Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Mapping Nearby Galaxies with Apache Point Observatory: Group and field galaxies' morphologies in the colour-magnitude plane

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper finds that a galaxy's morphological type decides how strongly its colours and colour-magnitude plane respond to living in a group rather than in the field.

desk verdict A routine but honest MaNGA restatement of the known morphology-colour-environment relation; the only new sub-claim, weak environmental dependence for late-type spirals and irregulars, is not established by the underpowered tests. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.01776 v2 pith:BXIBYORM submitted 2025-05-03 astro-ph.GA

Pius Privatus , Umananda Dev Goswami This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxymorphologycoloursenvironmentcolour-magnitudeplaneMaNGAfieldgalaxiesgroupstatisticaltests
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether a galaxy's morphological type controls how much its colour and its colour-magnitude position respond to living in a group rather than in the field. Using integral-field spectroscopy for about ten thousand MaNGA galaxies split into six Hubble morphologies, it compares six colour indices ($B-V$, $B-R$, $u-g$, $g-r$, $r-i$, $i-z$) between field and group samples with Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Anderson-Darling tests, and treats blue-cloud, green-valley, and red-sequence membership with a chi-square test. The result is a split across the Hubble sequence: elliptical, lenticular, early-type, and intermediate-type spirals show significant field-versus-group colour differences, while late-type spirals and irregulars show statistically indistinguishable distributions. The paper's central claim is that the strength of environmental colour dependence is itself a function of morphology.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the division of a volume-limited MaNGA sample into six morphological bins and two environments (field, no neighbour; group, at least one neighbour within 1 Mpc and 500 km/s), followed by two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Anderson-Darling tests on each of six colour distributions and a chi-square test on counts in the blue-cloud, green-valley, and red-sequence regions defined by linear cuts in $(g-r)$ versus $M_r$. The KS and AD statistics measure whether field and group colour distributions are drawn from the same parent population; the paper's inference of strong versus very weak environmental dependence is read off the p-values relative to the 0.05 threshold.

What would settle it

Repeat the same field-versus-group comparison on an enlarged, volume-limited sample of late-type spirals and irregulars, several times larger and matched in stellar mass and redshift, and check whether median colour offsets grow to the size seen for early types and whether KS and AD p-values fall below 0.05. If they do, the very-weak-dependence branch of the conclusion collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery claimed is that morphology moderates the environmental dependence of galaxy colours and colour-magnitude planes. Group ellipticals, lenticulars, and early-type spirals are redder than their field counterparts, and intermediate-type spirals shift as well, with KS p-values below 0.05 across most colour indices; the colour-magnitude planes for these four classes show group galaxies more concentrated in the green valley and red sequence. Late-type spirals and irregulars, in contrast, have average KS p-values of 0.31 and 0.36 and average AD p-values of 0.162 and 0.155, so their field and group colour distributions are not significantly different, and their blue-cloud fractions are nearly unchanged. The paper also reports that intermediate- and late-type spirals preferentially live in the field while early-type spirals preferentially live in groups, so environment and morphology are intertwined but not identical. The conclusion is that environment acts on colours and on blue-cloud-to-red-sequence transformation only for certain morphologies.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that late-type spirals and irregulars are essentially unaffected by environment carries the load of the conclusion, and it rests on treating non-significant test results from 110-field/75-group late-type spirals and 38-field/50-group irregulars as evidence of a real null effect rather than of low statistical power.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Colour-based studies of environment must either control for morphology or risk mixing a real environmental signal with the morphological mix of the sample.
  • Group membership is already enough to shift early-type and intermediate-type spirals redder, implying that quenching can precede any morphological transformation to ellipticals.
  • Late-type spirals and irregulars keep their blue-cloud colours in groups, so whatever quenches them does not act through the same kind of colour change seen in earlier types.
  • The morphology-dependent colour offsets give a new constraint on models of galaxy quenching: the same group environment must have type-dependent effects.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the null p-values for late-type spirals and irregulars are as consistent with insufficient sample size as with a true null; a formal power analysis would tell which reading is safer.
  • Editorial inference: because intermediate-type spirals are field-preferring yet show strong colour differences, the environmental signal is not simply a by-product of where morphologies live.
  • Editorial inference: the paper's framework predicts that in a larger sample the late-type and irregular field-versus-group colour medians will stay within their current uncertainties, a prediction directly testable with wider integral-field surveys.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper uses MaNGA integral-field spectroscopy and GEMA-VAC group catalogs to test whether galaxy colour distributions and colour-magnitude planes differ between field and group environments for six morphological classes (elliptical, lenticular, early-, intermediate-, late-type spirals, and irregulars). For each class the authors compare field and group colour distributions with KS and AD tests, compare median colours, and analyze placement in the colour-magnitude plane with chi-square tests on red-sequence/blue-cloud/green-valley counts. They report that elliptical, lenticular, early-type, and intermediate-type spirals show significant environmental differences, while late-type spirals and irregulars show only very weak environmental dependence, concluding that the environmental dependence of colours is influenced by morphology.

