Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 51 references

Mean field error estimate of the random batch method for vortex blob dynamics for the 2D Navier--Stokes Equation

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that the random batch vortex blob method approximates the two-dimensional Navier-Stokes vorticity equation with an error that is algebraic, not exponential, in the blob radius.

desk verdict The random-batch error analysis is the real contribution and it is careful; the algebraic-ε claim rests on a sketched ε-uniform regularity bootstrap (Proposition 4.1) that should be filled in before the theorem is taken as fully rigorous. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.06533 v1 pith:DG322ZAL submitted 2026-08-06 math.NA cs.NA

Zhenyu Huang This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.NAcs.NA MSC 65M7576M2335Q3060K3565C35
keywords randombatchmethodvortexblob2DNavier-StokesvorticityequationBiot-Savartkernelmean-fieldlimitpropagationofchaosrelativeentropyFisherinformationdissipation
topics Navier-Stokes Regularity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes a quantitative mean-field error estimate for the random batch vortex blob method, a particle scheme for the two-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations in vorticity form. The method replaces the singular Biot-Savart kernel by a mollified blob kernel and randomly regroups particles at each time step, lowering the per-step cost from $O(N^2)$ to $O(N)$. The main theorem bounds the normalized relative entropy between the $N$-particle law and the tensorized regularized vorticity solution by $C_T(h_0^N+\varepsilon^{-4}\tau^2(1+h_0^N)+N^{-1})$, with constants independent of $N$, $\tau$, and $\varepsilon$. The central point is that the blob radius enters only algebraically, unlike the exponential dependence one gets from treating the mollified kernel as a generic Lipschitz force; this keeps the method practical and permits a vanishing-blob limit back to the Navier-Stokes solution. A sympathetic reader should care because the result turns a heuristic acceleration into a provable approximation with explicit rates.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is the exact relative-entropy evolution identity $\frac{d}{dt}H_N=-\sigma I_N+R_{\mathrm{RBM}}+R_{\mathrm{mf}}$, where $I_N$ is the normalized Fisher information. For the random-batch term, the paper constructs, for each particle label, a locally coupled auxiliary batch partition obtained by exchanging two batches; conditional unbiasedness and exchangeability turn the batch error into a symmetric difference of two fixed-partition laws whose drift difference is supported on at most $2p$ coordinates, and Boltzmann entropy dissipation telescopes over time steps to yield $O(\varepsilon^{-4}\tau^2)$. For the mean-field term, the oddness of the mollified Biot-Savart kernel pairs it with the score difference $\nabla\log\omega_\varepsilon(x)-\nabla\log\omega_\varepsilon(y)$, and uniform Gaussian, score, and log-Hessian estimates for the regularized vorticity solution allow an exponential mean-field fluctuation estimate with a constant independent of $\varepsilon$, giving $R_{\mathrm{mf}}\le C_T(H_N+N^{-1})$.

What would settle it

Solve the regularized vorticity equation numerically for a Gaussian initial vorticity at several small blob radii and measure $\sup_{0\le t\le T}\|\nabla^2\log\omega_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)\|_{L^\infty}$; if this quantity grows like $\varepsilon^{-1}$ or worse as $\varepsilon\to 0$, the uniform regularity assumption fails and the algebraic $\varepsilon^{-4}\tau^2$ rate cannot hold. A direct check is the asserted uniform bound $\|\omega_\varepsilon\|_{W^{2,1}\cap W^{2,\infty}}\le C_T$ for $0<\varepsilon\le 1$: an admissible initial datum for which this norm diverges as $\varepsilon\to 0$ would falsify Proposition 4.1 and with it the main theorem.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that, for smooth strictly positive Gaussian-tailed initial vorticity, the random batch vortex blob particle system is quantitatively close at the level of laws to the solution of the regularized 2D Navier-Stokes vorticity equation, uniformly on finite time intervals. The normalized relative entropy $H_N(\tilde F^N_\varepsilon(t)|\omega_\varepsilon(t)^{\otimes N})$ stays below $C_T(h_0^N+\varepsilon^{-4}\tau^2(1+h_0^N)+N^{-1})$. This is achieved by separating the two error sources: the random-batch error is controlled through a locally coupled auxiliary partition, a symmetric law comparison, and Fisher-information dissipation, while the mean-field fluctuation is controlled by exploiting the oddness and divergence-free structure of the Biot-Savart kernel together with score-difference cancellation. The estimate implies $L^1$ propagation of chaos for fixed-particle marginals and, after letting $\varepsilon\to 0$, convergence of the particle approximation to the true vorticity solution of the Navier-Stokes equations.

