Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 3 cited by

On the Average Ultraviolet Emission Line Spectra of High-Redshift Galaxies: Hot and Cold, Carbon-poor, Nitrogen-modest, and Oozing Ionizing Photons

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The average star-forming galaxy at redshifts 4–10 has electron temperatures of 14,000–21,000 K from [O III] lines but only 8,000–13,000 K from the Balmer jump, a discrepancy that undermines abundance measurements.

desk verdict First stacked z>4 UV-line spectra from ~1000 galaxies; the 40% [O III]/Balmer-jump temperature gap is the real news, but the abundance claims lean on an assumed density. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.09262 v2 pith:EBGXEOMS submitted 2024-11-14 astro-ph.GA

Matthew J. Hayes , Alberto Saldana-Lopez , Annalisa Citro , Bethan L. James , Matilde Mingozzi , Claudia Scarlata , Zorayda Martinez , Danielle A. Berg This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords high-redshiftgalaxiesJWST/NIRSpecprismspectroscopystackedspectraelectrontemperatureBalmerjumpoxygenabundancecarbon-to-oxygenrationitrogenenhancement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper stacks the JWST/NIRSpec prism spectra of roughly a thousand star-forming galaxies at redshifts 4 to 10, reaching effective exposure times of millions of seconds per pixel. The average spectrum shows both ultraviolet metal lines and a strong nebular Balmer jump, giving two independent ways to measure the electron temperature. The collisionally excited [O III] lines indicate temperatures of 14,000–21,000 K in the doubly ionized oxygen zone, while the hydrogen recombination jump indicates only 8,000–13,000 K, a roughly 40 percent offset that survives corrections for temperature gradients between ionization zones. If the paper is right, one of the two standard temperature diagnostics is seriously biased at high redshift, and every abundance derived from the [O III] temperature scale (oxygen, carbon, nitrogen) is correspondingly affected. The same stacks also show carbon-poor (C/O ≈ 1/10), mildly nitrogen-enhanced gas, and the strongest starbursts show signs of leaking ionizing photons with high efficiency.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the stacked rest-frame spectrum: roughly 1,000 galaxies divided into five bins of [O III] λ5008 equivalent width, co-added to reach exposure times of several million seconds per pixel. This depth reveals weak UV lines and the nebular Balmer jump in the average galaxy, enabling two independent electron-temperature measurements: the collisionally excited [O III] 5008/1666 ratio (plus 5008/4363 in three stacks) and the Balmer jump amplitude, modeled with a combined stellar-plus-nebular continuum fit. The temperature discrepancy between these two thermometers is the load-bearing result that feeds the abundance analysis.

What would settle it

Measure the density-sensitive doublet ratios [O II] λ3726/3729 or [S II] λ6717/6731 in a sample of z ≈ 4–10 galaxies with medium-resolution NIRSpec gratings (or JWST/NIRSpec at R~1000) to determine the electron density. If the true density is near $10^{6}$ $cm^{-3}$, the [O III]-based temperatures would drop by ~20%, the 40% discrepancy with the Balmer jump would largely vanish, and the reported nitrogen enhancement would disappear; if densities are indeed ~250 $cm^{-3}$, the discrepancy is real and one of the thermometers is biased.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the average z=4–10 star-forming galaxy, the electron temperature measured from the collisionally excited [O III] 5008/1666 ratio is 14,000–21,000 K, whereas the Balmer jump measured from the hydrogen recombination continuum gives 8,000–13,000 K. After applying a standard temperature-zone correction for the cooler O+ region, the two estimates still disagree by about 40%. The paper argues this offset is not explained by dust attenuation, recombination physics, or the adopted density, and concludes that either the collisional or the recombination-based thermometer is biased in these systems. It then uses the [O III] temperatures to derive oxygen, carbon, and nitrogen abundances, finding log(C/O) ≈ −1 with no evolution across metallicity or age, and N/O mildly above local starbursts but below the extreme 'nitrogen-loud' galaxies. The most intense starbursts show ionizing photon production efficiencies reaching $10^{25}$.7 Hz/erg and multiple independent signatures of Lyman continuum escape, including near-complete Mg II escape and large [S II] deficits.

