JHEP 09 (2022) 146, [ arXiv:2203.11643]

2022 arXiv
[31]

Henriksson, A

J. Henriksson, A. Kakkar, and B. McPeak, Narain CFTs and quantum codes at higher genus , JHEP 04 (2023) 011, [ arXiv:2205.00025]

2023 arXiv
[32]

Angelinos, D

N. Angelinos, D. Chakraborty, and A. Dymarsky, Optimal Narain CFTs from codes , JHEP 11 (2022) 118, [ arXiv:2206.14825]

2022 arXiv
[33]

Henriksson and B

J. Henriksson and B. McPeak, Averaging over codes and an SU(2) modular bootstrap , JHEP 11 (2023) 035, [ arXiv:2208.14457]

2023 arXiv
[34]

Dymarsky and R

A. Dymarsky and R. R. Kalloor, Fake Z, JHEP 06 (2023) 043, [ arXiv:2211.15699]

2023 arXiv
[35]

Kawabata, T

K. Kawabata, T. Nishioka, and T. Okuda, Narain CFTs from qudit stabilizer codes , SciPost Physics Core 6 (2023), no. 2 035, [ arXiv:2212.07089]

2023 arXiv
[36]

Furuta, On the rationality and the code structure of a Narain CFT, and the simple current orbifold, J

Y. Furuta, On the rationality and the code structure of a Narain CFT, and the simple current orbifold, J. Phys. A 57 (2024), no. 27 275202, [ arXiv:2307.04190]

2024 arXiv
[37]

Y. F. Alam, K. Kawabata, T. Nishioka, T. Okuda, and S. Yahagi, Narain CFTs from nonbinary stabilizer codes, JHEP 12 (2023) 127, [ arXiv:2307.10581]

2023 arXiv
[38]

Kawabata, T

K. Kawabata, T. Nishioka, and T. Okuda, Supersymmetric conformal field theories from quantum stabilizer codes , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 8 L081901, [ arXiv:2307.14602]. – 68 –

2023 arXiv
[39]

Kawabata, T

K. Kawabata, T. Nishioka, and T. Okuda, Narain CFTs from quantum codes and their Z2 gauging, JHEP 05 (2024) 133, [ arXiv:2308.01579]

2024 arXiv
[40]

Aharony, A

O. Aharony, A. Dymarsky, and A. D. Shapere, Holographic description of Narain CFTs and their code-based ensembles, JHEP 05 (2024) 343, [ arXiv:2310.06012]

2024 arXiv
[41]

Barbar, A

A. Barbar, A. Dymarsky, and A. D. Shapere, Global Symmetries, Code Ensembles, and Sums Over Geometries, arXiv:2310.13044

arXiv
[42]

R. K. Singh and M. Sinha, Non-chiral vertex operator algebra associated to Lorentzian lattices and Narain CFTs , SciPost Phys. 17 (2024) 047, [ arXiv:2312.16296]

2024 arXiv
[43]

K. Ando, K. Kawabata, and T. Nishioka, Quantum subsystem codes, CFTs and their Z2-gaugings, JHEP 11 (2024) 125, [ arXiv:2405.18145]

2024 arXiv
[44]

R. K. Singh, M. Sinha, and R. Tao, Rationality of Lorentzian Lattice CFTs And The Associated Modular Tensor Category, arXiv:2408.02744

arXiv
[45]

Mizoguchi and T

S. Mizoguchi and T. Oikawa, Unifying error-correcting code/Narain CFT correspondences via lattices over integers of cyclotomic fields , arXiv:2410.12488

arXiv
[46]

Dymarsky and A

A. Dymarsky and A. Shapere, Bulk derivation of TQFT gravity , arXiv:2405.20366

arXiv
[47]

I. B. Frenkel and V. G. Kac, Basic Representations of Affine Lie Algebras and Dual Resonance Models, Invent. Math. 62 (1980) 23–66

1980
[48]

G. B. Segal, Unitary representations of some infinite dimensional groups , Communications in Mathematical Physics 80 (1981) 301–342

1981
[49]

Johnson-Freyd, Supersymmetry and the Suzuki chain

T. Johnson-Freyd, Supersymmetry and the Suzuki chain. , Tunis. J. Math. 3 (2021), no. 2 309–359, [arXiv:1908.11012]

2021 arXiv
[50]

D. S. Freed and C. Teleman, Relative quantum field theory , Commun. Math. Phys. 326 (2014) 459–476, [arXiv:1212.1692]

2014 arXiv
[51]

Bos and V

M. Bos and V. P. Nair, U(1) Chern-Simons Theory and c=1 Conformal Blocks , Phys. Lett. B 223 (1989) 61–66

1989
[52]

A. P. Polychronakos, Abelian Chern-Simons Theories in (2+1)-dimensions , Annals Phys. 203 (1990) 231–254

1990
[53]

Porrati and C

M. Porrati and C. Yu, Partition functions of Chern-Simons theory on handlebodies by radial quantization, JHEP 07 (2021) 194, [ arXiv:2104.12799]

2021 arXiv
[54]

Witten, Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial , Commun

E. Witten, Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial , Commun. Math. Phys. 121 (1989) 351–399

1989
[55]

Axelrod, S

S. Axelrod, S. Della Pietra, and E. Witten, Geometric quantization of Chern-Simons gauge theory, J. Diff. Geom. 33 (1991), no. 3 787–902

1991
[56]

V. P. Nair, Quantum field theory: A modern perspective . 2005

2005
[57]

Etingof, D

P. Etingof, D. Nikshych, V. Ostrik, and w. a. a. b. Ehud Meir, Fusion categories and homotopy theory, arXiv e-prints (Sept., 2009) arXiv:0909.3140, [ arXiv:0909.3140]

2009 arXiv
[58]

Etingof, S

P. Etingof, S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, Tensor categories, vol. 205 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2015. – 69 –

2015
[59]

J. H. Conway and N. J. A. Sloane, Sphere packings, lattices and groups , vol. 290. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

2013
[60]

Bhardwaj and Y

L. Bhardwaj and Y. Tachikawa, On finite symmetries and their gauging in two dimensions , JHEP 03 (2018) 189, [ arXiv:1704.02330]

2018 arXiv
[61]

Tasi 2019 lectures

Y. Tachikawa, “Tasi 2019 lectures.”

2019
[62]

M. F. Atiyah, Riemann surfaces and spin structures , Annales scientifiques de l’ ´Ecole Normale Sup´ erieure4 (1971), no. 1 47–62

1971
[63]

Johnson, Spin structures and quadratic forms on surfaces , J

D. Johnson, Spin structures and quadratic forms on surfaces , J. London Math. Soc. (2) 22 (1980), no. 2 365–373

1980
[64]

K. S. Narain, New Heterotic String Theories in Uncompactified Dimensions < 10, Phys. Lett. B 169 (1986) 41–46

1986
[65]

K. S. Narain, M. H. Sarmadi, and E. Witten, A Note on Toroidal Compactification of Heterotic String Theory, Nucl. Phys. B 279 (1987) 369–379

1987
[66]

S. T. Dougherty, M. Harada, and P. Sol´ e,Shadow lattices and shadow codes , Discrete Mathematics 219 (2000), no. 1-3 49–64

2000
[67]

S. T. Dougherty, M. Harada, and P. Sol´ e,Shadow codes over Z4, Finite Fields and Their Applications 7 (2001), no. 4 507–529

2001
[68]

Bonnecaze, Y

A. Bonnecaze, Y. Choie, S. T. Dougherty, and P. Sol´ e, Splitting the shadow , Discrete mathematics 270 (2003), no. 1-3 43–60

2003
[69]

S. T. Dougherty, Generalized shadows of codes over rings , Hokkaido mathematical journal 32 (2003), no. 1 101–116

2003
[70]

Vafa, Modular Invariance and Discrete Torsion on Orbifolds , Nucl

C. Vafa, Modular Invariance and Discrete Torsion on Orbifolds , Nucl. Phys. B 273 (1986) 592–606

1986
[71]

Polchinski, String theory

J. Polchinski, String theory. Vol. 2: Superstring theory and beyond . Cambridge University Press, 2007

2007
[72]

Polchinski, String theory

J. Polchinski, String theory. Vol. 1: An introduction to the bosonic string . Cambridge University Press, 2007

2007
[73]

Bannai, S

E. Bannai, S. Dougherty, M. Harada, and M. Oura, Type ii codes, even unimodular lattices, and invariant rings , IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 45 (1999), no. 4 1194–1205

1999
[74]

Fujimura, T

H. Fujimura, T. Nishioka, and S. Shimamori, Entanglement R´ enyi entropy and boson-fermion duality in the massless Thirring model , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 12 125016, [arXiv:2309.11889]

