Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 55 references

Ultrafast X-ray induced damage and nonthermal melting in cadmium sulfide

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Both crystal forms of CdS disorder at the same absorbed X-ray dose, about 0.4-0.5 eV/atom, with thermal melting near threshold and nonthermal melting at higher doses.

desk verdict A credible, well-scoped simulation study of ultrafast X-ray damage in CdS; the central thresholds are plausible, but the extreme-state DFTB parameterization is the main uncertainty. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.05799 v1 pith:DKAMO4SO submitted 2025-02-09 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.other

Nikita Medvedev , Aldo Artímez Peña This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.other
keywords cadmiumsulfidezincblendewurtziteultrafastX-rayirradiationnonthermalmeltingelectron-phononcouplingbandgaptuningXTANT-3
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks a practical question: at what absorbed dose does cadmium sulfide stop being a crystal when hit by an ultrafast XUV/X-ray pulse, and what state does it land in? Using a hybrid simulation that follows excited electrons and atoms together, it reports that zinc blende and wurtzite CdS both lose long-range order above roughly 0.4-0.5 eV/atom. Near that threshold the damage is mainly thermal, through electron-phonon heating over 2-3 ps; at doses around 1-1.1 eV/atom nonthermal bond weakening takes over and collapses the band gap, forming a dense liquid that may be semiconducting or metallic. The paper's wider point is that absorbed dose alone could characterize radiation damage in both CdS phases, and that varying the pulse dose might tune the material's band gap, ending in an amorphous phase near 1.7 eV after cooling.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the XTANT-3 hybrid model, which couples several levels of description: a Monte Carlo transport module for high-energy electrons and core-hole Auger cascades, Boltzmann collision integrals for low-energy electrons, and classical molecular dynamics for atoms. The load-bearing part is a transient density-functional tight-binding Hamiltonian for CdS, parameterized in Ref. [31], whose eigenvalues and forces are recomputed as atoms move; this is what lets electronic excitation change the interatomic potential, produce nonadiabatic electron-phonon energy transfer, and shrink or close the band gap. Short-range ZBL repulsion is added for Cd-Cd and Cd-S contacts at high-density liquid conditions. The key observable that organizes the results is the absorbed dose in eV/atom: the paper maps disorder, band gap, pressure, and final phase onto that single number.

