Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Imprints of Different Types of Low-Angular-Momentum Accretion Flow Solutions in General Relativistic Hydrodynamic Simulations

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In general relativistic hydrodynamic simulations of black hole accretion, hot bipolar jets appear only when the inflow passes through two sonic points; single-sonic-point flows remain inflow-dominated.

desk verdict Thermal jet claim is real but rides on one parameter point; the radiative ordering is solid and the paper deserves peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.05750 v2 pith:D4ELH73J submitted 2025-06-06 astro-ph.HE

Indu K. Dihingia , Akhil Uniyal , Yosuke Mizuno This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords blackholeaccretionlow-angular-momentumflowtransonicsolutionsgeneralrelativistichydrodynamicssonicpointsshocktransitionsthermallydrivenjetsX-raybinaries
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to show that the different classes of low-angular-momentum accretion onto a black hole leave distinct dynamical and radiative imprints. Starting the simulations from semi-analytical transonic solutions labeled by specific energy ${\cal E}_0$ and angular momentum $\lambda_0$, the authors recover three flow types: passage through an outer sonic point, an inner sonic point, or both with an intermittent shock. Only the two-sonic-point type develops a hot, bipolar, thermally driven outflow with Lorentz factor $\gamma\sim2$, despite zero magnetic field. In bremsstrahlung images at 1 keV, inner-sonic-point solutions are brightest and most extended, outer-sonic-point solutions are faint and compact, and two-sonic-point solutions sit between them. The implication is that the sonic-point structure of the inflow controls both jet activity and X-ray morphology, offering a semi-analytical route to interpret X-ray binaries and weak-field Sgr A* accretion.

What carries the argument

The central object is the family of one-dimensional transonic accretion solutions parameterized by the conserved specific energy ${\cal E}_0=-hu_t$ and specific angular momentum $\lambda_0=-u_\phi/u_t$, used to seed the two-dimensional simulations. The flow class is read off from the Mach-number profile: one crossing of $M=1$ from subsonic to supersonic gives an inner or outer sonic point, and two crossings joined by a shock give the two-sonic-point solution. The pressure gradient of the shock-heated post-shock region, aided by centrifugal effects, is the mechanism that launches the thermally driven jet.

What would settle it

A 2D GRHD simulation of a different two-sonic-point solution, for example lower $\lambda_0$ at the same ${\cal E}_0$, that reaches a quasi-steady state yet shows no bipolar outflow would falsify the claim that the two-sonic-point structure alone launches the jets, as would a long 3D run of the $\lambda_0=2.3$, ${\cal E}_0=1.005$ case in which the outflow is destroyed by non-axisymmetric instabilities.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Without magnetic fields, ideal general relativistic hydrodynamics can still launch a bipolar outflow, but only if the accretion solution passes through two sonic points. The flow first crosses the outer sonic point, then a shock decelerates it to subsonic, and it crosses the inner sonic point before the horizon; the post-shock region is hot and has a strong pressure gradient along the rotation axis, and the resulting thermal force drives matter outward at Lorentz factors up to $\gamma\sim2$. The same runs show that shock-heated two-sonic-point flows have temperature and density structures distinct from single-sonic-point flows, which translates directly into the ordering of bremsstrahlung brightness at 1 keV: inner-sonic-point flows brightest, outer-sonic-point flows faintest, two-sonic-point flows intermediate.

