Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

On-demand storage and retrieval of single photons from a semiconductor quantum dot in a room-temperature atomic vapor memory

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read On-demand storage and retrieval of single photons from a quantum dot is demonstrated in a room-temperature cesium vapor memory.

desk verdict A genuine advance in QD-vapor interfaces with an honest but significant gap: the retrieved light's nonclassical statistics are never measured. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.15663 v1 pith:CT47QRYI submitted 2025-01-26 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.optics

Benjamin Maass , Avijit Barua , Norman Vincenz Ewald , Elizabeth Robertson , Kartik Gaur , Suk In Park , Sven Rodt , Jin-Dong Song
show 2 more authors
Stephan Reitzenstein Janik Wolters
This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.mes-hallphysics.optics
keywords single-photonstoragequantummemorydotcesiumvaporladder-typeon-demandretrievaltime-bandwidthproductroom-temperatureatomic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Quantum networks need to buffer and synchronize photons from different kinds of sources, but solid-state single-photon emitters and room-temperature atomic memories operate on very different timescales and wavelengths. This paper demonstrates a working interface: single photons from a deterministically fabricated InGaAs quantum dot, tuned to the cesium D1 line at 895 nm, are stored in a warm cesium-vapor ladder-type memory and retrieved on demand after a programmable storage time. The authors report retrieval up to 19.8(3) ns, an internal efficiency of $\eta_\mathrm{int}=0.6(1)\%$, and a time-bandwidth product of $B=14(1)$, meaning the stored photon can be held more than an order of magnitude longer than the quantum dot's 1.4 ns exciton lifetime. This turns a previous fixed delay into a controllable buffer, a step toward heterogeneous quantum networks that mix solid-state sources with atomic memories.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is a ladder-type memory in warm cesium vapor: a strong control field writes the incoming photon field into a collective spinwave, a spin-orbital coherence of the atoms, and a second control pulse maps it back into light. The source side is a hybrid circular Bragg grating cavity with a deterministically positioned InGaAs quantum dot, temperature-tuned so its emission overlaps the cesium D1 line. The ratio of the memory's spectral acceptance window to the quantum dot linewidth, together with the temporal overlap between photon and control pulse, determines the efficiency, while the hyperfine manifold of the $6D_{3/2}$ storage level produces a beating that makes retrieval efficiency oscillate with storage time.

What would settle it

Measure the second-order correlation $g^{(2)}(0)$ of the photons emerging from the memory at the demonstrated storage times using a Hanbury Brown and Twiss setup; a value at or above 0.5 would show that the retrieved field is not single-photon-level, contradicting the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that a room-temperature atomic-vapor memory can capture and re-emit on demand the broadband photons of a semiconductor quantum dot, rather than merely delay them. The arrival-time histogram shows a storage period followed by a clear retrieval peak at $\tau_s = 13.8(3)$ ns, with the retrieval time tunable up to 19.8(3) ns. The memory's internal efficiency is $\eta_\mathrm{int}=0.6(1)\%$, and the time-bandwidth product $B=14(1)$ is set by comparing the storage time with the QD exciton lifetime of 1.4(1) ns. The modest efficiency is attributed to the mismatch between the quantum dot's 5.1(7) GHz inhomogeneous linewidth and the memory's 560(60) MHz acceptance window, together with temporal mode mismatch, while the memory's spinwave dephasing time of about 32 ns is identified as the fundamental storage-time limit.

