REVIEW 5 cited by
Tool Learning in the Wild: Empowering Language Models as Automatic Tool Agents
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Augmenting large language models (LLMs) with external tools has emerged as a promising approach to extend their utility, enabling them to solve practical tasks. Previous methods manually parse tool documentation and create in-context demonstrations, transforming tools into structured formats for LLMs to use in their step-by-step reasoning. However, this manual process requires domain expertise and struggles to scale to large toolsets. Additionally, these methods rely heavily on ad-hoc inference techniques or special tokens to integrate free-form LLM generation with tool-calling actions, limiting the LLM's flexibility in handling diverse tool specifications and integrating multiple tools. In this work, we propose AutoTools, a framework that enables LLMs to automate the tool-use workflow. Specifically, the LLM automatically transforms tool documentation into callable functions, verifying syntax and runtime correctness. Then, the LLM integrates these functions into executable programs to solve practical tasks, flexibly grounding tool-use actions into its reasoning processes. Extensive experiments on existing and newly collected, more challenging benchmarks illustrate the superiority of our framework. Inspired by these promising results, we further investigate how to improve the expertise of LLMs, especially open-source LLMs with fewer parameters, within AutoTools. Thus, we propose the AutoTools-learning approach, training the LLMs with three learning tasks on 34k instances of high-quality synthetic data, including documentation understanding, relevance learning, and function programming. Fine-grained results validate the effectiveness of our overall training approach and each individual task. Our methods are an important step towards the use of LLMs for solving real-world tasks with external tools.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
LocalSearchBench: Benchmarking Agentic Search in Real-World Local Life Services
LocalSearchBench—1.3M merchant records and 900 multi-hop local-life QA tasks across 9 Chinese cities—shows the best reasoning agent reaches only 35.6% correctness.
-
Doc2Agent: Scalable Generation of Tool-Using Agents from API Documentation
Doc2Agent automatically converts unstructured REST API documentation into validated, Python-based tools for AI agents, reporting a 55% relative WebArena improvement over direct API calling.
-
Self-Challenging Language Model Agents
A language model agent can generate its own verifiable training tasks and improve its tool-use success rate by about 2x without human-annotated data.
-
TrueReason: An Exemplar Personalised Learning System Integrating Reasoning with Foundational Models
TrueReason is a prototype personalised learning system that uses a large language model to orchestrate specialised micro-skills, including a TrueLearn-based recommender and a topic-controlled question generator fine-t...
-
How Can Input Reformulation Improve Tool Usage Accuracy in a Complex Dynamic Environment? A Study on $\tau$-bench
IRMA reformulates tool-agent inputs with memory, domain constraints, and tool suggestions, and reports improved tau-bench pass^5 reliability over ReAct, function calling, and self-reflection.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.