Significance. The question addressed is timely and the data combination is appropriate: MaNGA provides homogeneous IFS-based colours and GEMA-VAC provides group assignments, and the paper makes full tables of test statistics and counts available. The early-type results are robust, with extremely small p-values in many tests (e.g., ES g-r KS p=1.51e-15 in Table I). However, the paper's novel sub-claim that late-type spirals and irregulars have 'very weak' environmental colour dependence is not established by the analysis as presented: it rests on averaged null p-values, small samples with low power, and chi-square tests with expected counts below validity limits. The conclusion that environmental dependence is morphology-dependent depends critically on this sub-claim, so the paper requires substantial revision.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section IV, Tables I and II] The claim that LS and IR galaxies show 'very weak' environmental colour dependence is not supported by the evidence. The paper averages p-values across six colours (KS p=0.31/0.36 and AD p=0.162/0.155 for LS/IR) and treats p>0.05 as evidence for no difference. Averaging p-values from different tests is not a valid statistical procedure, and with LS n=110/75 and IR n=38/50 the tests have low power, so non-significant results cannot distinguish 'no difference' from 'difference too small to detect'. Individual tests in Tables I and II are borderline significant (e.g., LS u-g AD p=0.02, IR g-r AD p=0.05, LS i-z KS p=0.05, IR g-r KS p=0.05). The authors should report effect sizes with confidence intervals or a power analysis, use a proper meta-analytic combination if averaging is intended, and address multiple comparisons.
  2. [Section IV, Table IV] The chi-square tests on the colour-magnitude plane counts for LS and IR are based on tables with expected frequencies below 5 in the red-sequence cells (LS red sequence observed 2/2; IR red sequence observed 1/3). The chi-square approximation is unreliable in this regime, so the reported p-values (0.598 and 0.741) for LS and IR are not trustworthy. A Fisher exact test or permutation test should be used. Consequently, the statement that for LS and IR the blue-cloud to red-sequence transformation 'is not influenced by the environment' is not established.
  3. [Section IV] The averaging of KS and AD statistics across the six colour indices for each morphology is not a valid statistical procedure, because the test statistics have different sampling distributions for different sample sizes and the p-values are not directly combinable by simple averaging. For EL, LE, ES, and IS the individual p-values are extremely small, so the qualitative conclusion is likely unaffected; nevertheless, the reported 'average KS statistics' and 'average AD statistics' should be removed or replaced with a proper method such as a combined test or a summary of the individual results.
  4. [Section I and Section IV] The paper does not address multiple comparisons. With 6 colours x 2 tests x 6 morphologies, there are 72 hypothesis tests, and at the nominal 0.05 threshold a number of false positives is expected by chance. This is particularly relevant for the LS/IR sub-claim, where several p-values are marginal (0.02-0.05) and could easily arise under the global null. A multiple-comparison correction (e.g., Bonferroni or FDR) or an explicit justification for not correcting is required before the 'very weak dependence' conclusion can be accepted.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section IV] In the paragraph on median colours, 'group EL, LE, IS and SE are redder' should read 'ES' instead of 'SE'.
  2. [Section II.C] The sentence 'The volume limited samples have KS statistics (p-value) of 0.06 (0.814), 0.07 (0.074) and AD statistics (p-value) of 0.05 (0.25), 2.62 (0.274) for redshift and stellar mass, respectively' is ambiguous about which values correspond to redshift and which to stellar mass; a table or clearer labeling would help.
  3. [Table III] The uncertainty notation '0.25+0.99-0.99' for the IS r-i group median colour appears suspicious, as the quoted 16th/84th percentile range spans nearly two magnitudes; this entry should be checked.
  4. [Section III, Eqs. (2)-(3)] The criteria for blue cloud and red sequence are defined by Eqs. (2)-(3), but the green valley used in Table IV is never explicitly defined; state the criterion used to assign galaxies to the green valley.
  5. [Figures 3-8] The colour labels for irregular galaxies are inconsistent across figures (e.g., 'green' in Figure 6 and 'yellow' in Figure 5); unify the colour scheme or use a notation that is consistent in all panels.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the central claim is a direct empirical comparison using external catalogues, with no fitted parameters or author-derived inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, that the dependence of colours and colour-magnitude planes on environment is influenced by morphology, is a direct empirical comparison of observed distributions. The colour indices, morphologies, and environment classifications are all taken from external products: MaNGA/pyPipe3D photometry, NSA colours, the visual morphology catalogue of Vazquez-Mata et al., and the GEMA-VAC group catalogue. The blue-cloud and red-sequence cuts in Eqs. (2) and (3) are cited from the literature and are not fitted to the data. No parameter is fitted to the data, no model is constructed from the conclusions, and no prediction is generated from a fitted quantity. The KS, AD, and chi-square p-values are computed from the same samples being compared, but that is standard hypothesis testing rather than circular derivation: the conclusion is a statement about those test outcomes, not an input to them. The interpretation that late-type spirals and irregulars show 'very weak' environmental dependence does rest on accepting null results from small samples and on averaging p-values, which is a legitimate statistical-power and inference concern, but it is not circularity because the p-values were not constructed from the conclusion. There are no load-bearing self-citations; the reference list contains no work by the present authors. No uniqueness theorem, latent ansatz, or renamed prior result is invoked to force the conclusion. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained with respect to circularity, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted; the analysis relies on external morphology, environment, and photometry catalogs, and on literature-defined colour cuts. The main load-bearing assumptions are the reliability of the external classifications and the statistical interpretation of small samples.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The visual morphology classifications from Vazquez-Mata et al. (2022) correctly map MaNGA galaxies to Hubble types (EL, LE, ES, IS, LS, IR).
    Section II B relies on this catalog; misclassification would blur morphology-specific environmental signals.
  • domain assumption The GEMA-VAC group finder correctly identifies group (GS>=2) and field (GS=1) environments.
    Section II C uses group size from the external catalog; errors in group assignment affect all field/group comparisons.
  • domain assumption The colour measurements from pypipe3D (B-V, B-R) and NSA (u-g, g-r, r-i, i-z) are on a consistent photometric system after the Vega-to-AB conversion.
    Section III compares field/group colours; inconsistent photometry would introduce spurious offsets.
  • domain assumption The blue cloud and red sequence boundaries defined in Eqs. (2) and (3) from the literature are applicable to this MaNGA sample.
    Section III uses these cuts to classify galaxies into blue cloud, green valley, and red sequence; different cuts would alter the chi-square results.
  • domain assumption The MaNGA sample, after the volume-limited selection, has no residual colour-environment bias, in particular from the colour-enhanced subsample.
    Section II A describes the colour-enhanced subsample but Eq. (1) does not exclude it; if present, it biases colour distributions toward the green valley.
  • standard math Standard two-sample statistics (KS, AD, chi-square) are valid for the sample sizes and counts used.
    Section III applies these tests; the assumption is violated for some LS/IR cells with very low expected counts.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Mapping Nearby Galaxies with Apache Point Observatory: Group and field galaxies' morphologies in the colour-magnitude plane." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BXIBYORM

