pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.26280 · v1 · pith:CBXDWFRHnew · submitted 2026-06-24 · ✦ hep-th

A Circle That Won't Return: The Fate of RR Fluxes and D-branes in Type 0A Tachyon Condensation

Ahmed Rakin Kamal This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 01:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords type 0A string theorytachyon condensationRR fluxesD-branesM-theory wedgeStückelberg mechanismGauss law
0
0 comments X

The pith

As one circle collapses in the type 0A M-theory wedge, the long-range RR field energy of an unscreened D_p^- source diverges.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the doubled RR sector and closed-string tachyon of type 0A string theory through the proposed M-theory picture of two circles joined at a point. It derives the branch-balance condition from the type 0A equations of motion and isolates the branch-odd RR fluctuation that sources the tachyon on a symmetric background. The central result is a Gauss-law estimate showing that, for an isolated unscreened collapsing-branch D_p^- source, the long-range RR field-energy cost scales inversely with the shrinking circle radius and therefore becomes infinitely costly as the branch reaches the type IIA endpoint. The analysis further distinguishes infrared screening of the relative RR field via an effective higher-form Stückelberg mechanism from possible discharge of localized relative charge, and uses Wess-Zumino couplings to identify an effective relative-charge carrier together with a thin-wall criterion for when the discharge channel D_p^- to D_p^+ is energetically favored.

Core claim

For an isolated unscreened collapsing-branch D_p^- source, a Gauss-law estimate shows that the long-range RR field-energy cost scales inversely with the shrinking circle and thus becomes infinitely costly, generalizing the D0^-brane decoupling in the original wedge picture.

What carries the argument

The M-theory wedge S^1 vee S^1 whose two circle branches are each associated with one copy of the RR sector; tachyon condensation shrinks one branch while the branch-balance condition from the equations of motion enforces equilibrium.

If this is right

  • The relative RR field undergoes infrared screening through an effective higher-form Stückelberg mechanism.
  • Localized relative charge can discharge through the channel D_p^- to D_p^+ when a parametric thin-wall criterion derived from Wess-Zumino couplings is satisfied.
  • Unscreened RR data cannot persist on the collapsing branch without incurring infinite energy cost.
  • Standard D-brane Wess-Zumino couplings identify an effective carrier for the relative charge.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same infinite-cost mechanism may appear in other tachyon-condensation models that involve a shrinking circle or doubled flux sector.
  • The result constrains which RR data can survive in the type IIA endpoint of type 0A condensation.
  • The thin-wall discharge criterion could be checked by constructing explicit time-dependent solutions that track the energy balance between the two charge states.

Load-bearing premise

The M-theory description on the wedge of two circles correctly associates the two RR copies with the branches and models tachyon condensation as the shrinking of one branch to the type IIA endpoint.

What would settle it

An explicit solution or energy calculation in which the RR field energy of an unscreened collapsing-branch source remains finite as the circle radius approaches zero would falsify the divergence claim.