Load-bearing premise

The whole estimate leans on the blob-regularized vorticity staying well behaved—Gaussian decay and controlled slope and curvature—uniformly as the blob shrinks; if that uniformity fails, the algebraic error rate collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For fixed $\varepsilon>0$, as $N\to\infty$ and $\varepsilon^{-2}\tau\to0$, every fixed-$k$ marginal converges in $L^1$ to $\omega_\varepsilon^{\otimes k}$ at rate $(h_0^N)^{1/2}+\varepsilon^{-2}\tau(1+h_0^N)^{1/2}+N^{-1/2}$.
  • The time step needs only to be polynomially small in the blob radius ($\tau\ll\varepsilon^2$), rather than exponentially small as a generic Lipschitz-kernel analysis would demand.
  • Passing to the vanishing-blob limit $\varepsilon\to0$ recovers the vorticity solution of the two-dimensional Navier-Stokes equation, so the particle system approximates the true fluid equations.
  • The bounds hold uniformly in $N$, $\tau$, and $\varepsilon$, so the estimate is quantitative for every finite system and does not hide constants that blow up as the blob shrinks.
  • The proof also controls the time-integrated normalized Fisher information, giving quantitative smoothness of the particle law.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same separation of a structural kernel estimate from a random-batch combinatorial estimate likely applies to other divergence-free antisymmetric interaction kernels, such as vortex stretching in three dimensions, where generic Lipschitz bounds would be prohibitive.
  • Because the $\varepsilon^{-4}$ factor comes only from $\|K_\varepsilon\|_{L^\infty}^4$, mollifiers with additional vanishing moments may lower the exponent; this is a testable numerical improvement.
  • The $\varepsilon$-uniform regularity of the regularized vorticity solution is likely the true boundary of the method: for initial data outside the Gaussian-tailed smooth class, one should expect either slower rates or the need for weighted relative entropies.
  • The proof's mean-field step uses only oddness, divergence-freeness, and the score-difference structure, so the extension to unequal circulations, which the paper defers to future work, should be achievable by the same mechanism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes the random batch vortex blob method for the two-dimensional Navier–Stokes equation in vorticity form. The dynamics are an N-particle system with the regularized Biot–Savart kernel and viscosity, and the batches are refreshed randomly at intervals of length tau. The main result, Theorem 1.1, is a finite-time normalized relative-entropy bound between the joint law of the random batch particles and the tensorized solution of the regularized vorticity equation, of order h_N^0 + epsilon^{-4} tau^2 (1 + h_N^0) + N^{-1}. The proof separates the random batch error, controlled through a locally coupled auxiliary partition and Fisher-information dissipation, from the mean field fluctuation, controlled through the oddness and divergence-free structure of the Biot–Savart kernel together with the Jabin–Wang exponential estimate. The paper also states L1 propagation of chaos (Corollary 1.2) and convergence to the Navier–Stokes vorticity solution in the combined vanishing-blob and mean-field limit (Corollary 1.3).