What would settle it

Time-resolved X-ray or electron diffraction on a thin CdS film hit by a 10 fs FWHM, 30 eV photon pulse with independently calibrated absorbed dose would settle the claim: the paper's prediction fails if crystal peaks survive at 0.5 eV/atom or vanish below about 0.4 eV/atom, or if an optical probe fails to show a transient band gap near 1 eV at threshold and a collapse only above about 1 eV/atom. The thermal-versus-nonthermal assignment could be tested by the delay, since near-threshold disordering should take 2-3 ps while higher doses should disorder within about 1 ps.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central discovery is a threshold and a switch. The threshold is ~0.4-0.5 eV/atom absorbed dose for both CdS polymorphs, where the lattice disorders; if correct, resistance to ultrafast X-ray damage is governed by energy per atom rather than by crystal structure. The switch is electronic: near threshold the material is a thermally melted semiconducting liquid with a transient band gap near 1 eV, while above ~1-1.1 eV/atom, with about 2% of valence electrons promoted, the gap closes within about 1 ps and a metallic high-density liquid forms. The paper also finds that the high-density liquid is denser than either crystal, and that on fast cooling the material either recrystallizes (below ~1.3 eV/atom) or freezes into an amorphous phase with a stable band gap near 1.7 eV, with an intermediate dose window giving intermediate gap values.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes the fitted atomistic description of ordinary CdS remains accurate for forces, band structure, and electron-phonon coupling once about 2% of valence electrons are excited and the atoms reach dense disordered liquid states; if that assumption fails, the damage thresholds and phase assignments shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Radiation-hardness estimates for CdS devices can use one absorbed-dose criterion for both zinc blende and wurtzite, since the two polymorphs disorder at nearly the same dose.
  • A dose window from about 0.5 to 1 eV/atom should produce a transiently disordered but still semiconducting CdS, while doses above about 1-1.1 eV/atom should make it transiently metallic.
  • Because the melted state is denser than the crystals, irradiation should create negative pressure and contraction, which could leave residual strain or densified material in films.
  • With fast cooling, doses below about 1.3 eV/atom recover the crystal, doses above about 1.5 eV/atom leave an amorphous phase with band gap near 1.7 eV, and an intermediate dose window gives intermediate band gaps.
  • Calculated powder diffraction patterns change character within a few hundred femtoseconds and again on cooling, giving an experimental signature for the predicted sequence.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the two polymorphs truly share one dose threshold, the same criterion may apply to other II-VI compounds with similar bond ionicity, and the ionicity-dependent metallization trend could predict which ones show a semiconducting-liquid window and which collapse directly to a metal.
  • The semiconducting-to-metallic liquid transition suggests that pump-probe experiments could tune the optical properties of the liquid itself on a femtosecond timescale, not just the final amorphous band gap, giving a new test of the model beyond diffraction.
  • The recrystallization window depends on cooling time, which in experiments is set by penetration depth and heat diffusion; therefore the threshold dose for permanent damage should shift with photon energy, incidence angle, and sample geometry in a predictable way.
  • The reported 1.7 eV amorphous band gap comes from a 15 ps simulation, so longer annealing simulations or experimental aging would test whether that value is stable beyond the modeled timescale.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper uses the XTANT-3 hybrid simulation code to model ultrafast XUV/X-ray irradiation of CdS in both zinc blende and wurtzite phases. The model couples Monte Carlo transport of high-energy electrons, Boltzmann kinetics of low-energy electrons, a self-consistent-charge DFTB Hamiltonian for electronic structure and interatomic forces, and classical molecular dynamics. The authors report a damage threshold of about 0.4-0.5 eV/atom for both polymorphs, attribute near-threshold damage mainly to thermal (electron-phonon) heating on the basis of a Born-Oppenheimer comparison, and identify a higher-dose regime in which nonthermal effects dominate. They further predict transient semiconducting and metallic liquid states, a high-density liquid phase inferred from negative pressure, and, in simulations with a 1 ps Berendsen thermostat, recrystallization below about 1.3 eV/atom and an amorphous final state with a band gap near 1.7 eV above about 1.5 eV/atom.

Significance. If the predictions are correct, the paper provides a practical single-dose criterion for damaging either CdS polymorph and suggests a laser-based route to continuously tune the band gap between crystalline, partially damaged, and amorphous states. The use of a combined model that treats electronic excitation, nonadiabatic coupling, and atomic dynamics together is a strength, as is the explicit comparison between full and Born-Oppenheimer simulations to separate thermal and nonthermal channels. The code is available, and the paper includes a falsifiable prediction in the form of time-resolved powder diffraction patterns. The significance is, however, tempered by the fact that the central quantitative claims rest on a ground-state-fitted tight-binding parameterization that is not independently validated in the strongly excited, dense, disordered regimes where the predictions are made.