read the original abstract

We study the closed-string tachyon and doubled Ramond-Ramond sector of type 0A in light of the proposed M-theory description on $S^1\vee S^1$-the wedge of two circles joined at a point. In this picture the two RR copies are associated with the two circle components, which we call branches, and tachyon condensation corresponds to shrinking one branch to the type IIA endpoint. From the type 0A equations of motion, we derive the branch-balance condition for a tachyon stationary point and identify the branch-odd RR fluctuation that sources the tachyon around a symmetric background. We then analyze the fate of the collapsing branch RR data as one branch of the wedge collapses to the type IIA endpoint. For an isolated unscreened collapsing-branch $D_p^-$ source, a Gauss-law estimate shows that the long-range RR field-energy cost scales inversely with the shrinking circle and thus becoming infinitely costly, generalizing the $D0^-$-brane decoupling in the original wedge picture. We describe the infrared screening of the relative RR field through an effective higher-form St\"uckelberg mechanism and distinguish this from a possible discharge of localized relative charge. Finally, using standard Wess-Zumino couplings of D-branes, we identify an effective relative-charge carrier and derive a parametric thin-wall criterion for when such a discharge channel $D_p^- \to D_p^+$ can be energetically favored.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the closed-string tachyon and doubled RR sector of type 0A string theory in the context of a proposed M-theory description on the wedge S¹ ∨ S¹. It derives a branch-balance condition for tachyon stationary points from the type 0A equations of motion, identifies the branch-odd RR fluctuation, and analyzes the fate of collapsing-branch RR data. For an isolated unscreened D_p^- source, a Gauss-law estimate shows the long-range RR field energy cost diverges as the circle shrinks. The work describes IR screening via an effective higher-form Stückelberg mechanism, distinguishes it from localized charge discharge, and uses Wess-Zumino couplings to identify an effective relative-charge carrier together with a parametric thin-wall criterion for the D_p^- → D_p^+ discharge channel.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper supplies a concrete mechanism for RR flux and D-brane decoupling during type 0A tachyon condensation, generalizing the D0^- case within the wedge geometry. The Gauss-law scaling argument and the thin-wall discharge criterion constitute falsifiable, parameter-free predictions that could guide further model-building in string theory. The absence of ad-hoc parameters in the EOM-derived balance condition and the explicit distinction between screening and discharge are strengths that enhance the work's technical value.

major comments (2)
  1. [Introduction / M-theory description section] The branch-balance condition and the subsequent energy-cost analysis rest on the proposed M-theory wedge geometry S¹ ∨ S¹ and the input association of the two RR copies with the two branches. This geometry is stated as proposed rather than derived, creating a moderate circularity burden for the central claim that the RR field energy becomes infinitely costly on the collapsing branch.
  2. [Section containing the Gauss-law estimate] The Gauss-law estimate for the inverse scaling of long-range RR field energy with the shrinking circle (generalizing D0^- decoupling) is load-bearing for the decoupling conclusion, yet the explicit field configuration, integration measure on the wedge, and handling of the unscreened source are not spelled out sufficiently to confirm the scaling is independent of modeling choices.
minor comments (2)
  1. The distinction between 'branch-odd RR fluctuation' and the Stückelberg screening mechanism would benefit from an explicit equation or diagram early in the text to clarify their relation to the symmetric background.
  2. Notation for D_p^- versus D_p^+ (relative charge) should be introduced with a brief reminder of the Wess-Zumino coupling conventions used to identify the effective carrier.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading, positive assessment of the work's significance, and constructive major comments. We address each point below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity and rigor.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Introduction / M-theory description section] The branch-balance condition and the subsequent energy-cost analysis rest on the proposed M-theory wedge geometry S¹ ∨ S¹ and the input association of the two RR copies with the two branches. This geometry is stated as proposed rather than derived, creating a moderate circularity burden for the central claim that the RR field energy becomes infinitely costly on the collapsing branch.

    Authors: The S¹ ∨ S¹ wedge is explicitly introduced in the manuscript as a proposed M-theory description, motivated by and generalizing the earlier D0-brane analysis rather than derived ab initio here. The branch-balance condition itself follows directly from the type 0A equations of motion once the geometry and the association of the two RR sectors with the two branches are assumed. The energy-cost claim is therefore conditional on this proposal. We will revise the introduction to state this conditional status more explicitly, to cite the prior literature motivating the wedge, and to emphasize that the EOM-derived balance condition and the subsequent analysis stand or fall with the proposed geometry. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Section containing the Gauss-law estimate] The Gauss-law estimate for the inverse scaling of long-range RR field energy with the shrinking circle (generalizing D0^- decoupling) is load-bearing for the decoupling conclusion, yet the explicit field configuration, integration measure on the wedge, and handling of the unscreened source are not spelled out sufficiently to confirm the scaling is independent of modeling choices.