Load-bearing premise

The retrieved light is counted as single photons without a direct measurement of its photon statistics; the claim depends on the assumption that the memory readout adds no noise that would destroy the sub-Poissonian character of the quantum dot emission.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Real-time control of a quantum dot photon's arrival time becomes possible, enabling buffering and synchronization in quantum networks that mix different single-photon sources.
  • Because the storage time exceeds the quantum dot exciton lifetime by more than an order of magnitude, the memory can hold a photon until a synchronization event rather than only delaying it by a fixed amount.
  • Inserting a spectral filter before the memory would formally increase the internal efficiency by about a factor of ten, matching the fraction of quantum dot emission inside the memory acceptance window, though the net storage-and-retrieval rate would not improve.
  • The observed non-monotonic efficiency versus storage time is explained by beating among hyperfine spinwave contributions; preparing the atoms in a stretched state should remove this oscillation and make retrieval efficiency smoother.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct Hanbury Brown and Twiss measurement on the retrieved photons is the natural next check: if the memory is truly noiseless at the single-photon level, the second-order correlation at zero delay after retrieval should stay below 0.5.
  • The same interface could be substantially improved by using a resonantly excited or Purcell-narrowed quantum dot; with a linewidth closer to the memory's 560 MHz acceptance window, the internal efficiency would jump by roughly an order of magnitude.
  • Because the retrieval efficiency beats and rephases with storage time, a practical buffer could deliberately choose rephasing maxima to optimize readout at specific synchronization delays.
  • The demonstrated interface also suggests that alkali vapor memories can serve as a common buffer for several different kinds of single-photon sources, provided each source is wavelength-matched to the memory transition.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The authors report an experiment in which photons from a deterministically fabricated InGaAs quantum dot in a hybrid circular Bragg grating, tuned to the Cs D1 line at 895 nm, are sent into a room-temperature cesium vapor ladder-type memory. A control pulse stores and later retrieves the light after a programmable delay up to 19.8(3) ns, with an end-to-end efficiency of 0.026(4)% and an internal (as defined) efficiency of 0.6(1)%; the ratio of storage time to the QD exciton lifetime gives B = 14(1). The QD input is characterized by g^(2)(0) = 0.15(2) and a linewidth of 5.1(7) GHz; the memory parameters and loss budget are taken from a prior characterization of the same memory and from the present setup. The paper interprets the control-dependent retrieval peak as on-demand storage and retrieval of single photons.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is an important step: it would be the first demonstration of on-demand, variable-time storage and retrieval of QD photons in a room-temperature vapor memory, with storage times exceeding the QD exciton lifetime by more than an order of magnitude. The paper has clear strengths: a deterministic QD-cavity source, a transparent loss budget in Table I and Appendix H, direct measurement of the input g^(2)(0) and linewidth, and a control-pulse-dependent retrieval signal. The main caveat is that the single-photon character of the retrieved field is not directly measured; the nonclassical nature of the stored and retrieved light is inferred from the input statistics and the memory's previously characterized low noise. This limits the strength of the title-level claim but does not invalidate the demonstration of on-demand retrieval of light from a single-photon source.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. IV and Fig. 4] The retrieved light's photon statistics are never measured. The title and abstract claim storage and retrieval of single photons, but the only evidence that the retrieved field is nonclassical is the input QD g^(2)(0) = 0.15(2) together with the low-noise memory characterization of Ref. [26]. Section IV explicitly states that the low end-to-end efficiency hinders correlation measurements on the stored and retrieved photons. This matters because the retrieval peak in Fig. 4 sits on a constant background of about 30 counts per 100 ps bin, and the memory noise properties in Ref. [26] were established with 0.06-photon attenuated laser pulses under conditions that do not automatically cover the present 5.1 GHz, non-resonantly excited input. Please either add a Hanbury Brown-Twiss measurement on the retrieved light, even with a longer integration, or revise the title, abstract, and claims to state that the retrieved field's single-photon character was not directly verified, and discuss the bound on the retrieved g^(2)(0) implied by the measured background.
