High Order Asymptotic Expansion at Infinity for Strong Solutions to Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations

Shuai Xi; Weiquan Chen; Zhongmin Qian

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 137 references

High Order Asymptotic Expansion at Infinity for Strong Solutions to Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that velocity and vorticity inherit different spatial decay from Gaussian data; velocity develops an explicit rational expansion at infinity.

desk verdict Theorem 1.2 as printed has an off-by-one indexing error: the claimed O(|x|^{-2d-1}) remainder requires including the |α|=d term, which the displayed sum omits; the proof actually establishes the corrected version with the sum to d. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.22146 v1 pith:ECDEKNCA submitted 2026-07-24 math.AP

Weiquan Chen , Zhongmin Qian , Shuai Xi This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.AP MSC 35Q3035B4076D05

keywords Navier-StokesequationsvorticityGaussianboundsasymptoticexpansionpointwisedecayfundamentalsolutionmaximallifespanstrongsolutions

topics Navier-Stokes Regularity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper draws a sharp line between the velocity and vorticity equations for incompressible Navier-Stokes in the whole space. It proves that if the initial vorticity has a Gaussian bound, the vorticity keeps a Gaussian spatial bound for every time up to the maximal lifespan. The velocity, by contrast, cannot keep that bound: starting from well-localized (Gaussian or polynomial) initial data, the velocity develops rational, non-Gaussian tails and has an explicit expansion at infinity as a finite sum of derivatives of the fundamental solution of the Laplacian, up to order d−1, with coefficients that are moments of the product u⊗u. This is shown to hold for the whole maximal lifespan, with a remainder decaying like |x|^{-(2d+1)}. The paper also derives a necessary and sufficient condition, in terms of isotropy of the space-time L² correlations, for a localized strong solution to decay faster than the critical rate.

What carries the argument

The argument uses a mild-solution representation that replaces the usual Riesz-transform kernels with second derivatives of the Poisson potential, obtained through integration by parts where the singularity of the Poisson kernel contributes a trace term. The convolution is split into close and far regions: a Taylor expansion of the kernel acts in a region where the solution's pointwise polynomial decay is controlled, while the remaining regions are shown to contribute only higher-order decay. A final convolution lemma (Lemma 3.11) reduces to expanding ∇G_{νt}∗∂^α K^{i,j}; because K^{i,j} is harmonic away from the origin, all higher-order terms cancel and only the leading term survives. The w

What would settle it

Take a smooth compactly supported initial velocity in R³ and a time t just before any possible blow-up; if |x|^{2d+1}|u(x,t) + Σ_{|α|=0}^{d-1} (−1)^{|α|}/α! ∇∂^α K^{i,j}(x) ∫_0^t M^{i,j}_α(s) ds| does not go to 0 uniformly as |x|→∞, the expansion is false. More directly, exhibit a strong solution with |∇u(x,t)| decaying no faster than ⟨x⟩^{-p} for p=d/2+1 at some t; the remainder estimate then breaks and the expansion order cannot be attained.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that velocity and vorticity inherit different spatial localization from Gaussian initial data. For d=2,3, a strong vorticity solution keeps a Gaussian bound up to the maximal lifespan. For d≥2, a strong velocity solution with Gaussian-localized L∞ data satisfies an explicit asymptotic expansion: u(x,t) = −Σ_{|α|=0}^{d-1} (−1)^{|α|}/α! ∇∂^α K^{i,j}(x) ∫_0^t M^{i,j}_α(s) ds + R(x,t), with sup_{t∈[0,T]}|R(x,t)| = O(|x|^{−2d−1}) as |x|→∞, uniformly on any compact time interval inside the maximal lifespan. Here K^{i,j}=∂²_{i,j}Γ is the second derivative of the fundamental solution of the Laplacian and M^{i,j}_α are moments of u^i u^j. The expansion holds up to maximal lifespa

