REVIEW 1 cited by
Optimising the observation of optical kilonovae with medium size telescopes
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Optimising the observation of optical kilonovae with medium size telescopes
read the original abstract
We consider the optimisation of the observing strategy (cadence, exposure time and filter choice) using medium size (2-m class) optical telescopes in the follow-up of kilonovae localised with arcminute accuracy to be able to distinguish among various kilonova models and viewing angles. To develop an efficient observation plan, we made use of the synthetic light curves obtained with the Monte Carlo radiative transfer code POSSIS for different kilonova models and as a function of different viewing angles and distances. By adding the appropriate photon counting noise to the synthetic light curves, we analysed four alternative sequences having the same total time exposure of 8 hours, with different time windows (0.5, 1, 2, 4 h), each with $i$, $r$, and $u$ filters, to determine the observing sequence that maximises the chance of a correct identification of the model parameters. We suggest to avoid $u$ filter and to avoid the use of colour curves. We also found that, if the error on distance is $\le$ 2%, 0.5, 1, 2-hour time window sequences are equivalent, so we suggest to use 2-hour one, because it has 1 day cadence, so it can be easily realised. When the distance of the source is unknown, 0.5 h time window sequence is preferable.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Binary neutron stars in the next-generation era: Multi-messenger detection prospects and constraints on the equation of state, mass distribution, and cosmology
With ET (and ET+CE), mock multi-messenger BNS catalogues yield ~40–500 EM counterparts per year and, under ideal recovery, constrain R1.4 to ~0.2 km and H0 to ~1 km s−1 Mpc−1.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.