major comments (3)
  1. [III.1 and III.2 (Figs. 1, 6)] The central damage threshold of ~0.4-0.5 eV/atom is determined by visual inspection of atomic snapshots at a small number of doses. No quantitative order parameter (e.g., mean-square displacement, Lindemann ratio, bond-angle distribution, or structure factor) is used to define 'disorder' or to bracket the threshold with uncertainty. Because the two polymorphs are reported to have nearly identical thresholds, a shared visual criterion could bias the comparison. An objective, reproducible criterion is needed to support the load-bearing threshold claim.
  2. [II (DFTB parameterization and ZBL repulsion)] All interatomic forces and transient electronic properties are computed with the SCC-DFTB parameterization of Ref. [31], which was fitted to ground-state DFT data, with ZBL repulsion added only for Cd-Cd and Cd-S pairs. The regimes of interest—~2% valence-band depopulation, dense disordered liquid configurations, and near-gap-closure metallic states—are far outside the fitting set. No validation against DFT, TDDFT, or experimental data is presented for these states, and the S-S short-range interaction is not patched. Since the damage thresholds, the semiconducting-to-metallic crossover, and the 1.7 eV amorphous gap are all outputs of this Hamiltonian, the paper should either provide a transferability test for representative excited/disordered configurations or explicitly qualify the predictions as parameterization-dependent estimates.
  3. [IV (cooling simulations and band-gap tuning)] The recrystallization/amorphization behavior and the final band gap of ~1.7 eV are obtained with a Berendsen thermostat whose 1 ps cooling time is acknowledged as arbitrary. The claim that the band gap can be controllably tuned by irradiation dose depends on this choice, yet no sensitivity study is reported. At minimum, the authors should show how the final band gap and the recrystallization threshold vary with the cooling time, since experimental heat-drain rates can differ by orders of magnitude depending on penetration depth and sample geometry.
minor comments (5)
  1. [II] The statement that the 'Martyna-Tuckerman 4th order algorithm' is used should specify whether this refers to the integration scheme of Ref. [34] or to a different propagation method, and the reference should be given in the context where the algorithm is introduced.
  2. [III.1 and IV] Several figures lack quantitative axes labels or legends that would allow the reader to extract the claimed thresholds directly; for example, Figures 3 and 7 show curves for 'various doses' but the dose values are not listed in the captions or text. Adding dose values to legends would greatly improve reproducibility of the threshold estimates.
  3. [II] The single-pole approximation parameters for the complex dielectric function of CdS are stated to be taken from Ref. [26], but the specific values used (plasmon energy, damping, etc.) are not given; providing them in an appendix or supplementary table would make the Monte Carlo part reproducible.
  4. [III.1] The sentence 'the valence band symmetrically widens' in the discussion of Figure 4 is ambiguous; the figure shows energy levels, and a more precise description of how the valence-band width is measured would help.
  5. [Throughout] There are several typographical and formatting inconsistencies, including incomplete reference entries (e.g., Refs. [9] and [21]) and inconsistent use of 'Zinc Blende' versus 'zinc blende'; a careful copyedit is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: CdS damage thresholds and semiconducting/metallic state assignments are emergent outputs of the XTANT-3 simulation, not inputs used to set model constants.