Significance. If the main theorem is correct, the paper makes a substantial contribution: it gives an algebraic dependence on the blob radius, epsilon^{-4}, instead of an exponential dependence exp(C_T epsilon^{-2}) that would follow from treating the mollified kernel as a generic Lipschitz kernel. The random-batch analysis in Section 3 is careful and self-contained, and the symmetrization and cancellation structure in Section 4 is genuinely used. The paper also makes good use of the existing literature, building on Jabin–Wang, Feng–Wang, and Ben-Artzi rather than redeveloping those tools. The main caveat is that the epsilon-uniform regularity statement, Proposition 4.1, is load-bearing and is presented as a proof sketch; this needs to be completed or precisely cited before the main theorem can be considered fully proven.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 4.1, Proposition 4.1, Eq. (4.6)] The uniform-in-epsilon bound W^{2,1} cap W^{2,infty} for omega_epsilon and u_epsilon is the load-bearing input to Lemma 4.3, because it makes the constants in (4.3)-(4.5) and hence the Orlicz norm Lambda_T in (4.21) independent of epsilon. The proof given is a sketch: it asserts that the finite-time Sobolev argument of [14, Lemma 2.2] and Ben-Artzi [3] applies with K * nabla^m omega replaced by K * (phi_epsilon * nabla^m omega_epsilon), and that L1/Linfty-contractivity of phi_epsilon transfers the estimates. This transfer is not demonstrated. In particular, the coupled system controlling nabla omega_epsilon, nabla^2 omega_epsilon, nabla u_epsilon, and nabla^2 u_epsilon involves constants that must be tracked under this replacement, and (4.6) itself is used later in the same proof to define U_T and to justify the quotient bounds. As written, Proposition 4.1 is a stated regularity result with a proof sketch. Because the algebraic epsilon^{-4} tau^2 rate in Theorem 1.1 collapses if any of these constants degrades as epsilon goes to 0, the proof must be completed or an explicit reference with the uniform-in-epsilon statement must be supplied.
  2. [Section 4.2, Lemma 4.3, Eq. (4.16)] The cancellation conditions in (4.16) are central to the application of the Jabin-Wang exponential estimate, since they are exactly the hypotheses of Lemma 4.2. The verification is dismissed as 'straightforward,' but it is delicate because, by oddness, integral K_epsilon(x-y) omega_epsilon(x) dx equals -(K_epsilon * omega_epsilon)(y), and the sign matters. The cancellation does work out, but the computation should be written out explicitly so the reader can verify it without rederiving the signs. This is a presentational point, but it concerns the core mechanism of the mean-field estimate.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains a rendering glitch: 'and $varepsilon$' should be 'and $\varepsilon$'.
  2. [Section 3.2, Eq. (3.18)-(3.20)] The passage from (3.18) to (3.20) hides the dependence on p and on the initial-entropy bound; it would help to state explicitly that the final constant in (3.20) absorbs p, sigma, phi, T, and omega_0, so the reader does not have to reconstruct the absorption.
  3. [Section 4.2, Eq. (4.21)] The notation sup_y |Phi_epsilon(t, dot, y)| is used before the L^q norm is written; please define the normed quantity explicitly as a function of x for each fixed y.
  4. [References] Reference [14] is cited as 'Peking Mathematical Journal, 2026' without volume or article number; please update the citation if a final version is available.
  5. [Section 1.1, Theorem 1.1] The statement says 'for every tau > 0,' but the meaningful regime is epsilon^{-2} tau -> 0; a short comment noting this would clarify the order of the limits in Corollary 1.3.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the bound is obtained from an exact entropy identity plus independent external estimates; self-citations are contextual only.

