Einstein Probe discovery of the short period intermediate polar EP J115415.8-501810

A. Marino; B. Zhang; C. Jin; D. A. H. Buckley; D. de Martino; E. Kuulkers; F. Coti Zelati; F. Lu; H. Feng; H. Sun

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Einstein Probe discovery of the short period intermediate polar EP J115415.8-501810

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Einstein Probe finds a 231-second X-ray pulse in the intermediate polar EP J115415.8-501810 and shows it is produced by changing absorption, not by intrinsic flux changes.

desk verdict A clean, modest IP discovery paper: the 231 s soft X-ray periodicity is real but rests on one 3 ks exposure, and the authors are upfront about that. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.08304 v2 pith:COICKSWA submitted 2025-07-11 astro-ph.HE

Y. Xiao , M. Ge , N. Rea , F. Lu , H. Feng , L. Tao , D. de Martino , F. Coti Zelati

show 16 more authors

A. Marino E. Kuulkers W. Yuan C. Jin H. Sun J. Wu N. Hurley-Walker S. J. McSweeney D. A. H. Buckley B. Zhang S. Zhang S. Scaringi K. Mori Z. Yu X. Hou Y. Xu

This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.HE

keywords intermediatepolarcataclysmicvariablewhitedwarfaccretionX-raypulsationpartialcoveringabsorptionEinsteinProbesofttimingmagnetic

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the discovery and follow-up of EP J115415.8-501810, a transient intermediate polar caught by Einstein Probe in March 2024. It claims a $231 \pm 2$ s periodic modulation in the 0.3-2 keV band at about $4\sigma$ significance, with no corresponding pulsation in the 2-10 keV band. Phase-resolved spectral fitting shows the pulse is caused by a changing absorption column density (about $1.7\times10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$ in the bright phase versus $2.9\times10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$ in the faint phase) rather than by intrinsic changes in the X-ray flux. If true, the result shows that Einstein Probe can find new magnetic white-dwarf binaries in outburst and that soft X-ray pulse shapes of intermediate polars can be dominated by the geometry of the absorbing pre-shock accretion flow, not by the emission process itself.

What carries the argument

The mechanism that carries the argument is partial-covering absorption: a dense, localized absorber (modeled with the $tb pcf$ component in XSPEC) that covers roughly 90% of the X-ray source with a hydrogen column of order $10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$, superimposed on a much smaller interstellar column. As the white dwarf rotates, the line of sight through the cool pre-shock accretion flow changes, so the soft X-rays (0.3-2 keV) are periodically suppressed by photoelectric absorption while harder X-rays (2-10 keV) pass through largely unaffected. The timing detection itself rests on the $Z_2^2$ periodogram, with significance estimated by bootstrapping 10,000 uniform-distribution samples, and the period error quoted at 2 s at the 68% level.

What would settle it

A future pointed X-ray observation longer than about 20 ks either fails to recover a >4-sigma 0.3-2 keV periodicity between roughly 227 s and 235 s, or recovers a similar periodicity in the 2-10 keV band; either outcome would contradict the claim that the soft X-ray pulse is produced by changing partial-covering absorption rather than by intrinsic flux changes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

EP J115415.8-501810 is a cataclysmic variable of the intermediate polar type, with a white dwarf spinning in about 238 s and an orbital period of about 3.76 hr set by optical observations. Using a single 3,093 s Einstein Probe FXT observation, the paper detects a $231 \pm 2$ s periodicity in the 0.3-2 keV band with significance around $4\sigma$ using the $Z_2^2$ test, while the 2-10 keV light curve shows no significant periodicity. The phase-averaged 0.3-10 keV spectrum is described by an absorbed bremsstrahlung model with a partial-covering absorber of column density $N_{\rm H}=2.0\times10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$ and covering fraction near 0.9, much larger than the line-of-sight interstellar column. Fitting the pulse-on and pulse-off spectra separately, the paper finds that the partial-covering column changes from $1.7\times10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$ to $2.9\times10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$ while the normalization of the bremsstrahlung component stays constant; it concludes that the soft X-ray pulse is mainly an absorption effect, with the pre-shock accretion flow absorbing the pole at different projected columns as the white dwarf rotates. The optical spin period of 238 s lies close to the predicted negative beat period of the X-ray signal, so the 231 s feature may be the spin period or a sideband, a degeneracy the paper notes cannot be resolved from the current data.