  2. [Sec. III and Appendix H] The quantity called "internal efficiency" is not the usual memory internal efficiency, because N_input includes all QD photons, only roughly 10% of which lie in the memory's 560 MHz acceptance window. The statement that spectral filtering before the memory could formally increase the internal efficiency by a factor of 10 confirms this. Since the comparison with the 15(4)% efficiency from Ref. [26] uses a different input spectral mode, the label "internal efficiency" is misleading. Please either define η_int relative to photons within the memory acceptance band, or rename the present quantity (e.g., "source-to-retrieval conversion efficiency excluding technical losses") and make the comparison with Ref. [26] explicitly mode-matched.
minor comments (4)
  1. [After Fig. 4] The string of "/uni00000013 ..." tokens following Fig. 4 appears to be a PDF or LaTeX encoding artifact and should be removed.
  2. [Fig. 8(b) caption] The caption gives the fine-structure splitting as "FSS = 9(2) meV", but the text and the main text give 9(2) µeV; the unit in the caption should be corrected.
  3. [Sec. III] The time-bandwidth product B is defined as τ_s/τ_QD, which is not the standard definition of a time-bandwidth product; please define this quantity explicitly and justify the choice, since readers may otherwise misunderstand the claim.
  4. [Sec. II.B] The sentence that the memory acceptance window is larger than the homogeneous linewidth (≈400 MHz) of the QD photons gives no source for the 400 MHz value, while the measured inhomogeneous linewidth is 5.1(7) GHz; please specify how the homogeneous value was obtained.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the central storage-and-retrieval observation rests on direct time-correlated measurement, with self-citations used only as non-load-bearing benchmarks.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is supported by the measured arrival-time histogram in Fig. 4, where a retrieval peak appears after the programmed storage time tau_s = 13.8(3) ns and the inset demonstrates variable retrieval up to 19.8(3) ns. This is direct experimental evidence rather than a quantity fitted to itself. The end-to-end efficiency eta_e2e = Nret/Ninput is formed from two separately measured photon numbers, and the internal efficiency eta_int = eta_e2e/T uses a setup transmission T measured with a calibration laser together with a stated spectral-filter factor of 0.66; no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. The comparison with Ref. [26], whose authors overlap with the present paper, is used as a benchmark to interpret the observed low efficiency and the non-monotonic efficiency-vs-time behavior, but the retrieval signal itself is not defined by that benchmark. Ref. [26] is an independent prior experimental characterization of the memory with attenuated laser pulses, so invoking it is real supporting evidence rather than a circular input. The absence of a retrieved-photon g^(2)(0) measurement, explicitly conceded in Section IV ('hinders e.g. correlation measurements on the stored and retrieved photons'), is a validation gap for the single-photon-level claim, but it is not a circularity. No equation in the paper reduces to its input by construction, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work to force the conclusion.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper does not introduce new theoretical entities or free parameters. The central evidence is experimental. The main assumed inputs are the prior memory characterization and the QD linewidth measurement.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Ladder-type room-temperature vapor memory stores and retrieves single photons via a spin-wave as described in Refs. [22,23,26].
    The paper relies on the physical model and prior characterization of the memory from these references, including its efficiency and noise performance.
  • domain assumption The scanning Fabry-Perot linewidth measurement (5.1(7) GHz) correctly represents the QD emission linewidth at 17 K.
    This linewidth is used to explain the reduced storage efficiency via W/delta_nu approximately 0.1.
  • standard math The wavelength calibration using Doppler-free spectroscopy and the Fabry-Perot etalon is accurate.
    This underpins the claimed alignment of the QD to the Cs D1 line.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On-demand storage and retrieval of single photons from a semiconductor quantum dot in a room-temperature atomic vapor memory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CT47QRYI