@misc{pith2026250501776,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Mapping Nearby Galaxies with Apache Point Observatory: Group and field galaxies' morphologies in the colour-magnitude plane},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BXIBYORM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.01776}
}
abstract

This study involves the use of integral field spectroscopy (IFS) data from Mapping Nearby Galaxies at Apache Point Observatory (MaNGA) to investigate whether the morphology influences the environmental dependence of galaxies' colours and the colour-magnitude planes. The galaxies are classified into six morphologies (Elliptical, Lenticular, Early-type, Intermediate-type, Late-type spirals and Irregular) and further in field and group environments. The distributions of colours ($B-V, B-R, u-g, g-r, r-i$ and $i-z$) are compared between field and group environments and then the colour-magnitude planes are analysed. It is observed that Intermediate and Late-types spirals preferentially exist in field environments while Early-type spirals exist in groups. The colours and colour-magnitude planes of Elliptical, Lenticular, Early-type and Intermediate-type spirals depend on the environment while for the Late-type and Irregular galaxies, their dependence on the environment is very weak. The study concludes that the dependence of colours and colour-magnitude planes on the environment is influenced by morphology.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.01776 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The images for six classified morphologies: Elliptical (top left), Lenticular (top middle), Early-type spiral (top right), Intermediate-type [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Redshift- stellar mass scatter plot (left panel), redshift (middle panel), stellar mass (right panel) distributions for field (light) and group [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Comparison between field (light colour) and group (dark colour) galaxies’ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Comparison between field (light colour) and group (dark colour) galaxies’ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison between field (light colour) and group (dark colour) galaxies’ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Comparison between field (light colour) and group (dark colour) galaxies’ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Comparison between field (light colour) and group (dark colour) galaxies’ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Comparison between field (light colour) and group (dark colour) galaxies’ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Variation of median colours with morphology for field (light colour) and group (dark colour) galaxies. The bars in each measurement [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Comparison of colour-magnitude planes between field (light colour) and group (dark colour) types for EL, LE, ES, IS, LS and IR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A systematic comparison of green valley selection criteria across multiparameter spaces using a homogeneous ultraviolet-optical dataset

    astro-ph.GA 2026-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Four common green valley selection criteria identify statistically distinct galaxy subsets with small pairwise overlap, so the definitions are not interchangeable.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Strateva, ˇZ

