REVIEW 1 cited by
On the Anatomy of Attention
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We introduce a category-theoretic diagrammatic formalism in order to systematically relate and reason about machine learning models. Our diagrams present architectures intuitively but without loss of essential detail, where natural relationships between models are captured by graphical transformations, and important differences and similarities can be identified at a glance. In this paper, we focus on attention mechanisms: translating folklore into mathematical derivations, and constructing a taxonomy of attention variants in the literature. As a first example of an empirical investigation underpinned by our formalism, we identify recurring anatomical components of attention, which we exhaustively recombine to explore a space of variations on the attention mechanism.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Diagrammatic Approach to Improve Computational Efficiency in Group Equivariant Neural Networks
A diagrammatic, category-theoretic algorithm reduces the time complexity of applying equivariant weight matrices in tensor-power networks from O(n^(l+k)) to O(n^k) or better for four classical groups.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.