@misc{pith2026250115663,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On-demand storage and retrieval of single photons from a semiconductor quantum dot in a room-temperature atomic vapor memory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CT47QRYI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.15663}
}
abstract

Interfacing light from solid-state single-photon sources with scalable and robust room-temperature quantum memories has been a long-standing challenge in photonic quantum information technologies due to inherent noise processes and time-scale mismatches between the operating conditions of solid-state and atomic systems. Here, we demonstrate on-demand storage and retrieval of single photons from a semiconductor quantum dot device in a room-temperature atomic vapor memory. A deterministically fabricated InGaAs quantum dot light source emits single photons at the wavelength of the cesium D1 line at 895\,nm which exhibit an inhomogeneously broadened linewidth of 5.1(7)\,GHz and are subsequently stored in a low-noise ladder-type cesium vapor memory. We show control over the interaction between the single photons and the atomic vapor, allowing for variable retrieval times of up to 19.8(3)\,ns at an internal efficiency of $\eta_\mathrm{int}=0.6(1)\%$. Our results significantly expand the application space of both room-temperature vapor memories and semiconductor quantum dots in future quantum network architectures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.15663 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Interconnection of QD SPS with atomic quantum memory. (a) Electronic band structure of the InGaAs QD; (b) Atomic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The QD-hCBG device and its single-photon properties. (a) SEM image (45 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Schematic of the combined experimental source–memory setup. The emitted QD photons are collected with an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Arrival time histogram of the QD single-photon storage experiment. The bin width of the data is 100 ps. QD photons [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Second-order photon autocorrelation function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Linewidth measurement with scanning Fabry-Pérot [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) Power dependent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A digital twin of atomic ensemble quantum memories

    quant-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A quantum channel framework, implemented in code, models atomic ensemble quantum memories with Kraus operators and benchmarks them in a quantum token protocol.

  2. A Concise Primer on Solid-State Quantum Emitters

    quant-ph 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

    A concise primer that compares quantum dots, diamond defects, and silicon carbide defects as quantum emitters, detailing metrics, applications, and integration prospects.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [26]

    Thomas, S

    S. Thomas, S. Sagona-Stophel, Z. Schofield, I. Walm- sley, and P. Ledingham, Single-photon-compatible telecommunications-band quantum memory in a hot atomic gas, Phys. Rev. Appl.19, L031005 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [1]

    Perspectives of a quantum digital transformation: Near-term quantum computational devices and quantum processors

    Initially, an optical setup collects the single pho- tons emitted by the QD device and couples them into a single-mode fiber to be connected to the quantum mem- ory setup. In the following section, we first describe the fabrication of the QD device and its optical properties before presenting the QD-memory interface. A. QD single-photon source The QD-hCBG...

    work page

  3. [2]

    H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature453, 1023 (2008)

    2008

  4. [3]

    L.-M. Duan, M. D. Lukin, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Long- distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics, Nature414, 413 (2001)

    2001

  5. [4]

    Y. Wang, A. N. Craddock, R. Sekelsky, M. Flament, and M. Namazi, Field-deployable quantum memory for quan- tum networking, Phys. Rev. Appl.18, 044058 (2022)

    2022

  6. [5]

    Jutisz, A

    M. Jutisz, A. Erl, J. Wolters, M. Gündoğan, and M. Krutzik, Standalone mobile quantum memory system (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [6]

    Heindel, J.-H

    T. Heindel, J.-H. Kim, N. Gregersen, A. Rastelli, and S. Reitzenstein, Quantum dots for photonic quantum in- formation technology, Advances in Optics and Photonics 15, 613 (2023)

    2023

  8. [7]

    Senellart, G

    P. Senellart, G. Solomon, and A. White, High- performance semiconductor quantum-dot single- photon sources, Nature Nanotechnology 12, 10.1038/nnano.2017.218 (2017)

    doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.218 2017

Show all 61 references
  1. [8]

    Y. Yu, S. Liu, C.-M. Lee, P. Michler, S. Reitzenstein, K. Srinivasan, E. Waks, and J. Liu, Telecom-band quan- tum dot technologies for long-distance quantum net- works, Nature Nanotechnology18, 1389–1400 (2023)

    2023

  2. [9]