    I. Strateva, ˇZ. Ivezi´c, G. Knapp, V . Narayanan, et al.,Color separation of galaxy types in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey imaging data, ApJ 122, 1861 (2001) [arXiv:astro-ph/0107201]

    arXiv 2001

  2. [2]

    The relation between galaxy morphology and colour in the EAGLE simulation

    C. Correa, J. Schaye, B. Clauwens, R. Bower, et al., The relation between galaxy morphology and colour in the EAGLE simulation , MNRAS 472, L45 (2017) [arXiv:1704.06283]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    Dullo, A

    B. Dullo, A. Bouquin, A. De Paz, J. Knapen, et al., The Black Hole Mass-Color Relations for Early- and Late-type Galaxies: Red and Blue Sequences, ApJ 898, 83 (2020) [arXiv:2006.10128]

    work page arXiv 2020

  4. [4]

    pointed out that late-type display blue colour than early-type galaxies, using a Deep Learning (DL) based morphological catalogue built from images obtained by the third release of Southern Photometric Local Universe Survey (S-PLUS) [5]. The morphological changes are usually accompanied by colour transformation, however it should be kept in mind that it i...

    arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Mendes de Oliveira, T

    C. Mendes de Oliveira, T. Ribeiro, W. Schoenell, A. Kanaan, et al.,The Southern Photometric Local Universe Survey (S-PLUS): improved SEDs, morphologies, and redshifts with 12 optical filters, MNRAS 489, 241 (2019) [arXiv:1907.01567]

    arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    C. Liu, L. Hao, H. Wang, X. Yang, The morphological transformation and the quenching of galaxies , ApJ 878, 69 (2019) [arXiv:1905.11008 ]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    C. Bom, A. Cortesi, U. Ribeiro, L. Dias, et al., An extended catalogue of galaxy morphology using deep learning in southern photometric local universe survey data release 3 , MNRAS 528, 4188 (2024) [arXiv:2306.08684]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Quantifying the Poor Purity and Completeness of Morphological Samples Selected by Galaxy Colour

    R. Smethurst, K. Masters, B. Simmons, I. Garland, et al., Quantifying the poor purity and completeness of morphological samples selected by galaxy colour, MNRAS 510, 4126 (2022) [arXiv:2112.04507]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

Show all 92 references
  1. [9]

    S. Mei, N. Hatch, S. Amodeo, A. Afanasiev, et al., Morphology-density relation, quenching, and mergers in CARLA clusters and proto- clusters at 1.4<z < 2.8, A&A 670, A58 (2023) [arXiv:2209.02078]

    2023 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Correa, J

    C. Correa, J. Schaye, J. Trayford, The origin of the red-sequence galaxy population in the EAGLE simulation, MNRAS 484, 4401 (2019) [arXiv:1810.07189]

    2019 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Paulino-Afonso, D

    A. Paulino-Afonso, D. Sobral, B. Darvish, B. Ribeiro, et al., VIS3COS-II. Nature and nurture in galaxy structure and morphology, A&A 630, A57 (2019) [arXiv:1907.10062]

    2019 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Y . Gu, G. Fang, Q. Yuan, S. Lu, et al., The Effect of Environment on Star Formation Activity and Morphology at 0.5 < z <2.5 in CANDELS, ApJ 921, 60 (2021) [arXiv:2109.11261]

    2021

  5. [13]

    Sazonova, K

    E. Sazonova, K. Alatalo, J. Lotz, K. Rowlands, et al., The Morphology–Density Relationship in 1<z < 2 Clusters, ApJ 899, 85 (2020) [arXiv:2007.03698]

    2020 arXiv

  6. [14]

    T. Goto, C. Yamauchi, Y . Fujita, S. Okamura, et al.,The morphology—density relation in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, MNRAS 346, 601 (2003)

    2003

  7. [15]

    N. Ball, J. Loveday, R. Brunner, Galaxy colour, morphology and environment in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, MNRAS 383, 907 (2008)

    2008

  8. [16]

    Postman, M

    M. Postman, M. Geller, The morphology-density relation - The group connection, ApJ 281, 95 (1984)

    1984

  9. [17]

    Koekemoer, S

    A. Koekemoer, S. Faber, H. Ferguson, N. Grogin, et al., CANDELS: the cosmic assembly near-infrared deep extragalactic legacy survey- the Hubble Space Telescope observations, imaging data products, and mosaics, ApJS 197, 36 (2011) [arXiv:1105.3754]

    2011 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Cooke, J

    K. Cooke, J. Kartaltepe, C. Rose, K. Tyler, et al., The Roles of Morphology and Environment on the Star Formation Rate–Stellar Mass Relation in COSMOS from 0<z < 3.5, ApJ 942, 49 (2023) [arXiv:2211.16527]