full rationale

The central claim, Theorem 1.1, is assembled from an exact relative-entropy identity (Proposition 2.1), a derived integrated bound on the random-batch remainder (Proposition 3.3), and a mean-field fluctuation bound (Lemma 4.3) whose external inputs are the Jabin–Wang large-deviation estimate (Lemma 4.2) and uniform Gaussian/score/log-Hessian estimates for the regularized vorticity (Proposition 4.1). No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction: the constants are explicit consequences of the stated assumptions, and the rate epsilon^{-4} tau^2 arises directly from ||K_epsilon||_L^infty ~ epsilon^{-1} and the coupling estimate, not from a fit. The author's own prior work [26] appears only as the generic Lipschitz-kernel baseline to be improved, in the passages 'standard argument in [26]' and 'framework of [26, Lemma 4.5] is not uniform', and no step of the proof of Theorem 1.1 relies on that paper. The genuinely load-bearing estimates come from independent external sources: Ben-Artzi [3], Feng-Wang [14], and Jabin-Wang [29]. Proposition 4.1 is a stated regularity result whose proof sketch imports Sobolev and Hamilton-type estimates and asserts the epsilon-uniformity; the manuscript itself flags this with 'The only point that requires verification is that all constants remain uniform for 0<epsilon<=1.' That is a proof-completeness or rigor gap, not circularity, because Proposition 4.1 does not assume the theorem it feeds. No equation in the paper reduces by construction to its own input, and no self-citation is load-bearing; consequently there are no circular steps to report.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted and no new entities are postulated. The proof relies on standard parabolic regularity results and the Jabin-Wang exponential concentration estimate. The only restrictions are the strong initial data assumptions (1.10), which are explicit in the theorem.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Initial vorticity omega0 is strictly positive, has Gaussian upper bound and log-gradient bounds (1.10)
    This is the stated domain of Theorem 1.1; it guarantees the reference solution omega_epsilon has Gaussian decay and logarithmic derivative bounds uniform in epsilon (Prop 4.1).
  • domain assumption Mollifier phi is smooth, nonnegative, even, compactly supported with integral one
    Defines K_epsilon = K * phi_epsilon; evenness gives oddness of K_epsilon, compact support gives |z||K_epsilon(z)| bounded. These identities are used throughout Sections 3 and 4.
  • standard math Jabin-Wang exponential estimate (Lemma 4.2)
    Cited from [29, Theorem 4]; used to control the mean field fluctuation exponential moment in Lemma 4.3.
  • standard math Ben-Artzi [3] and Feng-Wang [14] regularity theory for the 2D vorticity equation (W^{2,1} cap W^{2,infinity} bounds, Hamilton-type log-gradient estimates)
    Prop 4.1 builds on these published results to obtain uniform-in-epsilon Gaussian, score and log-Hessian bounds; the paper sketches the extension to epsilon-uniform constants.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Mean field error estimate of the random batch method for vortex blob dynamics for the 2D Navier--Stokes Equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DG322ZAL

@misc{pith2026260806533,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Mean field error estimate of the random batch method for vortex blob dynamics for the 2D Navier--Stokes Equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DG322ZAL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.06533}
}
abstract

We propose and analyze the random batch vortex blob method for the 2D Navier--Stokes equation in vorticity form on the whole plane. The vortex blob method is based on an interacting particle system of $N$ particles with computational complexity of $O(N^2)$, which is reduced to $O(N)$ by the random batch method \cite{JinLiLiu2020}. Our main result is a quantitative law level mean field error estimate whose dependence on the blob radius remains algebraic. We treat the two main error mechanisms separately. The random batch error is controlled through a locally coupled auxiliary partition, a symmetric law comparison, and Fisher-information dissipation. The mean field fluctuation is estimated by exploiting the oddness and divergence-free structure of the Biot--Savart kernel. For smooth, strictly positive initial vorticity, we prove on every finite time interval a normalized relative-entropy bound of order $ O\!\left(\varepsilon^{-4}\tau^2+N^{-1} \right), $ with constants independent of $N$, $\tau$, and $varepsilon$. Here $\tau$ is the batch refreshing interval and $\varepsilon$ is the blob radius. As a consequence, the fixed-particle marginals converge strongly in $L^1$ to tensor products of the regularized vorticity solution when $N\to\infty$ and $\varepsilon^{-2}\tau\to 0$.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [26]

