REVIEW 3 cited by
Deep-Learning Classification and Parameter Inference of Rotational Core-Collapse Supernovae
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Deep-Learning Classification and Parameter Inference of Rotational Core-Collapse Supernovae
read the original abstract
We test deep-learning (DL) techniques for the analysis of rotational core-collapse supernovae (CCSN) gravitational-wave (GW) signals by performing classification and parameter inference of the maximum (peak) frequency and the GW strain amplitude ($\Delta h$) multiplied by the luminosity distance ($D$) attained at core bounce, respectively, $(f_{peak})$ and $(D \cdot \Delta h)$. Our datasets are built from a catalog of numerically generated CCSN waveforms assembled by Richers et al. 2017. Those waveforms are injected into noise from the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory and Advanced Virgo detectors corresponding to the O2 and O3a observing runs. For a network signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) above 5, our classification network using time series detects Galactic CCSN GW signals buried in detector noise with a false positive rate of 0.10% and a 98% accuracy, being able to detect all signals with SNR>10. The inference of $f_{peak}$ is more accurate than for $D \cdot \Delta h $, particularly for our datasets with the shortest time window (0.25 s) and for a minimum SNR=15. From the calibration plots of predicted versus true values of the two parameters, the standard deviation ($\sigma$) and the slope deviation with respect to the ideal value are computed. We find $\sigma_{D \cdot \Delta h} = 52.6$ cm and $\sigma_{f_{peak}} = 18.3$ Hz, with respective slope deviations of 11.6% and 8.3%. Our best model is also tested on waveforms from a recent CCSN catalog built by Mitra et al. 2023, different from the one used for the training. For these new waveforms, the true values of the two parameters are mostly within the $1\sigma$ band around the network's predicted values. Our results show that DL techniques hold promise to infer physical parameters of Galactic rotational CCSN events.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Contrastive self-supervised convolutional autoencoder for core-collapse supernova gravitational-wave detection
A contrastive self-supervised convolutional autoencoder detects core-collapse supernova gravitational waves with performance comparable to supervised CNNs, better generalization to unseen waveforms, and ~120 kpc sensi...
-
Parameter Estimation Horizon of Core-Collapse Supernovae with Current and Next-Generation Gravitational-Wave Detectors
Machine learning extracts core rotation and signal properties from CCSN gravitational waves, with next-generation detectors constraining rotation beyond 100 kpc for favorable orientations despite some uncertainties.
-
Parameter Estimation Horizon of Core-Collapse Supernovae with a Network of Gravitational-Wave Detectors
A CNN can recover supernova peak frequency out to about 30 kpc and rotation/amplitude out to 200-250 kpc with current networks, extending to roughly 300 kpc and 2-2.5 Mpc with third-generation detectors.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.