full rationale

The paper's central predictions—damage threshold dose, thermal versus nonthermal melting, band gap collapse, and the amorphous band gap near 1.7 eV—are dynamical outputs of the XTANT-3 hybrid simulation. The interatomic forces and electronic structure come from the DFTB parameterization of Ref. [31], which was fitted to independent ground-state DFT data for Cd-X compounds, not to the damage thresholds or transient band gaps reported here. No equation or parameter in the manuscript is adjusted to reproduce the 0.4-0.5 eV/atom threshold, the 1 eV band-gap shrinkage, the metallic crossover near 1 eV/atom, or the cooled amorphous gap. The conclusion that damage is mainly thermal is obtained by comparing full simulations with Born-Oppenheimer simulations that omit electron-phonon coupling, an internal computational contrast rather than a circular fitting procedure. The XTANT-3 references [19,20,22], which are largely authored or co-authored by Medvedev, describe the code's methodology and prior validation against experiments on other materials; they do not inject the CdS conclusions as premises. The added ZBL repulsion for Cd-Cd and Cd-S pairs is a standard high-density correction and is not fitted to CdS damage data. The paper's own caveats, such as the arbitrary cooling time of 1 ps in the recrystallization runs, are acknowledged modeling choices, not circular steps. The main scientific risk is that the ground-state-fitted DFTB parameterization is used in a highly excited, dense liquid regime without direct validation, but that is an accuracy concern, not a circular derivation. Therefore the analysis is self-contained with respect to its inputs, and no specific reduction of a claimed prediction to a fitted or self-cited input can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central predictions depend on two borrowed parameter sets (DFTB for CdS and single-pole CDF for electron scattering), a hand-set 10 eV kinetic cutoff, an arbitrary 1 ps thermostat time, and domain assumptions about instantaneous electron thermalization, Hamiltonian transferability, and finite-size representativeness. No free parameters are fit to the target damage data in this paper, and no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • DFTB (SCC-DFTB) Slater-Koster parameter set for CdS = Not specified in paper; taken from Ref. [31]
    This parameter set controls interatomic forces, transient band structure, and nonadiabatic electron-phonon matrix elements in XTANT-3. It was fitted to DFT data in the parameter development paper, not in the present work.
  • Single-pole complex dielectric function parameters for CdS = Not specified; taken from Ref. [26]
    These parameters determine the inelastic scattering rates (impact ionization, plasmon losses) in the Monte Carlo electron cascade stage.
  • Kinetic energy cutoff for Monte Carlo / Boltzmann split = 10 eV
    Electrons above 10 eV from the conduction band bottom are treated with Monte Carlo; below it, with Boltzmann collision integrals. The choice partitions the electron kinetics and is not varied or justified beyond a chosen cutoff.
  • Thermostat cooling time constant = 1000 fs (1 ps)
    Used in the long recrystallization simulations; Section IV calls it 'rather arbitrary'. It controls whether and how quickly CdS recrystallizes, so the recovered band gap values depend on it.
  • ZBL short-range repulsion added for Cd-Cd and Cd-S = Standard ZBL parameters, no values given
    Added to the DFTB Hamiltonian to model high-temperature and close-contact states; the choice affects liquid and amorphous state energetics.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Low-energy electrons reach a Fermi-Dirac distribution instantaneously on the simulation timescale.
    Invoked in Section II for the BCI stage. If electron-electron thermalization is slower than the pulse and atomic response, the electron distribution and energy transfer rates would differ.
  • domain assumption The transferable tight-binding (DFTB) Hamiltonian from Ref. [31] remains valid for highly excited, disordered, and dense CdS states.
    Used in Section II to compute all forces, band gaps, and coupling. Its training data are ground-state DFT calculations, so extrapolation to about 2% valence excitation and liquid density is assumed without direct validation in this paper.
  • domain assumption Classical molecular dynamics with velocity-scaled nonadiabatic energy transfer captures electron-phonon coupling.
    Section II: the nonadiabatic energy exchange is delivered via velocity scaling rather than a full quantum or Langevin treatment; this can affect equilibration rates and the thermal damage threshold.
  • domain assumption 200-216 atom supercells with periodic boundary conditions are representative for damage and phase transitions.
    Section II states this is 'sufficient for reliable simulation', citing earlier work, but no finite-size convergence check is reported for CdS specifically.
  • domain assumption Photoabsorption cross sections, Auger decay times, and ionization potentials from EPICS2023 are accurate inputs for CdS.
    Used in the Monte Carlo stage in Section II; errors in these database values propagate into the electronic excitation density and resulting damage.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ultrafast X-ray induced damage and nonthermal melting in cadmium sulfide." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DKAMO4SO

@misc{pith2026250205799,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ultrafast X-ray induced damage and nonthermal melting in cadmium sulfide},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DKAMO4SO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.05799}
}
read the original abstract

Cadmium sulfide is a valuable material for solar cells, photovoltaic, and radiation detectors. It is thus important to evaluate the material damage mechanisms and damage threshold in response to irradiation. Here, we simulate the ultrafast XUV/X-ray irradiation of CdS with the combined model, XTANT-3. It accounts for nonequilibrium electronic and atomic dynamics, nonadiabatic coupling between the two systems, nonthermal melting and bond breaking due to electronic excitation. We find that the two phases of CdS, zinc blende and wurtzite, demonstrate very close damage threshold dose of ~0.4-0.5 eV/atom. The damage is mainly thermal, whereas with increase of the dose, nonthermal effects begin to dominate leading to nonthermal melting. The transient disordered state is a high-density liquid, which may be semiconducting or metallic depending on the dose. Later recrystallization may recover the material back to the crystalline phase, or at high doses create an amorphous phase with variable bandgap. The revealed effects may potentially allow for controllable tuning of the band gap via laser irradiation of CdS.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [31]

    Sarkar, S

    S. Sarkar, S. Pal, P. Sarkar, A.L. Rosa, T. Frauenheim, Self -Consistent-Charge Density - Functional Tight -Binding Parameters for Cd –X (X = S, Se, Te) Compounds and Their Interaction with H, O, C, and N, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 7 (2011) 2262 –2276. https://doi.org/10.1021/CT200266F

    work page doi:10.1021/ct200266f 2011

  2. [1]

    Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Na Slovance 1999/2, 182 00 Prague 8, Czech Republic

    1999

  3. [2]

    Institute of Plasma Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Za Slovankou 3, 182 00 Prague 8, Czech Republic

    work page

  4. [3]

    It is thus important to evaluate the material damage mechanisms and damage threshold in response to irradiation

    Higher Institute of Technologies and Applied Sciences, University of Havana, Cuba Abstract Cadmium sulfide is a valuable material for solar cells, photovoltaic, and radiation detectors. It is thus important to evaluate the material damage mechanisms and damage threshold in response to irradiation. Here, we simulate the ultrafast XUV/X-ray irradiation of C...

    work page

  5. [4]

    The material disorders at the dose of ~ 0.4-0.5 eV/atom, see atomic snapshots showing the material response to below and above the threshold dose in Figure 1

    Zinc Blende structure We modelled irradiation of CdS with various doses to find the threshold of onsetting a phase transition. The material disorders at the dose of ~ 0.4-0.5 eV/atom, see atomic snapshots showing the material response to below and above the threshold dose in Figure 1. At the shown dose of 0.6 eV/atom, by the time of 500-1000 fs, the atomi...

    work page

  6. [5]

    The atomic snapshots in Figure 6 show that the material disorders at doses above this threshold

    Wurtzite structure CdS in Wurtzite structure also damages at the irradiated dose of ~ 0.4-0.5 eV/atom. The atomic snapshots in Figure 6 show that the material disorders at doses above this threshold. The processes taking place in Wurtzite are the same as in Zinc Blende structure of CdS – the disorder is thermal, induced by the electron -ion coupling heati...

    work page

  7. [6]

    J. Wang, F. Fang, H. An, S. Wu, H. Qi, Y. Cai, G. Guo, Laser machining fundamentals: micro, nano, atomic and close -to-atomic scales, Int. J. Extrem. Manuf. 5 (2023) 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-7990/ACB134

    work page doi:10.1088/2631-7990/acb134 2023

  8. [7]

    Sinha, D

    T. Sinha, D. Lilhare, A. Khare, A review on the improvement in performance of CdTe/CdS thin-film solar cells through optimization of structural parameters, J. Mater. Sci. 54 (2019) 12189–12205. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10853-019-03651-0/TABLES/1

    work page doi:10.1007/s10853-019-03651-0/tables/1 2019

Show all 55 references
  1. [8]

    J. Wang, M. Isshiki, II–IV Semiconductors for Optoelectronics: CdS, CdSe, CdTe, Springer Handbooks (2006) 829–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-29185-7_34

    2006 doi

  2. [9]

    Naikwadi, B.K

    A.T. Naikwadi, B.K. Sharma, K.D. Bhatt, P.A. Mahanwar, Gamma Radiation Processed Polymeric Materials for High Performance Applications: A Review, Front. Chem. 10 (2022)

    2022

  3. [10]

    V Shugaev, C

    M. V Shugaev, C. Wu, O. Armbruster, A. Naghilou, N. Brouwer, D.S. Ivanov, T.J.Y. Derrien, N.M. Bulgakova, W. Kautek, B. Rethfeld, L. V Zhigilei, Fundamentals of ultrafast laser - material interaction, MRS Bull. 41 (2016) 960–968. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs.2016.274

    2016 doi

  4. [11]

    The figure shows that the crystalline peaks start to disappear at the timescale of a few hundred femtoseconds after the pulse arrival, consistent with the timescales of nonthermal melting [14,15]. Then, as the material cools down and relaxes to equilibrium at the timescales of...

    2022

  5. [12]

    Qiu, C.L

    T.Q. Qiu, C.L. Tien, Heat transfer mechanisms during short-pulse laser heating of metals, J. Heat Transfer 115 (1993) 835–841. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2911377

    1993 doi

  6. [13]

    Palneedi, J.H

    H. Palneedi, J.H. Park, D. Maurya, M. Peddigari, G. -T. Hwang, V. Annapureddy, J.-W. Kim, J.-J. Choi, B.-D. Hahn, S. Priya, K.J. Lee, J. Ryu, Laser Irradiation of Metal Oxide Films and Nanostructures: Applications and Advances, Adv. Mater. 30 (2018) 170 5148. https://doi.org/1...