    D. A. Vajner, L. Rickert, T. Gao, K. Kay- mazlar, and T. Heindel, Quantum communica- tion using semiconductor quantum dots, Ad- vanced Quantum Technologies 5, 2100116 (2022), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/qute.202100116

    2022 doi

  3. [10]

    H.-K. Lo, M. Curty, and K. Tamaki, Secure quan- tum key distribution, Nature Photonics8, 10.1038/npho- ton.2014.149 (2014)

    2014 doi

  4. [11]

    F. B. Basset, M. Valeri, E. Roccia, V. Muredda, D. Poderini, J. Neuwirth, N. Spagnolo, M. B. Rota, G. Carvacho, F. Sciarrino, and R. Trotta, Quantum key distribution with entangled pho- tons generated on demand by a quantum dot, Science Advances 7, eabe6379 (2021), https://www...

    2021 doi

  5. [12]

    Kómár, E

    P. Kómár, E. M. Kessler, M. Bishof, L. Jiang, A. S. Sørensen, J. Ye, and M. D. Lukin, A quantum network of clocks, Nature Physics10, 582 (2014)

    2014

  6. [13]

    Zhao, Y.-Z

    S.-R. Zhao, Y.-Z. Zhang, W.-Z. Liu, J.-Y. Guan, W. Zhang, C.-L. Li, B. Bai, M.-H. Li, Y. Liu, L. You, J. Zhang, J. Fan, F. Xu, Q. Zhang, and J.-W. Pan, Field demonstration of distributed quantum sensing without post-selection, Phys. Rev. X11, 031009 (2021)

    2021

  7. [14]

    B. C. Nichol, R. Srinivas, D. P. Nadlinger, P. Drmota, D. Main, G. Araneda, C. J. Ballance, and D. M. Lu- cas, An elementary quantum network of entangled opti- cal atomic clocks, Nature609, 689 (2022)

    2022

  8. [15]

    Wehner, D

    S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, and R. Han- son, Quantum internet: A vision for the road ahead, Science 362, eaam9288 (2018), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aam9288

    2018 doi

  9. [16]

    L. Zhai, M. C. Löbl, G. N. Nguyen, A. Javadi, C. Spinnler, and R. J. Warburton, Low-noise GaAs quan- tum dots for quantum photonics, Nature Communica- 11 tions 11, 10.1038/s41467-020-18625-z (2020)

    2020 doi

  10. [17]

    Akopian, L

    N. Akopian, L. Wang, A. Rastelli, O. G. Schmidt, and V. Zwiller, Hybrid semiconductor-atomic interface: slow- ing down single photons from a quantum dot, Nature Photonics 5, 230 (2011)

    2011

  11. [18]

    J. S. Wildmann, R. Trotta, J. Martín-Sánchez, E. Za- llo, M. O’Steen, O. G. Schmidt, and A. Rastelli, Atomic clouds as spectrally selective and tunable delay lines for single photons from quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 92, 235306 (2015)

    2015

  12. [19]

    T. Kroh, J. Wolters, A. Ahlrichs, A. W. Schell, A. Thoma, S. Reitzenstein, J. S. Wildmann, E. Zallo, R. Trotta, A. Rastelli, O. G. Schmidt, and O. Benson, Slow and fast single photons from a quantum dot inter- acting with the excited state hyperfine structure of the cesium D1-...

    2019

  13. [20]

    Bremer, S

    L. Bremer, S. Fischbach, S.-I. Park, S. Rodt, J.-D. Song, T. Heindel, and S. Reitzenstein, Cesium- vapor-based delay of single photons emitted by de- terministically fabricated quantum dot microlenses, Advanced Quantum Technologies 3, 1900071 (2020), https://onlinelibrary.wile...