    2023 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Grogin, D

    N. Grogin, D. Kocevski, S. Faber, H. Ferguson, et al., CANDELS: The Cosmic Assembly Near-infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey, ApJS 197, 35 (2011) [arXiv:1105.3753]

    2011 arXiv

  12. [20]

    P ´erez-Mill´an, J

    D. P ´erez-Mill´an, J. Fritz, R. Gonz ´alez-L´opezlira, A. Moretti, et al., The relation between morphology, star formation history, and envi- ronment in local Universe galaxies, MNRAS 521, 1292 (2023) [arXiv:2302.06687]

    2023 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Bhattacharjee, B

    S. Bhattacharjee, B. Pandey, S. Sarkar, et al., Can a conditioning on stellar mass explain the mutual information between morphology and environment?, JCAP 2020, 039 (2020) [arXiv:2004.05016]

    2020 arXiv

  14. [22]

    used the colour selection to study the clustering of galaxies within the redshift range 0<z < 0.4, obtained that clustering strongly depends on the environment with blue galaxies weakly clustered than the red ones suggesting that galaxy clustering strongly correlate with colou...

  15. [23]

    Scoville, H

    N. Scoville, H. Aussel, M. Brusa, P. Capak, et al., The cosmic evolution survey (COSMOS): overview, ApJSS 172, 1 (2007)

    2007

  16. [24]

    Deng, The environmental dependence of different colors in the CMASS sample of the SDSS DR9 , RAA 14, 553 (2014) [arXiv:1401.0344]

    X. Deng, The environmental dependence of different colors in the CMASS sample of the SDSS DR9 , RAA 14, 553 (2014) [arXiv:1401.0344]

    2014 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Brown, R

    M. Brown, R. Webster, B. Boyle, The clustering of colour-selected galaxies, MNRAS 317, 782 (2000)

    2000

  18. [26]

    Blanton, D

    M. Blanton, D. Eisenstein, D. Hogg, D. Schlegel, et al., Relationship between environment and the broadband optical properties of galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, ApJ 629, 143 (2005) [arXiv:astro-ph/0310453]

    2005 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Tinker, C

    J. Tinker, C. Conroy, P. Norberg, S. Patiri, et al., Void statistics in large galaxy redshift surveys: does halo occupation of field galaxies depend on environment?, ApJ 686, 53 (2008) [arXiv:0707.3445 ]

    2008 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Bamford, A

    S. Bamford, A. Rojas, R. Nichol, C. Miller, et al., Revealing components of the galaxy population through non-parametric techniques , MNRAS 391, 607 (2008)

    2008

  21. [29]

    Skibba, R

    R. Skibba, R. Sheth, A halo model of galaxy colours and clustering in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, MNRAS 392, 1080 (2009)

    2009

  22. [30]

    Making the local density fixed authors observed the same trend meaning that the colours of galaxies depend on the environment even if the local density is fixed

    obtained that the red galaxies are preferentially found in filament with high fraction when compared to sheet environment no matter the luminosity of a particular galaxy. Making the local density fixed authors observed the same trend meaning that the colours of galaxies depend...

  23. [31]

    Weinmann, F

    S. Weinmann, F. Van-Den-Bosch, X. Yang, H. Mo, Properties of galaxy groups in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey—I. The dependence of colour, star formation and morphology on halo mass, MNRAS 366, 2 (2006)

    2006

  24. [32]

    Zehavi, Z

    I. Zehavi, Z. Zheng, D. Weinberg, J. Frieman, et al., The luminosity and color dependence of the galaxy correlation function, ApJ 630, 1 (2005) [arXiv:astro-ph/0408569]

    2005 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Pandey, S

    B. Pandey, S. Sarkar, Exploring galaxy colour in different environments of the cosmic web with SDSS , MNRAS 498, 6069 (2020). [arXiv:2002.08400]. 12

    2020 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Zhang, X

    F. Zhang, X. Deng, u −r color dependence of galaxy clustering in the main galaxy sample of SDSS DR10, Astrophysics 58, 21 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    Skibba, S

    R. Skibba, S. Bamford, R. Nichol, C. Lintott, et al., Galaxy Zoo: disentangling the environmental dependence of morphology and colour, MNRAS 399, 966 (2009) [arXiv:0811.3970]

    2009 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Lintott, K

    C. Lintott, K. Schawinski, S. Bamford, A. Slosar et al. Galaxy Zoo 1: data release of morphological classifications for nearly 900 000 galaxies, MNRAS 410, 166 (2011) [arXiv:1007.3265]

    2011 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Bamford, R

    S. Bamford, R. Nichol, I. Baldry, K. Land, et al., Galaxy Zoo: the dependence of morphology and colour on environment, MNRAS 393, 1324 (2009)

    2009

  30. [38]

    O. Bait, S. Barway, Y . Wadadekar,On the interdependence of galaxy morphology, star formation and environment in massive galaxies in the nearby Universe, MNRAS 471, 2687 (2017) [arXiv:1707.00568]