    Mean field error estimate of the random batch method for large interacting particle system.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 59(1):265–289, 2025

    Zhenyu Huang, Shi Jin, and Lei Li. Mean field error estimate of the random batch method for large interacting particle system.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 59(1):265–289, 2025

    work page 2025

  2. [3]

    Global solutions of two-dimensional Navier-Stokes and Euler equations

    Matania Ben-Artzi. Global solutions of two-dimensional Navier-Stokes and Euler equations. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 128(4):329–358, 1994

    work page 1994

  3. [14]

    Quantitative propagation of chaos for 2D viscous vortex model on the whole space.Peking Mathematical Journal, 2026

    Xuanrui Feng and Zhenfu Wang. Quantitative propagation of chaos for 2D viscous vortex model on the whole space.Peking Mathematical Journal, 2026

    work page 2026

  4. [1]

    Thomas Beale and Andrew Majda

    J. Thomas Beale and Andrew Majda. Vortex methods. I. Convergence in three dimensions. Mathematics of Computation, 39(159):1–27, 1982

    work page 1982

  5. [2]

    Thomas Beale and Andrew Majda

    J. Thomas Beale and Andrew Majda. Vortex methods. II. Higher order accuracy in two and three dimensions.Mathematics of Computation, 39(159):29–52, 1982

    work page 1982

  6. [4]

    Berselli and Stefano Spirito

    Luigi C. Berselli and Stefano Spirito. On the existence of Leray–Hopf weak solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations.Fluids, 6(1):42, 2021

    work page 2021

  7. [5]

    Weighted Csisz´ ar-Kullback-Pinsker inequalities and ap- plications to transportation inequalities

    Fran¸ cois Bolley and C´ edric Villani. Weighted Csisz´ ar-Kullback-Pinsker inequalities and ap- plications to transportation inequalities. InAnnales de la Facult´ e des sciences de Toulouse: Math´ ematiques, volume 14, pages 331–352, 2005

    work page 2005

  8. [6]

    Convergence of random batch method with replacement for interacting particle systems.Mathematics of Computation, 2026

    Zhenhao Cai, Jian-Guo Liu, and Yuliang Wang. Convergence of random batch method with replacement for interacting particle systems.Mathematics of Computation, 2026. Published electronically February 27, 2026; print pagination pending

    work page 2026

Show all 51 references
  1. [7]

    Carrillo, Shi Jin, Lei Li, and Yuhua Zhu

    Jos´ e A. Carrillo, Shi Jin, Lei Li, and Yuhua Zhu. A consensus-based global optimization method for high dimensional machine learning problems.ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations, 27:S5, 2021

    2021

  2. [8]

    Carrillo, Shi Jin, and Yijia Tang

    Jos´ e A. Carrillo, Shi Jin, and Yijia Tang. Random batch particle methods for the homogeneous Landau equation.Communications in Computational Physics, 31(4):997–1019, 2022

    2022

  3. [9]

    Patacchini

    Jos´ e Antonio Carrillo, Katy Craig, and Francesco S. Patacchini. A blob method for diffusion. Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations, 58(2):53, 2019

    2019

  4. [10]

    Alexandre J. Chorin. Numerical study of slightly viscous flow.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 57(4):785–796, 1973

    1973

  5. [11]

    A blob method for the aggregation equation.Mathematics of Computation, 85(300):1681–1717, 2016

    Katy Craig and Andrea Bertozzi. A blob method for the aggregation equation.Mathematics of Computation, 85(300):1681–1717, 2016

    2016

  6. [12]

    A collision-oriented interacting particle system for Landau-type equations and the molecular chaos, 2024

    Kai Du and Lei Li. A collision-oriented interacting particle system for Landau-type equations and the molecular chaos, 2024. arXiv.2408.16252

