Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Multi-Path Collaborative Reactive and Reflection agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.00430 v2 pith:CLSUSIAY submitted 2024-12-31 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords reasoningtasksagentsframeworkmulti-pathpathreactivereflection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Agents have demonstrated their potential in scientific reasoning tasks through large language models. However, they often face challenges such as insufficient accuracy and degeneration of thought when handling complex reasoning tasks, which impede their performance. To overcome these issues, we propose the Reactive and Reflection agents with Multi-Path Reasoning (RR-MP) Framework, aimed at enhancing the reasoning capabilities of LLMs. Our approach improves scientific reasoning accuracy by employing a multi-path reasoning mechanism where each path consists of a reactive agent and a reflection agent that collaborate to prevent degeneration of thought inherent in single-agent reliance. Additionally, the RR-MP framework does not require additional training; it utilizes multiple dialogue instances for each reasoning path and a separate summarizer to consolidate insights from all paths. This design integrates diverse perspectives and strengthens reasoning across each path. We conducted zero-shot and few-shot evaluations on tasks involving moral scenarios, college-level physics, and mathematics. Experimental results demonstrate that our method outperforms baseline approaches, highlighting the effectiveness and advantages of the RR-MP framework in managing complex scientific reasoning tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bridging Inference-Time Scaling and Episodic Memory with Action-Centric Graphs

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Graph-based action memory with dual-stream TD learning improves best-of-N inference scaling for LLM agents, reporting +20.81% success / +6.17% progress over vanilla baselines.

  2. DeCoDe: Defer-and-Complement Decision-Making via Decoupled Concept Bottleneck Models

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    DeCoDe combines concept bottleneck models with learning to defer to select per-instance among AI-only, human-only, and AI+human strategies, reporting accuracy gains over binary deferral baselines on three image datasets.

  3. Meta-Policy Reflexion: Reusable Reflective Memory and Rule Admissibility for Resource-Efficient LLM Agent

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Storing LLM reflections as predicate-like rules and applying them via prompt guidance plus hard validity filtering is reported to improve AlfWorld task accuracy over Reflexion, without weight updates.

  4. MUPA: Towards Multi-Path Agentic Reasoning for Grounded Video Question Answering

    cs.CV 2025-06

Pith tools