Load-bearing premise

The detection of the 231 s period depends on a single 3,093 s exposure with only about 13 cycles, and its 4-sigma significance is computed assuming the X-ray background is white noise; if the source varies slowly or the detector drifts on minute timescales, the broad periodogram peak could be spurious or its period biased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The source becomes an example of an intermediate polar whose X-ray spin modulation is produced by absorption rather than by a varying emission region, so its 0.3-2 keV pulse fraction (about 41%) can be much stronger than its 2-10 keV pulse fraction (about 20%).
The near-equality of the optical 238 s period and the X-ray negative beat period (about 235 s) implies that optical and X-ray data can be reconciled by reprocessing of the spin signal in the binary; a precise X-ray period would fix which frequency is the true spin.
Einstein Probe's discovery of this transient IP demonstrates that wide-field soft X-ray monitors can catch previously unknown magnetic cataclysmic variables as they emerge from low states or undergo outbursts.
The ASKAP and MWA radio upper limits place EP J115415.8-501810 outside the bright radio-emitting long-period transient class despite its unusual transient X-ray behavior.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A single 3,093 s exposure covers only about 13 cycles of the 231 s signal, so the periodogram peak is broad; a longer pointed observation could resolve whether the true period is the 231 s spin or the 235 s sideband and would test the stability of the modulation over many cycles.
If the partial-covering interpretation is correct, the soft-to-hard pulse-fraction contrast should scale smoothly with energy; measuring the pulse spectrum with more counts would provide a quantitative test of the column-density swing versus any residual flux modulation.
Because the significance calculation assumes white noise, the same bootstrap procedure applied to a longer observation, or to a control source-free field region, could reveal whether low-frequency (red) variability contaminates the 4-sigma estimate.
Other magnetic cataclysmic variables found by wide-field X-ray surveys could be screened the same way: a transient IP with a soft-only X-ray pulse and an optical period near the sideband is a candidate absorption-dominated rotator.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Plainly: this is a solid, modest discovery paper. What is actually new: EP J1154-5018 is an intermediate polar with a 231 s soft X-ray periodicity, phase-resolved partial-covering column variation, and radio upper limits from ASKAP and MWA. The X-ray periodicity is not in the cited ATels or in Potter et al.'s optical study. The paper does a clean job: barycenter-corrected FXT data, a Z^2_2 period search with bootstrapped significance, spectral fits with tbabs*tbpcf*bremss, and explicit statements about what cannot be constrained. The radio null search is a useful addition.

Soft spots: the 231 s detection rests on a single 3093 s exposure, about 13 cycles, and the significance is against a white-noise null. If there is red noise on 100-300 s timescales, the peak could be biased. The authors acknowledge this by conditioning on instrumental white noise, but they do not present a red-noise control. The period assignment is also fragile: the 235 s negative beat and the 238 s optical period are close, and the paper itself says the envelope precludes a clear beat determination. That honesty is good, but it means the abstract's '231 s' should be read as the periodogram centroid under a white-noise model, not a high-precision spin period. The phase-resolved spectral result is the most interesting part and is internally consistent: the partial-covering column changes while the bremsstrahlung normalization does not. But it depends on the same periodicity, so if the period is wrong, that interpretation weakens. The temperature lower limit above 11 keV, with 12 keV fixed for phase-resolved fits, is a minor caveat; the authors checked robustness.

