REVIEW 2 cited by
State Machine of Thoughts: Leveraging Past Reasoning Trajectories for Enhancing Problem Solving
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Current Large Language Model-based agents reason within an exploration-evaluation framework, navigating problem-solving processes in a tree-like manner. However, these methods often neglect successful reasoning trajectories once a problem is resolved, leading to inefficient use of these trajectories for future analogous problems. To address this inefficiency, we adopt a state machine to record experience derived from previous reasoning trajectories. Within the state machine, states represent decomposed sub-problems, while state transitions reflect the dependencies among sub-problems. The state machine records both successful and failed trajectories. Utilizing the experience from the state machine, our proposed State Machine of Thoughts (SMoT) selects the most optimal sub-solutions and avoids incorrect ones. Our experiments show that SMoT can significantly improve problem-solving abilities in two exploration-intensive problems: the 24-point game and a taxi navigation reinforcement learning game.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
From Token to Action: State Machine Reasoning to Mitigate Overthinking in Information Retrieval
A state-machine framework that replaces token-level chain-of-thought with discrete query-refinement and reranking actions reduces token use by 74% while improving nDCG@10 on retrieval benchmarks.
-
SHERPA: A Model-Driven Framework for Large Language Model Execution
A framework that executes LLM tasks through hierarchical state machines improves output quality in 12 of 15 comparisons, but the evaluation lacks error bars and includes test-set-informed design choices.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.