Load-bearing premise

The assumed electron density of 250 $cm^{-3}$, which cannot be measured from the low-resolution prism spectra, drives the [O III] temperature and all derived oxygen, carbon, and nitrogen abundances; the paper shows that a density of $10^{6}$ $cm^{-3}$ removes the temperature discrepancy and shifts the nitrogen points onto the local relation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the temperature discrepancy is real, all high-redshift abundances derived from the [O III] temperature scale (e.g., 12+log(O/H), C/O, N/O) are systematically biased, potentially reconciling some disagreements between early- and late-universe metallicity measurements.
  • The Balmer jump is a reliable, recombination-based thermometer even in unresolved prism spectra, offering a path to measure gas temperatures without the density and collisional assumptions that plague forbidden-line ratios.
  • The finding that log(C/O) ≈ −1 with no evolution means that carbon production lags oxygen in the first billion years, requiring star-formation histories or IMFs that delay carbon enrichment.
  • Mild nitrogen enhancement in the average galaxy implies the same processes seen in extreme 'nitrogen-loud' galaxies (very massive stars, dense clusters) are common but at lower intensity, ruling out rare exotic events like tidal disruptions as the primary cause.
  • If the highest-[O III] stacks really leak LyC with f_esc ~ 5–10% or more, these galaxies could sustain reionization, and the [S II] deficit and Mg II escape diagnostics can be used to identify similar leakers at lower redshift.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct measurement of the electron density in these galaxies (e.g., via [O II] 3726/3729 or [S II] 6717/6731 with higher-resolution JWST gratings or ALMA) would settle whether the temperature discrepancy is an artifact; the paper shows that n_e = 10^6 cm^-3 removes the discrepancy and brings N/O onto the local relation.
  • The 40% temperature gap might reflect a bimodal temperature distribution in the ISM (hot, low-metallicity, high-ionization regions vs. cooler, denser gas), which would make single-temperature abundance derivations invalid and could explain the C/O and N/O patterns.
  • If the Balmer jump temperature is the correct one, then oxygen abundances in the early universe may be higher than currently reported, which would flatten the mass-metallicity relation and ease the tension with chemical evolution models.
  • The same stacking technique could be applied to medium-resolution grating data for a subset of these galaxies to test whether the assumed density and the fitted line widths change the conclusions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper co-adds ~1000 z=4-10 galaxies from the DAWN JWST Archive with NIRSpec prism spectroscopy, building five stacks sorted by [O III] 5008 equivalent width. It reports the first statistical detections of faint UV lines (C IV, He II, O III], C III], N III], N IV], [C II], Mg II) in average high-redshift star-forming galaxies, and measures electron temperatures from both the [O III] 5008/1666 collisionally excited ratio and the nebular Balmer jump. From these temperatures it derives O, C, and N abundances, finding roughly solar-like C/O ~ -1 with no trend, a mildly enhanced N/O relative to local starbursts, and a ~40% discrepancy between the collisionally excited and recombination-based temperature diagnostics. The paper also uses Mg II escape fractions, a [S II] deficit, O32 ratios, and UV slopes to argue that the strongest starbursts are strong Lyman-continuum leakers.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper provides the first statistical view of the UV line emission and chemical abundances of the average z=4-10 galaxy, with a sample size an order of magnitude larger than earlier stacked analyses. The care in line measurement, bootstrap error estimation, and cross-checks of [O III] temperatures with the 4363 line and dust-insensitive ratios is commendable, as is the explicit comparison with CLASSY, LzLCS, and SDSS benchmarks. The potential 40% offset between collisionally excited and recombination temperatures would challenge standard nebular diagnostics at high redshift, and the finding that Mg II and [S II] indicate significant LyC escape in the average high-EW galaxy has clear implications for reionization. However, the abundance and temperature results depend on an assumed and unmeasured electron density, and the paper's own density test substantially weakens the central claims, so the significance is contingent on resolving this systematic.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.1.2 and §4.3] The electron density is assumed to be n_e=250 cm^-3 throughout because the prism data cannot resolve density-sensitive doublets (§4.1.2). This assumption enters directly into the PyNeb calculation of the [O III] 5008/1666 temperature and into all O, C, N abundances in §4.2. The paper's own test with n_e=10^6 cm^-3 (§4.3, Figure 9 right) increases 12+log(O/H) by ~0.5 dex and moves the N/O points onto the local relation, which would remove the 'mild nitrogen enhancement' claim and reduce the ~40% temperature offset to ~20%. Because density cannot be measured with the current data, the central abundance and temperature results carry an unquantified systematic error. I request that the paper either obtain a density constraint from medium-resolution data for a subsample or, at minimum, present the density dependence as the dominant systematic and explicitly state that all abundance conclusions are conditional on n_e.
  2. [§7 versus Table 8] The summary states that log(N/O) ≃ -0.3 in the three highest WOIII stacks, but Table 8 reports log(N/O) = -0.42 ± 0.70, -0.92 ± 0.61, and -1.05 ± 0.52 for stacks 3, 4, and 5. The values for stacks 4 and 5 are more than 1 sigma below the claimed value and are consistent within the uncertainties with the local N/O relation at the same oxygen abundance. This apparent inconsistency between the abstract/summary and the tabulated measurements directly affects the paper's nitrogen-enhancement conclusion, and must be resolved with a corrected summary or a re-analysis of the N/O estimates.
  3. [§6.2] The 'around 40% offset' between the [O III] and Balmer Jump temperatures is a central claim, but its magnitude depends on the assumed n_e and on the detailed Balmer Jump model, which includes free parameters for the stellar population age, the fraction of lost LyC photons, and independent stellar and nebular reddening (§4.1.1). The paper's own n_e=10^6 test reduces the offset to roughly 20%, and the model-dependence of the Balmer Jump is not fully explored (for example, the sensitivity to the assumed constant-SFR history and the choice of stellar templates is not quantified). Please re-evaluate the discrepancy with a systematic treatment of both the density and the Balmer Jump model uncertainties, and state the resulting range of the offset.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§4.2, last paragraph] The sentence 'we do not find evolution of N/O with 12+log(O/H) although the estimate values do correlate' is self-contradictory; please rephrase to state clearly whether a trend is found or not, and quantify the significance.
  2. [§5 and Table 9] The text says 'the average galaxy exceeds the most extreme deficit seen in the LzLCS program' with regard to the [S II] deficit, but only stack 5 (and possibly stack 4) shows a deficit beyond the LzLCS extreme; the other stacks are consistent with the SDSS locus. Please clarify which stacks are meant by 'average galaxy'.
  3. [§4.2] The propagation of the assumed T_low (from Garnett et al. 1995) into the O/H uncertainties is not described; please state whether the 0.1-0.3 dex errors in 12+log(O/H) include the systematic uncertainty in the O+/O++ temperature scaling.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: independent diagnostics and external calibrations carry the central results; only minor methodological self-citations appear.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular. The electron-temperature discrepancy is between two independent diagnostics: the [O III] 5008/1666 ratio run through PyNeb with external atomic data, and a Balmer-jump spectral fit using Starburst99 and Schirmer (2016) recombination continua; neither quantity is defined in terms of the other or fitted to a target result. The C, N, O abundances are computed from measured line ratios and these temperatures using standard PyNeb emissivities and ICFs, with the ICF choice explicitly tested (negligible difference) and the high-density case n_e=10^6 presented as a sensitivity test rather than hidden. The Mg II escape fraction and [S II] deficit use external calibrations (Xu et al. 2022; Wang et al. 2021) validated against CLOUDY, SDSS, and LzLCS, not against the paper's own outputs. The only self-references (Hayes et al. 2023 line-fitting engine; Berg et al. 2019b and Martinez et al. in prep ICFs) are methodological; the central claims do not reduce to them, and the ICF variants are shown to be negligible. The assumed n_e=250 cm^-3 is a stated, tested assumption producing a systematic uncertainty, not a circular reduction. Thus no equation reduces to its input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's absolute abundance scale, the N/O enhancement claim, and the LyC escape indicators inherit a chain of adopted parameters and calibrations from local-Universe work. The authors test the density and ICF assumptions, but the central temperature scale remains ambiguous because of the unresolved 40 percent offset between the two thermometers.