Overall, the central phenomenological claims hold up as measurements, with uncertainties the authors mostly state. The paper is not overreaching; it repeatedly flags limitations. The significance is moderate, but the source was already classified as an IP from optical data, so the X-ray period does not carry the whole classification. I would send this to a serious referee. It is the kind of paper that benefits from an expert checking the period search and spectral model, and it will be a useful reference for the EP mission and the CV/IP community. My own verdict would be accept with minor revisions, mainly asking for a red-noise or alternative-significance check and clearer language about the period ambiguity.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports follow-up X-ray observations of the transient EP J115415.8−501810 with the Einstein Probe FXT. The source was already classified optically as an intermediate polar with a 3.76 hr orbital period and a proposed 238.2 s white-dwarf spin period. From a single 3093 s FXT exposure, the authors detect a 231 ± 2 s periodic modulation in the 0.3–2 keV band at about 4σ using a Z2_2 test with a bootstrap null, report no significant 2–10 keV pulsation, and derive a 0.3–2 keV pulse fraction of 41 ± 9%. Phase-averaged spectroscopy is fit with tbabs × tbpcf × bremss, giving kT > 11 keV, a partial-covering column of 2.0 × 10^22 cm^-2 with covering fraction 0.87, and an unabsorbed 0.3–10 keV luminosity of ~2 × 10^32 erg s^-1 at a Gaia distance of 309.5 pc. Phase-resolved fits show that the pulse-on and pulse-off spectra differ mainly in the partial-covering column density (1.7 vs 2.9 × 10^22 cm^-2), with no significant change in the bremsstrahlung normalization. Archival ASKAP and MWA data yield only radio upper limits. The paper interprets the X-ray modulation as absorption by the pre-shock accretion flow and discusses the relation between the X-ray period and the optical spin/beat periods.

Significance. If the 231 s modulation is genuine, the paper provides a useful addition to the small sample of X-ray-detected intermediate polars with strong soft-band absorption modulation, and it also adds radio non-detections for a transient IP. The authors make good use of a short FXT observation and public radio archives, and they clearly report the spectral model, fit statistics, and upper limits. The central claim, however, rests on a single 3.1 ks exposure and on a significance estimate that assumes white noise; the period assignment is also entangled with the optical 238 s spin period and the 235 s beat period. For these reasons the X-ray periodicity should be treated as a candidate requiring confirmation, and the abstract currently overstates the certainty of the detection.

major comments (3)

[Sec. 2, period search paragraph] The 4σ significance is computed by comparing the maximum Z2_2 value with 10,000 simulations drawn from a uniform distribution, i.e., a pure white-noise null. The FXT light curve in Fig. 1 shows both a decreasing trend and short-timescale variability, and the observation covers only about 13 cycles at 231 s. With no red-noise or aperiodic-variability null (for example, simulated light curves that reproduce the observed power spectrum, or a permutation test on the data), the quoted significance is not robust. The 2–10 keV non-detection is only a weak check because that band has low count rates. Please add a red-noise control and report the resulting false-alarm probability, or explicitly temper the detection claim.
[Sec. 2, Fig. 2 and Sec. 4] The period assignment is underdetermined. The ±2 s bootstrap error is a centroid uncertainty under the white-noise assumption and does not include the systematic uncertainty implied by the broad periodogram envelope. The optical spin period (238 s) and the negative beat period (235 s) lie inside or near that envelope, and the text itself states that the envelope 'precludes a clear determination of a beat period in the X-rays.' The abstract's unqualified '231 s' therefore overstates the measurement. Please quote a period range that includes the systematic uncertainty, or explicitly describe the X-ray period as a candidate pending longer observations.
[Sec. 2, Table 2 and phase-resolved spectra] The phase-resolved conclusion that the modulation is mainly caused by a change in the partial-covering column rests on a single division into pulse-on (0.2–0.6) and pulse-off (0.6–1.2) with kT fixed at 12 keV. The difference in column density (1.7+0.4/−0.4 versus 2.9+0.6/−0.5 ×10^22 cm^-2) is only moderately significant, and the result should be tested for robustness to the phase-boundary choices and to the assumed kT over the allowed >11 keV range. Please quantify the significance of ΔNH explicitly rather than relying on the separation of the fitted values.

minor comments (6)

