Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Stability estimates for critical points of a nonlocal Sobolev-type inequality

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Quantitative stability holds for multi-bubble critical Hartree solutions.

desk verdict Genuinely new multi-bubble stability results for the Hartree inequality, but the n=7 branch is unsupported as typeset because condition (2.4) cannot be satisfied. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.01927 v2 pith:CVIWIAMY submitted 2025-01-03 math.AP

Minbo Yang , Shunneng Zhao This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35A2326D1035B3535J20
keywords nonlocalSobolevinequalityHardy-Littlewood-SobolevquantitativestabilitycriticalHartreeequationStruweprofiledecompositionLyapunov-Schmidtreductionbubbleinteractionsweightednorms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves a quantitative stability estimate for critical points of a nonlocal Sobolev-type inequality induced by the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality. The Euler-Lagrange equation is the critical Hartree equation, whose positive solutions are bubbles $W[\xi,\lambda]$. The claim is that any function lying near a sum of $\kappa\geq 2$ weakly interacting bubbles, whose residual is small in the dual norm, must lie at a controlled distance from the manifold of bubble sums; the allowed distance is governed by the piecewise rate $\tau_{n,\mu}$. This matters because it converts a qualitative rigidity statement into an explicit quantitative one in the previously open range $n\geq 6-\mu$, and it supplies the missing multi-bubble stability theory for the nonlocal inequality.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the linearized operator $\Phi_{n,\mu}[\sigma,\rho]$ of the Hartree equation around a bubble sum, together with the weighted norms $\|\cdot\|_*$ and $\|\cdot\|_{**}$ built from inner and outer weight functions $S_j$ and $T_j$. The proof adds a correction $\rho_0$ by solving the reduced system (3.6), controls the interaction term $\hbar$ through convolution estimates (Lemmas 2.5, 2.6 and 3.6), and proves the core a-priori bound $\|\varphi\|_*\leq C\|\hbar\|_{**}$ in Lemma 3.9 using a bubble-tree blow-up argument. The final distance estimate combines an energy estimate for $\nabla\rho_0$ with an $L^2$ bound for the remaining error $\rho_1$ and the interaction bound $Q\lesssim\|\hat{f}\|_{(D^{1,2})^{-1}}$.

What would settle it

Evaluate condition (2.4) for $n=7$ and $\mu=3$: the stated bound $(9-4\mu)/5$ equals $-0.6$, so no positive $\theta_2$ exists; verifying whether Lemma 2.5 can hold under any positive $\theta_2$ in the claimed range would directly test whether the $n=7$ branch of Theorem 1.1 is supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Under the parameter assumption $(\sharp)$, namely $\frac{n^2-6n}{n-4}<\mu<4$ and $n\geq 6-\mu$, Theorem 1.1 asserts that for $\kappa\geq 2$ and weakly $\delta$-interacting bubbles, the estimate $\operatorname{dist}_{D^{1,2}}(u,\mathcal{M}_0)\leq C\,\tau_{n,\mu}(\|\hat{f}\|_{(D^{1,2})^{-1}})$ holds whenever $u$ is $\delta$-close to the bubble sum, where $\tau_{n,\mu}(x)=x^{(2^*-1)/2}$ for $0<\mu<\frac{n+\mu-2}{2}$ and $\tau_{n,\mu}(x)=x^{2-\mu/(n-2)}$ otherwise. The theorem also proves the pairwise interaction bound (1.14), showing that bubble overlaps are controlled linearly by the residual. The proof achieves this by a Lyapunov-Schmidt reduction in specially weighted spaces, and the rates are designed to match the expected threshold behavior near $\mu=\frac{n+\mu-2}{2}$.