free parameters (4)
  • electron density n_e = 250 cm^-3
    Assumed throughout for temperatures and abundances because PRISM cannot resolve density doublets. Test at 10^6 cm^-3 changes O/H by +0.5 dex and removes the N enhancement (Section 4.3).
  • intrinsic Balmer decrement H-alpha/H-beta = 2.86
    Assumed for 10^4 K gas to deredden line fluxes (Section 3.2). Using a lower value would reduce required attenuation and affect line ratios.
  • stellar population age in Balmer Jump model = 3-60 Myr across stacks
    Fitted with Starburst99 constant-SFR templates; sets the stellar continuum below the Balmer break and therefore the inferred nebular temperature from the Balmer Jump (Section 4.1.1, Figure 6).
  • fraction of lost LyC photons in Balmer Jump model = not stated
    Additional scale factor in the nebular model to account for photons that escape or are absorbed by dust; degenerate with temperature and normalization (Section 4.1.1).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Atomic data for O, C, N (transition probabilities, collision strengths) implemented in PyNeb are correct.
    Used to convert line ratios to temperatures and abundances (Section 4.1.2).
  • domain assumption Garnett et al. (1995) scaling between Te(O+) and Te(O++) applies at z=4-10.
    Used to estimate the low-ionization-zone temperature (Section 4.1.2).
  • domain assumption Starburst99 models with Geneva tracks and Salpeter IMF represent high-z stellar continua.
    Used to separate stellar from nebular Balmer break in the Balmer Jump fit (Section 4.1.1).
  • domain assumption Local-universe calibrations (Xu et al. 2022 for MgII, Wang et al. 2021 for [S II] deficit, Chisholm et al. 2022 for beta) transfer to z=4-10.
    Used as indirect LyC escape diagnostics (Section 5).
  • domain assumption Stacked galaxies are dominated by star formation rather than AGN.
    Diagnostic diagrams place the stacks in the SF region, but a few approach AGN loci; the paper relies on this for abundance and xi_ion interpretation (Section 3.2).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the Average Ultraviolet Emission Line Spectra of High-Redshift Galaxies: Hot and Cold, Carbon-poor, Nitrogen-modest, and Oozing Ionizing Photons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EBGXEOMS

@misc{pith2026241109262,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the Average Ultraviolet Emission Line Spectra of High-Redshift Galaxies: Hot and Cold, Carbon-poor, Nitrogen-modest, and Oozing Ionizing Photons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EBGXEOMS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.09262}
}
read the original abstract

We determine the spectroscopic properties of ~1000 ostensibly star-forming galaxies at redshifts (z=4-10) using prism spectroscopy from JWST/NIRSpec. With rest-wavelength coverage between Lya and [S II] in the optical, we stack spectra as a function of nebular conditions, and compare UV spectral properties with stellar age. This reveals UV lines of N III], N IV], C III], C IV, He II, and O III] in the average high-z galaxy. All UV lines are more intense in younger starbursts. We measure electron temperatures from the collisionally excited [O III] line ratios, finding Te=18000-22000 K for the O++ regions. We also detect a significant nebular Balmer Jump from which we estimate only Te=8000-13000 K. Accounting for typical temperature offsets between zones bearing doubly and singly ionized oxygen, these two temperatures remain discrepant by around 40%. We use the [O III] temperatures to estimate abundances of carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen. We find that log(C/O) is consistently ~-1, with no evolution of C/O with metallicity or stellar age. The average spectra are mildly enhanced in Nitrogen, with higher N/O than low-z starbursts, but are less enhanced than samples of high-z galaxies with visible UV N III] and N IV]. Whatever processes produce the N-enhancement in the individual galaxies must also be ongoing, at lower levels, in the median galaxy in the early Universe. The strongest starbursts are a source of significant ionizing emission: ionizing photon production efficiencies reach 10^25.7 Hz/erg, and show multiple signatures of high Lyman continuum escape, including Mg II escape fractions nearing 100%, significant deficits in [S II] emission, high degrees of ionization, and blue UV colors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.09262 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Basic sample characteristics. Histograms from left to right show redshift, UV absolute magnitude, and UV continuum slope 𝛽. All are stacked by dependent variable 𝑊OIII, in a color coding that follows throughout the manuscript. order polynomial functions to the UV and optical regions independently. We also fit the UV range (1500 to 2200 Å) with a power-law, to recover the UV continuum slope, 𝛽 and use it as a test pa… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Stacked spectra, ordered by 𝑊OIII. Ultraviolet spectra are shown to the left and optical spectra to the right. Upper panels show the logarithm of the total integration time per spectral pixel. The second row shows the combination of spectra normalized by a single luminosity density, measured at 3500Å. The third row shows stacks where the continuum has been subtracted from the individual spectra at each wavelength be… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Evolution of the EW (in Å) of different UV features as a function of 𝑊OIII in the stacked spectra. C iv 𝜆𝜆1548, 51 transi￾tions from absorption (stellar P-Cygni+ISM) to emission (nebular dominated). The strength of He ii 𝜆1640, O iii] 𝜆𝜆1661, 66, and C iii] 𝜆𝜆1907, 09 increase monotonically with 𝑊OIII, e.g., up to 16Å in the case of C iii]. perature diagnostics based upon collisionally excited lines. The very fact t… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Some diagnostic diagrams constructed from the UV line measurements. From left to right: equivalent width of C iii] vs. C iv/C iii], C iii]/O iii] vs. O iii]/He ii, C iv/C iii] vs. (C iv+C iii])/He ii and C iv/C iii] vs. O iii]/He ii. Points with errorbars correspond in…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Zoom of the Balmer Jump region of the spectra. These spectra have been continuum subtracted using a polynomial fit to the continuum at wavelengths longer than 3800Å, which have been extrapolated to bluer wavelengths . Strong emission lines are labeled. The color coding…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left: Example of a fit to capture 𝑇e from the Balmer Jump, using the highest 𝑊OIII stack from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The abundance of carbon with respect to that of oxygen (C/O) vs the nebular oxygen abundance. Points from our five main stacks are shown in colors consistent with other figures; the open point has an uncertainty of ≃ 1 dex and is not treated as a measure￾ment. Various …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The abundance of nitrogen with respect to oxygen (N/O) vs the nebular oxygen abundance, 12 + log(O/H). High-𝑧 literature data are shown in green (Bunker et al. 2023; Isobe et al. 2023; Marques-Chaves et al. 2024; Ji et al. 2024; Castellano et al. 2024; Napolitano et al…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The production and potential escape of ionizing radiation. Upper left shows the ionizing photon production efficiency, 𝜉ion, where the canonical value needed to reionize the Universe (Robertson et al. 2015) is illustrated by the shaded region. We project 𝜉ion against …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unveiling and Characterising Ubiquitous Nitrogen Enhancement in $6 \leq z \leq 10$ Galaxies with JWST Spectroscopy

