REVIEW 4 cited by
The iWildCam 2020 Competition Dataset
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Camera traps enable the automatic collection of large quantities of image data. Biologists all over the world use camera traps to monitor animal populations. We have recently been making strides towards automatic species classification in camera trap images. However, as we try to expand the geographic scope of these models we are faced with an interesting question: how do we train models that perform well on new (unseen during training) camera trap locations? Can we leverage data from other modalities, such as citizen science data and remote sensing data? In order to tackle this problem, we have prepared a challenge where the training data and test data are from different cameras spread across the globe. For each camera, we provide a series of remote sensing imagery that is tied to the location of the camera. We also provide citizen science imagery from the set of species seen in our data. The challenge is to correctly classify species in the test camera traps.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Quantifying Structure in CLIP Embeddings: A Statistical Framework for Concept Interpretation
A rotation-sensitivity hypothesis test plus Varimax rotation produces sparse concept dictionaries from CLIP embeddings and improves worst-group accuracy after spurious concept removal.
-
When to retrain a machine learning model
A cost-aware retraining rule that forecasts future model accuracy with uncertainty and retrains only when the forecast cost favors it.
-
Visual Species Recognition with Large Multimodal Models as Post-Hoc Correctors
LMMs underperform few-shot experts on species recognition, but re-ranking the expert's top-5 candidates with an LMM improves mean accuracy by 6.4 points across five benchmarks.
-
Learning Causality for Modern Machine Learning
A thesis compiling six papers that use causal invariance to improve graph neural networks' out-of-distribution generalization, interpretability, and robustness.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.