Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Backdoor Attacks and Countermeasures in Natural Language Processing Models: A Comprehensive Security Review

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.06055 v5 pith:D4GKLXER submitted 2023-09-12 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords backdoorcountermeasuresattacksmodelreviewmodelsattackinglanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Language Models (LMs) are becoming increasingly popular in real-world applications. Outsourcing model training and data hosting to third-party platforms has become a standard method for reducing costs. In such a situation, the attacker can manipulate the training process or data to inject a backdoor into models. Backdoor attacks are a serious threat where malicious behavior is activated when triggers are present, otherwise, the model operates normally. However, there is still no systematic and comprehensive review of LMs from the attacker's capabilities and purposes on different backdoor attack surfaces. Moreover, there is a shortage of analysis and comparison of the diverse emerging backdoor countermeasures. Therefore, this work aims to provide the NLP community with a timely review of backdoor attacks and countermeasures. According to the attackers' capability and affected stage of the LMs, the attack surfaces are formalized into four categorizations: attacking the pre-trained model with fine-tuning (APMF) or parameter-efficient fine-tuning (APMP), attacking the final model with training (AFMT), and attacking Large Language Models (ALLM). Thus, attacks under each categorization are combed. The countermeasures are categorized into two general classes: sample inspection and model inspection. Thus, we review countermeasures and analyze their advantages and disadvantages. Also, we summarize the benchmark datasets and provide comparable evaluations for representative attacks and defenses. Drawing the insights from the review, we point out the crucial areas for future research on the backdoor, especially soliciting more efficient and practical countermeasures.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. HeteroBA: A Structure-Manipulating Backdoor Attack on Heterogeneous Graphs

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    HeteroBA achieves high attack success rates by inserting trigger nodes with sampled features and strategically chosen connections into heterogeneous graphs, with minimal impact on clean accuracy.

Pith tools