2023 arXiv
[75]

Karch, D

A. Karch, D. Tong, and C. Turner, A Web of 2d Dualities: Z2 Gauge Fields and Arf Invariants, SciPost Phys. 7 (2019) 007, [ arXiv:1902.05550]

2019 arXiv
[76]

Ji, S.-H

W. Ji, S.-H. Shao, and X.-G. Wen, Topological Transition on the Conformal Manifold , Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (2020), no. 3 033317, [ arXiv:1909.01425]

2020 arXiv
[77]

Boyle Smith, Y.-H

P. Boyle Smith, Y.-H. Lin, Y. Tachikawa, and Y. Zheng, Classification of chiral fermionic CFTs of central charge ≤ 16, SciPost Phys. 16 (2024), no. 2 058, [ arXiv:2303.16917]. – 70 –

2024 arXiv
[78]

B. C. Rayhaun, Bosonic rational conformal field theories in small genera, chiral fermionization, and symmetry/subalgebra duality , J. Math. Phys. 65 (2024), no. 5 052301, [ arXiv:2303.16921]

2024 arXiv
[79]

H¨ ohn and S

G. H¨ ohn and S. M¨ oller,Classification of Self-Dual Vertex Operator Superalgebras of Central Charge at Most 24 , arXiv:2303.17190

arXiv
[80]

Witten, Constraints on Supersymmetry Breaking , Nucl

E. Witten, Constraints on Supersymmetry Breaking , Nucl. Phys. B 202 (1982) 253

1982
[81]

Heluani and V

R. Heluani and V. G. Kac, Susy lattice vertex algebras , arXiv preprint arXiv:0710.1587 (2007)

2007 arXiv
[82]

J. F. Duncan, Super-moonshine for conway’s largest sporadic group , Duke Mathematical Journal 139 (2007), no. 2 255–315

2007
[83]

Bae and S

J.-B. Bae and S. Lee, Emergent supersymmetry on the edges , SciPost Phys. 11 (2021), no. 5 091, [arXiv:2105.02148]

2021 arXiv
[84]

Wang and Z

L. Wang and Z. Wang, In and around Abelian anyon models , J. Phys. A 53 (2020), no. 50 505203, [arXiv:2004.12048]

2020 arXiv
[85]

Gannon, WZW commutants, lattices, and level 1 partition functions , Nucl

T. Gannon, WZW commutants, lattices, and level 1 partition functions , Nucl. Phys. B 396 (1993) 708–736, [ hep-th/9209043]

1993 arXiv
[86]

Benini, C

F. Benini, C. Copetti, and L. Di Pietro, Factorization and global symmetries in holography , SciPost Phys. 14 (2023), no. 2 019, [ arXiv:2203.09537]. – 71 –

2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Dijkgraaf and E

R. Dijkgraaf and E. Witten, Topological Gauge Theories and Group Cohomology , Commun. Math. Phys. 129 (1990) 393

1990

[2] [2]

Belov and G

D. Belov and G. W. Moore, Classification of Abelian spin Chern-Simons theories , hep-th/0505235

arXiv

[3] [3]

Gaiotto and J

D. Gaiotto and J. Kulp, Orbifold groupoids, JHEP 02 (2021) 132, [ arXiv:2008.05960]

arXiv 2021

[4] [4]

Apruzzi, F

F. Apruzzi, F. Bonetti, I. Garcia Etxebarria, S. S. Hosseini, and S. Schafer-Nameki, Symmetry TFTs from String Theory , Commun. Math. Phys. 402 (2023), no. 1 895–949, [arXiv:2112.02092]

arXiv 2023

[5] [5]

D. S. Freed, G. W. Moore, and C. Teleman, Topological symmetry in quantum field theory , arXiv:2209.07471

arXiv

[6] [6]

Kaidi, K

J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, and Y. Zheng, Symmetry TFTs for Non-invertible Defects , Communications in Mathematical Physics 404 (Dec., 2023) 1021–1124, [ arXiv:2209.11062]

arXiv 2023

[7] [7]

Kapustin and N

A. Kapustin and N. Saulina, Topological boundary conditions in abelian Chern-Simons theory , Nucl. Phys. B 845 (2011) 393–435, [ arXiv:1008.0654]

arXiv 2011

[8] [8]

Kapustin and N

A. Kapustin and N. Saulina, Surface operators in 3d Topological Field Theory and 2d Rational Conformal Field Theory , arXiv:1012.0911

arXiv