    astro-ph.GA 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Stacked JWST/NIRSpec spectra of 135 z=6-10 galaxies show supersolar N/O that is highest after a star-formation lull, consistent with delayed AGB enrichment and pristine gas inflows.

  2. The Pitfalls of Using Lyman Alpha Damping Wings in High-z Galaxy Spectra to Measure the Intergalactic Neutral Hydrogen Fraction

    astro-ph.GA 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Recovery of xHI and NDLA from Ly-alpha damping wings in low-resolution galaxy spectra is heavily biased and degenerate, with xHI effectively unconstrained.

  3. Systematic Bias in Ionizing Radiation Escape Fraction Measurements from Foreground Large-Scale Structures

    astro-ph.GA 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Lyman-alpha forest absorption at z~2.5 is weakly but significantly stronger along sightlines through overdense galaxy regions, implying a systematic bias in ionizing escape fraction measurements.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

145 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    J., Rigby, J

    Acharyya, A., Kewley, L. J., Rigby, J. R., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 5862, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1987

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1987 2019

  2. [2]

    M., & Keenan, F

    Aggarwal, K. M., & Keenan, F. P. 1999, ApJS, 123, 311, doi: 10.1086/313232

    doi:10.1086/313232 1999

  3. [3]

    2019, RMxAA, 55, 377, doi: 10.22201/ia.01851101p.2019.55.02.21

    Alarie, A., & Morisset, C. 2019, RMxAA, 55, 377, doi: 10.22201/ia.01851101p.2019.55.02.21

    doi:10.22201/ia.01851101p.2019.55.02.21 2019

  4. [4]

    M., Heckman, T

    Alexandroff, R. M., Heckman, T. M., Borthakur, S., Overzier, R., & Leitherer, C. 2015, ApJ, 810, 104, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/810/2/104

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/810/2/104 2015

  5. [5]

    Kewley, L. J. 2008, ApJS, 178, 20, doi: 10.1086/589652 Amorín, R., Fontana, A., Pérez-Montero, E., et al. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0052, doi: 10.1038/s41550-017-0052 Arellano-Córdova, K. Z., Berg, D. A., Chisholm, J., et al. 2022, ApJL, 940, L23, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9ab2

    doi:10.1086/589652 2008

  6. [6]

    J., et al

    Atek, H., Labbé, I., Furtak, L. J., et al. 2024, Nature, 626, 975, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07043-6

    doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07043-6 2024

  7. [7]

    E., Trump, J

    Backhaus, B. E., Trump, J. R., Pirzkal, N., et al. 2024, ApJ, 962, 195, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1520

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1520 2024

  8. [8]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.08052, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.08052

    Barrufet, L., Oesch, P., Marques-Chaves, R., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.08052, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.08052

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.08052 2024

Show all 145 references
  1. [9]

    B., Rigby, J

    Bayliss, M. B., Rigby, J. R., Sharon, K., et al. 2014, ApJ, 790, 144, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/790/2/144

    2014 doi

  2. [10]

    J., Cullen, F., et al

    Begley, R., McLure, R. J., Cullen, F., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.10988, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.10988

    2024 doi arXiv

  3. [11]

    A., Chisholm, J., Erb, D

    Berg, D. A., Chisholm, J., Erb, D. K., et al. 2019a, ApJL, 878, L3, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab21dc

    doi

  4. [12]

    McQuinn, K. B. W. 2019b, ApJ, 874, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab020a

    doi

  5. [13]

    A., Pogge, R

    Berg, D. A., Pogge, R. W., Skillman, E. D., et al. 2020, ApJ, 893, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7eab

    2020 doi

  6. [14]

    A., Skillman, E

    Berg, D. A., Skillman, E. D., Henry, R. B. C., Erb, D. K., & Carigi, L. 2016, ApJ, 827, 126, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/827/2/126

    2016 doi

  7. [15]

    A., James, B

    Berg, D. A., James, B. L., King, T., et al. 2022, ApJS, 261, 31, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac6c03

    2022 doi

  8. [16]

    N., Röttgering, H

    Best, P. N., Röttgering, H. J. A., & Longair, M. S. 2000, MNRAS, 311, 23, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03028.x

    2000

  9. [17]

    J., Stefanon, M., Brammer, G., et al

    Bouwens, R. J., Stefanon, M., Brammer, G., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 1036, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1145

    2023 doi

  10. [18]

    Bruton, S., Lin, Y.-H., Scarlata, C., & Hayes, M. J. 2023a, ApJL, 949, L40, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acd5d0

    doi

  11. [19]

    2023b, ApJ, 953, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd179

    Bruton, S., Scarlata, C., Haardt, F., et al. 2023b, ApJ, 953, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd179

    doi

  12. [20]

    J., Saxena, A., Cameron, A

    Bunker, A. J., Saxena, A., Cameron, A. J., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A88, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346159

    2023 doi

  13. [21]

    J., Saxena, A., Bunker, A

    Cameron, A. J., Saxena, A., Bunker, A. J., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2302.04298, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2302.04298

    2023 doi arXiv

  14. [22]

    C., Cullen, F., McLure, R

    Carnall, A. C., Cullen, F., McLure, R. J., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 534, 325, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2092 22 M. J. Hayes et al

    2024 doi

  15. [23]

    A., Cen, R., Scarlata, C., et al

    Carr, C. A., Cen, R., Scarlata, C., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.05180, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.05180

    2024 doi arXiv

  16. [24]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.10238, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2403.10238

    Castellano, M., Napolitano, L., Fontana, A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.10238, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2403.10238

    2024 doi arXiv

  17. [25]

    2023, A&A, 673, L7, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346410

    Charbonnel, C., Schaerer, D., Prantzos, N., et al. 2023, A&A, 673, L7, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346410

    2023 doi

  18. [26]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.17110, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.17110

    Chemerynska, I., Atek, H., Dayal, P., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.17110, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.17110

    2024 doi arXiv

  19. [27]

    2018, MNRAS, 479, 3264, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1461

    Chevallard, J., Charlot, S., Senchyna, P., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 3264, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1461

    2018 doi

  20. [28]

    2020, MNRAS, 498, 2554, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2470

    Henry, A. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 2554, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2470

    2020 doi

  21. [29]

    2022, MNRAS, 517, 5104, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2874

    Chisholm, J., Saldana-Lopez, A., Flury, S., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 517, 5104, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2874

    2022 doi

  22. [30]

    2012, MNRAS, 427, 1973, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22007.x

    Christensen, L., Laursen, P., Richard, J., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 1973, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22007.x

    2012

  23. [31]

    A., Erb, D

    Citro, A., Berg, D. A., Erb, D. K., et al. 2024, ApJ, 969, 148, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4600

    2024 doi

  24. [32]

    2023, MNRAS, 518, 425, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2737

    Curti, M., D’Eugenio, F., Carniani, S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 425, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2737

    2023 doi

  25. [33]

    2024, A&A, 684, A75, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346698

    Curti, M., Maiolino, R., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 684, A75, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346698

    2024 doi

  26. [34]

    T., McLeod, D

    Donnan, C. T., McLeod, D. J., Dunlop, J. S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 6011, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3472

    2023 doi

  27. [35]

    P., Whitler, L., et al

    Endsley, R., Stark, D. P., Whitler, L., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 1111, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1857

    2024 doi

  28. [36]

    K., Pettini, M., Shapley, A

    Erb, D. K., Pettini, M., Shapley, A. E., et al. 2010, ApJ, 719, 1168, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/719/2/1168

    2010 doi

  29. [37]

    2009, ApJ, 700, 654, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/700/1/654

    Esteban, C., Bresolin, F., Peimbert, M., et al. 2009, ApJ, 700, 654, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/700/1/654

    2009 doi

  30. [38]

    2014, MNRAS, 443, 624, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1177

    Esteban, C., García-Rojas, J., Carigi, L., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 624, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1177

    2014 doi

  31. [39]

    2004, MNRAS, 355, 229, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08313.x

    Esteban, C., Peimbert, M., García-Rojas, J., et al. 2004, MNRAS, 355, 229, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08313.x

    2004

  32. [40]

    2016, MNRAS, 456, 3354, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2794

    Feltre, A., Charlot, S., & Gutkin, J. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 3354, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2794

    2016 doi

  33. [41]

    L., Leung, G

    Finkelstein, S. L., Leung, G. C. K., Bagley, M. B., et al. 2024, ApJL, 969, L2, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad4495

    2024 doi

  34. [42]

    R., Jaskot, A

    Flury, S. R., Jaskot, A. E., Ferguson, H. C., et al. 2022a, ApJ, 930, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac61e4 —. 2022b, ApJS, 260, 1, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac5331

    doi

  35. [43]

    R., Jaskot, A

    Flury, S. R., Jaskot, A. E., Saldana-Lopez, A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.12118. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12118 Froese Fischer, C., & Tachiev, G. 2004, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, 87, 1, doi: 10.1016/j.adt.2004.02.001 García-Rojas, J., & Esteban, C. 20...

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    R., Skillman, E

    Garnett, D. R., Skillman, E. D., Dufour, R. J., et al. 1995, ApJ, 443, 64, doi: 10.1086/175503 Götberg, Y., de Mink, S. E., Groh, J. H., Leitherer, C., & Norman, C. 2019, A&A, 629, A134, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834525

    1995 doi

  37. [45]

    G., Izotov, Y

    Guseva, N. G., Izotov, Y. I., & Thuan, T. X. 2006, ApJ, 644, 890, doi: 10.1086/503865

    2006 doi

  38. [46]

    2016, MNRAS, 462, 1757, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1716

    Gutkin, J., Charlot, S., & Bruzual, G. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 1757, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1716

    2016 doi

  39. [47]

    2023a, ApJS, 265, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acaaa9

    Harikane, Y., Ouchi, M., Oguri, M., et al. 2023a, ApJS, 265, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acaaa9

    doi

  40. [48]

    2023b, ApJ, 959, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e

    Harikane, Y., Zhang, Y., Nakajima, K., et al. 2023b, ApJ, 959, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e

    doi

  41. [49]

    Rivera-Thorsen, T. E. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 5903, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad477

    2023 doi

  42. [50]

    J., & Scarlata, C

    Hayes, M. J., & Scarlata, C. 2023, ApJL, 954, L14, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acee6a

    2023 doi

  43. [51]

    J., Tan, J

    Hayes, M. J., Tan, J. C., Ellis, R. S., et al. 2024, ApJL, 971, L16, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad63a7

    2024 doi

  44. [52]

    2024, ApJL, 960, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad12cd

    He, X., Wang, X., Jones, T., et al. 2024, ApJL, 960, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad12cd

