REVIEW 1 cited by
Transparency: Motivations and Challenges
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Transparency is often deemed critical to enable effective real-world deployment of intelligent systems. Yet the motivations for and benefits of different types of transparency can vary significantly depending on context, and objective measurement criteria are difficult to identify. We provide a brief survey, suggesting challenges and related concerns. We highlight and review settings where transparency may cause harm, discussing connections across privacy, multi-agent game theory, economics, fairness and trust.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
"Trust Junk" Leads to Unjustified Support for Highly Discriminatory Predictive Models
Accurate but irrelevant 'trust junk' in AI explanations made crowdsourced users trust and agree with a deliberately discriminatory model more.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.