Load-bearing premise

The central jet conclusion rests on a single simulated two-sonic-point case with $\lambda_0=2.3$ and ${\cal E}_0=1.005$; the paper does not establish that all two-sonic-point solutions produce outflows because the boundary in the parameter plane is not mapped.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Observers can use the compactness of 1 keV bremsstrahlung images as a discriminator: outer-sonic-point flows appear compact, inner-sonic-point flows extended, and two-sonic-point flows intermediate.
  • Semi-relativistic jets in black hole X-ray binaries may be understood as thermal outflows from two-sonic-point accretion, without magnetic launching, at least in low-magnetization regimes.
  • Radiative modeling restricted to equatorial 1D profiles will miss a substantial part of the emission, since excluding off-equatorial layers with $|\theta_{\rm cut}|<20^\circ$ changes the spectral energy distribution noticeably.
  • Calibrated semi-analytic solutions can be used to generate libraries of 230 GHz images for low-angular-momentum Sgr A* models in the weak-field limit, rather than running full simulations for every parameter set.
  • Because the simulated equatorial Mach-number profiles closely track the semi-analytic solutions, the sonic-point classification itself can be extended to parameters that were not simulated.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next test is to map the jet-launching region in the (${\cal E}_0,\lambda_0$) plane; the paper exhibits one launching realization, so the boundary between jet-producing and non-jet-producing two-sonic-point solutions remains unknown.
  • The 3D validation run stops at 5,000 $t_g$, before the two-sonic-point state is reached, so whether the 2D jet survives non-axisymmetric instabilities is still open; a longer 3D realization of the fiducial model would settle it.
  • Because only bremsstrahlung at 1 keV is considered, the brightness ordering may not carry over to magnetized flows where synchrotron and inverse-Compton emission dominate; repeating the morphology comparison at 230 GHz is the natural extension.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents two-dimensional general relativistic hydrodynamic (GRHD) simulations of low-angular-momentum accretion onto a spinning black hole, initialized from semi-analytic transonic solutions with prescribed specific energy E0 and angular momentum lambda0. It reports three classes of solutions—outer-sonic-point, inner-sonic-point, and two-sonic-point with a shock—and claims that only the two-sonic-point class produces hot, thermally driven bipolar jets/outflows with Lorentz factors up to gamma~2 in the absence of magnetic fields. The authors also post-process the 2D flows with the RAPTOR radiation-transfer code to compute bremsstrahlung spectra and 1 keV images, finding that inner-sonic-point solutions are brightest and most extended, outer-sonic-point solutions are faint and compact, and two-sonic-point solutions are intermediate. A single short 3D simulation is presented as a validation of the 2D approach.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper would establish a physically interesting connection between transonic solution topology and the production of mildly relativistic thermal outflows, with implications for low-angular-momentum accretion in X-ray binaries and low-luminosity AGN such as Sgr A*. The study has clear strengths: the 2D runs are evolved to 50,000 t_g, the global quantities E and lambda remain close to their initial values, the equatorial Mach-number profiles match the semi-analytic solutions, and the radiative post-processing gives concrete, falsifiable predictions. However, the jet claim and the 3D validation rest on evidence that is thinner than the abstract and conclusions suggest, and the construction of the initial conditions from the same semi-analytic solutions it claims to confirm introduces a circularity that needs to be addressed explicitly.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4, Fig. 3; Section 8 item 2] The claim that only two-sonic-point solutions produce hot, thermally driven jets/outflows with gamma~2 is supported by exactly one 2D realization: (lambda0=2.3, E0=1.005), shown in the third column of Fig. 3. Fig. 4 varies lambda0 and E0 but reports only the number and location of sonic points, not outflow properties. Without at least several two-sonic-point runs spanning different shock locations, post-shock temperatures, and energy/angular-momentum values, the paper has not established that jets are a generic property of the two-sonic-point class rather than a feature of this one parameter point.
  2. [Section 6, Figs. 5a-c; Section 8] The 3D validation run is only 5,000 t_g and, as the authors state, its Mach-number profile follows the inner-sonic-point branch and has not yet reached the outer sonic point or the shock of the two-sonic-point solution. The conclusion that the 2D results are 'validated' by the 3D run therefore overstates what Fig. 5c actually demonstrates: the 3D run does not yet test whether the jet, which appears only in the time-averaged quasi-steady two-sonic-point state, survives non-axisymmetric evolution.
  3. [Appendix B, Eq. (A3)] Appendix B openly documents that the assumed vertical function f(theta) produces sharp Mach-number transitions that can be mistaken for shocks, and that such transitions can be made 'steady/oscillatory' by choosing the initial condition suitably. The subsequent assertion that the final state is 'expected to be independent' of f(theta) is not demonstrated. This matters because the only jet-producing run is initialized from a semi-analytic solution with this f(theta), and the jet is attributed to the high pressure gradient in the post-shock region (Fig. 2); without a run using a different vertical structure or a more generic initial condition, the shock and outflow could be partly artifacts of the chosen initialization.
  4. [Section 2 and Section 3] Because the initial conditions are taken directly from the semi-analytic solutions of Dihingia et al. (2018a, 2019b), and the same solutions are used as the reference curves in the comparisons of Fig. 1, the agreement on the equatorial plane is to a significant degree imposed by construction rather than an emergent property of the simulation. This does not invalidate the study, but the abstract and conclusions should state clearly that the classification of flow types is inherited from the initial data, and at least one test with a non-solution initial condition (e.g., a Bondi-like flow or a different vertical profile) should be shown to relax onto the same solution type.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3, Fig. 1] The text refers to the 'third row' when describing the Mach-number panels, but the figure has only three rows; the intended reference is the lower (bottom) row.
  2. [Section 4] The phrase 'in the same order as Fig. 3' appears to be a typo for Fig. 1, since the displayed columns follow the same model ordering as the first row of Fig. 1.
  3. [Section 7] The density normalization procedure—fixing the 1 keV flux to 1e-9 erg cm^-2 s^-1 for one model and applying the same density scaling to the others—should be stated explicitly as a modeling assumption, because the reported flux ordering is partly a consequence of this choice.
  4. [Section 6] The 3D run uses resolution 256x128x64 while the 2D runs use an effective resolution of 512x256; the paper should state whether this resolution difference could affect the comparison of shock location and jet formation.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Flow-type taxonomy is carried in by construction from the same authors' semi-analytic initial data; outflows and radiative maps are emergent, but the jet claim rests on a single 2D realization.