    2018 doi

  7. [14]

    O’Connell, Production and annealing of intrinsic defects i n x-ray irradiated cadmium 14 sulfide, University of Delaware, 1967

    J.C. O’Connell, Production and annealing of intrinsic defects i n x-ray irradiated cadmium 14 sulfide, University of Delaware, 1967

    1967

  8. [15]

    Park, J.K

    S.K. Park, J.K. Park, C.W. Mun, H.W. Lee, C.K. Eun, S.H. Nam, X -ray detection characteristics of cadmium sulfide as an multi function dosimeter, Annu. Reports Res. React. Institute, Kyoto Univ. 4 (2001) 3375. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2001.1019552

    2001 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Nikishev, N

    N. Nikishev, N. Medvedev, Damage Mechanisms in Polyalkenes Irradiated with Ultrashort XUV/X-Ray Laser Pulses, J. Phys. Chem. B (2024). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c04126

    2024 doi

  10. [17]

    Voronkov, N

    R.A. Voronkov, N. Medvedev, A.E. Volkov, Superionic State in Alumina Produced by Nonthermal Melting, Phys. Status Solidi - Rapid Res. Lett. 14 (2020) 1900641. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssr.201900641

    2020 doi

  11. [18]

    Rethfeld, D.S

    B. Rethfeld, D.S. Ivanov, M.E. Garcia, S.I. Anisimov, Modelling ultrafast laser ablation, J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 50 (2017) 193001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/50/19/193001

    2017 doi

  12. [19]

    Keski -Rahkonen, M.O

    O. Keski -Rahkonen, M.O. Krause, Total and partial atomic -level widths, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 14 (1974) 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-640X(74)80020-3

    1974 doi

  13. [20]

    Medvedev, A.E

    N. Medvedev, A.E. Volkov, R. Rymzhanov, F. Akhmetov, S. Gorbunov, R. Voronkov, P. Babaev, Frontiers, challenges, and solutions in modeling of swift heavy ion effects in materials, J. Appl. Phys. 133 (2023) 100701. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0128774

    2023 doi

  14. [21]

    Siders, A

    C.W. Siders, A. Cavalleri, K. Sokolowski -Tinten, C. Tó th, T. Guo, M. Kammler, M.H. von Hoegen, K.R. Wilson, D. von der Linde, C.P.J. Barty, Detection of nonthermal melting by ultrafast X -ray diffraction, Science 286 (1999) 1340 –1342. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5443.1340

    1999

  15. [22]

    Rousse, C

    A. Rousse, C. Rischel, S. Fourmaux, I. Uschmann, S. Sebban, G. Grillon, P. Balcou, E. Förster, J.P. Geindre, P. Audebert, J.C. Gauthier, D. Hulin, Non -thermal melting in semiconductors measured at femtosecond resolution., Nature 410 (2001) 65 –8. https://doi.org/10.1038/35065045

    2001 doi

  16. [23]

    Medvedev, A.E

    N. Medvedev, A.E. Volkov, Nonthermal acceleration of atoms as a mechanism of fast lattice heating in ion tracks, J. Appl. Phys. 131 (2022) 225903. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0095724

    2022 doi

  17. [24]

    Cullen, EPICS2023: August 2023 Status Report, Vienna, Austria, 2023

    D.E. Cullen, EPICS2023: August 2023 Status Report, Vienna, Austria, 2023. https://www- nds.iaea.org/epics/

    2023

  18. [25]

    Medvedev, R

    N. Medvedev, R. Voronkov, A.E. Volkov, Metallic water: Transient state under ultrafast electronic excitation, J. Chem. Phys. 158 (2023) 074501. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0139802

    2023 doi

  19. [26]

    Medvedev, XTANT -3 [Computer Software], (2023)