Load-bearing premise

The proof requires auxiliary parameters $\theta_1,\theta_2,\theta_3$ satisfying (2.3)-(2.4); as typeset, the $n=7$ case demands $0<\theta_2\leq (9-4\mu)/5$ with $\mu\in(7/3,4)$, an impossible requirement since $7/3>9/4$, so the stated $n=7$ range depends on an empty constraint as written.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, the result completes the quantitative stability picture for the nonlocal inequality in all dimensions $n\geq 6-\mu$, overlapping with the previously known low-dimensional range.
  • The rates $\tau_{n,\mu}$ give explicit exponents for how the distance to the bubble-sum manifold decays as the residual tends to zero.
  • The pairwise interaction bound (1.14) shows that in the same regime, bubble overlaps are controlled linearly by the residual.
  • Corollary 1.2 converts the estimate into a linear-in-residual bound for nonnegative functions with prescribed energy, matching the qualitative Struwe-type profile decomposition.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the auxiliary parameter condition (2.4) is genuinely empty for $n=7$, the theorem's $n=7$ branch would require a corrected version of Lemma 2.5; this is an internal consistency issue rather than a direct challenge to the stability heuristic.
  • The phase transition in $\tau_{n,\mu}$ at $\mu=\frac{n+\mu-2}{2}$ suggests that the sharp stability exponent changes at that threshold; one could test this numerically by computing distances for two-bubble configurations on both sides of the threshold.
  • The same weighted-space reduction should extend to related nonlocal critical equations whenever analogous convolution estimates and a nondegeneracy theorem are available.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper establishes quantitative stability estimates for critical points of the nonlocal Sobolev-type (Hartree) inequality (1.6) in the multiple-bubble case κ ≥ 2 for parameters satisfying n ≥ 6−µ and (♯): n²−6n/(n−4) < µ < 4. Theorem 1.1 asserts that if u is δ-close in D^{1,2} to a sum of δ-interacting bubbles, then its distance to the bubble manifold is controlled by a rate τ_{n,µ}(‖f̂‖_{(D^{1,2})^{-1}}), where τ_{n,µ} is piecewise defined in (1.11), and the bubble interactions satisfy (1.14). The proof follows the Deng–Sun–Wei Lyapunov–Schmidt reduction program adapted to the nonlocal Hartree term, and relies on new convolution estimates (Section 2), weighted norms (Section 3.1), a core a priori bound (Lemma 3.9), and a tree-structure blow-up argument (Sections 4–5). The paper also derives a corollary (Corollary 1.2) combining the profile decomposition of [53] with the main theorem.

Significance. If correct, the result is a significant extension of the quantitative stability theory for the classical Sobolev inequality (Ciraolo–Figalli–Maggi, Figalli–Glaudo, Deng–Sun–Wei) to the nonlocal Hartree case, completing the multi-bubble stability picture of Piccione–Yang–Zhao [53] in the range n ≥ 6−µ. The rates τ_{n,µ} are derived from estimates rather than fitted, and the main theorem is stated with explicit, checkable hypotheses. The proof is long and technical, but the structure is a faithful adaptation of a successful program, and many of the auxiliary convolution estimates represent genuine new work. However, as typeset, the condition (2.4) in Lemma 2.5 forbids the n = 7 case of Theorem 1.1, since no positive θ₂ exists for µ ∈ (7/3, 4). This is a load-bearing gap that must be repaired before the claimed range is supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Lemma 2.5, eq. (2.4)] The parameter restriction (2.4) states 0 < θ₂ ≤ (9−4µ)/5 for n = 7. In the range µ ∈ (7/3, 4) of Theorem 1.1, the quantity (9−4µ)/5 is negative, so no admissible θ₂ exists. This is not a stylistic issue: θ₂ enters Lemma 2.5's convolution estimate for J^(1)_µ, which is used in Lemma 4.6, Lemma 6.1, and ultimately in the a priori bound Lemma 3.9, and therefore the n = 7 branch of Theorem 1.1 is unsupported as written. The natural correction is 0 < θ₂ < (3µ−7)/5, which is consistent with the computation in (2.12); the authors should fix the constraint and verify that all later uses (esp. Lemma 4.6 and Lemma 6.1) remain valid.
  2. [Proposition 5.5 and its use in Section 5] The nondegeneracy of the linearized operator is stated in Proposition 5.5 and attributed to the unreviewed preprint [44]. This property is used essentially in Proposition 5.12 to conclude that the limit of the blow-up sequence is zero, which closes the proof of Lemma 3.9. Since the whole theorem depends on Lemma 3.9, the authors should either provide a complete proof of Proposition 5.5 in this manuscript or cite a peer-reviewed source; relying on an unreviewed preprint for a load-bearing spectral fact is not satisfactory for a journal submission.
  3. [Theorem 1.1 and Abstract] The abstract and introductory paragraphs repeatedly state that the result covers µ ∈ (0, 4], but Theorem 1.1 actually requires µ < 4 by (♯), and Remark 1.4 explicitly says that µ = 4 is not valid for the estimates in Lemma 6.1 and Lemmas 4.3–4.10. This mismatch is confusing: the statement should consistently say µ ∈ (0, 4) or indicate that µ = 4 is included only under an additionally modified hypothesis, which it currently is not.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Title and opening] The title and abstract contain the repeated typo “Soblev” for “Sobolev”; please correct throughout the manuscript.
  2. [Lemma 2.3, proof] In the proof after equation (2.2) the text uses “N = 4” and “N > 4”; these should be n = 4 and n > 4.
  3. [Section 3.2, proof of Lemma 3.6] In equation (3.25) the expression “τz 2)4” appears to be a typo for τ(z₂)⁴; please fix the formatting.
  4. [Section 1.2] There are several typographical issues, e.g., “f qu antitative” and “the poineering paper”; a careful proofreading pass is needed.
  5. [Section 3.3, proof of Lemma 3.5] The symbol R in equation (3.13) inside the proof of Lemma 3.6 is undefined; it should probably be ℏ.
  6. [References] Reference [44] is cited as an unreviewed preprint; if it remains essential, the authors should update it once a peer-reviewed version is available.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No by-construction circularity: the rate tau_{n,mu} is derived from proved Lyapunov-Schmidt estimates, and the self-citations are auxiliary theorems, not fitted inputs; the n=7 parameter gap is a correctness issue, not circularity.