    Authors: We agree that the Gauss-law argument requires additional explicit detail to establish the scaling rigorously. In the revised version we will expand the relevant section to specify: the explicit RR field ansatz satisfying the equations of motion on the wedge, the precise integration measure entering the energy integral, and the modeling of the isolated unscreened source as a delta-function charge with no accompanying screening currents. This will demonstrate that the inverse scaling with the shrinking radius follows from Gauss's law and the wedge geometry alone. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained within proposed framework

full rationale

The paper states its M-theory wedge picture (S^1 vee S^1 with RR copies associated to branches) as a proposed input framework rather than a derived result. Within that setup it derives the branch-balance condition directly from the type 0A equations of motion and applies a standard Gauss-law scaling estimate to the RR field energy of an unscreened source. The Stückelberg screening and Wess-Zumino analysis likewise use conventional tools on the assumed geometry. No quoted step equates a claimed prediction or first-principles result to its own inputs by construction, nor does any load-bearing claim reduce to a self-citation chain or fitted parameter renamed as output. The central energy-cost argument is therefore an independent scaling consequence inside the stated ansatz.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim depends on the wedge geometry as a domain assumption and introduces effective mechanisms without independent evidence outside the derivation.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption M-theory description on S^1 vee S^1 with the two RR copies associated with the two circle branches
    The paper studies the closed-string tachyon and doubled RR sector in light of this proposed description.
invented entities (2)
  • branch-odd RR fluctuation no independent evidence
    purpose: sources the tachyon around a symmetric background
    Identified from the type 0A equations of motion as the fluctuation that couples to the tachyon.
  • effective relative-charge carrier no independent evidence
    purpose: enables the discharge channel D_p^- to D_p^+
    Identified using standard Wess-Zumino couplings of D-branes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5794 in / 1549 out tokens · 27126 ms · 2026-06-26T01:10:09.713202+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 32 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    A Symmetry of the String Background Field Equations,

    T. H. Buscher, “A Symmetry of the String Background Field Equations,”Phys. Lett. B194(1987) 59–62

    1987

  2. [2]

    Path Integral Derivation of Quantum Duality in Nonlinear Sigma Models,

    T. H. Buscher, “Path Integral Derivation of Quantum Duality in Nonlinear Sigma Models,”Phys. Lett. B201 (1988) 466–472

    1988

  3. [3]

    Target Space Duality in String Theory,

    A. Giveon, M. Porrati, and E. Rabinovici, “Target Space Duality in String Theory,”Phys. Rept.244(1994) 77–202,arXiv:hep-th/9401139

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  4. [4]

    Strong-Weak Coupling Duality and Nonperturbative Effects in String Theory,

    A. Font, L. E. Ibanez, D. Lust, and F. Quevedo, “Strong-Weak Coupling Duality and Nonperturbative Effects in String Theory,”Phys. Lett. B249(1990) 35–43

    1990

  5. [5]

    Strong-Weak Coupling Duality in Four-Dimensional String Theory,

    A. Sen, “Strong-Weak Coupling Duality in Four-Dimensional String Theory,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A9 (1994) 3707–3750,arXiv:hep-th/9402002

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  6. [6]

    Unity of Superstring Dualities,

    C. M. Hull and P. K. Townsend, “Unity of Superstring Dualities,”Nucl. Phys. B438(1995) 109–137, arXiv:hep-th/9410167

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  7. [7]

    String Theory Dynamics in Various Dimensions,

    E. Witten, “String Theory Dynamics in Various Dimensions,”Nucl. Phys. B443(1995) 85–126, arXiv:hep-th/9503124

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  8. [8]

    Dirichlet Branes and Ramond-Ramond Charges,

    J. Polchinski, “Dirichlet Branes and Ramond-Ramond Charges,”Phys. Rev. Lett.75(1995) 4724–4727, arXiv:hep-th/9510017

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  9. [9]

    A Pair of Calabi-Yau manifolds as an exactly soluble superconformal theory,

    P. Candelas, X. C. de la Ossa, P. S. Green, and L. Parkes, “A Pair of Calabi-Yau manifolds as an exactly soluble superconformal theory,”Nucl. Phys. B359(1991) 21–74