    N. Medvedev, XTANT -3 [Computer Software], (2023). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8392569

    2023 doi

  20. [27]

    Medvedev, V

    N. Medvedev, V. Tkachenko, V. Lipp, Z. Li, B. Ziaja, Various damage mechanisms in carbon and silicon materials under femtosecond x -ray irradiation, 4open 1 (2018) 3. https://doi.org/10.1051/fopen/2018003

    2018

  21. [28]

    Apostolova, E

    T. Apostolova, E. Artacho, F. Cleri, M. Cotelo, M.L. Crespillo, F. Da Pieve, V. Dimitriou, F. Djurabekova, D.M. Duffy, G. Garc ía, M. García-Lechuga, B. Gu, T. Jarrin, E. Kaselouris, J. Kohanoff, G. Koundourakis, N. Koval, V. Lipp, L. Martin -Samos, N. Medvedev, A. Molina - Sá...

    2021

  22. [29]

    Medvedev, XTANT -3: X -ray-induced Thermal And Nonthermal Transitions in matter: theory, numerical details, user manual, Http://Arxiv.Org/Abs/2307.03953 (2023)

    N. Medvedev, XTANT -3: X -ray-induced Thermal And Nonthermal Transitions in matter: theory, numerical details, user manual, Http://Arxiv.Org/Abs/2307.03953 (2023). http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.03953 (accessed July 11, 2023)

    2023 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Jenkins, W.R

    T.M. Jenkins, W.R. Nelson, A. Rindi, Monte Carlo Transport of Electrons and Photons, Springer US, Boston, MA, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1059-4

    1988 doi

  24. [32]

    Ritchie, A

    R.H. Ritchie, A. Howie, Electron excitation and the optical potential in electron microscopy, Philos. Mag. 36 (1977) 463 –481. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786437708244948

    1977 doi

  25. [33]

    Medvedev, F

    N. Medvedev, F. Akhmetov, R.A. Rymzhanov, R. Voronkov, A.E. Volkov, Modeling time - resolved kinetics in solids induced by extreme electronic excitation, Adv. Theory Simulations 5 (2022) 2200091. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADTS.202200091

    2022 doi

  26. [34]

    Medvedev, H.O

    N. Medvedev, H.O. Jeschke, B. Ziaja, Nonthermal phase transitions in semiconductors induced by a femtosecond extreme ultraviolet laser pulse, New J. Phys. 15 (2013) 15016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/15/1/015016

    2013 doi

  27. [35]

    Medvedev, Electronic nonequilibrium effect in ultrafast -laser-irradiated solids, Phys

    N. Medvedev, Electronic nonequilibrium effect in ultrafast -laser-irradiated solids, Phys. Scr. 99 (2024) 015934. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad13df

    2024 doi

  28. [36]

    Medvedev, I

    N. Medvedev, I. Milov, Electron -phonon coupling in metals at high electronic temperatures, Phys. Rev. B 102 (2020) 064302. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.064302

    2020 doi

  29. [37]

    Koskinen, V

    P. Koskinen, V. M äkinen, Density-functional tight-binding for beginners, Comput. Mater. Sci. 47 (2009) 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2009.07.013

    2009 doi

  30. [38]

    Medvedev, J

    N. Medvedev, J. Chalupsk ý, L. Juha, Microscopic Kinetics in Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Exposed to a Single Ultra -Short XUV/X -ray Laser Pulse, Molecules 26 (2021) 6701. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26216701

    2021 doi

  31. [39]

    W. Ding, H. He, B. Pan, Development of a tight-binding model for Cu and its application to a Cu -heat-sink under irradiation, J. Mater. Sci. 50 (2015) 5684 –5693. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10853-015-9097-7

    2015 doi

  32. [40]

    Medvedev, P

    N. Medvedev, P. Babaev, J. Chalupský, L. Juha, A.E. Volkov, An interplay of various damage channels in polyethylene exposed to ultra -short XUV/x -ray pulse, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 23 (2021) 16193–16205. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CP02199K

    2021 doi

  33. [41]

    Martyna, M.E

    G.J. Martyna, M.E. Tuckerman, Symplectic reversible integrators: Predictor –corrector methods, J. Chem. Phys. 102 (1995) 8071. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.469006