full rationale

The derivation chain for Theorem 1.1 is self-contained at the level of the main argument. The weighted norms S_j and T_j are defined in Section 3.1; Lemma 3.6 proves the interaction bound hbar <= C T_j; Lemma 3.8 and Lemma 3.9 give the a-priori estimates for the reduced problem; Lemma 7.1 proves ||grad rho_0||_{L^2} <= C tau_{n,mu}(Q); Lemma 3.12 proves Q <= C ||fhat||_{(D^{1,2})^{-1}}; and Theorem 1.1 follows by composing these displayed estimates. The function tau_{n,mu} in (1.11) is not a fitted parameter: its two power-law regimes are the rates that emerge from the exponent computations in Lemmas 3.7, 3.12, 7.1, and 7.5. There is no step where a quantity is fitted to the target error ||fhat|| and then renamed as a prediction. The paper does reuse prior work by the same group: Theorem A is quoted from [53] for the qualitative profile decomposition, Lemma 7.2's coercive estimate is quoted from [53], and Proposition 5.5 uses nondegeneracy from [36] and [44]. These are auxiliary results about the linearized operator and about profile decomposition; they are not restatements or definitions of the quantitative stability conclusion. Self-citation alone is therefore not circularity here. The manuscript itself flags a real limitation: Remark 1.4 and Section 6.3 state that mu = 4 is not valid for the desired estimates in Lemma 6.1 and Lemmas 4.3-4.10, so the theorem's assumption mu in (0,4] must be read with that caveat. A further correctness gap, unrelated to circularity, appears in (2.4): it requires 0 < theta_2 <= (9-4mu)/5 for n=7, but the claimed range (sharp) includes mu > 7/3, where 9-4mu < 0, so no admissible positive theta_2 exists; since theta_2 enters exponents such as 2p-n+mu-theta_2 in Lemma 4.6 and later in Lemmas 4.10 and 6.1, the n=7 branch is unsupported as typeset. This is an invalid-parameter gap in the proof, not a by-construction identification of input with output, so it does not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No data-fitted free parameters exist: this is a proof paper, and the constants δ, C in Theorem 1.1 are existential. The auxiliary parameters Θ, θ₁, θ₂, θ₃, ε₀ are chosen to satisfy the constraints (2.3)-(2.4), not fitted to data; note that (2.4) is internally inconsistent for n = 7 as typeset. No new physical entities are introduced; the weighted spaces S_j, T_j, the rate function τ_{n,µ}, and the barrier functions are internal mathematical constructions without independent falsifiable handles.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Nondegeneracy of the linearized Hartree operator at the bubble W, with kernel exactly spanned by the n+1 bubble derivatives (Proposition 5.5, cited to [36] for n = 6, µ = 4 and to the preprint [44] for all µ ∈ (0,4)).
    Used to establish the linear theory (Lemma 3.5 via Fredholm alternative), the vanishing of the limit profile (Step 5.7, Proposition 5.12), and coercivity on the orthogonal complement (Section 7.2). If false, the Lyapunov-Schmidt reduction collapses; it rests partly on an unreviewed preprint.
  • domain assumption Qualitative profile decomposition and one-bubble stability of equation (1.8) from [53] (Piccione-Yang-Zhao, JDE 2025), by the same research group.
    Used to derive Corollary 1.2 from Theorem 1.1 and to justify starting from a δ-close weakly interacting bubble sum. This is a published, self-cited tool.
  • domain assumption Classification of positive solutions of the critical Hartree equation (1.8) as the bubble family W[ξ,λ], cited to [28, 37, 40].
    Defines the manifold M₀ whose distance is being measured; standard in this literature and needed for any distance-to-manifold statement.
  • standard math Exact Riesz-potential identity |x|^{-μ} * W^p = α_{n,µ} W^{2*−p} (Lemma A.2), cited to [16].
    A checkable convolution identity from Fourier analysis of Riesz kernels; used throughout Section 4, Lemma 3.10, and Section 7. It is exact for the explicit bubble family, not an approximation.
  • standard math Bubble-tree partial order (Lemma 5.2), the comparison estimate Lemma 4.4, and the weighted-norm machinery adapted from Deng-Sun-Wei [21].
    The δ-interaction tree structure and the f_{k,j} pointwise comparison estimates are taken from [21] (to appear in Duke Math. J.); the present argument inherits unstated details from that source.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stability estimates for critical points of a nonlocal Sobolev-type inequality." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CVIWIAMY