    2020 doi

  14. [21]

    Vural, S

    H. Vural, S. Seyfferle, I. Gerhardt, M. Jetter, S. L. Por- talupi, and P. Michler, Delaying two-photon Fock states in hot cesium vapor using single photons generated on demand from a semiconductor quantum dot, Phys. Rev. B 103, 195304 (2021)

    2021

  15. [22]

    Trotta, J

    R. Trotta, J. Martín-Sánchez, J. S. Wildmann, G. Piredda, M. Reindl, C. Schimpf, E. Zallo, S. Stroj, J. Edlinger, and A. Rastelli, Wavelength-tunable sources of entangled photons interfaced with atomic vapours, Na- ture Communications7, 10375 (2016)

    2016

  16. [23]

    K. T. Kaczmarek, P. M. Ledingham, B. Brecht, S. E. Thomas, G. S. Thekkadath, O. Lazo-Arjona, J. H. D. Munns, E. Poem, A. Feizpour, D. J. Saunders, J. Nunn, and I. A. Walmsley, High-speed noise-free optical quan- tum memory, Phys. Rev. A97, 042316 (2018)

    2018

  17. [24]

    Ran Finkelstein, Eilon Poem, Ohad Michel, Ohr Lahad, and Ofer Firstenberg, Fast, noise-free memory for photon synchronization at room temperature, Science advances 4, eaap8598 (2018)

    2018

  18. [25]

    Wolters, G

    J. Wolters, G. Buser, A. Horsley, L. Béguin, A. Jöckel, J.-P. Jahn, R. J. Warburton, and P. Treutlein, Sim- ple atomic quantum memory suitable for semiconduc- tor quantum dot single photons, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 060502 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    B. Maaß, N. V. Ewald, A. Barua, S. Reitzenstein, and J. Wolters, Room-temperature ladder-type optical mem- ory compatible with single photons from semiconductor quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Appl.22, 044050 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    S. E. Thomas, L. Wagner, R. Joos, R. Sittig, C. Nawrath, P. Burdekin, I. M. de Buy Wenniger, M. J. Rasiah, T. Huber-Loyola, S. Sagona-Stophel, S. Höfling, M. Jet- ter, P. Michler, I. A. Walmsley, S. L. Portalupi, and P. M. Ledingham, Deterministic storage and retrieval of tele...

    2024

  21. [29]

    Rodt and S

    S. Rodt and S. Reitzenstein, High-performance de- terministic in situ electron-beam lithography enabled by cathodoluminescence spectroscopy, Nano Express2, 014007 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    S. Rodt, S. Reitzenstein, and T. Heindel, Deterministi- cally fabricated solid-state quantum-light sources, Jour- nal of Physics: Condensed Matter32, 153003 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Rickert, T

    L. Rickert, T. Kupko, S. Rodt, S. Reitzenstein, and T. Heindel, Optimized designs for telecom-wavelength quantum light sources based on hybrid circular Bragg gratings, Opt. Express27, 36824 (2019)

    2019

  24. [32]

    B.Yao, Y.W.RongbinSu, T.Z.ZhuojunLiu,andJ.Liu, Design for hybrid circular bragg gratings for a highly ef- ficient quantum dot single-photon source, Journal of the Korean Physical Society73 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    U.W.Pohl, Epitaxy of Semiconductors (SpringerNature, 2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    H. Wang, H. Hu, T.-H. Chung, J. Qin, X. Yang, J.-P. Li, R.-Z. Liu, H.-S. Zhong, Y.-M. He, X. Ding, Y.-H. Deng, Q. Dai, Y.-H. Huo, S. Höfling, C.-Y. Lu, and J.- W. Pan, On-demand semiconductor source of entangled photons which simultaneously has high fidelity, efficiency, and i...

    2019

  27. [35]

    J. Liu, R. Su, Y. Wei, B. Yao, S. F. C. da Silva, Y. Yu, J. Iles-Smith, K. Srinivasan, A. Rastelli, J. Li,et al., A solid-state source of strongly entangled photon pairs with high brightness and indistinguishability, Nature Nan- otechnology 14 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    Nawrath, R

    C. Nawrath, R. Joos, S. Kolatschek, S. Bauer, P. Pruy, F. Hornung, J. Fischer, J. Huang, P. Vi- jayan, R. Sittig, M. Jetter, S. L. Portalupi, and P. Michler, Bright source of purcell-enhanced, trig- gered, single photons in the telecom c-band, Ad- vanced Quantum Technologies 6...

