Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Simulating Task-Oriented Dialogues with State Transition Graphs and Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.14772 v1 pith:CPZY62QZ submitted 2024-04-23 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords responseconversationsllmsmodelsclassificationdataend-to-endfilling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper explores SynTOD, a new synthetic data generation approach for developing end-to-end Task-Oriented Dialogue (TOD) Systems capable of handling complex tasks such as intent classification, slot filling, conversational question-answering, and retrieval-augmented response generation, without relying on crowdsourcing or real-world data. SynTOD utilizes a state transition graph to define the desired behavior of a TOD system and generates diverse, structured conversations through random walks and response simulation using large language models (LLMs). In our experiments, using graph-guided response simulations leads to significant improvements in intent classification, slot filling and response relevance compared to naive single-prompt simulated conversations. We also investigate the end-to-end TOD effectiveness of different base and instruction-tuned LLMs, with and without the constructed synthetic conversations. Finally, we explore how various LLMs can evaluate responses in a TOD system and how well they are correlated with human judgments. Our findings pave the path towards quick development and evaluation of domain-specific TOD systems. We release our datasets, models, and code for research purposes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Procedural Knowledge Is Not Low-Rank: Why LoRA Fails to Internalize Multi-Step Procedures

    cs.AI 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    On multi-step procedural tasks, LoRA fine-tuning underperforms full fine-tuning at every rank tested because procedural knowledge requires high-rank weight updates.

  2. Beyond Factual Accuracy: Evaluating Coverage of Diverse Factual Information in Long-form Text Generation

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ICAT automatically scores long-form text on both factual accuracy and diverse aspect coverage, with its best variant correlating with human judgments better than standard n-gram and embedding metrics.

  3. Leveraging Graph Structures and Large Language Models for End-to-End Synthetic Task-Oriented Dialogues

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Users describe a conversation flow as a JSON graph and two LLM agents generate the full task-oriented dialogue from it.

Pith tools