@misc{pith2026250101927,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stability estimates for critical points of a nonlocal Sobolev-type inequality},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CVIWIAMY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.01927}
}
abstract

In this paper, we study the stability of the following nonlocal Soblev-type inequality \begin{equation*} C_{HLS}\big(\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}\big(|x|^{-\mu} \ast u^{p}\big)u^{p} dx\big)^{\frac{1}{p}}\leq\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}|\nabla u|^2 dx , \quad \forall~u\in D^{1,2}(\mathbb{R}^n), \end{equation*} which is induced by the classical Sobolev inequality and the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality, where $p=\frac{2n-\mu}{n-2}$, $n\geq3$ and $\mu\in(0,n)$, is energy-critical exponent and $C_{HLS}$ is the best constant depending on $n$ and $\mu$. Up to translation and scaling, the best constant of the nonlocal Soblev inequality can be achieved by a unique family of positive and radially symmetric extremal function $W(x)$ that satisfies, up to a suitable scaling, the classical critical Hartree equation \begin{equation*} \Delta u+(|x|^{-\mu}\ast u^{p})u^{p-1}=0 \quad \mbox{in}\quad \mathbb{R}^n. \end{equation*} Recently, Piccione, Yang and Zhao in \cite{p-y-z24} established a nonlocal version of Struwe's profile decomposition and they only proved the nonlocal version of the quantitative stability for the one bubble case without dimension restriction and the multiple bubbles case $\kappa\geq2$ if dimension $3\leq n<6-\mu$ and $\mu\in(0,n)$ with $\mu\in(0,4]$ in Ciraolo-Figalli-Maggi \cite{CFM18} and Figalli-Glaudo \cite{FG20}. We establish the quantitative stability estimates for critical point of the nonlocal Soblev inequality for $n\geq6-\mu$ and $\mu\in(0,4)$, which is an extension of the recent works by Deng-Sun-Wei in \cite{DSW21} for the classical Sobolev inequality.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Sharp gradient stability for a class of Hardy-Sobolev-Maz'ya inequalities

    math.AP 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For 3<=k<=n-1, 1<p<n, the deficit in the Hardy-Sobolev-Maz'ya inequality is bounded below by a constant times the gradient distance to the extremal manifold raised to the power max{2,p}, and this exponent is optimal.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [53]

    Piccion, M

    P. Piccion, M. Yang, and S. Zhao. Quantitative profile de composition and stability for a nonlocal Sobolev inequalit y, J. Differential Equations , 417 (2025), 64-104. 1, 4, 5, 71

    work page 2025

  2. [44]

