Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

AI-GAs: AI-generating algorithms, an alternate paradigm for producing general artificial intelligence

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.10985 v2 pith:CROIAYAS submitted 2019-05-27 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords generalapproachintelligencelearningarguebecausecommunitymachine
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Perhaps the most ambitious scientific quest in human history is the creation of general artificial intelligence, which roughly means AI that is as smart or smarter than humans. The dominant approach in the machine learning community is to attempt to discover each of the pieces required for intelligence, with the implicit assumption that some future group will complete the Herculean task of figuring out how to combine all of those pieces into a complex thinking machine. I call this the "manual AI approach". This paper describes another exciting path that ultimately may be more successful at producing general AI. It is based on the clear trend in machine learning that hand-designed solutions eventually are replaced by more effective, learned solutions. The idea is to create an AI-generating algorithm (AI-GA), which automatically learns how to produce general AI. Three Pillars are essential for the approach: (1) meta-learning architectures, (2) meta-learning the learning algorithms themselves, and (3) generating effective learning environments. I argue that either approach could produce general AI first, and both are scientifically worthwhile irrespective of which is the fastest path. Because both are promising, yet the ML community is currently committed to the manual approach, I argue that our community should increase its research investment in the AI-GA approach. To encourage such research, I describe promising work in each of the Three Pillars. I also discuss AI-GA-specific safety and ethical considerations. Because it it may be the fastest path to general AI and because it is inherently scientifically interesting to understand the conditions in which a simple algorithm can produce general AI (as happened on Earth where Darwinian evolution produced human intelligence), I argue that the pursuit of AI-GAs should be considered a new grand challenge of computer science research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 52 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Beyond Fixed Representations: The Vocabulary and Verifier Gaps in Open-Ended AI

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Open-ended AI is blocked by a vocabulary gap (inventing reusable primitives) and a verifier gap (valuing them when payoff is delayed), unified under cognitive discrepancy reduction and a four-level autonomy ladder.

  2. Evolutionary Developmental Biology Can Serve as the Conceptual Foundation for a New Design Paradigm in Artificial Intelligence

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper proposes regulatory connections, weak linkage, and component-level variation-selection, drawn from evo-devo, as the unifying conceptual foundation for a new AI design paradigm.

  3. Automated Capability Discovery via Foundation Model Self-Exploration

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ACD automatically generates thousands of open-ended tasks and clusters them into dozens of capability and failure categories, with LLM-vs-human scoring agreement (F1 = 0.86).

  4. Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Ecosystem: Evolutionary Developments, Challenges, and Future Directions

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 3.5 of 10

    AIIE is framed as an AI-dominated innovation ecosystem whose participant mix, coopetition, and goals shift by lifecycle stage, illustrated with Owkin and four open challenges.

Pith tools