  1. self definitional [Section 2 (Numerical Setup) and Section 3 (Types of Solutions); Appendix A, Eqs. (A1)-(A3)]
    "The radial four-velocity (u^r) is obtained from semi-analytical solutions for the given λ0 and E0. With that, all other initial quantities can be calculated. ... With our simulations, we also observe all different kinds of solutions: (i) passing through the inner sonic point ... (ii) passing through the outer sonic points ... and (iii) passing through the two sonic points."

    The number and location of sonic points are intrinsic properties of the semi-analytic transonic solution used to set u^r. Because each simulation is initialized with a solution of a prescribed type (outer, inner, or two sonic points), the later 'observation' that the simulation exhibits that same type is not an independent prediction; it only shows that the time evolution remained close to its own initial condition. The classification of flow types is therefore inherited from the input by construction, rather than emerging from the simulation. This makes the first main conclusion partly self-definitional, although the outflow and radiative quantities are genuinely emergent.

  2. self citation load bearing [Section 3 (Types of Solutions) and Conclusion item 1; references to Dihingia et al. 2018a, 2019b]
    "The time-averaged profiles of accretion flows on the equatorial plane closely follow the earlier semi-analytical solutions (e.g., I. K. Dihingia et al. 2018a, 2019b)."

    The 'earlier semi-analytical solutions' cited here are the same authors' prior work and are precisely the solutions used to construct the initial conditions of the simulations. The paper then presents the agreement between simulation and this cited solution as confirmation of the cited prediction. This is a closed loop: the prior same-author solution is the input, the simulation reproduces the input, and the reproduction is offered as independent support. While the underlying GRHD equations are standard and externally checkable, the paper provides no derivation of the solution types independent of the self-cited initial data, so the taxonomic part of the central claim rests on a self-citation chain.