    1991

  10. [10]

    Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,

    A. Strominger and C. Vafa, “Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,”Phys. Lett. B379(1996) 99–104,arXiv:hep-th/9601029

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  11. [11]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2(1998) 231–252,arXiv:hep-th/9711200. [Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 1113–1133 (1999)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  12. [12]

    Double Field Theory at Orderα ′,

    O. Hohm and B. Zwiebach, “Double Field Theory at Orderα ′,”JHEP11(2014) 075,arXiv:1407.3803 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  13. [13]

    No manifest T duality at orderα’3,

    S. W. Hsia, A. R. Kamal, and L. Wulff, “No manifest T duality at orderα’3,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 6, (2025) L061904,arXiv:2411.15302 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Completing R 4 using O(d, d),

    L. Wulff, “Completing R 4 using O(d, d),”JHEP08 (2022) 187,arXiv:2111.00018 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    One loop in D = 11 vs D = 10: 4-point check,

    A. Aggarwal, S. Chakrabarti, S. W. Hsia, A. R. Kamal, and L. Wulff, “One loop in D = 11 vs D = 10: 4-point check,”JHEP02(2026) 010,arXiv:2506.16391 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2026

  16. [16]

    Effective action of bosonic string theory at orderα ′3,

    M. Ameri, A. Pahlavan, and M. R. Garousi, “Effective action of bosonic string theory at orderα ′3,” 2025

    2025

  17. [17]

    Second order bosonic string effective action from O(d, d),

    L. Wulff, “Second order bosonic string effective action from O(d, d),”JHEP02(2025) 194,arXiv:2406.15234 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Superstrings in the Early Universe,

    R. H. Brandenberger and C. Vafa, “Superstrings in the Early Universe,”Nucl. Phys. B316(1989) 391–410

    1989

  19. [19]

    Scale Factor Duality for Classical and Quantum Strings,

    G. Veneziano, “Scale Factor Duality for Classical and Quantum Strings,”Phys. Lett. B265(1991) 287–294

    1991

  20. [20]

    Symmetries of Cosmological Superstring Vacua,

    K. A. Meissner and G. Veneziano, “Symmetries of Cosmological Superstring Vacua,”Phys. Lett. B267 (1991) 33–36

    1991

  21. [21]

    Topological Gravity as the Early Phase of Our Universe,

    P. Agrawal, S. Gukov, G. Obied, and C. Vafa, “Topological Gravity as the Early Phase of Our Universe,” 9, 2020

    2020

  22. [22]

    O(d) x O(d) symmetry of the space of cosmological solutions in string theory, scale factor duality and two-dimensional black holes,

    A. Sen, “O(d) x O(d) symmetry of the space of cosmological solutions in string theory, scale factor duality and two-dimensional black holes,”Phys. Lett. B 271(1991) 295–300

    1991

  23. [23]

    String Theories in Ten-Dimensions Without Space-Time Supersymmetry,

    L. J. Dixon and J. A. Harvey, “String Theories in Ten-Dimensions Without Space-Time Supersymmetry,” Nucl. Phys. B274(1986) 93–105

    1986

  24. [24]

    Spin Structures in String Theory,

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “Spin Structures in String Theory,”Nucl. Phys. B276(1986) 272

    1986

  25. [25]

    An O(16) x O(16) Heterotic String,

    L. Alvarez-Gaume, P. H. Ginsparg, G. W. Moore, and C. Vafa, “An O(16) x O(16) Heterotic String,”Phys. Lett. B171(1986) 155–162

    1986

  26. [26]

    Dualities of Type 0 Strings,

    O. Bergman and M. R. Gaberdiel, “Dualities of Type 0 Strings,”JHEP07(1999) 022,arXiv:hep-th/9906055

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  27. [27]

    Type 0 T-duality and the tachyon coupling,

    P. Meessen and T. Ortin, “Type 0 T-duality and the tachyon coupling,”Phys. Lett. B511(2001) 183–190, arXiv:hep-th/0103244

