REVIEW 1 cited by
The maximal subgroups of the Monster
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The classification of the maximal subgroups of the Monster $\mathbf{M}$ is a long-standing problem in finite group theory. According to the literature, the classification is complete apart from the question of whether $\mathbf{M}$ contains maximal subgroups that are almost simple with socle $\mathrm{PSL}_2(13)$. However, this conclusion relies on reported claims, with unpublished proofs, that $\mathbf{M}$ has no maximal subgroups that are almost simple with socle $\mathrm{PSL}_2(8)$, $\mathrm{PSL}_2(16)$, or $\mathrm{PSU}_3(4)$. The aim of this paper is to settle all of these questions, and thereby complete the solution to the maximal subgroup problem for $\mathbf{M}$, and for the sporadic simple groups as a whole. Specifically, we prove the existence of two new maximal subgroups of $\mathbf{M}$, isomorphic to the automorphism groups of $\mathrm{PSL}_2(13)$ and $\mathrm{PSU}_3(4)$, and we establish that $\mathbf{M}$ has no almost simple maximal subgroup with socle $\mathrm{PSL}_2(8)$ or $\mathrm{PSL}_2(16)$. We also correct the claim that $\mathbf{M}$ has no almost simple maximal subgroup with socle $\mathrm{PSU}_3(4)$, and provide evidence that the maximal subgroup $\mathrm{PSL}_2(59)$ (constructed in 2004) does not exist. Our proofs are supported by reproducible computations carried out using the publicly available Python package mmgroup for computing with $\mathbf{M}$ recently developed by M. Seysen. We provide explicit generators for our newly discovered maximal subgroups of $\mathbf{M}$ in mmgroup format.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Explicit construction of the maximal subgroups of the Monster
Explicit mmgroup generators are given for all maximal subgroups of the Monster except 59:29, and PSL2(59) is shown not to be a subgroup, with 59:29 maximal instead.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.