    X. Li, C. Liu, X. Tang and G. Xu. Nondegeneracy of positiv e bubble solutions for generalized energy-critical Hartre e equations. Preprint. arXiv: 2304. 04139 [math.AP]. 3, 48 80 M. YANG AND S. ZHAO

    work page

  3. [36]

    F. Gao, V. Moroz, M. Yang and S. Zhao. Construction of infi nitely many solutions for a critical Choquard equation via local Pohoˇ zaev identities.Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. , 61, 222, 2022. 3, 48

    work page 2022

  4. [1]

    Aubin, Problemes isoperimetriques et espaces de Sobo lev

    T. Aubin, Problemes isoperimetriques et espaces de Sobo lev. J. Differ. Geometry , 11(4), 573-598, 1976. 1

    work page 1976

  5. [2]

    Bartsch, T

    T. Bartsch, T. Weth and M. Willem, A Sobolev inequality wi th remainder term and critical equations on domains with topology for the polyharmonic operator. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations , 18 (2003), 253-268. 3

    work page 2003

  6. [3]

    S. Aryan. Stability of Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequ ality under bubbling. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations , 62 (2023), Article No. 23, 42 pp. 3

    work page 2023

  7. [4]

    Bahri, Critical Points at Infinity in some Variational Problems

    A. Bahri, Critical Points at Infinity in some Variational Problems. Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series , 182, Longman 1989. 28

    work page 1989

  8. [5]

    Bianchi, H

    G. Bianchi, H. Egnell. A note on the Sobolev inequality. J. Funct. Anal. , 100(1), 18-24, 1991. 3

    work page 1991

Show all 58 references
  1. [6]

    Br´ ezis, E

    H. Br´ ezis, E. Lieb. Sobolev inequalities with remainde r terms. J. Funct. Anal. , 62, 73-86, 1985. 3

    1985

  2. [7]

    Caffarelli, B

    L. Caffarelli, B. Gidas and J. Spruck. Asymptotic symmetr y and local behavior of semilinear elliptic equations with c ritical Sobolev growth. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 42(3), 271-297, 1989. 2

    1989

  3. [8]

    E. Carlen. Duality and stability for functional inequal ities. Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. , (6) 26, no. 2, 319-350, 2017. 3

    2017

  4. [9]

    H. Chen, S. Kim and J. Wei, Sharp quantitative stability e stimates for critical points of fractional Sobolev inequal ities, preprint, arXiv: 2408. 07775 [math.AP]. 4

  5. [10]

    L. Chen, G. Lu and H. Tang, Stability of Hardy-Littlewoo d-Sobolev inequalities with explicit lower bounds. Adv. Math. , 450, Paper No. 109778, 28 pp. 2024. 3

    2024

  6. [11]

    S. Chen, R. Frank, and T. Weth. Remainder terms in the fra ctional Sobolev inequality. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 62(4), 1381–1397, 2013. 3

    2013

  7. [12]

    W. Chen, C. Li, and O. Biao, Classification of solutions f or an integral equation. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. , 59(2006), 330-343. 3 STABILITY FOR NONLOCAL SOBOLEV INEQUALITY 79

    2006

  8. [13]

    Chodosh, M

    O. Chodosh, M. Engelstein, and L. Spolaor, The Riemanni an quantitative isoperimetric inequality. J. Eur. Math. Soc. , 25 (2023), 1711-1741. 3

    2023

  9. [14]

    Cianchi, N

    A. Cianchi, N. Fusco, F. Maggi, and A. Pratelli, The shar p Sobolev inequality in quantitative form. J. Eur. Math. Soc. , 11, 1105–1139, 2009. 3

    2009

  10. [15]

    Ciraolo, A

    G. Ciraolo, A. Figalli and F. Maggi. A quantitative anal ysis of metrics on RN with almost constant positive scalar curvature, with applications to fast diffusion flows. Int. Math. Res. Not. , 2017, 6780-6797, 2018. 1, 3

    2017

  11. [16]

    W. Dai, J. Huang, Y. Qin, B. Wang, and Y. Fang, Regularity and classification of solutions to static Hartree equations involving fractional Laplacians. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. , 39, 1389-1403 (2019). 76

    2019

  12. [17]

    del Pino, J

    M. del Pino, J. Dolbeault, and M. Musso. ”Bubble-tower” radial solutions in the slightly supercritical Brezis-Nir enberg problem. J. Differential Equations , 193(2): 280-306, 2003. 48