full rationale

The paper's genuinely new content—thermally driven bipolar outflows and bremsstrahlung images/SEDs—is not contained in the initial conditions and is computed with independent machinery (GRHD evolution in BHAC and GRRT in RAPTOR). Those results are not circular. However, the paper's first and framing conclusion, that low-angular-momentum flows come in three types with shock transitions, is not an emergent simulation discovery: the initial data are taken from the same authors' semi-analytic solutions, and the simulations merely preserve the prescribed sonic-point structure. The 'confirmation' of the same-author analytic predictions is therefore partly circular. The jet/outflow claim ('only solutions with two sonic points produce hot, thermally driven bipolar jets/outflows') is emergent but statistically fragile: it rests on a single 2D realization of each solution class, and the 3D validation run (Section 6) reaches only t=5000 t_g, at which point it still follows the inner-sonic-point branch and has not formed the outer sonic point or shock of the two-sonic-point state. Appendix B also shows that the assumed vertical profile f(θ) can create sharp jumps easily mistaken for shocks and states that the final state is 'expected to be independent' of f(θ) without demonstrating it. These are robustness concerns rather than circularity. Overall, the classification component reduces partly to the self-cited input, while the outflow and radiation components retain independent content, giving a score of 4.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the choice of specific energy and angular momentum (which select the solution type), the semi-analytical initial conditions from the authors' prior work, the assumption that the 2D axisymmetric flow reaches a quasi-steady state, and the adequacy of pure bremsstrahlung emission for the radiative signatures. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • lambda_0 (specific angular momentum) = 1.0, 2.2, 2.3, 2.2969
    Chosen by hand to select the desired accretion solution type (outer sonic point, inner sonic point, two sonic points). The central claims depend on the existence of these regimes, but the paper does not map the full parameter space.
  • E_0 (specific energy) = 1.0047, 1.005, 1.01, 1.0114
    Chosen by hand together with lambda_0 to select solution types; the radiative comparison uses E0=1.005 and 1.01 for two-sonic and inner-sonic cases.
  • Radiative density normalization = Scaled so 1 keV flux = 1e-9 erg/cm2/s for the E0=1.01 model
    Section 7: the density scaling is searched for one model to match a target X-ray flux, then applied to all models. This fixes absolute fluxes but not the relative ordering.
  • Vertical distribution function f(theta) = 1 + sin^2(pi cos(theta)/cos(theta_H)) for |cos(theta)| <= |cos(theta_H)|/2
    Appendix A: an assumed function to set the initial off-equatorial velocity profile; chosen to accelerate relaxation. Its influence on final results is argued but not demonstrated to be negligible.
  • Black hole spin a* = 0.9375
    Fixed spin; no variation, so spin dependence of jets and radiation is untested.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math GRHD equations as implemented in BHAC correctly describe the flow
    The simulation code solves the general relativistic hydrodynamic equations; the paper relies on the code's correctness (Section 2).
  • domain assumption Ideal gas equation of state with Gamma=4/3
    Used for initial pressure and evolution; appropriate for hot accretion flows but an assumption (Section 2).
  • domain assumption Kerr metric with a*=0.9375
    The background spacetime is fixed; the chosen spin is representative but not varied (Section 2).
  • domain assumption Semi-analytical transonic solutions from Dihingia et al. (2018a, 2019b) provide valid initial conditions
    The simulations are seeded with these solutions; the equatorial profiles match by construction, so the classification of flow types is inherited from these solutions (Section 3, Appendix A).
  • domain assumption Bremsstrahlung emission calculation in RAPTOR is adequate for this optically thin, weakly magnetized flow
    Only thermal bremsstrahlung is included; synchrotron and inverse Compton are neglected with justification that magnetic fields are absent (Section 7).
  • domain assumption Quasi-steady state is reached at t=50,000 t_g and the time-average represents the physical flow
    The paper shows accretion rate and Mach profiles stabilize in 40,000 to 50,000 t_g, but the lower-energy model in Fig. 4b has not fully relaxed beyond about 160 r_g (Section 5, Appendix B).
  • domain assumption Axisymmetry for reconstructing 3D emission from 2D simulations
    2D hydrodynamic data are rotated around the axis to compute images; justified by the mostly radial flow, and partially supported by the short 3D run (Section 7).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Imprints of Different Types of Low-Angular-Momentum Accretion Flow Solutions in General Relativistic Hydrodynamic Simulations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/D4ELH73J

@misc{pith2026250605750,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Imprints of Different Types of Low-Angular-Momentum Accretion Flow Solutions in General Relativistic Hydrodynamic Simulations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/D4ELH73J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.05750}
}
abstract