[Abstract] 'An hydrogen column density' should be 'a hydrogen column density'.
[Fig. 2 caption] The red line is labeled '2−6 keV' in the caption while the text says the period search used the 2–10 keV band; please make these consistent.
[References] The entries for Tingay et al. (2013) and Wayth et al. (2018) are missing the journal name (Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia).
[Sec. 4] The sentence 'IPs rarely undergo frequent luminosity state changes (e.g. (Kennedy et al. 2017; Littlefield et al. 2025)' contains a doubled parenthesis; please fix the formatting.
[Sec. 2, period search paragraph] The description of the bootstrap error is vague: 'the period distribution searched from 10,000 samples based on the observed distribution' should specify whether the bootstrap resamples photon arrival times or light-curve bins.
[Table 2] The phase intervals 'pulse-on (0.2–0.6)' and 'pulse-off (0.6–1.2)' are not symmetric in length; please either define equal phase intervals or justify the choice.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the 231 s period is a direct time-series measurement, the absorption-modulation interpretation is an independent spectral fit, and the optical reconciliation uses external data with the period ambiguity explicitly acknowledged.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are direct observational measurements and model fits, not derivations from fitted inputs. The 231±2 s period is obtained from a Z2_2 test on barycentered FXT photon arrival times, with significance estimated from 10,000 bootstrap samples; even if the white-noise null is too simple and the detection rests on a single 3093 s exposure, that is a statistical robustness concern, not circularity, because the period is measured from the data rather than imposed. The phase-resolved conclusion that the modulation arises from changing partial-covering absorption rests on spectral fits to two independently selected pulse-phase bins: the partial-covering column densities (1.7 vs 2.9 × 10^22 cm^-2) and the bremsstrahlung normalization (3.5 vs 3.6 × 10^-3) are separately free parameters, and the paper explicitly reports no significant normalization variation, so the absorption interpretation is not forced by construction. The reconciliation with the optical 238 s period uses an independent TESS optical frequency (Potter et al. 2024) and is presented cautiously: the paper states 'the broad envelope of the peak in the Z2_2 periodogram precludes a clear determination of a beat period in the X-rays' and explicitly considers the 235 s negative-beat and 234 s alternatives. Overlap of some authors with the optical follow-up is not load-bearing here, because the optical period is externally measured data rather than an unverified premise imported to force the X-ray result. No equation is defined in terms of the quantity it predicts; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction; no uniqueness theorem is invoked. The acknowledged limitations—single short exposure, possible red noise, broad periodogram envelope—are honest caveats and do not constitute circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on fitted spectral parameters and on an external optical classification. The 231 s pulsation itself is a direct measurement, so the main burden is the assumed IP nature, the single-exposure significance, and the fixed-temperature phase-resolved model. No new particles, forces, or objects are invented.

free parameters (5)

Partial covering column density nH (tbpcf) = 2.0e22 cm^-2 average; 1.7e22 pulse-on; 2.9e22 pulse-off
Fitted to FXT spectra with XSPEC model tbabs*tbpcf*bremss; the pulse-off value is higher, which is the evidence for absorption-modulated spin pulsation.
Covering fraction fcover (tbpcf) = 0.87 average; 0.88 pulse-on; 0.91 pulse-off
Second fitted parameter of the partial covering absorber; does not change significantly between pulse phases.
Bremsstrahlung normalization = 3.3e-3 phase average; 3.5e-3 pulse-on; 3.6e-3 pulse-off
Fitted normalization of the hot plasma component used to estimate unabsorbed flux and luminosity; consistent across phases within errors.
Bremsstrahlung temperature kT = >11 keV; fixed to 12 keV for phase-resolved fits
Unconstrained by the FXT band; the fixed 12 keV value is a modeling choice that could affect the inferred column densities.
Pulse-on and pulse-off phase intervals = 0.2-0.6 and 0.6-1.2
Hand-selected boundaries for the phase-resolved spectra; different boundaries would change the fitted column density contrast.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The source is an intermediate polar, as established by optical photometry and spectroscopy in Potter et al. (2024) and Buckley et al. (2024).
All X-ray interpretations (spin period, accretion curtain, beat frequencies) inherit this external classification; the EP data alone show a transient X-ray source, not specifically a CV or IP.
domain assumption The X-ray spectrum is described by tbabs*tbpcf*bremss with interstellar nH fixed to the Galactic value.
Section 2 spectral fitting; a more complex multi-temperature plasma (apec) was tried and could not be constrained, so the bremsstrahlung model is a simplification.
domain assumption The noise in the FXT period search is white and instrumental, so bootstrap samples from a uniform distribution give the significance.
Stated in Section 2 period search; if red noise is present, the 4 sigma significance is not valid.
domain assumption The Gaia DR3 parallax distance of 309.5 pc applies to the optical counterpart of the X-ray source.
Section 2 luminosity estimate; assumes the optical counterpart from Potter et al. (2024) is the same object as the X-ray transient.
domain assumption The spin modulation is caused by photoelectric absorption in a pre-shock accretion flow, not by intrinsic flux variation.
Section 4 scenario; the phase-resolved fits show column density changes and constant normalization, supporting but not proving this interpretation.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Einstein Probe discovery of the short period intermediate polar EP J115415.8-501810." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/COICKSWA