    2003

  13. [18]

    del Pino, P

    M. del Pino, P. Felmer, and M. Musso, Two-bubble solutio ns in the super-critical Bahri-Coron’s problem. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations , 16(2):113–145, 2003. 23, 48

    2003

  14. [19]

    del Pino, M

    M. del Pino, M. Musso, F. Pacard and A. Pistoia. Large ene rgy entire solutions for the Yamabe equation. J. Differential Equations, 251(9): 2568-2597, 2011. 48

    2011

  15. [20]

    del Pino, M

    M. del Pino, M. Musso, F. Pacard and A. Pistoia. Torus act ion on Sn and sign changing solutions for conformally invariant equations. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. , pages 209-237, March 2013. 48

    2013

  16. [21]

    B. Deng, L. Sun and J. Wei. Sharp quantitative estimates of Struwe’s Decomposition. to appear in Duke Math. J. , arXiv:2103.15360 [math.AP]. 1, 3, 6, 31, 32, 46, 49, 60, 77

    arXiv

  17. [22]

    Deng, X, Tian, M

    S. Deng, X, Tian, M. Yang and S. Zhao, Remainder terms of a nonlocal Sobolev inequality, Math. Nachr. , (2023), 1-16. 4

    2023

  18. [23]

    de Nitti and T

    N. de Nitti and T. Konig, Stability with explicit consta nts of the critical points of the fractional Sobolev inequal ity and applications to fast diffusion, J. Funct. Anal. 285, Article No. 110093, 30 pp. 2023. 3

    2023

  19. [24]

    Dolbeault

    J. Dolbeault. Sobolev and Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev i nequalities: duality and fast diffusion. Math. Res. Lett ., 18(6), 1037– 1050, 2011. 3

    2011

  20. [25]

    Dolbeault, M

    J. Dolbeault, M. J. Esteban, A. Figalli, R. L. Frank, and M. Loss, Sharp stability for Sobolev and log-Sobolev inequa lities, with optimal dimensional dependence, preprint, arXiv: 2209. 08651 . 3

  21. [26]

    Dolbeault, M

    J. Dolbeault, M. Esteban. Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev a nd related inequalities: stability. The physics and mathematics of Elliott Lieb the 90th anniversary . Vol. I, 247–268, EMS Press, Berlin, 2022. 3

    2022

  22. [27]

    Druet, From one bubble to several bubbles: the low-di mensional case

    O. Druet, From one bubble to several bubbles: the low-di mensional case. J. Differential Geom. , 63 (2003), 399-473. 46

    2003

  23. [28]

    Du and M

    L. Du and M. Yang, Uniqueness and nondegeneracy of solut ions for a critical nonlocal equation. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. A. , 39(10), 5847-5866, 2019. 3

    2019

  24. [29]

    Engelstein, R

    M. Engelstein, R. Neumayer, and L. Spolaor, Quantitati ve stability for minimizing Yamabe metrics. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. Ser. B , 9 (2022), 395-414. 3

    2022

  25. [30]

    Fusco, F

    N. Fusco, F. Maggi and A. Pratelli, The sharp quantitati ve isoperimetric inequality. Ann. of Math. , 168 (2008), no. 3, 941–980. 3

    2008

  26. [31]

    Figalli and F

    A. Figalli and F. Glaudo, On the sharp stability of criti cal points of the Sobolev inequality. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 237(1), 201-258, 2020. 1, 3, 5, 8, 9, 30

    2020

  27. [32]

    Figalli, F

    A. Figalli, F. Maggi and A. Pratelli, A mass transportat ion approach to quantitative isoperimetric inequalities. Invent. Math., 182 (2010), no. 1, 167-211. 3

    2010

  28. [33]

    Figalli and R

    A. Figalli and R. Neumayer, Gradient stability for the S obolev inequality: the case p ≥ 2, J. Eur. Math. Soc. , 21, 319-354,

  29. [34]

    Figalli and Y

    A. Figalli and Y. R.-Y. Zhang, Sharp gradient stability for the Sobolev inequality, Duke Math. J. , 171, 2407-2459, 2022. 3

    2022

  30. [35]

    R. L. Frank, Degenerate stability of some Sobolev inequ alities. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire., 39 (2022), 1459-1484. 3

    2022

  31. [37]