Depending on the astrophysical source and its environment, the accretion flows can exhibit a variety of behaviors and characteristics in accordance with the type of solutions. We study low-angular-momentum accretion flows onto black holes using two-dimensional general relativistic hydrodynamic (GRHD) simulations to find imprints of different types of accretion solutions. Such flows, relevant to X-ray binaries and wind-fed low-luminosity active galactic nuclei, often lack sufficient angular momentum to form standard accretion disks. We initialize simulations with semi-analytical transonic solutions defined by specific energy (${\cal E}_0$) and angular momentum ($\lambda_0$), allowing a systematic classification of flow types with: (i) an outer sonic point, (ii) an inner sonic point, and (iii) both, exhibiting shock transitions. Only solutions with two sonic points produce hot, thermally driven bipolar jets/outflows with Lorentz factors up to $\gamma\sim2$, despite the absence of magnetic fields. Using a general relativistic radiation transfer calculation, we compute broadband spectra and images at X-ray ($1 \, \rm keV$) from bremsstrahlung emission. Radiative properties depend strongly on the type of accretion solution. Solutions with inner sonic points produce the brightest and most extended X-ray emission, while outer-point solutions produce compact, fainter signals. These multidimensional models are thus essential for predicting radiative signatures and will enable the development of semi-analytical tools for interpreting X-ray binaries and possibly Sgr~A$^*$ in weak magnetic field regimes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.05750 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Upper panels: Plot of normalized logarithmic density (log(ρ/ρmax)) distribution on the poloidal plane. Middle panels: Plot of normalized density profile (ρ/ρmax) on the equatorial plane. Bottom panels: Plot of Mach number (M) profile on the equatorial plane. The values of specific angular momentum (λ0) and energy (E0) are written on every panel. Black solid and red dashed lines correspond to simulation and semi-anal… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Distribution of (a) logarithmic pressure (log10 p), (b) logarithmic normalized pressure gradient (log10 |∇p|/p), and (c) Mach number (M) for λ0 = 2.3 and E0 = 1.005. The solid contour in panel (c) corresponds to the boundary for M = 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (Upper panels) distribution of Lorentz factor (log10(γ −1)) and (lower panels) distribution of temperature (Θ = p/ρ) in the same fashion as the first row of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: radial distribution of time-averaged Mach number profiles with specific angular momentum (λ0). Right: radial distribution of time-averaged Mach number profiles with specific energy (E0) on the equatorial plane. The sonic points are marked with solid circles. mome…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Time-averaged normalized logarithmic density (log10(ρ/ρmax)) distribution of the poloidal (a) and equatorial plane (b) for 3D simulation with λ0 = 2.3 and E0 = 1.005. (c) Mach number (M) for the same is shown on the equatorial plane along with the semi-analytical expec…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) and (b) panels: Spectral energy distribution of bremsstrahlung emission for different θcut and different simulation models with different inclinations, respectively. 3 × 3 panels: 1 keV normalized logarithmic intensity (log10(I/I0)) maps for different specific ener…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Panel (a). Profiles of mass accretion rate at the event horizon for three different models with different specific energy (E0) and angular momentum (λ0). Panels (b) and (c). Mach number profiles (M) calculated for λ0 = 2.3, E0 = 1.005 for different simulation time rang…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Outflow Behavior from the Transonic Advective Disks: A Hydrodynamical Simulation Study

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In viscous hydro simulations, colder transonic advective disks drive faster, higher kinetic-energy and momentum bipolar outflows than hotter disks, and outflow strength increases with viscosity.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    adobe:ns:meta/

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt \@twocolumntrue 12pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key o...

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    2019, title First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Akiyama, K., et al. 2019, title First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole , Astrophys. J. Lett., 875, L1, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 2019

  5. [5]

    2022, title First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Akiyama, K., et al. 2022, title First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way , Astrophys. J. Lett., 930, L12, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6674

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6674 2022

  6. [6]

    2015, title Mass-loss from advective accretion disc around rotating black holes , , 453, 3414, 10.1093/mnras/stv1874

    Aktar , R., Das , S., & Nandi , A. 2015, title Mass-loss from advective accretion disc around rotating black holes , , 453, 3414, 10.1093/mnras/stv1874

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1874 2015

  7. [7]

    Belloni , T. M. 2010, in Lecture Notes in Physics, Berlin Springer Verlag, ed. T. Belloni , Vol. 794, 53, 10.1007/978-3-540-76937-8\_3

    doi:10.1007/978-3-540-76937-8 2010

  8. [8]

    1952, title On spherically symmetrical accretion , , 112, 195, 10.1093/mnras/112.2.195

    Bondi , H. 1952, title On spherically symmetrical accretion , , 112, 195, 10.1093/mnras/112.2.195

    doi:10.1093/mnras/112.2.195 1952

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    2018, title RAPTOR

    Bronzwaer , T., Davelaar , J., Younsi , Z., et al. 2018, title RAPTOR. I. Time-dependent radiative transfer in arbitrary spacetimes , , 613, A2, 10.1051/0004-6361/201732149

    2018 doi

  2. [10]

    2020, title RAPTOR

    Bronzwaer , T., Younsi , Z., Davelaar , J., & Falcke , H. 2020, title RAPTOR. II. Polarized radiative transfer in curved spacetime , , 641, A126, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038573

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    Chakrabarti , S. K. 1989, title Standing Rankine-Hugoniot Shocks in the Hybrid Model Flows of the Black Hole Accretion and Winds , , 347, 365, 10.1086/168125

    1989 doi

  4. [12]

    Chakrabarti , S. K. 1996, title Global solutions of viscous transonic flows in Kerr geometry - I. Weak viscosity limit , , 283, 325, 10.1093/mnras/283.1.325

    1996 doi

  5. [13]

    K., Acharyya , K., & Molteni , D

    Chakrabarti , S. K., Acharyya , K., & Molteni , D. 2004, title The effect of cooling on time dependent behaviour of accretion flows around black holes , , 421, 1, 10.1051/0004-6361:20034523

    2004 doi

  6. [16]