    2017 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Dhiwar, K

    S. Dhiwar, K. Saha, A. Dekel, A. Paswan, et al., Witnessing the star formation quenching in L ∗ ellipticals, MNRAS 518, 4943 (2023) [arXiv:2211.08884]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Driver, S

    S. Driver, S. Bellstedt, A. Robotham, I. Baldry, et al., Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): Data Release 4 and the z <0.1 total and z <0.08 morphological galaxy stellar mass functions, MNRAS 513, 439 (2022) [arXiv:2203.08539]

    2022 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Baldry, J

    I. Baldry, J. Liske, M. Brown, A. Robotham, S. Driver, et al.,Galaxy And Mass Assembly: the G02 field, Herschel–ATLAS target selection and data release 3, MNRAS 474, 3875 (2018) [arXiv:1711.09139]

    2018 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Driver, D

    S. Driver, D. Hill, L. Kelvin, A. Robotham, et al., Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA): survey diagnostics and core data release , MNRAS 413, 971 (2011)

    2011

  35. [43]

    Driver, D

    S. Driver, D. Hill, L. Kelvin, A. Robotham, et al., GAMA: towards a physical understanding of galaxy formation, A&G 50, 5 (2009)

    2009

  36. [44]

    Bhambhani, I

    P. Bhambhani, I. Baldry, S. Brough, A. Hill, et al., Red riding on hood: exploring how galaxy colour depends on environment, MNRAS 522, 4116 (2023) [arXiv:2210.16112]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [45]

    X. Deng, J. He, X. Wen, X. Tang, et al., Comparisons of the environmental dependence of galaxy properties between galaxies above and below M⋆, MNRAS 395, L90 (2009)

    2009

  38. [46]

    Bernardi, R

    M. Bernardi, R. Sheth, J. Annis, S. Burles, et al., Early-type galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. IV . Colors and chemical evolution, AJ 125, 1882 (2003) [arXiv:astro-ph/0301629]

    2003 arXiv

  39. [47]

    X. Deng, C. Luo, Y . Xin, P. Wu,Environmental Dependence of Different Colors for the Apparent Magnitude-Limited Main Galaxy Sample of the SDSS DR7, Open Astronomy 2, 133 (2013)

    2013

  40. [48]

    X. Deng, Z. Wu, Environmental Dependence of Different Colors of Active Galactic Nucleus (AGN) Host Galaxies, Astrophysics 66, 173 (2023)

    2023

  41. [49]

    O’Kane, U

    C. O’Kane, U. Kuchner, M. Gray, A. Arag ´on-Salamanca, The effect of cosmic web filaments on galaxy evolution , MNRAS 534, 1682 (2024) [arXiv:2409.09028]

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Bundy, M

    K. Bundy, M. Bershady, D. Law, R. Yan, et al., Overview of the sdss-iv manga survey: mapping nearby galaxies at apache point observatory, ApJ 798, 7 (2014) [arXiv:1412.1482]

    2014 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Blanton, M

    M. Blanton, M. Bershady, B. Abolfathi, F. Albareti, et al., Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV: Mapping the Milky Way, nearby galaxies, and the distant universe, AJ 154, 28 (2017) [arXiv:1703.00052]

    2017 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Drory, N

    N. Drory, N. MacDonald, MA. Bershady, K. Bundy, et al., The MaNGA integral field unit fiber feed system for the Sloan 2.5 m telescope, AJ 149, 77 (2015) [arXiv:1412.1535]

    2015 arXiv

  45. [53]

    R. Yan, K. Bundy, D. Law, M. Bershady, B. Andrews, et al., SDSS-IV MaNGA IFS galaxy survey—Survey design, execution, and initial data quality, AJ 152, 197 (2016) [arXiv:1607.08613]

    2016 arXiv

  46. [54]

    D. Wake, K. Bundy, A. Diamond-Stanic, R. Yan, et al., The SDSS-IV MaNGA sample: design, optimization, and usage considerations , AJ 154, 86 (2017) [arXiv:1707.02989]

    2017 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Teerikorp, Eddington-Malmquist bias in a cosmological context, A & A 576, A75 (2015) [arXiv:1503.02812]

    P. Teerikorp, Eddington-Malmquist bias in a cosmological context, A & A 576, A75 (2015) [arXiv:1503.02812]

    2015 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Abdurro’uf, K

    N. Abdurro’uf, K. Accetta, C. Aerts, V . Silva Aguirre, et al., The seventeenth data release of the Sloan Digital Sky Surveys: Complete release of MaNGA, MaStar, and APOGEE-2 data, AJ 259, 35 (2022) [arXiv:2112.0202]

    2022

  49. [57]