    2024 arXiv

  7. [13]

    A structure-preserving collisional particle method for the Landau kinetic equation.Journal of Computational Physics, 543:114387, 2025

    Kai Du, Lei Li, Yulong Xie, and Yang Yu. A structure-preserving collisional particle method for the Landau kinetic equation.Journal of Computational Physics, 543:114387, 2025. 27

    2025

  8. [15]

    Quantitative propagation of chaos for 2D viscous vortex model with general circulations on the whole space.Nonlinearity, 39(1):015009, 2026

    Xuanrui Feng and Zhenfu Wang. Quantitative propagation of chaos for 2D viscous vortex model with general circulations on the whole space.Nonlinearity, 39(1):015009, 2026

    2026

  9. [16]

    Propagation of chaos for the 2D viscous vortex model.Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 16(7):1423–1466, 2014

    Nicolas Fournier, Maxime Hauray, and St´ ephane Mischler. Propagation of chaos for the 2D viscous vortex model.Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 16(7):1423–1466, 2014

    2014

  10. [17]

    On the dynamics of large particle systems in the mean field limit

    Fran¸ cois Golse. On the dynamics of large particle systems in the mean field limit. In Adrian Muntean, Jens Rademacher, and Antonios Zagaris, editors,Macroscopic and Large Scale Phenomena: Coarse Graining, Mean Field Limits and Ergodicity, pages 1–144. Springer, Cham, 2016

    2016

  11. [18]

    The random batch method forN-body quantum dynamics.Journal of Computational Mathematics, 39(6):897–922, 2021

    Fran¸ cois Golse, Shi Jin, and Thierry Paul. The random batch method forN-body quantum dynamics.Journal of Computational Mathematics, 39(6):897–922, 2021

    2021

  12. [19]

    Convergence of the random vortex method.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 40(2):189–220, 1987

    Jonathan Goodman. Convergence of the random vortex method.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 40(2):189–220, 1987

    1987

  13. [20]

    Hou, and John Lowengrub

    Jonathan Goodman, Thomas Y. Hou, and John Lowengrub. Convergence of the point vortex method for the 2-D Euler equations.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 43(3):415–430, 1990

    1990

  14. [21]

    Tinsley Oden, and Serge Prudhomme

    Jean-Luc Guermond, J. Tinsley Oden, and Serge Prudhomme. Mathematical perspectives on large eddy simulation models for turbulent flows.Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics, 6(2):194–248, 2004

    2004

  15. [22]

    Uniform in time propagation of chaos for the 2D vortex model and other singular stochastic systems.Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 27(6):2359–2386, 2025

    Arnaud Guillin, Pierre Le Bris, and Pierre Monmarch´ e. Uniform in time propagation of chaos for the 2D vortex model and other singular stochastic systems.Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 27(6):2359–2386, 2025

    2025

  16. [23]

    Uniform-in-time error estimate of the random batch method for the Cucker–Smale model.Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 31(6):1099–1135, 2021

    Seung-Yeal Ha, Shi Jin, Doheon Kim, and Dongnam Ko. Uniform-in-time error estimate of the random batch method for the Cucker–Smale model.Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 31(6):1099–1135, 2021

    2021

  17. [24]

    Ole H. Hald. Convergence of vortex methods for Euler’s equations. II.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 16(5):726–755, 1979

    1979

  18. [25]

    Hou and John Lowengrub

    Thomas Y. Hou and John Lowengrub. Convergence of the point vortex method for the 3-D Euler equations.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 43(8):965–981, 1990

    1990

  19. [27]

    A review of the mean field limits for Vlasov equations.Kinetic and Related Models, 7(4):661–711, 2014

    Pierre-Emmanuel Jabin. A review of the mean field limits for Vlasov equations.Kinetic and Related Models, 7(4):661–711, 2014

    2014

  20. [28]