    2007, title Behaviour of dissipative accretion flows around black holes , , 376, 1659, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11501.x

    Das , S. 2007, title Behaviour of dissipative accretion flows around black holes , , 376, 1659, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11501.x

    2007

  7. [17]

    W., & Tchekhovskoy , A

    Davis , S. W., & Tchekhovskoy , A. 2020, title Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations of Active Galactic Nucleus Disks and Jets , , 58, annurev, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051905

    2020 doi

  8. [18]

    K., Das , S., Maity , D., & Chakrabarti , S

    Dihingia , I. K., Das , S., Maity , D., & Chakrabarti , S. 2018 a , title Limitations of the pseudo-Newtonian approach in studying the accretion flow around a Kerr black hole , , 98, 083004, 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.083004

    2018 doi

  9. [19]

    K., Das , S., Maity , D., & Nandi , A

    Dihingia , I. K., Das , S., Maity , D., & Nandi , A. 2019 a , title Shocks in relativistic viscous accretion flows around Kerr black holes , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 1852, 10.1093/mnras/stz1933

    2019 doi

  10. [20]

    K., Das , S., & Mandal , S

    Dihingia , I. K., Das , S., & Mandal , S. 2018 b , title Properties of two-temperature dissipative accretion flow around black holes , , 475, 2164, 10.1093/mnras/stx3269

    2018 doi

  11. [21]

    K., Das , S., & Nandi , A

    Dihingia , I. K., Das , S., & Nandi , A. 2019 b , title Low angular momentum relativistic hot accretion flow around Kerr black holes with variable adiabatic index , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 484, 3209, 10.1093/mnras/stz168

    2019 doi

  12. [22]

    K., & Fendt , C

    Dihingia , I. K., & Fendt , C. 2024, title Thin Accretion disks in GR-MHD simulations , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.06140, 10.48550/arXiv.2404.06140

    2024 doi arXiv

  13. [23]

    K., & Mizuno , Y

    Dihingia , I. K., & Mizuno , Y. 2024, title Dynamical Properties of Magnetized Low-angular-momentum Accretion Flows around a Kerr Black Hole , , 967, 4, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad391a

    2024 doi

  14. [24]

    K., & Mizuno , Y

    Dihingia , I. K., & Mizuno , Y. 2025, title Emergence of cHz Quasiperiodic Oscillations from a Low-angular-momentum Flow onto a Supermassive Black Hole , , 982, L21, 10.3847/2041-8213/adbc6d

    2025 doi

  15. [25]

    2025, title The persistent shadow of the supermassive black hole of M87: II

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration , Akiyama , K., Albentosa-Ru \' z , E., et al. 2025, title The persistent shadow of the supermassive black hole of M87: II. Model comparisons and theoretical interpretations , , 693, A265, 10.1051/0004-6361/202451296

    2025 doi

  16. [26]

    P., Belloni , T

    Fender , R. P., Belloni , T. M., & Gallo , E. 2004, title Towards a unified model for black hole X-ray binary jets , , 355, 1105, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08384.x

    2004

  17. [27]

    Frank , J., King , A., & Raine , D. J. 2002, Accretion Power in Astrophysics: Third Edition (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, February 2002)

    2002

  18. [28]

    1987, title Transonic disk accretion revisited , , 39, 309

    Fukue , J. 1987, title Transonic disk accretion revisited , , 39, 309

    1987

  19. [29]

    K., & Kim , J

    Garain , S. K., & Kim , J. 2023, title Three-dimensional simulations of advective, sub-Keplerian accretion flow on to non-rotating black holes , , 519, 4550, 10.1093/mnras/stac3736

    2023 doi

  20. [30]

    K., Samanta , M

    Giri , K., Chakrabarti , S. K., Samanta , M. M., & Ryu , D. 2010, title Hydrodynamic simulations of oscillating shock waves in a sub-Keplerian accretion flow around black holes , , 403, 516, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16147.x

    2010

  21. [31]

    Huang , J.-X., & Singh , C. B. 2025, title Relativistic Low Angular Momentum Advective Flows Onto Black Hole and Associated Observational Signatures , Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 25, 025013, 10.1088/1674-4527/ada2e8

    2025 doi

  22. [32]

    K., Balsara , D

    Kim , J., Garain , S. K., Balsara , D. S., & Chakrabarti , S. K. 2017, title General relativistic numerical simulation of sub-Keplerian transonic accretion flows on to black holes: Schwarzschild space-time , , 472, 542, 10.1093/mnras/stx1986