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  28. [28]

    M-theory on S1 ∨S 1 as Type 0A,

    Z. K. Baykara, E. Dudas, and C. Vafa, “M-theory on S1 ∨S 1 as Type 0A,”arXiv:2603.13468 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  29. [29]

    A Duality Web for Non-Supersymmetric Strings,

    Z. K. Baykara, M. Delgado, E. Dudas, H. Parra De Freitas, and C. Vafa, “A Duality Web for Non-Supersymmetric Strings,”arXiv:2604.07433 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    Heterotic Ouroboros,

    C. Altavista, S. Raucci, A. M. Uranga, and C. Wang, “Heterotic Ouroboros,”arXiv:2604.22915 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    The Art of Branching: Cobordism Junctions of 10d String Theories,

    C. Altavista, E. Anastasi, R. Angius, and A. M. Uranga, “The Art of Branching: Cobordism Junctions of 10d String Theories,”arXiv:2603.24667 [hep-th]. 10 Ahmed Rakin Kamal: A Circle That Won’t Return: RR Fluxes and D-branes in Type 0A Tachyon Condensation

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    Hoˇ rava-Witten theory onS1 ∨S 1 as type 0 orientifold,

    C. Altavista, E. Anastasi, S. Raucci, A. M. Uranga, and C. Wang, “Hoˇ rava-Witten theory onS1 ∨S 1 as type 0 orientifold,”arXiv:2603.25786 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    Towards Wedge Construction of Four-Dimensional Non-Supersymmetric Theories and Torsion Classes,

    K. Dasgupta and R. Tatar, “Towards Wedge Construction of Four-Dimensional Non-Supersymmetric Theories and Torsion Classes,” 5, 2026

    2026

  34. [34]

    String dualities and wedge singularities,

    I. Basile and D. L¨ ust, “String dualities and wedge singularities,” 6, 2026

    2026

  35. [35]

    Stable Non-BPS States in String Theory,

    A. Sen, “Stable Non-BPS States in String Theory,” JHEP06(1998) 007,arXiv:hep-th/9803194

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  36. [36]

    Tachyon Condensation on the Brane Anti-brane System,

    A. Sen, “Tachyon Condensation on the Brane Anti-brane System,”JHEP08(1998) 012,arXiv:hep-th/9805170

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  37. [37]

    D-branes and K Theory,

    E. Witten, “D-branes and K Theory,”JHEP12(1998) 019,arXiv:hep-th/9810188

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  38. [38]

    Rolling tachyon,

    A. Sen, “Rolling tachyon,”JHEP04(2002) 048, arXiv:hep-th/0203211

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  39. [39]

    Tachyon dynamics in open string theory,

    A. Sen, “Tachyon dynamics in open string theory,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A20(2005) 5513–5656, arXiv:hep-th/0410103

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  40. [40]

    Universality of the tachyon potential,

    A. Sen, “Universality of the tachyon potential,”JHEP12 (1999) 027,arXiv:hep-th/9911116

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  41. [41]

    The Inflationary brane anti-brane universe,

    C. P. Burgess, M. Majumdar, D. Nolte, F. Quevedo, G. Rajesh, and R.-J. Zhang, “The Inflationary brane anti-brane universe,”JHEP07(2001) 047, arXiv:hep-th/0105204

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  42. [42]

    Back to the origins of brane–antibrane inflation,

    M. Cicoli, C. Hughes, A. R. Kamal, F. Marino, F. Quevedo, M. Ramos-Hamud, and G. Villa, “Back to the origins of brane–antibrane inflation,”Eur. Phys. J. C 85no. 3, (2025) 315,arXiv:2410.00097 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Fire at the Tip of the Throat: Hagedorn Phase after brane-antibrane inflation?,

    D. Chakraborty and A. R. Kamal, “Fire at the Tip of the Throat: Hagedorn Phase after brane-antibrane inflation?,”arXiv:2606.08767 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    Don’t panic! Closed string tachyons in ALE space-times,