    2023 doi

  29. [37]

    C.-W. Shih, S. Rodt, and S. Reitzenstein, Universal de- sign method for bright quantum light sources based on circular bragg grating cavities, Opt. Express31, 35552 (2023)

    2023

  30. [39]

    Burger, L

    S. Burger, L. Zschiedrich, J. Pomplun, S. Herrmann, and F. Schmidt, Hp-finite element method for simulating light scattering from complex 3D structures, inMetrol- ogy, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithogra- phy XXIX , Vol. 9424, edited by J. P. Cain and M. I. Sanch...

    2015

  31. [40]

    Schneider, Jcmsuite (14.08.2024)

    P.-I. Schneider, Jcmsuite (14.08.2024)

    2024

  32. [41]

    Hanbury Brown and R

    R. Hanbury Brown and R. Twiss, The question of cor- relation between photons in coherent light rays, Nature 178 (1956)

    1956

  33. [42]

    X. Ding, Y. He, Z.-C. Duan, N. Gregersen, M.-C. Chen, S.Unsleber, S.Maier, C.Schneider, M.Kamp, S.Höfling, C.-Y.Lu,andJ.-W.Pan,On-demandsinglephotonswith high extraction efficiency and near-unity indistinguisha- bility from a resonantly driven quantum dot in a mi- cropillar, P...

    2016

  34. [43]

    Santori, D

    C. Santori, D. Fattal, J. Vuckovic, G. S. Solomon, and Y. Yamamoto, Single-photon generation with inas quan- 12 tum dots, New Journal of Physics6, 89 (2004)

    2004

  35. [44]

    S. Gao, O. Lazo-Arjona, B. Brecht, K. T. Kaczmarek, S.E.Thomas, J.Nunn, P.M.Ledingham, D.J.Saunders, and I. A. Walmsley, Optimal coherent filtering for sin- gle noisy photons, Physical Review Letters123, 213604 (2019)

    2019

  36. [45]

    L. Zhai, M. C. Löbl, G. N. Nguyen, J. Ritzmann, A.Javadi, C.Spinnler, A.D.Wieck, A.Ludwig,andR.J. Warburton, Low-noise GaAs quantum dots for quantum photonics, Nature Communications11, 10.1038/s41467- 020-18625-z (2020)

    2020 doi

  37. [46]

    Moczala-Dusanowska, L

    M. Moczala-Dusanowska, L. Dusanowski, O. Iff, T. Hu- ber, S. Kuhn, T. Czyszanowski, C. Schneider, and S. Höfling, Strain-tunable single-photon source based on a circular Bragg grating cavity with embed- ded quantum dots, ACS Photonics 7, 3474 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1021/ac...

    2020 doi

  38. [47]

    Wijitpatima, N

    S. Wijitpatima, N. Auler, P. Mudi, T. Funk, A. Barua, B. Shrestha, I. Limame, S. Rodt, D. Reuter, and S. Reitzenstein, Bright electrically contacted circular Bragg grating resonators with deterministically inte- grated quantum dots (2024), arXiv:2406.08057 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [48]

    D. Main, T. M. Hird, S. Gao, E. Oguz, D. J. Saun- ders, I. A. Walmsley, and P. M. Ledingham, Prepar- ing narrow velocity distributions for quantum memories in room-temperature alkali-metal vapors, Phys. Rev. A 103, 043105 (2021)

    2021

  40. [49]

    Finkelstein, O

    R. Finkelstein, O. Lahad, I. Cohen, O. Davidson, S. Kiriati, E. Poem, and O. Firstenberg, Continuous pro- tection of a collective state from inhomogeneous dephas- ing, Phys. Rev. X11, 011008 (2021)