    Mean field limit for stochastic particle systems

    Pierre-Emmanuel Jabin and Zhenfu Wang. Mean field limit for stochastic particle systems. In Nicola Bellomo, Pierre Degond, and Eitan Tadmor, editors,Active Particles, Volume 1: Advances in Theory, Models, and Applications, pages 379–402. Birkh¨ auser, Cham, 2017. 28

    2017

  21. [29]

    Quantitative estimates of propagation of chaos for stochastic systems withW −1,∞ kernels.Inventiones Mathematicae, 214(1):523–591, 2018

    Pierre-Emmanuel Jabin and Zhenfu Wang. Quantitative estimates of propagation of chaos for stochastic systems withW −1,∞ kernels.Inventiones Mathematicae, 214(1):523–591, 2018

    2018

  22. [30]

    On the mean field limit of the random batch method for interacting particle systems.Science China Mathematics, 65(1):169–202, 2022

    Shi Jin and Lei Li. On the mean field limit of the random batch method for interacting particle systems.Science China Mathematics, 65(1):169–202, 2022

    2022

  23. [31]

    Random batch methods (RBM) for interacting particle systems.Journal of Computational Physics, 400:108877, 2020

    Shi Jin, Lei Li, and Jian-Guo Liu. Random batch methods (RBM) for interacting particle systems.Journal of Computational Physics, 400:108877, 2020

    2020

  24. [32]

    Convergence of the random batch method for interacting particles with disparate species and weights.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 59(2):746– 768, 2021

    Shi Jin, Lei Li, and Jian-Guo Liu. Convergence of the random batch method for interacting particles with disparate species and weights.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 59(2):746– 768, 2021

    2021

  25. [33]

    On the random batch method for second-order interacting particle systems.Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, 20(2):741–768, 2022

    Shi Jin, Lei Li, and Yiqun Sun. On the random batch method for second-order interacting particle systems.Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, 20(2):741–768, 2022

    2022

  26. [34]

    A random batch Ewald method for particle systems with Coulomb interactions.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 43(4):B937–B960, 2021

    Shi Jin, Lei Li, Zhenli Xu, and Yue Zhao. A random batch Ewald method for particle systems with Coulomb interactions.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 43(4):B937–B960, 2021

    2021

  27. [35]

    Ergodicity and long-time behavior of the random batch method for interacting particle systems.Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 33(1):67–102, 2023

    Shi Jin, Lei Li, Xuda Ye, and Zhennan Zhou. Ergodicity and long-time behavior of the random batch method for interacting particle systems.Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 33(1):67–102, 2023

    2023

  28. [36]

    Random batch algorithms for quantum Monte Carlo simulations

    Shi Jin and Xiantao Li. Random batch algorithms for quantum Monte Carlo simulations. Communications in Computational Physics, 28(5):1907–1936, 2020

    1907

  29. [37]

    Asymptotic uniform estimate of random batch method with replacement for the Cucker–Smale model.Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, pages 1–57, 2026

    Shi Jin, Yuelin Wang, and Yuliang Wang. Asymptotic uniform estimate of random batch method with replacement for the Cucker–Smale model.Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, pages 1–57, 2026. Advance online publication

    2026

  30. [38]

    Sur le mouvement d’un liquide visqueux emplissant l’espace.Acta Mathematica, 63:193–248, 1934

    Jean Leray. Sur le mouvement d’un liquide visqueux emplissant l’espace.Acta Mathematica, 63:193–248, 1934

    1934

  31. [39]

    A stochastic version of Stein variational gradient descent for efficient sampling.Communications in Applied Mathematics and Computational Science, 15(1):37–63, 2020

    Lei Li, Yingzhou Li, Jian-Guo Liu, Zibu Liu, and Jianfeng Lu. A stochastic version of Stein variational gradient descent for efficient sampling.Communications in Applied Mathematics and Computational Science, 15(1):37–63, 2020

    2020

  32. [40]