    Argudo-Fern ´andez, S

    M. Argudo-Fern ´andez, S. Verley, G. Bergond, S. Puertas, et al., Catalogues of isolated galaxies, isolated pairs, and isolated triplets in the local Universe, A&A 578, A110 (2015) [arXiv:1504.00117]

    2015 arXiv

  50. [58]

    V ´azquez-Mata, H

    J. V ´azquez-Mata, H. Hern´andez-Toledo, V . Avila-Reese, M. Herrera-Endoqui, et al.,SDSS IV MaNGA: visual morphological and statis- tical characterization of the DR15 sample, MNRAS 512, 2222 (2022) [arXiv:2203.02565]

    2022 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Hubble, Extra-galactic nebulae, ApJ 64, 326 (1926)

    E. Hubble, Extra-galactic nebulae, ApJ 64, 326 (1926)

    1926

  52. [60]

    S ´anchez, J

    S. S ´anchez, J. Barrera-Ballesteros, E. Lacerda, A. Mej´ıa-Narvaez, et al.,SDSS-IV MaNGA: pyPipe3D analysis release for 10000 galaxies, ApJ 262, 32 (2022) [arXiv:2206.0706]

    2022

  53. [61]

    Etherington, D

    J. Etherington, D. Thomas, Measuring galaxy environments in large-scale photometric surveys , MNRAS 451, 660 (2015) [arXiv:1505.01171]

    2015 arXiv

  54. [62]

    H. Wang, H. Mo, X. Yang, Y . Zhang, et al.,ELUCID—exploring the local universe with reconstructed initial density field. III. Constrained simulation in the SDSS volume, ApJ 831,164 (2016) [arXiv:1608.01763]

    2016 arXiv

  55. [63]

    X. Yang, H. Mo, F. Van den Bosch, A. Pasquali, et al.,Galaxy groups in the SDSS DR4. I. The catalog and basic properties, AJ 671, 153 (2007) [arXiv:0707.4640]

    2007 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Hodges, The significance probability of the Smirnov two-sample test, Arkiv f¨or matematik 3, 469 (1958)

    J. Hodges, The significance probability of the Smirnov two-sample test, Arkiv f¨or matematik 3, 469 (1958)

    1958

  57. [65]

    Harari, S

    D. Harari, S. Mollerach, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test as a tool to study the distribution of ultra-high energy cosmic ray sources, A & A 394, 916 (2009) [arXiv:0811.0008]

    2009 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Anderson, D

    T. Anderson, D. Darling, Asymptotic theory of certain” goodness of fit” criteria based on stochastic processes, The Annals of Mathemat- ical Statistics 23, 193 (1952)

    1952

  59. [67]

    Pettitt, A two-sample Anderson-Darling rank statistic, Biometrika 63, 161 (1976)

    A. Pettitt, A two-sample Anderson-Darling rank statistic, Biometrika 63, 161 (1976)

    1976

  60. [68]

    Scholz, M

    F. Scholz, M. Stephens, K-Sample Anderson–Darling Tests, J. Am. Stat. Assoc 82, 918 (1987)

    1987

  61. [69]

    G. Babu, E. Feigelson, Astrostatistics: Goodness-of-fit and all that, ASPCS 351, 127 (2006). 13

    2006

  62. [70]

    Fukugita, K

    M. Fukugita, K. Shimasaku, T. Ichikawa, Galaxy colors in various photometric band systems, PASP 107, 945 (1995)

    1995

  63. [71]

    Blanton, S

    M. Blanton, S. Roweis K-corrections and filter transformations in the ultraviolet, optical, and near infrared , AJ 133, 734 (2007) [arXiv:astro-ph/0606170]

    2007 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Blanton, E

    M. Blanton, E. Kazin, D. Muna, B. Weaver, et al., Improved background subtraction for the sloan digital sky survey images, AJ 142, 31 (2011) [arXiv:1105.1960]

    2011 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Blanton, R

    M. Blanton, R. Lupton, D. Schlegel, M. Strauss, et al., The Properties and Luminosity Function of Extremely Low Luminosity Galaxies, ApJ 631, 208 (2005) [arXiv:astro-ph/0410164]

    2005 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Fischer, H

    J. Fischer, H. Dom´ınguez-S´anchez, M. Bernardi, SDSS-IV MaNGA PyMorph Photometric and Deep Learning Morphological Catalogues and implications for bulge properties and stellar angular momentum, MNRAS 483, 2057 (2019) [arXiv:1811.02580]

    2019 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Dom´ınguez-S´anchez, B

    H. Dom´ınguez-S´anchez, B. Margalef, M. Bernardi, M. Huertas-Company,SDSS-IV DR17: final release of MaNGA PyMorph photometric and deep-learning morphological catalogues, MNRAS 509, 4024 (2021) [arXiv:2110.10694]

    2021 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Dressler, Galaxy morphology in rich clusters-Implications for the formation and evolution of galaxies, ApJ 236, 351 (1980)