    2021

  41. [50]

    Express28, 3159 (2020)

    Roberto Mottola, Gianni Buser, Chris Müller, Tim Kroh, Andreas Ahlrichs, Sven Ramelow, Oliver Benson, Philipp Treutlein, and Janik Wolters, An efficient, tunable, and robust source of narrow-band photon pairs at the 87rb d1 line, Opt. Express28, 3159 (2020)

    2020

  42. [51]

    Buser, R

    G. Buser, R. Mottola, B. Cotting, J. Wolters, and P. Treutlein, Single-photon storage in a ground-state va- por cell quantum memory, PRX Quantum 3, 020349 (2022)

    2022

  43. [52]

    Davidson, O

    O. Davidson, O. Yogev, E. Poem, and O. Firstenberg, Single-photon synchronization with a room-temperature atomic quantum memory, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 033601 (2023)

    2023

  44. [53]

    D. W. Jenkins, Optical constants of AlxGa1- xAs, Journal of Applied Physics 68, 1848 (1990), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article- pdf/68/4/1848/18636134/1848_1_online.pdf

    1990

  45. [54]

    P. B. Johnson and R. W. Christy, Optical constants of the noble metals, Phys. Rev. B6, 4370 (1972)

    1972

  46. [55]

    D. T. F. Marple, Refractive Index of GaAs, Journal of Applied Physics 35, 1241 (1964), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article- pdf/35/4/1241/18331384/1241_1_online.pdf

    1964

  47. [56]

    L. V. R. de Marcos, J. I. Larruquert, J. A. Méndez, and J. A. Aznárez, Self-consistent optical constants of sio2 and ta2o5 films, Opt. Mater. Express6, 3622 (2016)

    2016

  48. [57]

    Gschrey, R

    M. Gschrey, R. Schmidt, J.-H. Schulze, A. Strittmatter, S. Rodt, and S. Reitzenstein, Resolution and align- ment accuracy of low-temperature in situ electron beam lithography for nanophotonic device fabrica- tion, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B 33, 021603 (2015), htt...

    2015 doi

  49. [58]

    A. A. Madigawa, J. N. Donges, B. Gaál, S. Li, M. A. Jacobsen, H. Liu, D. Dai, X. Su, X. Shang, H. Ni, J. Schall, S. Rodt, Z. Niu, N. Gregersen, S. Reitzenstein, and B. Munkhbat, Assessing the alignment accuracy of state-of-the-art deterministic fabrication methods for sin- gle...

    2024 doi

  50. [59]

    M. W. Cole, S. Salimian, C. B. Cooper, H. S. Lee, and M. Dutta, Reactive ion etching of gaas with sicl4: A residual damage and elec- trical investigation, Scanning 14, 31 (1992), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/sca.4950140106

    1992 doi

  51. [60]

    J. J. Finley, A. D. Ashmore, A. Lemaître, D. J. Mowbray, M. S. Skolnick, I. E. Itskevich, P. A. Maksym, M. Hop- kinson, and T. F. Krauss, Charged and neutral exciton complexes in individual self-assembled In(Ga)As quan- tum dots, Phys. Rev. B63, 073307 (2001)

    2001

  52. [61]

    Ediger, G

    M. Ediger, G. Bester, B. D. Gerardot, A. Badolato, P. M. Petroff, K. Karrai, A. Zunger, and R. J. Warburton, Fine structure of negatively and positively charged excitons in semiconductor quantum dots: Electron-hole asymmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 036808 (2007)

    2007

  53. [62]

    Warming, E

    T. Warming, E. Siebert, A. Schliwa, E. Stock, R. Zim- mermann, and D. Bimberg, Hole-hole and electron-hole exchange interactions in single inas/gaas quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B79, 125316 (2009)

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.