    1995 doi

  34. [42]

    https://materialsproject.org/ (accessed June 13, 2023)

    Materials Project, (n.d.). https://materialsproject.org/ (accessed June 13, 2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Medvedev, A.E

    N. Medvedev, A.E. Volkov, Multitemperature atomic ensemble: Nonequilibrium evolution after ultrafast electronic excitation, Phys. Rev. E 110 (2024) 024142. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.110.024142

    2024 doi

  36. [44]

    Stukowski, Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO –the Open Visualization Tool, Model

    A. Stukowski, Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO –the Open Visualization Tool, Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18 (2010) 15012. 16 https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012

    2010 doi

  37. [45]

    Milov, V

    I. Milov, V. Lipp, D. Ilnitsky, N. Medvedev, K. Migdal, V. Zhakhovsky, V. Khokhlov, Y. Petrov, N. Inogamov, S. Semin, A. Kimel, B. Ziaja, I.A. Makhotkin, E. Louis, F. Bijkerk, Similarity in ruthenium damage induced by photons with different energies: From visible light to hard...

    2020

  38. [46]

    Medvedev, Z

    N. Medvedev, Z. Li, B. Ziaja, Thermal and nonthermal melting of silicon under femtosecond x -ray irradiation, Phys. Rev. B 91 (2015) 054113. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.054113

    2015 doi

  39. [47]

    Akhmetov, N

    F. Akhmetov, N. Medvedev, I. Makhotkin, M. Ackermann, I. Milov, Effect of Atomic - Temperature Dependence of the Electron –Phonon Coupling in Two -Temperature Model, Materials (Basel). 15 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15155193

    2022 doi

  40. [48]

    Medvedev, Electron -phonon coupling in semiconductors at high electronic temperatures, Phys

    N. Medvedev, Electron -phonon coupling in semiconductors at high electronic temperatures, Phys. Rev. B 108 (2023) 144305. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.144305

    2023 doi

  41. [49]

    Voronkov, N

    R.A. Voronkov, N. Medvedev, A.E. Volkov, Dependence of nonthermal metallization kinetics on bond ionicity of compounds, Sci. Rep. 10 (2020) 13070. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70005-1

    2020 doi

  42. [50]

    M. Beye, F. Sorgenfrei, W.F. Schlotter, W. Wurth, A. F öhlisch, The liquid -liquid phase transition in silicon revealed by snapshots of valence electrons., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107 (2010) 16772–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1006499107

    2010 doi

  43. [51]

    Rymzhanov, N

    R.A. Rymzhanov, N. Medvedev, J.H. O ’Connell, A. Janse van Vuuren, V.A. Skuratov, A.E. Volkov, Recrystallization as the governing mechanism of ion track formation, Sci. Rep. 9 (2019) 3837. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40239-9

    2019 doi

  44. [53]

    Heimann, N.J

    P. Heimann, N.J. Hartley, I. Inoue, V. Tkachenko, A. Antoine, F. Dorchies, R. Falcone, J. Gaudin, H. Höppner, Y. Inubushi, K.J. Kapcia, H.J. Lee, V. Lipp, P. Martinez, N. Medvedev, F. Tavella, S. Toleikis, M. Yabashi, T. Yabuuchi, J. Yamada, B. Ziaja, Non-thermal structural tr...

    2023 doi

  45. [54]

    Rudenko, D

    A. Rudenko, D. Rolles, Time -resolved studies with FELs, J. Electron Spectros. Relat. Phenomena (2015). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0368204815001553

    2015

  46. [55]

    Sokolowski-Tinten, X

    K. Sokolowski-Tinten, X. Shen, Q. Zheng, T. Chase, R. Coffee, M. Jerman, R.K. Li, M. Ligges, I. Makasyuk, M. Mo, A.H. Reid, B. Rethfeld, T. Vecchione, S.P. Weathersby, H.A. Dürr, X.J. Wang, Electron -lattice energy relaxation in laser -excited thin -film Au -insulator heterost...

    2017 doi

  47. [138]

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2022.837111

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.