Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Learning Multimorbidity Patterns from Electronic Health Records Using Non-negative Matrix Factorisation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1907.08577 v2 pith:DDFXJ4ZH submitted 2019-07-19 stat.ML cs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.LG
keywords multimorbiditypatternsclustersdiseasebeenelectronicfactorisationhealth
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Multimorbidity, or the presence of several medical conditions in the same individual, has been increasing in the population, both in absolute and relative terms. However, multimorbidity remains poorly understood, and the evidence from existing research to describe its burden, determinants and consequences has been limited. Previous studies attempting to understand multimorbidity patterns are often cross-sectional and do not explicitly account for multimorbidity patterns' evolution over time; some of them are based on small datasets and/or use arbitrary and narrow age ranges; and those that employed advanced models, usually lack appropriate benchmarking and validations. In this study, we (1) introduce a novel approach for using Non-negative Matrix Factorisation (NMF) for temporal phenotyping (i.e., simultaneously mining disease clusters and their trajectories); (2) provide quantitative metrics for the evaluation of disease clusters from such studies; and (3) demonstrate how the temporal characteristics of the disease clusters that result from our model can help mine multimorbidity networks and generate new hypotheses for the emergence of various multimorbidity patterns over time. We trained and evaluated our models on one of the world's largest electronic health records (EHR), with 7 million patients, from which over 2 million where relevant to this study.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools