pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.23376 · v1 · pith:EB23FPLDnew · submitted 2026-05-22 · 🌀 gr-qc

The field-theoretical formalism for TEGR

E. D. Emtsova , A. N. Petrov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 04:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords teleparallel equivalent of general relativityTEGRfield-theoretical formalismperturbationsNoether chargesgravitational wavesSchwarzschild solutionKerr solution
0
0 comments X

The pith

A field-theoretical version of TEGR is equivalent to the original theory and recovers correct masses and angular momenta for Schwarzschild and Kerr from linear perturbations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out a Lagrangian formulation of the teleparallel equivalent of general relativity in which tetrad and matter perturbations act as dynamic fields propagating on an arbitrary background solution whose tetrad and metric obey the background Einstein equations. This representation remains fully equivalent to standard TEGR for finite as well as infinitesimal perturbations. Gauge transformations are introduced, the Lagrangian and its derived equations are shown to be invariant, and the Noether theorem supplies conserved currents, superpotentials and charges. On Ricci-flat backgrounds the linearised equations reduce to gravitational-wave equations in the TT gauge, while the charge expressions reproduce the accepted mass of the Schwarzschild solution, the mass of the Kerr solution and the angular momentum of the Kerr solution.

Core claim

The teleparallel equivalent of general relativity is represented in a field-theoretical form where tetrad and matter perturbations are propagated on a background solution of TEGR. The background tetrad and metric satisfy the background Einstein field equations. This presentation, where perturbations can be finite, is equivalent to the original form of TEGR. The background can be arbitrary. The formalism is Lagrangian based, perturbations are classified as dynamic fields, and varying the Lagrangian yields the equations for perturbations. Gauge transformations are defined and the gauge invariance of the Lagrangian and field equations is stated. The Noether theorem supplies conserved currents,

What carries the argument

The Lagrangian for finite tetrad and matter perturbations treated as dynamic fields on a background tetrad and metric satisfying the Einstein equations, from which the perturbation equations and Noether-derived charges are obtained.

If this is right

  • Linear equations on Ricci-flat backgrounds reduce to gravitational wave equations.
  • Tetrad perturbations admit the TT gauge.
  • New charge formulae give the accepted mass of the Schwarzschild black hole.
  • New charge formulae give the accepted mass and angular momentum of the Kerr black hole.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same Lagrangian setup may be used to treat finite-amplitude perturbations without linearisation.
  • Backgrounds other than Ricci-flat ones could be inserted to study perturbations around cosmological or strongly gravitating solutions.
  • The construction supplies a template that could be repeated for other teleparallel or metric-affine theories.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen background tetrad and metric must satisfy the background Einstein equations exactly, and the finite-perturbation treatment must preserve full equivalence to the original TEGR without extra constraints.

What would settle it

A direct computation of the mass or angular momentum of the Schwarzschild or Kerr solution via the new superpotential formulae that differs from the standard value would show the claimed equivalence does not hold.

read the original abstract

The teleparallel equivalent of general relativity (TEGR) is represented in a field-theoretical form, where tetrad and matter perturbations are propagated on a background solution of TEGR. Thus, the background tetrad and metric satisfy the background Einstein field equations. This presentation, where perturbations can be finite (not infinitesimal or approximate), is equivalent to the original form of TEGR. The background can be arbitrary, usually corresponding to the solution of TEGR under consideration. Such a formalism is Lagrangian based, where perturbations are classified as dynamic fields, and varying the Lagrangian with respect to dynamic variables leads to the equations for perturbations. Gauge (inner) transformations are defined, and the gauge invariance of the Lagrangian and the field equations are stated. Applying the Noether theorem to the Lagrangian we construct conserved currents, related superpotentials and charges. As an application, we have considered linear gravitational equations on the Ricci-flat background and analyzed their properties, finally deriving gravitational wave equations and the tetrad perturbations in TT-gauge. By new formulae for charges, we have calculated the mass for the Schwarzschild and Kerr black holes and the angular momentum for the Kerr solution. The results are quite acceptable, which signals that the new formalism is powerful, can be used further, and has a potential for future development that can be applied to generalizations of TEGR.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reformulates TEGR in a field-theoretical Lagrangian framework in which finite (not necessarily infinitesimal) tetrad and matter perturbations are treated as dynamical fields propagating on an arbitrary background solution of TEGR. The background tetrad and metric are required to satisfy the background Einstein equations exactly. Gauge transformations are defined, the Lagrangian and field equations are shown to be gauge-invariant, and the Noether theorem is applied to construct conserved currents, superpotentials and charges. The linearised theory on Ricci-flat backgrounds is shown to recover the standard gravitational-wave equations together with the TT-gauge form of the tetrad perturbations. Explicit evaluation of the new charge formulae yields the expected mass for the Schwarzschild and Kerr solutions and the expected angular momentum for Kerr.

Significance. If the claimed equivalence to the original TEGR and the explicit charge calculations hold, the work supplies a Lagrangian-based perturbation formalism that is directly applicable to finite deviations and to generalisations of TEGR. The reproduction of textbook black-hole charges on Ricci-flat backgrounds constitutes an independent consistency check that strengthens the internal coherence of the construction.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (equivalence argument): the statement that the finite-perturbation Lagrangian is fully equivalent to the original TEGR is asserted after imposing that the background satisfies the Einstein equations, but the explicit reduction of the perturbed field equations back to the standard TEGR equations (without residual terms) is not displayed; this step is load-bearing for the central equivalence claim.
  2. [§5.2] §5.2 (charge formulae): the superpotential expressions used to compute the Schwarzschild and Kerr charges are presented as new, yet the paper does not show that these expressions reduce to the standard Komar or ADM integrals when the tetrad perturbation vanishes; an explicit check would confirm that the formalism does not introduce spurious contributions by construction.
minor comments (2)
  1. The notation for the background tetrad (e^a_μ) versus the full tetrad is introduced without a dedicated table or consistent typographic distinction; this affects readability when following the perturbation expansion.
  2. [§2] Reference to the original TEGR Lagrangian (Eq. (2)) is given, but the precise relation between the torsion scalar and the Einstein-Hilbert term is not restated; a one-line reminder would help readers unfamiliar with the teleparallel literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review, as well as the recommendation for minor revision. The two major comments identify opportunities to strengthen the clarity of the equivalence argument and the consistency check for the charge formulae. We address each point below and will incorporate the suggested clarifications in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (equivalence argument): the statement that the finite-perturbation Lagrangian is fully equivalent to the original TEGR is asserted after imposing that the background satisfies the Einstein equations, but the explicit reduction of the perturbed field equations back to the standard TEGR equations (without residual terms) is not displayed; this step is load-bearing for the central equivalence claim.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit, step-by-step reduction of the perturbed field equations to the standard TEGR equations (showing the absence of residual terms once the background Einstein equations are imposed) would make the equivalence argument more transparent and self-contained. Although the Lagrangian construction already encodes this equivalence, we will add the requested explicit derivation in the revised §3. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5.2] §5.2 (charge formulae): the superpotential expressions used to compute the Schwarzschild and Kerr charges are presented as new, yet the paper does not show that these expressions reduce to the standard Komar or ADM integrals when the tetrad perturbation vanishes; an explicit check would confirm that the formalism does not introduce spurious contributions by construction.

    Authors: We appreciate the suggestion. In the revised manuscript we will include an explicit demonstration that the superpotential reduces to the standard Komar integral (and, where appropriate, the ADM form) in the limit of vanishing tetrad perturbation. This check will confirm that the new expressions introduce no spurious contributions by construction. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper reformulates TEGR in field-theoretical terms with finite perturbations on a background that satisfies the background Einstein equations exactly. Equivalence to the original TEGR is asserted directly from the Lagrangian construction, and the central results (gravitational wave equations in TT gauge plus Noether charges for Schwarzschild and Kerr) are obtained by applying the formalism to known Ricci-flat solutions and recovering textbook mass and angular-momentum values. These recoveries constitute external consistency checks rather than reductions to fitted parameters or self-referential definitions. No load-bearing step is shown to collapse by construction to an input, self-citation chain, or smuggled ansatz; the derivation chain remains independent of the target quantities.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable from the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5769 in / 1021 out tokens · 39924 ms · 2026-05-25T04:22:26.686392+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Primordial Fluctuations within Teleparallelism.Phys

    Yi-Peng Wu and Chao-Qiang Geng. Primordial Fluctuations within Teleparallelism.Phys. Rev. D, 86:104058, 2012

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    Cosmological Perturbation inf(T) Gravity Revisited.JCAP, 06:029, 2013

    Keisuke Izumi and Yen Chin Ong. Cosmological Perturbation inf(T) Gravity Revisited.JCAP, 06:029, 2013

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Inflation with teleparallelism: Can torsion generate primordial fluctuations without local Lorentz symmetry?Phys

    Yi-Peng Wu. Inflation with teleparallelism: Can torsion generate primordial fluctuations without local Lorentz symmetry?Phys. Lett. B, 762:157–161, 2016

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Dent, Sourish Dutta, and Emmanuel N

    Shih-Hung Chen, James B. Dent, Sourish Dutta, and Emmanuel N. Saridakis. Cosmological perturbations in f(T) gravity.Phys. Rev. D, 83:023508, 2011

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    Rafael C. Nunes. Structure formation inf(T) gravity and a solution forH 0 tension.JCAP, 05:052, 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Cosmological perturbations in modified teleparallel gravity models

    Alexey Golovnev and Tomi Koivisto. Cosmological perturbations in modified teleparallel gravity models. JCAP, 11:012, 2018

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Toporensky and Petr V

    Alexey V. Toporensky and Petr V. Tretyakov. Spin connection and cosmological perturbations inf(T) gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 102:044049, 2020

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Toporensky and Petr V

    Alexey V. Toporensky and Petr V. Tretyakov. Spin connection and cosmological perturbations in scalar-torsion gravity.Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys., 19:2250147, 2022

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    General cosmological perturbations in teleparallel gravity.Eur

    Manuel Hohmann. General cosmological perturbations in teleparallel gravity.Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 136:65, 2021

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    Saridakis

    Sebastian Bahamonde, Viktor Gakis, Stella Kiorpelidi, Tomi Koivisto, Jackson Levi Said, and Emmanuel N. Saridakis. Cosmological perturbations in modified teleparallel gravity models: Boundary term extension.Eur. Phys. J. C, 81:53, 2021

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    Dialektopoulos, Manuel Hohmann, Jackson Levi Said, Christian Pfeifer, and Emmanuel N

    Sebastian Bahamonde, Konstantinos F. Dialektopoulos, Manuel Hohmann, Jackson Levi Said, Christian Pfeifer, and Emmanuel N. Saridakis. Perturbations in Non-Flat Cosmology forf(T) gravity.Eur. Phys. J. C, 83:193, 2023

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Dialektopoulos, Jackson Levi Said, Abdurakhmon Nosirov, Odil Yunusov, and Zinovia Oikonomopoulou

    Bobomurat Ahmedov, Konstantinos F. Dialektopoulos, Jackson Levi Said, Abdurakhmon Nosirov, Odil Yunusov, and Zinovia Oikonomopoulou. Cosmological Perturbations in the Teleparallel analog of Horndeski gravity.JCAP, 08:074, 2023

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    Cosmological teleparallel perturbations.JCAP, 03:063, 2024

    Lavinia Heisenberg, Manuel Hohmann, and Simon Kuhn. Cosmological teleparallel perturbations.JCAP, 03:063, 2024

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Saridakis

    Gabriel Farrugia, Jackson Levi Said, Viktor Gakis, and Emmanuel N. Saridakis. Gravitational Waves in Modified Teleparallel Theories.Phys. Rev. D, 97:124064, 2018. 31

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    Gravitational waves in modified teleparallel theories of gravity.Eur

    Habib Abedi and Salvatore Capozziello. Gravitational waves in modified teleparallel theories of gravity.Eur. Phys. J. C, 78:474, 2018

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    Weak Field Limit and Gravitational Waves in f(T, B) Teleparallel Gravity.Eur

    Salvatore Capozziello, Maurizio Capriolo, and Loredana Caso. Weak Field Limit and Gravitational Waves in f(T, B) Teleparallel Gravity.Eur. Phys. J. C, 80:156, 2020

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Saridakis, and LingQin Xue.f(T) gravity after GW170817 and GRB170817A.Phys

    Yi-Fu Cai, Chunlong Li, Emmanuel N. Saridakis, and LingQin Xue.f(T) gravity after GW170817 and GRB170817A.Phys. Rev. D, 97:103513, 2018

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    Propagation of gravitational waves in teleparallel gravity theories.Phys

    Manuel Hohmann, Martin Krsak, Christian Pfeifer, and Ulbossyn Ualikhanova. Propagation of gravitational waves in teleparallel gravity theories.Phys. Rev. D, 98:124004, 2018

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    Gravitational Waves in Higher Order Teleparallel Gravity.Class

    Salvatore Capozziello, Maurizio Capriolo, and Loredana Caso. Gravitational Waves in Higher Order Teleparallel Gravity.Class. Quant. Grav., 37:235013, 2020

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Dialektopoulos, Viktor Gakis, Manuel Hohmann, Jack- son Levi Said, Emmanuel N

    Sebastian Bahamonde, Maria Caruana, Konstantinos F. Dialektopoulos, Viktor Gakis, Manuel Hohmann, Jack- son Levi Said, Emmanuel N. Saridakis, and Joseph Sultana. Gravitational Wave Propagation and Polarizations in the Teleparallel analog of Horndeski Gravity.Phys. Rev. D, 104:084082, 2021

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Alexey Golovnev, A. N. Semenova, and V. P. Vandeev. Gravitational Waves in New General Relativity.JCAP, 01:003, 2024

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    S. Deser. Self-interaction and gauge invariance.Gen. Relat. Grav., 1(1):9–18, 1970

    work page 1970

  23. [23]

    Deser and B

    S. Deser and B. Tekin. Gravitational energy in quadratic curvature gravities.Phys. Rev. Lett., 89:101101, 2002

    work page 2002

  24. [24]

    Deser and B

    S. Deser and B. Tekin. Energy in topologically massive gravity.Class. Quantum Grav., 20(21)

    work page

  25. [25]

    Deser and B

    S. Deser and B. Tekin. Energy in generic higher curvature gravity theories.Phys. Rev. D, 67:084009, 2003

    work page 2003

  26. [26]

    Deser, I

    S. Deser, I. Kanik, and B. Tekin. Conserved charges in higher D Kerr-AdS spacetimes.Class. Quantum Grav., 22(17):3383, 2005

    work page 2005

  27. [27]

    Deser and B

    S. Deser and B. Tekin. New energy definition for higher curvature gravities .Phys. Rev. D, 75:084032, 2007

    work page 2007

  28. [28]

    B. Tekin. Chern-Simons modified general relativity: Conserved charges .Phys. Rev. D, 77:024005, 2008

    work page 2008

  29. [29]

    L. F. Abbott and S. Deser. Stability of gravity with a cosmological constant.Nucl. Phys. B, 195:76–96, 1982

    work page 1982

  30. [30]

    L. P. Grishchuk, A. N. Petrov, and A. D. Popova. Exact theory of the (Einstein) gravitational field in an arbitrary background space-time.Commun. Math. Phys., 94(3):379–396, 1984

    work page 1984

  31. [31]

    A. D. Popova and A. N. Petrov. Exact Dynamic Theories on a Given Background in Gravitation.Mod. Phys. A, 3(11):2651–2679, 1988

    work page 1988

  32. [32]

    A. N. Petrov. New harmonic coordinates for the schwarzshild geometry and the field approach .Astronomical and Astrophysical Transactions, 1(3):195–205, 1992

    work page 1992

  33. [33]

    A. N. Petrov. General relativity from ’localization’ of Killing vector fields.Class. Quantum Grav., 10(12):2663– 2673, 1993

    work page 1993

  34. [34]

    A. N. Petrov. Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes at Spatial Infinity: The Field Approach and the Lagrangian Description.Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 4:451–478, 1995

    work page 1995

  35. [35]

    A. N. Petrov. Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes at Spatial Infinity: II. Gauge Invariance of the Integrals of Motion in the Field Approach.Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 6:239–261, 1997. 32

    work page 1997

  36. [36]

    A. N. Petrov. A note on the Deser-Tekin charges.Class. Quantum Grav., 22(16):L83–L90, 2005

    work page 2005

  37. [37]

    A. N. Petrov. Three types of superpotentials for perturbations in the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity.Class. Quantum Grav., 26(13):135010, 2009

    work page 2009

  38. [38]

    A. N. Petrov. Noether and Belinfante corrected types of currents for perturbations in the Einstein-Gauss- Bonnet gravity.Class. Quantum Grav., 28(21):215021, 2011

    work page 2011

  39. [39]

    S. M. Kopeikin and A. N. Petrov. Post-Newtonian Celestial Dynamics in Cosmology: Field Equations.Phys. Rev. D, 87(4):044029, 2013

    work page 2013

  40. [40]

    A. N. Petrov and R. R. Lompay. Covariantized Nœther identities and conservation laws for perturbations in metric theories of gravity.Gen. Relat. Grav., 45(3):545–579, 2013

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    A. N. Petrov and R. R. Lompay. A point mass and continuous collapse to a point mass in general relativity. Gen. Relat. Grav., 50(1):6, 2018

    work page 2018

  42. [42]

    A. N. Petrov. Field-theoretical construction of currents and superpotentials in Lovelock gravity.Class. Quantum Grav., 36(23):235021, 2019

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    A. N. Petrov. Conserved quantities for black hole solutions in pure Lovelock gravity.Class. Quantum Grav., 38(15):155017, 2021

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Petrov, Sergei M

    Alexander N. Petrov, Sergei M. Kopeikin, Robert R. Lompay, and Bayram Tekin.Metric Theories of Gravity: Perturbations and Conservation Laws, volume 38 ofDe Gruyter Studies in Mathematical Physics. De Gruyter, 4 2017

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    A. N. Petrov and J. B. Pitts. The field-theoretic approach in general relativity and other metric theories. A review.Space,Time and Fundamental Interactions, (4):66–124, 2019

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    B. S. DeWitt.Dynamical Theory of Groups and Fields. Gordon and Breach, New York, 1965

    work page 1965

  47. [47]

    Fock.The theory of space, time and gravitation

    V. Fock.The theory of space, time and gravitation. Pergamon Press, Oxford, London, New York, Paris, 1964

    work page 1964

  48. [48]

    Aldrovandi and J

    R. Aldrovandi and J. G. Pereira.Teleparallel Gravity: An Introduction. Springer, Dordrechts, 2012

    work page 2012

  49. [49]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifschits.The Classical Theory of Fields. Pergamon Press, 1975

    work page 1975

  50. [50]

    Lichnerowicz

    A. Lichnerowicz. Propagateurs et commutateurs en relativit´e g´en´erate.Publ. Math. IHES, 10(1):9–18, 1961

    work page 1961

  51. [51]

    Farrugia, J

    G. Farrugia, J. L. Said, V. Gakis, and E. N. Saridakis. Gravitational waves in modified teleparallel theories. Phys. Rev. D, 97:124064, 2018

    work page 2018

  52. [52]

    E. D. Emtsova, A. N. Petrov, and A. V. Toporensky. Noether formalism for constructing conserved quantities in teleparallel equivalents of general relativity.Phys. Usp., 68:1164–1172, 2025

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    E. D. Emtsova, A. N. Petrov, and A. V. Toporensky. Conserved currents and superpotentials in teleparallel equivalent of GR.Class. Quant. Grav., 37(9):095006, 2020

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    E. D. Emtsova, A. N. Petrov, and A. V. Toporensky. On conservation laws in teleparallel gravity.J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1557(1):012017, 2020

    work page 2020

  55. [55]

    E. D. Emtsova, M. Krˇ sˇ s´ ak, A. N. Petrov, and A. V. Toporensky. On conserved quantities for the Schwarzschild black hole in teleparallel gravity.Eur. Phys. J. C, 81(8):743, 2021

    work page 2021

  56. [56]

    E. D. Emtsova, M. Krˇ sˇ s´ ak, A. N. Petrov, and A. V. Toporensky. On the Schwarzschild solution in TEGR.J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2081(1):012017, 2021. 33

    work page 2081

  57. [57]

    E. D. Emtsova, A. N. Petrov, and A. V. Toporensky. Mass and angular momentum for the Kerr black hole in TEGR and STEGR.Eur. Phys. J. C, 85(1):23, 2025

    work page 2025

  58. [58]

    S. M. Kopeikin and A. N. Petrov. Dynamic Field Theory and Equations of Motion in Cosmology.Ann. Phys., 350:379–440, 2014. 34

    work page 2014