    2024 doi

  45. [53]

    E., Brammer, G

    Heintz, K. E., Brammer, G. B., Watson, D., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.02211, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.02211

    2024 doi arXiv

  46. [54]

    A., Scarlata, C., Verhamme, A., & Erb, D

    Henry, A., Berg, D. A., Scarlata, C., Verhamme, A., & Erb, D. 2018, ApJ, 855, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab099

    2018 doi

  47. [55]

    Y.-Y., Topping, M

    Hsiao, T. Y.-Y., Topping, M. W., Coe, D., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.04625, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.04625

    2024 doi

  48. [56]

    2024, ApJ, 971, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5015

    Hu, W., Papovich, C., Dickinson, M., et al. 2024, ApJ, 971, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5015

    2024 doi

  49. [57]

    2014, MNRAS, 442, 753, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu723

    Humphrey, A., & Binette, L. 2014, MNRAS, 442, 753, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu723

    2014 doi

  50. [58]

    2023, MNRAS, 518, 5018, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3198

    Iani, E., Zanella, A., Vernet, J., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 5018, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3198

    2023 doi

  51. [59]

    K., Shimizu, I., Iwata, I., & Tanaka, M

    Inoue, A. K., Shimizu, I., Iwata, I., & Tanaka, M. 2014, MNRAS, 442, 1805, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu936

    2014 doi

  52. [60]

    2023, ApJ, 959, 100, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad09be

    Isobe, Y., Ouchi, M., Tominaga, N., et al. 2023, ApJ, 959, 100, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad09be

    2023 doi

  53. [61]

    I., Chisholm, J., Worseck, G., et al

    Izotov, Y. I., Chisholm, J., Worseck, G., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 515, 2864, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1899

    2022 doi

  54. [62]

    I., Guseva, N

    Izotov, Y. I., Guseva, N. G., Fricke, K. J., et al. 2021, A&A, 646, A138, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039772

    2021 doi

  55. [63]

    I., Schaerer, D., Thuan, T

    Izotov, Y. I., Schaerer, D., Thuan, T. X., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 3683, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1205

    2016 doi

  56. [64]

    I., Schaerer, D., Worseck, G., et al

    Izotov, Y. I., Schaerer, D., Worseck, G., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 1228, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1036

    2023 doi

  57. [65]

    2022, A&A, 661, A80, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142663 Stack the DJA 23

    Jakobsen, P., Ferruit, P., Alves de Oliveira, C., et al. 2022, A&A, 661, A80, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142663 Stack the DJA 23

    2022 doi

  58. [67]

    L., Pettini, M., Christensen, L., et al

    James, B. L., Pettini, M., Christensen, L., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 440, 1794, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu287

    2014 doi

  59. [68]

    L., Berg, D

    James, B. L., Berg, D. A., King, T., et al. 2022, ApJS, 262, 37, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac8008

    2022 doi

  60. [69]

    E., & Ravindranath, S

    Jaskot, A. E., & Ravindranath, S. 2016, ApJ, 833, 136, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/136

    2016 doi

  61. [70]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.04148, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.04148

    Ji, X., Übler, H., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.04148, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.04148

    2024 doi arXiv

  62. [71]

    2023, ApJL, 951, L17, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acd938

    Jones, T., Sanders, R., Chen, Y., et al. 2023, ApJL, 951, L17, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acd938

    2023 doi

  63. [72]

    J., Saxena, A., et al

    Katz, H., Cameron, A. J., Saxena, A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.03189, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.03189

    2024 doi arXiv

  64. [73]

    J., Nicholls, D

    Kewley, L. J., Nicholls, D. C., & Sutherland, R. S. 2019, ARA&A, 57, 511, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051832

    2019 doi

  65. [74]

    J., Ferland, G

    Kisielius, R., Storey, P. J., Ferland, G. J., & Keenan, F. P. 2009, MNRAS, 397, 903, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14989.x

    2009

  66. [75]

    2024, ApJL, 962, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad1de1

    Kobayashi, C., & Ferrara, A. 2024, ApJL, 962, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad1de1

    2024 doi

  67. [76]

    D., Finkelstein, S

    Kocevski, D. D., Finkelstein, S. L., Barro, G., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.03576, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.03576

    2024 doi arXiv

  68. [77]

    I., Greene, J

    Kokorev, V., Caputi, K. I., Greene, J. E., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2401.09981, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2401.09981

    2024 doi arXiv

  69. [78]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.13045, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.13045

    Langeroodi, D., & Hjorth, J. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.13045, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.13045

    2024 doi arXiv

  70. [79]

    S., et al

    Laporte, N., Nakajima, K., Ellis, R. S., et al. 2017, ApJ, 851, 40, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa96a8

    2017 doi

  71. [80]

    2024, A&A, 687, A73, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449362

    Leclercq, F., Chisholm, J., King, W., et al. 2024, A&A, 687, A73, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449362

    2024 doi

  72. [81]

    2013, A&A, 553, A106, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118370

    Leitet, E., Bergvall, N., Hayes, M., Linné, S., & Zackrisson, E. 2013, A&A, 553, A106, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118370

    2013 doi

  73. [82]

    D., et al

    Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., et al. 1999, ApJS, 123, 3, doi: 10.1086/313233

    1999 doi

  74. [83]

    2022, A&A, 659, A16, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141651 López-Sánchez, Á

    Llerena, M., Amorín, R., Cullen, F., et al. 2022, A&A, 659, A16, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141651 López-Sánchez, Á. R., Esteban, C., García-Rojas, J., Peimbert, M., & Rodríguez, M. 2007, ApJ, 656, 168, doi: 10.1086/510112

    2022 doi

  75. [84]

    Luridiana, V., Morisset, C., & Shaw, R. A. 2015, A&A, 573, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323152

    2015 doi

  76. [85]

    P., Tang, M., et al

    Mainali, R., Stark, D. P., Tang, M., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 719, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa751

    2020 doi

  77. [86]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2308.01230, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2308.01230

