Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Systematic Literature Survey of Sparse Matrix-Vector Multiplication

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.06047 v1 pith:DWN6TIQE submitted 2024-04-09 cs.DC

classification cs.DC
keywords spmvoptimizationarchitecturescomprehensivesurveyanalyzesapplicationscompares
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Sparse matrix-vector multiplication (SpMV) is a crucial computing kernel with widespread applications in iterative algorithms. Over the past decades, research on SpMV optimization has made remarkable strides, giving rise to various optimization contributions. However, the comprehensive and systematic literature survey that introduces, analyzes, discusses, and summarizes the advancements of SpMV in recent years is currently lacking. Aiming to fill this gap, this paper compares existing techniques and analyzes their strengths and weaknesses. We begin by highlighting two representative applications of SpMV, then conduct an in-depth overview of the important techniques that optimize SpMV on modern architectures, which we specifically classify as classic, auto-tuning, machine learning, and mixed-precision-based optimization. We also elaborate on the hardware-based architectures, including CPU, GPU, FPGA, processing in Memory, heterogeneous, and distributed platforms. We present a comprehensive experimental evaluation that compares the performance of state-of-the-art SpMV implementations. Based on our findings, we identify several challenges and point out future research directions. This survey is intended to provide researchers with a comprehensive understanding of SpMV optimization on modern architectures and provide guidance for future work.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 7 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. A Comparative Study of Pruning Methods in Transformer-based Time Series Forecasting

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A benchmark shows most time-series Transformers tolerate about 50% unstructured pruning without clear accuracy loss, while structured pruning rarely delivers meaningful inference speedups.

Pith tools