REVIEW 2 cited by
Qudit-based scalable quantum algorithm for solving the integer programming problem
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Integer programming (IP) is an NP-hard combinatorial optimization problem that is widely used to represent a diverse set of real-world problems spanning multiple fields, such as finance, engineering, logistics, and operations research. It is a hard problem to solve using classical algorithms, as its complexity increases exponentially with problem size. Most quantum algorithms for solving IP are highly resource inefficient because they encode integers into qubits. In [1], the issue of resource inefficiency was addressed by mapping integer variables to qudits. However, [1] has limited practical value due to a lack of scalability to multiple qudits to encode larger problems. In this work, by extending upon the ideas of [1], a circuit-based scalable quantum algorithm is presented using multiple interacting qudits for which we show a quantum speed-up. The quantum algorithm consists of a distillation function that efficiently separates the feasible from the infeasible regions, a phase-amplitude encoding for the cost function, and a quantum phase estimation coupled with a multi-controlled single-qubit rotation for optimization. We prove that the optimal solution has the maximum probability of being measured in our algorithm. The time complexity for the quantum algorithm is shown to be $O(d^{n/2} + m\cdot n^2\cdot \log{d} + n/\epsilon_{QPE})$ for a problem with the number of variables $n$ taking $d$ integer values, satisfying $m$ constraints with a precision of $\epsilon_{QPE}$. Compared to the classical time complexity of brute force $O(d^n)$ and the best classical exact algorithm $O((\log{n})^{3n})$, it incurs a reduction of $d^{n/2}$ in the time complexity in terms of $n$ for solving a general polynomial IP problem.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Benchmarking Hybrid Quantum-Classical Algorithms for Power Grid Optimization Problems
For AC-OPF-UC instances with 5-13 generators, the qubit-efficient hybrid VQA does not outperform uniform random bitstring sampling on ideal-time quantum hardware.
-
Resource-Efficient Quantum Optimization via Higher-Order Encoding
HUBO encodings reduce qubit counts from n*m to n*ceil(log2 m) and cut CNOT counts by 89.6-100% in QAOA benchmarks on gate assignment, max k-colorable subgraph, and integer programming instances.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.