    Maiolino, R., Scholtz, J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2308.01230, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2308.01230

    2023 doi arXiv

  78. [87]

    2024, A&A, 687, A67, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347087

    Maiolino, R., Übler, H., Perna, M., et al. 2024, A&A, 687, A67, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347087

    2024 doi

  79. [88]

    2024, A&A, 681, A30, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347411

    Marques-Chaves, R., Schaerer, D., Kuruvanthodi, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 681, A30, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347411

    2024 doi

  80. [89]

    M., & Kunth, D

    Mas-Hesse, J. M., & Kunth, D. 1991, A&AS, 88, 399

    1991

  81. [90]

    2023, A&A, 674, A221, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245152 Matthee,J.,Sobral,D.,Hayes,M.,etal.2021,MNRAS,505,1382, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1304

    Mascia, S., Pentericci, L., Saxena, A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A221, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245152 Matthee,J.,Sobral,D.,Hayes,M.,etal.2021,MNRAS,505,1382, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1304

    2023 doi

  82. [91]

    P., Brammer, G., et al

    Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345

    2024 doi

  83. [92]

    2010, A&A, 515, A68, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913315 Méndez-Delgado, J

    Mattsson, L. 2010, A&A, 515, A68, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913315 Méndez-Delgado, J. E., Esteban, C., García-Rojas, J., Kreckel, K., & Peimbert, M. 2023, Nature, 618, 249, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05956-2 Meštrić, U., Vanzella, E., Upadhyaya, A., et al. 2023, A&A, 673, A50, do...

    2010 doi

  84. [93]

    L., Arellano-Córdova, K

    Mingozzi, M., James, B. L., Arellano-Córdova, K. Z., et al. 2022, ApJ, 939, 110, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac952c

    2022 doi

  85. [94]

    L., Berg, D

    Mingozzi, M., James, B. L., Berg, D. A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 962, 95, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1033

    2024 doi

  86. [95]

    2023, ApJS, 269, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acd556

    Nakajima, K., Ouchi, M., Isobe, Y., et al. 2023, ApJS, 269, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acd556

    2023 doi

  87. [96]

    2018, A&A, 612, A94, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731935

    Nakajima, K., Schaerer, D., Le Fèvre, O., et al. 2018, A&A, 612, A94, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731935

    2018 doi

  88. [97]

    2024, A&A, 688, A142, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348866

    Nandal, D., Sibony, Y., & Tsiatsiou, S. 2024, A&A, 688, A142, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348866

    2024 doi

  89. [98]

    2024a, A&A, 688, A106, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449644

    Napolitano, L., Pentericci, L., Santini, P., et al. 2024a, A&A, 688, A106, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449644

    doi

  90. [99]

    2024b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.18763, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.18763

    Napolitano, L., Castellano, M., Pentericci, L., et al. 2024b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.18763, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.18763

    doi

  91. [100]

    B., et al

    Newville, M., Stensitzki, T., Allen, D. B., et al. 2016, Lmfit: Non-Linear Least-Square Minimization and Curve-Fitting for

    2016

  92. [101]

    Groves, B. A. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 4403, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3235 Oke,J.B.,&Gunn,J.E.1983,ApJ,266,713,doi:10.1086/160817

    2017 doi

  93. [102]

    F., & Tsang, B

    Pascale, M., Dai, L., McKee, C. F., & Tsang, B. T. H. 2023, ApJ, 957, 77, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf75c Peña-Guerrero, M. A., Leitherer, C., de Mink, S., Wofford, A., & Kewley,L. 2017,ApJ, 847,107,doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa88bf

    2023 doi

  94. [103]

    Peimbert, A., Peimbert, M., & Ruiz, M. T. 2005, ApJ, 634, 1056, doi: 10.1086/444557

    2005 doi

  95. [104]

    W., Oey, M

    Pellegrini, E. W., Oey, M. S., Winkler, P. F., et al. 2012, ApJ, 755, 40, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/755/1/40

    2012 doi

  96. [105]

    2020, ApJ, 896, 170, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab91a5

    Tumlinson, J. 2020, ApJ, 896, 170, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab91a5

    2020 doi

  97. [106]

    A., Steidel, C

    Reddy, N. A., Steidel, C. C., Pettini, M., & Bogosavljević, M. 2016, ApJ, 828, 107, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/828/2/107

    2016 doi

  98. [107]

    A., Kriek, M., Shapley, A

    Reddy, N. A., Kriek, M., Shapley, A. E., et al. 2015, ApJ, 806, 259, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/259 24 M. J. Hayes et al

    2015 doi

  99. [108]

    A., Sanders, R

    Reddy, N. A., Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., et al. 2023, ApJ, 951, 56, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd0b1

    2023 doi

  100. [109]

    2024, ApJ, 966, 228, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad382c

    Revalski, M., Rafelski, M., Henry, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 228, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad382c

    2024 doi

  101. [110]

    E., Dahle, H., Chisholm, J., et al

    Rivera-Thorsen, T. E., Dahle, H., Chisholm, J., et al. 2019, Science, 366, 738, doi: 10.1126/science.aaw0978

    2019 doi

  102. [111]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.07103, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2403.07103

    Roberts-Borsani, G., Treu, T., Shapley, A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.07103, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2403.07103

    2024 doi arXiv

  103. [112]

    W., Bouwens, R

    Roberts-Borsani, G. W., Bouwens, R. J., Oesch, P. A., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, 143, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/143

    2016 doi

  104. [113]

    D., Tacchella, S., et al

    Robertson, B., Johnson, B. D., Tacchella, S., et al. 2024, ApJ, 970, 31, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad463d

    2024 doi

  105. [114]

    E., Ellis, R

    Robertson, B. E., Ellis, R. S., Furlanetto, S. R., & Dunlop, J. S. 2015, ApJL, 802, L19, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/802/2/L19

    2015 doi

  106. [115]

    2022, A&A, 663, A59, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141864

    Saldana-Lopez, A., Schaerer, D., Chisholm, J., et al. 2022, A&A, 663, A59, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141864