    Gao and M

    F. Gao and M. Yang. The Brezis-Nirenberg type critical p roblem for nonlinear Choquard equation. Sci. China Math. , 61, 1219-1242, 2018. 3

    2018

  32. [38]

    Gazzola and T

    F. Gazzola and T. Weth, Remainder terms in a higher order Sobolev inequality. Arch. Math., (Basel) 95 (2010), 381-388. 3

    2010

  33. [39]

    Gidas, W

    B. Gidas, W. Ni and L. Nirenberg. Symmetry and related pr operties via the maximum principle. Commun. Math. Phy. , 68(3), 209-243, 1979. 2

    1979

  34. [40]

    L. Guo, T. Hu, S. Peng and W. Shuai. Existence and uniquen ess of solutions for Choquard equation involving Hardy- Littlewood-Sobolev critical exponent. Calc. Var. Partial Dif. , 58(4), Paper No. 128, 34 pp, 2019. 3

    2019

  35. [41]

    Hardy and J

    G. Hardy and J. Littlewood. Some properties of fraction al integral. I. Math. Z. , 27(1), 565–606, 1928. 2

    1928

  36. [42]

    T, K¨ onig, On the sharp constant in the Bianchi-Egnell s tability inequality. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. , 55, 2070-2075, 2023. 3

    2023

  37. [43]

    T, K¨ onig, Stability for the Sobolev inequality: exist ence of a minimizer. J. Eur. Math. Soc. arXiv: 2211. 14185v3 [Math. AP] (to appear). 3

  38. [45]

    Lieb and M

    E. Lieb and M. Loss, Analysis. Second edn., Graduate Studies in Mathematics 14, American Mathematical Society, Provi- dence, RI, , 2001. 2

    2001

  39. [46]

    Lieb, Sharp constants in the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobo lev and related inequalities

    E. Lieb, Sharp constants in the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobo lev and related inequalities. Ann. of Math. 118, 349-374, 1983. 2

    1983

  40. [47]

    K. Liu, Q. Zhang, and W. Zou, On the stability of critical points of the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality. Preprint. arXiv: 2306. 15862v2 [math.AP] 5

  41. [48]

    Lu and J

    G. Lu and J. Wei, On a Sobolev inequality with remainder t erms. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 128, 75-84, 2000. 3

    2000

  42. [49]

    Mercuri, V

    C. Mercuri, V. Moroz, and J. Van Schaftingen, Groundsta tes and radial solutions to nonlinear Schr¨ odinger-Poisso n-Slater equations at the critical frequency. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations , (2016) 55:146. 2

    2016

  43. [50]

    Musso and A

    M. Musso and A. Pistoia, Tower of bubbles for almost crit ical problems in general domains. J. Math. Pures Appl. , (9), 93(1):1–40, 2010. 48

    2010

  44. [51]

    Palatucci and A

    G. Palatucci and A. Pisante, A global compactness type r esult for Palais-Smale sequences in fractional Sobolev spa ces. Nonlinear Anal. , 117(2015), 1-7. 3

    2015

  45. [52]

    T. H. Parker, Bubble tree convergence for harmonic maps , J. Differential Geom. , 44 (1996), 595-633. 46

    1996

  46. [54]

    Qing and G

    J. Qing and G. Tian, Bubbling of the heat flows for harmoni c maps from surfaces. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 50 (1997), 295-310. 46

    1997

  47. [55]

    S. Sobolev. On a theorem of functional analysis. Transl ated by J. R. Brown. Transl., Ser. 2, Am. Math. Soc. , 34(1963), 39–68. 1, 2

    1963

  48. [56]

    M. Struwe. A global compactness result for elliptic bou ndary value problems involving limiting nonlinearities. Math. Z. , 187(1984), 511–517. 3, 4

    1984

  49. [57]

    Talenti, Best constant in Sobolev inequality

    G. Talenti, Best constant in Sobolev inequality. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. , 110, 353-372, 1976. 1, 2

    1976

  50. [58]

    Zhang, Y

    Y. Zhang, Y. Zhou, and W. Zou, On the stability of fractio nal Sobolev trace inequality and corresponding profile deco m- position. Preprint. arXiv: 2312. 01766 [math.AP] 4 Minbo Yang School of Mathematical Sciences, Zhejiang Normal Universi ty, Jinhua 321004, Zhejiang, People’...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.