@misc{pith2026250708304,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Einstein Probe discovery of the short period intermediate polar EP J115415.8-501810},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/COICKSWA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.08304}
}

abstract

The X-ray transient source EP240309a/EP\,J115415.8$-$501810 was first detected by the Wide-Field X-ray Telescope (WXT) on board Einstein Probe (EP) during the commissioning phase. Subsequent optical observations confirmed it as a Cataclysmic Variable of the intermediate polar type with a 238.2\,s spinning white dwarf in a $\sim$3.76\,hr orbit. We report on the source discovery and follow-up studies made with the Follow-up X-ray Telescope (FXT) of EP. A periodic variation of 231\,s is detected in the 0.3$-$2\,keV band, while no obvious pulsation appears in the 2$-$10\,keV band. The spectral analysis shows that the X-ray emission could be described by an absorbed bremsstrahlung model with $kT$\textgreater\,11\,keV. The partial covering absorption, with an hydrogen column density $N_H$ = 2.0$\times 10^{22}\,\rm cm^{-2}$ and covering fraction around 0.9, is much larger than the interstellar absorption along the line of sight. According to the distance $d = 309.5$\,pc obtained from Gaia parallax, we estimate that the luminosity of this source in the 0.3$-$10\,keV range is $\sim 2\times10^{32}$\,erg\,s$^{-1}$. In addition, phase-resolved spectral analysis reveals that the detected periodic variation is mainly caused by the change in the absorption column density. In this scenario the spin modulation arises due to absorption from the pre-shock accretion flow of the X-ray emitting pole, while the optical radiation is modulated at the orbital side band ($\omega_{\rm spin} - \Omega_{\rm orbit}$) due to reprocessing in regions within the binary system. Due to its unusual transient behaviour for an intermediate polar, we have also searched for radio signals similar to those observed in the new class of long period transients. We derived upper limits with ASKAP (200--300\,$\mu$Jy\,beam$^{-1}$ between 800--1500 MHz) and MWA (40--90\,mJy\,beam$^{-1}$ between 80--300 MHz).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.08304 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Light curves of EP J1154−5018. The main panel shows the average count rates (black dots) of each observation by EP/WXT. The red vertical line indicates the start time of the EP/FXT observation. The inset displays the light curve (with 20 s bin size) and hardness ratio (with 120 s bin size) of EP/FXT observation. The details of the observations can be found in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Phase-average and phase-resolved spectral fitting of EP/ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

On the Physical Origins of Long Period Radio Transients
astro-ph.HE 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

LPRTs are likely a two-population phenomenon: short periods point to isolated neutron stars or white dwarfs, long periods to detached white-dwarf/neutron-star plus red-dwarf binaries powered by unipolar induction or m...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Arnaud, K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V , ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes, 17

1996
[2]

Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Rybizki, J., Fouesneau, M., Demleitner, M., & Andrae, R. 2021, AJ, 161, 147

2021
[3]

2012, A&A, 542, A22

Bernardini, F., de Martino, D., Falanga, M., et al. 2012, A&A, 542, A22

2012
[4]

2018, MNRAS, 478, 1185

Bernardini, F., de Martino, D., Mukai, K., & Falanga, M. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 1185

work page 2018
[5]

F., et al

Buccheri, R., Bennett, K., Bignami, G. F., et al. 1983, A&A, 128, 245

1983
[6]

Buckley, D. A. H., Monageng, I., Aydi, E., Scaringi, S., & Charles, P. A. 2024, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16554, 1

work page 2024
[7]

2024, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16572, 1 de Martino, D., Bernardini, F., Mukai, K., Falanga, M., & Masetti, N

Chang, N., Jiang, P., Liao, J., et al. 2024, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16572, 1 de Martino, D., Bernardini, F., Mukai, K., Falanga, M., & Masetti, N. 2020, Advances in Space Research, 66, 1209 Article number, page 5 A&A proofs: manuscript no. aa54876-25

work page 2024
[8]

& Magdziarz, P

Done, C. & Magdziarz, P. 1998, MNRAS, 298, 737

work page 1998

Show all 27 references

[9]