    2017 doi

  23. [33]

    K., Chakrabarti , S

    Kim , J., Garain , S. K., Chakrabarti , S. K., & Balsara , D. S. 2019, title General relativistic numerical simulation of sub-Keplerian transonic accretion flows on to rotating black holes: Kerr space-time , , 482, 3636, 10.1093/mnras/sty2953

    2019 doi

  24. [34]

    Lanzafame , G., Molteni , D., & Chakrabarti , S. K. 1998, title Smoothed particle hydrodynamic simulations of viscous accretion discs around black holes , , 299, 799, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01816.x

    1998

  25. [35]

    2010, From Multiwavelength to Mass Scaling: Accretion and Ejection in Microquasars and AGN, ed

    Markoff, S. 2010, From Multiwavelength to Mass Scaling: Accretion and Ejection in Microquasars and AGN, ed. T. Belloni (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg), 143--172, 10.1007/978-3-540-76937-8_6

    2010 doi

  26. [36]

    2014, title The relation between radio and X-ray luminosity of black hole binaries: affected by inner cool disks? , Astron

    Meyer-Hofmeister, E., & Meyer, F. 2014, title The relation between radio and X-ray luminosity of black hole binaries: affected by inner cool disks? , Astron. Astrophys., 562, A142, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322423

    2014 doi

  27. [37]

    2022, title GRMHD Simulations and Modeling for Jet Formation and Acceleration Region in AGNs , Universe, 8, 85, 10.3390/universe8020085

    Mizuno , Y. 2022, title GRMHD Simulations and Modeling for Jet Formation and Acceleration Region in AGNs , Universe, 8, 85, 10.3390/universe8020085

    2022 doi

  28. [38]

    Molteni , D., Lanzafame , G., & Chakrabarti , S. K. 1994, title Simulation of Thick Accretion Disks with Standing Shocks by Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics , , 425, 161, 10.1086/173972

    1994 doi

  29. [39]

    Molteni , D., Ryu , D., & Chakrabarti , S. K. 1996 a , title Numerical Simulations of Standing Shocks in Accretion Flows around Black Holes: A Comparative Study , , 470, 460, 10.1086/177877

    1996 doi

  30. [40]

    Molteni , D., Sponholz , H., & Chakrabarti , S. K. 1996 b , title Resonance Oscillation of Radiative Shock Waves in Accretion Disks around Compact Objects , , 457, 805, 10.1086/176775

    1996 doi

  31. [41]

    K., & Czerny, B

    Moscibrodzka, M., Das, T. K., & Czerny, B. 2006, title The pattern of accretion flow onto Sgr A* , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 370, 219, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10470.x

    2006

  32. [42]

    J., & Ressler , S

    Murchikova , L., White , C. J., & Ressler , S. M. 2022, title Remarkable Correspondence of the Sagittarius A* Submillimeter Variability with a Stellar-wind-fed Accretion Flow Model , , 932, L21, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac75c3

    2022 doi

  33. [43]

    2014, title Low angular momentum flow model II for Sgr A* , , 441, 2354, 10.1093/mnras/stu738

    Okuda , T. 2014, title Low angular momentum flow model II for Sgr A* , , 441, 2354, 10.1093/mnras/stu738

    2014 doi

  34. [44]

    2015, title Unstable mass-outflows in geometrically thick accretion flows around black holes , , 453, 147, 10.1093/mnras/stv1626

    Okuda , T., & Das , S. 2015, title Unstable mass-outflows in geometrically thick accretion flows around black holes , , 453, 147, 10.1093/mnras/stv1626

    2015 doi

  35. [45]

    2012, title Low angular momentum flow model for Sgr A* , , 425, 2413, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21571.x

    Okuda , T., & Molteni , D. 2012, title Low angular momentum flow model for Sgr A* , , 425, 2413, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21571.x

    2012

  36. [46]

    B., & Aktar , R

    Okuda , T., Singh , C. B., & Aktar , R. 2022, title Radiative shock oscillation model for the long-term flares of Sgr A* , , 514, 5074, 10.1093/mnras/stac1630

    2022 doi

  37. [47]

    B., Das , S., et al

    Okuda , T., Singh , C. B., Das , S., et al. 2019, title A possible model for the long-term flares of Sgr A* , , 71, 49, 10.1093/pasj/psz021

    2019 doi

  38. [48]

    2019, title Constrained transport and adaptive mesh refinement in the Black Hole Accretion Code , , 629, A61, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935559