    A. Adams, J. Polchinski, and E. Silverstein, “Don’t panic! Closed string tachyons in ALE space-times,” JHEP10(2001) 029,arXiv:hep-th/0108075

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  45. [45]

    Things fall apart: Topology change from winding tachyons,

    A. Adams, X. Liu, J. McGreevy, A. Saltman, and E. Silverstein, “Things fall apart: Topology change from winding tachyons,”JHEP10(2005) 033, arXiv:hep-th/0502021

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  46. [46]

    Quantum Symmetries of String Vacua,

    C. Vafa, “Quantum Symmetries of String Vacua,”Mod. Phys. Lett. A4(1989) 1615

    1989

  47. [47]

    D-branes and dual gauge theories in type 0 strings,

    I. R. Klebanov and A. A. Tseytlin, “D-branes and dual gauge theories in type 0 strings,”Nucl. Phys. B546 (1999) 155–181,arXiv:hep-th/9811035

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  48. [48]

    String scattering from D-branes in type 0 theories,

    M. R. Garousi, “String scattering from D-branes in type 0 theories,”Nucl. Phys. B550(1999) 225–237, arXiv:hep-th/9901085

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  49. [49]

    On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland,

    H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, “On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland,”Nucl. Phys. B766 (2007) 21–33,arXiv:hep-th/0605264

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  50. [50]

    Anomalous U(1)’s in type I and type IIB D = 4, N=1 string vacua,

    L. E. Ibanez, R. Rabadan, and A. M. Uranga, “Anomalous U(1)’s in type I and type IIB D = 4, N=1 string vacua,”Nucl. Phys. B542(1999) 112–138, arXiv:hep-th/9808139

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  51. [51]

    Antisymmetric tensorZ p gauge symmetries in field theory and string theory,

    M. Berasaluce-Gonz´ alez, G. Ram´ ırez, and A. M. Uranga, “Antisymmetric tensorZ p gauge symmetries in field theory and string theory,”JHEP01(2014) 059, arXiv:1310.5582 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  52. [52]

    Effective actions for dual massive (super)p-forms,

    S. M. Kuzenko and K. Turner, “Effective actions for dual massive (super)p-forms,”JHEP01(2021) 040, arXiv:2009.08263 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021

  53. [53]

    A missing link: Brane networks and the Cobordism Conjecture,

    M. Dierigl and I. Ruiz, “A missing link: Brane networks and the Cobordism Conjecture,” 5, 2026

    2026

  54. [54]

    Dielectric branes,

    R. C. Myers, “Dielectric branes,”JHEP12(1999) 022, arXiv:hep-th/9910053

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  55. [55]

    Brane / flux annihilation and the string dual of a nonsupersymmetric field theory,

    S. Kachru, J. Pearson, and H. L. Verlinde, “Brane / flux annihilation and the string dual of a nonsupersymmetric field theory,”JHEP06(2002) 021, arXiv:hep-th/0112197

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  56. [56]

    Proposal for nonBPS D-brane action,

    J. Kluson, “Proposal for nonBPS D-brane action,”Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 126003,arXiv:hep-th/0004106

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  57. [57]

    The Fate of the False Vacuum. 1. Semiclassical Theory,

    S. R. Coleman, “The Fate of the False Vacuum. 1. Semiclassical Theory,”Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 2929–2936. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 16, 1248 (1977)]

    1977

  58. [58]

    The Fate of the False Vacuum. 2. First Quantum Corrections,

    C. G. Callan, Jr. and S. R. Coleman, “The Fate of the False Vacuum. 2. First Quantum Corrections,”Phys. Rev. D16(1977) 1762–1768

    1977

  59. [59]

    Gravitational Effects on and of Vacuum Decay,

    S. R. Coleman and F. De Luccia, “Gravitational Effects on and of Vacuum Decay,”Phys. Rev. D21(1980) 3305

    1980