Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Towards Demystifying Membership Inference Attacks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1807.09173 v2 pith:CU46Q4QU submitted 2018-06-28 cs.CR

Towards Demystifying Membership Inference Attacks

classification cs.CR
keywords membershipmodelinferenceattackattacksblack-boxdifferentlearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Membership inference attacks seek to infer membership of individual training instances of a model to which an adversary has black-box access through a machine learning-as-a-service API. In providing an in-depth characterization of membership privacy risks against machine learning models, this paper presents a comprehensive study towards demystifying membership inference attacks from two complimentary perspectives. First, we provide a generalized formulation of the development of a black-box membership inference attack model. Second, we characterize the importance of model choice on model vulnerability through a systematic evaluation of a variety of machine learning models and model combinations using multiple datasets. Through formal analysis and empirical evidence from extensive experimentation, we characterize under what conditions a model may be vulnerable to such black-box membership inference attacks. We show that membership inference vulnerability is data-driven and corresponding attack models are largely transferable. Though different model types display different vulnerabilities to membership inference, so do different datasets. Our empirical results additionally show that (1) using the type of target model under attack within the attack model may not increase attack effectiveness and (2) collaborative learning exposes vulnerabilities to membership inference risks when the adversary is a participant. We also discuss countermeasure and mitigation strategies.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Sublinearly Structured Deep Neural Networks Achieve Feature Learning Consistency for Compositional Functions

    stat.ML 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Sublinearly structured DNNs attain feature-learning consistency and universal approximation for hierarchically compositional functions, with popular CNNs fitting this structure on image benchmarks.

  2. DCMI: A Differential Calibration Membership Inference Attack Against Retrieval-Augmented Generation

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    DCMI infers RAG database membership by subtracting the system's yes-probability on a perturbed query from the original query, cancelling the interference of non-member retrieved documents.