    Olivares , H., Porth , O., Davelaar , J., et al. 2019, title Constrained transport and adaptive mesh refinement in the Black Hole Accretion Code , , 629, A61, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935559

    2019 doi

  39. [49]

    R., Mo \'s cibrodzka , M

    Olivares , H. R., Mo \'s cibrodzka , M. A., & Porth , O. 2023, title General relativistic hydrodynamic simulations of perturbed transonic accretion , , 678, A141, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346010

    2023 doi

  40. [50]

    2019, title Effects of adiabatic index on the sonic surface and time variability of low angular momentum accretion flows , , 487, 755, 10.1093/mnras/stz1296

    Palit , I., Janiuk , A., & Sukova , P. 2019, title Effects of adiabatic index on the sonic surface and time variability of low angular momentum accretion flows , , 487, 755, 10.1093/mnras/stz1296

    2019 doi

  41. [51]

    Porth , O., Mizuno , Y., Younsi , Z., & Fromm , C. M. 2021, title Flares in the Galactic Centre - I. Orbiting flux tubes in magnetically arrested black hole accretion discs , , 502, 2023, 10.1093/mnras/stab163

    2021 doi

  42. [52]

    2017, title The black hole accretion code , Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology, 4, 1, 10.1186/s40668-017-0020-2

    Porth , O., Olivares , H., Mizuno , Y., et al. 2017, title The black hole accretion code , Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology, 4, 1, 10.1186/s40668-017-0020-2

    2017 doi

  43. [53]

    Proga , D., & Begelman , M. C. 2003, title Accretion of Low Angular Momentum Material onto Black Holes: Two-dimensional Hydrodynamical Inviscid Case , , 582, 69, 10.1086/344537

    2003 doi

  44. [54]

    2004, title A Dynamical Model for Hot Gas in the Galactic Center , , 613, 322, 10.1086/422973

    Quataert , E. 2004, title A Dynamical Model for Hot Gas in the Galactic Center , , 613, 322, 10.1086/422973

    2004 doi

  45. [55]

    M., Quataert , E., & Stone , J

    Ressler , S. M., Quataert , E., & Stone , J. M. 2018, title Hydrodynamic simulations of the inner accretion flow of Sagittarius A* fuelled by stellar winds , , 478, 3544, 10.1093/mnras/sty1146

    2018 doi

  46. [56]

    M., White , C

    Ressler , S. M., White , C. J., & Quataert , E. 2023, title Wind-Fed GRMHD Simulations of Sagittarius A*: Tilt and Alignment of Jets and Accretion Discs, Electron Thermodynamics, and Multi-Scale Modeling of the Rotation Measure , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2303.15503, 10.48550/arXi...

    2023 doi arXiv

  47. [57]

    L., Ostriker , J

    Ryu , D., Brown , G. L., Ostriker , J. P., & Loeb , A. 1995, title Stable and Unstable Accretion Flows with Angular Momentum near a Point Mass , , 452, 364, 10.1086/176308

    1995 doi

  48. [58]

    V., & Baganoff, F

    Shcherbakov, R. V., & Baganoff, F. K. 2010, title Inflow-Outflow Model with Conduction and Self-Consistent Feeding for Sgr A* , Astrophys. J., 716, 504, 10.1088/0004-637X/716/1/504

    2010 doi

  49. [59]

    B., Okuda , T., & Aktar , R

    Singh , C. B., Okuda , T., & Aktar , R. 2021, title Effects of resistivity on standing shocks in low angular momentum flows around black holes , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2101.05474. 2101.05474

    2021 arXiv

  50. [60]

    2017, title Shocks in the relativistic transonic accretion with low angular momentum , , 472, 4327, 10.1093/mnras/stx2254

    Sukov \'a , P., Charzy \'n ski , S., & Janiuk , A. 2017, title Shocks in the relativistic transonic accretion with low angular momentum , , 472, 4327, 10.1093/mnras/stx2254

    2017 doi

  51. [61]

    2015, title Oscillating shocks in the low angular momentum flows as a source of variability of accreting black holes , Mon

    Sukov\'a, P., & Janiuk, A. 2015, title Oscillating shocks in the low angular momentum flows as a source of variability of accreting black holes , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 447, 1565, 10.1093/mnras/stu2544

    2015 doi

  52. [62]

    Tchekhovskoy , A., Narayan , R., & McKinney , J. C. 2011, title Efficient generation of jets from magnetically arrested accretion on a rapidly spinning black hole , , 418, L79, 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01147.x

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.