    Some random batch particle methods for the Poisson– Nernst–Planck and Poisson–Boltzmann equations.Communications in Computational Physics, 32(1):41–82, 2022

    Lei Li, Jian-Guo Liu, and Yijia Tang. Some random batch particle methods for the Poisson– Nernst–Planck and Poisson–Boltzmann equations.Communications in Computational Physics, 32(1):41–82, 2022

    2022

  33. [41]

    Propagation of chaos and approximation error of random batch particle system in the mean field regime, 2025

    Lei Li, Yuelin Wang, and Shi Jin. Propagation of chaos and approximation error of random batch particle system in the mean field regime, 2025. arXiv:2505.12172

    2025 arXiv

  34. [42]

    A random-batch Monte Carlo method for many-body systems with singular kernels.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 42(3):A1486–A1509, 2020

    Lei Li, Zhenli Xu, and Yue Zhao. A random-batch Monte Carlo method for many-body systems with singular kernels.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 42(3):A1486–A1509, 2020

    2020

  35. [43]

    Superscalability of the random batch Ewald method.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 156(1):014114, 2022

    Jiuyang Liang, Pan Tan, Yue Zhao, Lei Li, Shi Jin, Liang Hong, and Zhenli Xu. Superscalability of the random batch Ewald method.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 156(1):014114, 2022

    2022

  36. [44]

    On random batch methods (RBM) for interacting particle systems driven by L´ evy processes.Stochastics and Dynamics, 25(7–8):2550034, 2025

    Jian-Guo Liu and Yuliang Wang. On random batch methods (RBM) for interacting particle systems driven by L´ evy processes.Stochastics and Dynamics, 25(7–8):2550034, 2025. 29

    2025

  37. [45]

    Convergence of vortex methods for weak solutions to the 2-D Euler equations with vortex sheet data.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 48(6):611–628, 1995

    Jian-Guo Liu and Zhouping Xin. Convergence of vortex methods for weak solutions to the 2-D Euler equations with vortex sheet data.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 48(6):611–628, 1995

    1995

  38. [46]

    Convergence of the random vortex method in two dimensions.Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 1(4):779–804, 1988

    Ding-Gwo Long. Convergence of the random vortex method in two dimensions.Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 1(4):779–804, 1988

    1988

  39. [47]

    Hydrodynamics in two dimensions and vortex theory

    Carlo Marchioro and Mario Pulvirenti. Hydrodynamics in two dimensions and vortex theory. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 84(4):483–503, 1982

    1982

  40. [48]

    Propagation of chaos for the two-dimensional Navier–Stokes equation.Pro- ceedings of the Japan Academy, Series A, Mathematical Sciences, 62(1):8–11, 1986

    Hirofumi Osada. Propagation of chaos for the two-dimensional Navier–Stokes equation.Pro- ceedings of the Japan Academy, Series A, Mathematical Sciences, 62(1):8–11, 1986

    1986

  41. [49]

    Propagation of chaos for the two-dimensional Navier–Stokes equation

    Hirofumi Osada. Propagation of chaos for the two-dimensional Navier–Stokes equation. In Probabilistic Methods in Mathematical Physics (Katata/Kyoto, 1985), pages 303–334, Boston, MA, 1987. Academic Press

    1985

  42. [50]

    On the mean-field limit of the Cucker–Smale model with random batch method.Kinetic and Related Models, 18(6):872–910, 2025

    Yuelin Wang and Yiwen Lin. On the mean-field limit of the Cucker–Smale model with random batch method.Kinetic and Related Models, 18(6):872–910, 2025

    2025

  43. [51]

    Error analysis of time-discrete random batch method for interacting particle systems and associated mean-field limits.IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 44(3):1660–1698, 2024

    Xuda Ye and Zhennan Zhou. Error analysis of time-discrete random batch method for interacting particle systems and associated mean-field limits.IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 44(3):1660–1698, 2024. 30

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.