REVIEW 1 cited by
Replicability is Asymptotically Free in Multi-armed Bandits
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We consider a replicable stochastic multi-armed bandit algorithm that ensures, with high probability, that the algorithm's sequence of actions is not affected by the randomness inherent in the dataset. Replicability allows third parties to reproduce published findings and assists the original researcher in applying standard statistical tests. We observe that existing algorithms require $O(K^2/\rho^2)$ times more regret than nonreplicable algorithms, where $K$ is the number of arms and $\rho$ is the level of nonreplication. However, we demonstrate that this additional cost is unnecessary when the time horizon $T$ is sufficiently large for a given $K, \rho$, provided that the magnitude of the confidence bounds is chosen carefully. Therefore, for a large $T$, our algorithm only requires $K^2/\rho^2$ times smaller amount of exploration than existing algorithms. To ensure the replicability of the proposed algorithms, we incorporate randomness into their decision-making processes. We propose a principled approach to limiting the probability of nonreplication. This approach elucidates the steps that existing research has implicitly followed. Furthermore, we derive the first lower bound for the two-armed replicable bandit problem, which implies the optimality of the proposed algorithms up to a $\log\log T$ factor for the two-armed case.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The Role of Randomness in Stability
Randomness complexity for replicability and differential privacy equals, up to one bit, the inverse log of global stability, and finite randomness complexity of PAC learning exactly matches finite Littlestone dimension.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.