REVIEW 1 cited by
Finding Densest Subgraphs with Edge-Color Constraints
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We consider a variant of the densest subgraph problem in networks with single or multiple edge attributes. For example, in a social network, the edge attributes may describe the type of relationship between users, such as friends, family, or acquaintances, or different types of communication. For conceptual simplicity, we view the attributes as edge colors. The new problem we address is to find a diverse densest subgraph that fulfills given requirements on the numbers of edges of specific colors. When searching for a dense social network community, our problem will enforce the requirement that the community is diverse according to criteria specified by the edge attributes. We show that the decision versions for finding exactly, at most, and at least $\textbf{h}$ colored edges densest subgraph, where $\textbf{h}$ is a vector of color requirements, are NP-complete, for already two colors. For the problem of finding a densest subgraph with at least $\textbf{h}$ colored edges, we provide a linear-time constant-factor approximation algorithm when the input graph is sparse. On the way, we introduce the related at least $h$ (non-colored) edges densest subgraph problem, show its hardness, and also provide a linear-time constant-factor approximation. In our experiments, we demonstrate the efficacy and efficiency of our new algorithms.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Fair densest subgraph across multiple graphs
The authors prove that two fairness-constrained variants of the densest subgraph problem over graph snapshots are NP-hard and give integer-programming and greedy algorithms.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.