1993, MNRAS, 265, L35 HI4PI Collaboration, Ben Bekhti, N., Flöer, L., et al

Hellier, C. 1993, MNRAS, 265, L35 HI4PI Collaboration, Ben Bekhti, N., Flöer, L., et al. 2016, A&A, 594, A116

1993
[10]

W., Bunton, J

Hotan, A. W., Bunton, J. D., Chippendale, A. P., et al. 2021, PASA, 38, e009

2021
[11]

J., et al

Hurley-Walker, N., Rea, N., McSweeney, S. J., et al. 2023, Nature, 619, 487

2023
[12]

R., Garnavich, P

Kennedy, M. R., Garnavich, P. M., Littlefield, C., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, 956

2017
[13]

X., Liu, M

Ling, Z. X., Liu, M. J., Liu, Y ., et al. 2024, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16546, 1

2024
[14]

2025, The Astronomer’s Tele- gram, 17050, 1

Littlefield, C., Bonnardeau, M., & Garnavich, P. 2025, The Astronomer’s Tele- gram, 17050, 1

2025
[15]

L., Lenc, E., et al

McConnell, D., Hale, C. L., Lenc, E., et al. 2020, PASA, 37, e048

2020
[16]

2017, PASP, 129, 062001

Mukai, K. 2017, PASP, 129, 062001

2017
[17]

L., et al

Murphy, T., Chatterjee, S., Kaplan, D. L., et al. 2013, PASA, 30, e006

2013
[18]

Norton, A. J. & Watson, M. G. 1989, MNRAS, 237, 853

1989
[19]

R., McKinley, B., Hurley-Walker, N., et al

Offringa, A. R., McKinley, B., Hurley-Walker, N., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 606

2014
[20]

L., Norton, A

Parker, T. L., Norton, A. J., & Mukai, K. 2005, A&A, 439, 213

2005
[21]

1994, PASP, 106, 209

Patterson, J. 1994, PASP, 106, 209

1994
[22]

B., Buckley, D

Potter, S. B., Buckley, D. A. H., Scaringi, S., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 532, L21

2024
[23]

R., Mason, K

Rosen, S. R., Mason, K. O., & Cordova, F. A. 1988, MNRAS, 231, 549

1988
[24]

J., Goeke, R., Bowman, J

Tingay, S. J., Goeke, R., Bowman, J. D., et al. 2013, 30, 7

2013
[25]

B., Tingay, S

Wayth, R. B., Tingay, S. J., Trott, C. M., et al. 2018, 35, 33

2018
[26]

2000, ApJ, 542, 914

Wilms, J., Allen, A., & McCray, R. 2000, ApJ, 542, 914

2000
[27]

2022, in Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics, ed

Yuan, W., Zhang, C., Chen, Y ., & Ling, Z. 2022, in Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics, ed. C. Bambi & A. Sangangelo, 86 Article number, page 6

2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Arnaud, K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V , ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes, 17

1996

[2] [2]

Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Rybizki, J., Fouesneau, M., Demleitner, M., & Andrae, R. 2021, AJ, 161, 147

2021

[3] [3]

2012, A&A, 542, A22

Bernardini, F., de Martino, D., Falanga, M., et al. 2012, A&A, 542, A22

2012

[4] [4]

2018, MNRAS, 478, 1185

Bernardini, F., de Martino, D., Mukai, K., & Falanga, M. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 1185

work page 2018

[5] [5]

F., et al

Buccheri, R., Bennett, K., Bignami, G. F., et al. 1983, A&A, 128, 245

1983

[6] [6]

Buckley, D. A. H., Monageng, I., Aydi, E., Scaringi, S., & Charles, P. A. 2024, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16554, 1

work page 2024

[7] [7]

2024, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16572, 1 de Martino, D., Bernardini, F., Mukai, K., Falanga, M., & Masetti, N

Chang, N., Jiang, P., Liao, J., et al. 2024, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16572, 1 de Martino, D., Bernardini, F., Mukai, K., Falanga, M., & Masetti, N. 2020, Advances in Space Research, 66, 1209 Article number, page 5 A&A proofs: manuscript no. aa54876-25

work page 2024

[8] [8]

& Magdziarz, P

Done, C. & Magdziarz, P. 1998, MNRAS, 298, 737

work page 1998