    2022 doi

  107. [116]

    Brammer, G. B. 2024, ApJ, 962, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad15fc

    2024 doi

  108. [117]

    L., Shapley, A

    Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., Kriek, M., et al. 2018, ApJ, 858, 99, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabcbd

    2018 doi

  109. [118]

    L., Shapley, A

    Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., Clarke, L., et al. 2023, ApJ, 943, 75, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca9cc

    2023 doi

  110. [119]

    2022a, A&A, 665, L4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244556

    Schaerer, D., Marques-Chaves, R., Barrufet, L., et al. 2022a, A&A, 665, L4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244556

    doi

  111. [120]

    2024, A&A, 687, L11, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450721

    Schaerer, D., Marques-Chaves, R., Xiao, M., & Korber, D. 2024, A&A, 687, L11, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450721

    2024 doi

  112. [121]

    I., Worseck, G., et al

    Schaerer, D., Izotov, Y. I., Worseck, G., et al. 2022b, A&A, 658, L11, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243149

    doi

  113. [122]

    2016, PASP, 128, 114001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/128/969/114001

    Schirmer, M. 2016, PASP, 128, 114001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/128/969/114001

    2016 doi

  114. [123]

    2024, A&A, 687, A283, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347187

    Scholtz, J., Witten, C., Laporte, N., et al. 2024, A&A, 687, A283, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347187

    2024 doi

  115. [124]

    P., Charlot, S., et al

    Senchyna, P., Stark, D. P., Charlot, S., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 6112, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab884

    2021 doi

  116. [125]

    P., Vidal-García, A., et al

    Senchyna, P., Stark, D. P., Vidal-García, A., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 472, 2608, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2059

    2017 doi

  117. [126]

    P., Charlot, S., et al

    Senchyna, P., Stark, D. P., Charlot, S., et al. 2022, ApJ, 930, 105, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5d38

    2022 doi

  118. [127]

    E., Sanders, R

    Shapley, A. E., Sanders, R. L., Topping, M. W., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.00157, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.00157

    2024 doi arXiv

  119. [128]

    2024a, MNRAS, 527, 6139, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3605 —

    Simmonds, C., Tacchella, S., Hainline, K., et al. 2024a, MNRAS, 527, 6139, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3605 —. 2024b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.01286, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.01286

    doi arXiv

  120. [129]

    P., Richard, J., Siana, B., et al

    Stark, D. P., Richard, J., Siana, B., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 3200, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1618 Stark,D.P.,Ellis,R.S.,Charlot,S.,etal.2017,MNRAS,464,469, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2233

    2014 doi

  121. [130]

    J., Illingworth, G

    Stefanon, M., Bouwens, R. J., Illingworth, G. D., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 94, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7e44

    2022 doi

  122. [131]

    C., Strom, A

    Steidel, C. C., Strom, A. L., Pettini, M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 826, 159, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/159

    2016 doi

  123. [132]

    2023, ApJL, 957, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0159

    Stiavelli, M., Morishita, T., Chiaberge, M., et al. 2023, ApJL, 957, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0159

    2023 doi

  124. [133]

    P., Chevallard, J., & Charlot, S

    Tang, M., Stark, D. P., Chevallard, J., & Charlot, S. 2019, MNRAS, 489, 2572, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2236

    2019 doi

  125. [134]

    P., Topping, M

    Tang, M., Stark, D. P., Topping, M. W., Mason, C., & Ellis, R. S. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.01507, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.01507

    2024 doi arXiv

  126. [135]

    P., Chen, Z., et al

    Tang, M., Stark, D. P., Chen, Z., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2301.07072, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2301.07072

    2023 doi arXiv

  127. [136]

    1985, A&A, 150, 151

    Tarrab, I. 1985, A&A, 150, 151

    1985

  128. [137]

    W., Stark, D

    Topping, M. W., Stark, D. P., Senchyna, P., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 3301, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae682 Toribio San Cipriano, L., Domínguez-Guzmán, G., Esteban, C., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 3759, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx328 Toribio San Cipriano, L., García-Rojas, J., Esteban, C., ...

    2024 doi

  129. [138]

    R., Arrabal Haro, P., Simons, R

    Trump, J. R., Arrabal Haro, P., Simons, R. C., et al. 2023, ApJ, 945, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acba8a van Zee, L., & Haynes, M. P. 2006, ApJ, 636, 214, doi: 10.1086/498017

    2023 doi

  130. [139]

    2010, A&A, 513, A20, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913042 Vázquez, G

    Vanzella, E., Grazian, A., Hayes, M., et al. 2010, A&A, 513, A20, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913042 Vázquez, G. A., & Leitherer, C. 2005, ApJ, 621, 695, doi: 10.1086/427866

    2010 doi

  131. [140]

    M., Leitherer, C., et al

    Wang, B., Heckman, T. M., Leitherer, C., et al. 2019, ApJ, 885, 57, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab418f

    2019 doi

  132. [141]

    M., Amorín, R., et al

    Wang, B., Heckman, T. M., Amorín, R., et al. 2021, ApJ, 916, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0434

    2021 doi

  133. [142]

    J., et al

    Weibel, A., de Graaff, A., Setton, D. J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.03829, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.03829

    2024 doi arXiv

  134. [143]

    E., Rigby, J., et al

    Welch, B., Rivera-Thorsen, T. E., Rigby, J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.06631, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2405.06631

    2024 doi arXiv

  135. [144]

    W., & Barlow, M

    Wesson, R., Liu, X. W., & Barlow, M. J. 2005, MNRAS, 362, 424, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09325.x

    2005

  136. [145]

    2024, A&A, 682, A40, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347176

    Witstok, J., Smit, R., Saxena, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 682, A40, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347176

    2024 doi

  137. [146]

    2022, ApJ, 933, 202, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7225 —

    Xu, X., Henry, A., Heckman, T., et al. 2022, ApJ, 933, 202, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7225 —. 2023, ApJ, 943, 94, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca89a

    2022 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.