Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Calibration, event reconstruction, data analysis and limits calculation for the LUX dark matter experiment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1712.05696 v1 pith:EANAOLAD submitted 2017-12-15 physics.ins-det

D. S. Akerib , S. Alsum , H. M. Araújo , X. Bai , A. J. Bailey , J. Balajthy , P. Beltrame , E. P. Bernard
show 90 more authors
A. Bernstein T. P. Biesiadzinski E. M. Boulton P. Brás D. Byram S. B. Cahn M. C. Carmona-Benitez C. Chan A. Currie J. E. Cutter T. J. R. Davison A. Dobi J. E. Y. Dobson E. Druszkiewicz B. N. Edwards C. H. Faham S. R. Fallon A. Fan S. Fiorucci R. J. Gaitskell V. M. Gehman J. Genovesi C. Ghag M. G. D. Gilchriese C. R. Hall M. Hanhardt S. J. Haselschwardt S. A. Hertel D. P. Hogan M. Horn D. Q. Huang C. M. Ignarra R. G. Jacobsen W. Ji K. Kamdin K. Kazkaz D. Khaitan R. Knoche N. A. Larsen C. Lee B. G. Lenardo K. T. Lesko A. Lindote M. I. Lopes A. Manalaysay R. L. Mannino M. F. Marzioni D. N. McKinsey D. M. Mei J. Mock M. Moongweluwan J. A. Morad A. St. J. Murphy C. Nehrkorn H. N. Nelson F. Neves K. O'Sullivan K. C. Oliver-Mallory K. J. Palladino E. K. Pease L. Reichhart C. Rhyne S. Shaw T. A. Shutt C. Silva M. Solmaz V. N. Solovov P. Sorensen T. J. Sumner M. Szydagis D. J. Taylor W. C. Taylor B. P. Tennyson P. A. Terman D. R. Tiedt W. H. To M. Tripathi L. Tvrznikova S. Uvarov V. Velan J. R. Verbus R. C. Webb J. T. White T. J. Whitis M. S. Witherell F. L. H. Wolfs J. Xu K. Yazdani S. K. Young C. Zhang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.ins-det
keywords calibrationdarklow-energymatteranalysisbackgroundelectron-experiment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The LUX experiment has performed searches for dark matter particles scattering elastically on xenon nuclei, leading to stringent upper limits on the nuclear scattering cross sections for dark matter. Here, for results derived from ${1.4}\times 10^{4}\;\mathrm{kg\,days}$ of target exposure in 2013, details of the calibration, event-reconstruction, modeling, and statistical tests that underlie the results are presented. Detector performance is characterized, including measured efficiencies, stability of response, position resolution, and discrimination between electron- and nuclear-recoil populations. Models are developed for the drift field, optical properties, background populations, the electron- and nuclear-recoil responses, and the absolute rate of low-energy background events. Innovations in the analysis include in situ measurement of the photomultipliers' response to xenon scintillation photons, verification of fiducial mass with a low-energy internal calibration source, and new empirical models for low-energy signal yield based on large-sample, in situ calibrations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Flow-dependent tagging of $^{214}$Pb decays in the LZ dark matter detector

    physics.ins-det 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Flow-dependent tagging, built from paired radon-polonium decays, identifies 63% of 214Pb beta-decay backgrounds in LZ's fiducial volume at 9.0% exposure cost.

Pith tools