    A. Dressler, Galaxy morphology in rich clusters-Implications for the formation and evolution of galaxies, ApJ 236, 351 (1980)

    1980

  69. [77]

    C. Park, Y . Choi, M. V ogeley, .R Gott III, et al.,Environmental dependence of properties of galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, ApJ 658, 898 (2007) [arXiv:astro-ph/0611610]

    2007 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Calvi, B

    R. Calvi, B. Vulcani, B. Poggianti, A. Moretti, et al., Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA): Demonstrating the Power of WISE in the Study of Galaxy Groups toz <0.1, ApJ 898, 20 (2020) [arXiv:2006.07535]

    2020 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Nantais, H

    J. Nantais, H. Flores, R. Demarco, C. Lidman, et al., Morphology with light profile fitting of confirmed cluster galaxies at z = 0.84, A&A 555, A5 (2013) [arXiv:1305.0826]

    2013 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Wilman, P Erwin, The Relation between Galaxy Morphology and Environment in the Local Universe: An RC3-SDSS Picture , ApJ 746, 160 (2012) [arXiv:1112.3990]

    D. Wilman, P Erwin, The Relation between Galaxy Morphology and Environment in the Local Universe: An RC3-SDSS Picture , ApJ 746, 160 (2012) [arXiv:1112.3990]

    2012 arXiv

  73. [81]

    van der Wel, P

    A. van der Wel, P. Holden, M. Franx, D. Illingworth et al., The evolution of the field and cluster morphology-density relation for mass- selected samples of galaxies, ApJ 670, 206 (2007) [arXiv:0707.2787]

    2007 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Pearson, L

    W. Pearson, L. Wang, S. Brough, B. Holwerda, et al., Galaxy and Mass Assembly: Group and field galaxy morphologies in the star- formation rate - stellar mass plane, A&A 646, A151 (2021) [arXiv:2101.03804]

    2021 arXiv

  75. [83]

    van-Dokkum, M

    P. van-Dokkum, M. Franx, D. Fabricant, G. Illingworth, et al., Hubble Space Telescope Photometry and Keck Spectroscopy of the Rich Cluster MS 1054-03: Morphologies, Butcher-Oemler Effect, and the Color-Magnitude Relation at z = 0 .83, ApJ 541, 95 (2000) [arXiv:astro-ph/0002507]

    2000 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Bouwens, G

    R. Bouwens, G. Illingworth, M. Franx, H. Ford, UV luminosity functions at z ∼ 4, 5, and 6 from the Hubble ultra deep field and other deep Hubble space telescope ACS fields: evolution and star formation history, ApJ 670, 928 (2007) [arXiv:0707.2080]

    2007 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Girardi, F

    M. Girardi, F. Mardirossian, C. Marinoni, M. Mezzetti, et al., Galaxies in group and field environments: A comparison of optical–NIR luminosities and colors, A&A 410, 461 (2003) [arXiv:astro-ph/0308139]

    2003 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Balogh, S

    M. Balogh, S. McGee, D. Wilman, R. Bower, et al.,The colour of galaxies in distant groups, MNRAS 398, 754 (2009) [arXiv:0905.3401]

    2009 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Cramer, A

    W. Cramer, A. Noble, G Rudnick, A. Pigarelli, et al., Resolved UV and Optical Color Gradients Reveal Environmental Influence on Galaxy Evolution at Redshiftz ∼ 1.6, ApJ 975, 144 (2024) [arXiv:2404.07355]

    2024 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Coenda, D

    V . Coenda, D. Mast, H. Muriel, H. Mart ´ınez, Effects of environment on stellar metallicity profiles of late-type galaxies in the CALIFA survey, A&A 642, A132 (2020) [arXiv:2008.06012]

    2020 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Giuricin, C

    G. Giuricin, C. Marinoni, L. Ceriani, A. Pisani, Nearby Optical Galaxies: Selection of the Sample andIdentification of Groups, ApJ 543, 178 (2000) [arXiv:astro-ph/0001140]

    2000 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Sampaio, R

    V . Sampaio, R. de-Carvalho, I. Ferreras, A. Arag ´on-Salamanca, et al., From blue cloud to red sequence: evidence of morphological transition prior to star formation quenching, MNRAS 509, 567 (2022) [arXiv:2110.04342]

    2022 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Eales, M

    S. Eales, M. Baes, N. Bourne, M. Bremer, et al., The causes of the red sequence, the blue cloud, the green valley, and the green mountain, MNRAS 481, 1183 (2018) [arXiv:1809.01171]

    2018 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Eales, M

    S. Eales, M. Baes, N. Bourne, M. Bremer, et al.,The green valley is a red herring: Galaxy Zoo reveals two evolutionary pathways towards quenching of star formation in early-and late-type galaxies, MNRAS 440, 889 (2014) [arXiv:1402.4814]

    2014 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.