Load-bearing premise

The expansion rests on the pointwise bound (3.32), especially the gradient part |∇u(x,t)| ≤ h(t)⟨x⟩^{-p}/√(νt) for some p>d/2+1 up to the maximal lifespan; the proof of the gradient part is only sketched as a repetition of the line-by-line argument for the velocity, so if that bound fails the O(|x|^{-2d-1}) remainder could fail as well.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The far-field profile of any well-localized strong solution is fully determined by the moment integrals of u⊗u spent over time; no other feature of the solution enters the leading term.
The orthogonality criterion gives a concrete, checkable condition for faster-than-critical decay: the matrix of time-integrated cross-correlations must be a scalar multiple of the identity.
Vorticity-based simulations or estimates can safely assume Gaussian localization for all positive times, while velocity-based estimates cannot.
The expansion is uniform up to the maximal lifespan, so it remains meaningful even if the solution blows up at the end: the spatial profile at any time before blow-up still has this explicit form.
The method extends beyond Gaussian data to the larger class of initial values with polynomial decay ⟨x⟩^{-p}, p≤d+1.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

One could test the theorem numerically in 2D or 3D by computing the moment integrals from a simulation and comparing the predicted far field to the computed velocity; a mismatch at any time would pinpoint a failure of the pointwise gradient decay estimate.
The same Poisson-potential decomposition may apply to other incompressible models with a pressure-induced nonlocal coupling, such as the Boussinesq or magnetohydrodynamic systems, to derive analogous far-field expansions.
The necessary and sufficient condition suggests a possible measurement strategy: observing the angular dependence of the far field at the critical decay rate reveals whether the solution's space-time correlations are isotropic.
If the gradient decay estimate (Prop. 3.5) were false, the remainder order would drop; hence the expansion itself is a subtle test of gradient localization, and the gap in the written proof is worth closing.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things to know. First, the main expansion theorem is misstated as printed. The sum runs to |α|=d−1, but the claimed remainder O(|x|^{-2d−1}) only follows from Proposition 3.7 by taking N=d, which includes the |α|=d term. That term decays exactly like |x|^{-2d−1} and its coefficients are generic moments of the solution, so it cannot be absorbed into the remainder. This is a genuine off-by-one in the statement, not a subtle gap—the proof, including Remark 4, actually establishes the version with the sum to d. Second, the paper is still worth engaging with: the explicit d-th order expansion via the Poisson-potential formulation and the cancellation in Lemma 3.11 is a real step beyond Brandolese–Vigneron’s first-order profile, and the vorticity Gaussian-inheritance result is new and nicely proved.

What is genuinely good: the expansion is written in terms of moment coefficients, holds up to the maximal lifespan, and the remainder analysis in Section 3.4 is mostly careful. The Gaussian bound for vorticity (Theorem 1.1) is a clean iterative argument and stands on its own. There is no circularity and no fitting—the coefficients are moments of the solution itself.

Soft spots. The indexing error is load-bearing and must be fixed. The reader’s flagged concern about Proposition 3.5 is also legitimate: the pointwise gradient decay estimate is needed for the far-field remainder estimates, and its proof is only sketched as “almost verbatim repeat” of Proposition 3.4. Given that the theorem statement already needs correction, the authors should use the revision to write out that gradient estimate. The novelty discussion relative to McOwen–Topalov and Topalov is also thinner than it should be: those papers are cited, but the text does not crisply say what the new expansion adds over their spherical-harmonic expansions. The likely answer—explicit moment coefficients and maximal-lifespan validity—needs to be stated.

Who this is for: specialists in spatial asymptotics for Navier–Stokes, especially the Brandolese–Vigneron line. The vorticity result has broader interest. I would send it to peer review rather than desk-reject, because the core is sound and the fix is straightforward, but not in its current form. The referee should insist on a corrected theorem statement and a real proof of Proposition 3.5.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper studies spatial decay of strong solutions to the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations on R^d. The first main result, Theorem 1.1, states that if the initial vorticity has a Gaussian bound, then this Gaussian localization is inherited by the vorticity up to the maximal lifespan, in dimensions two and three. The second main result, Theorem 1.2, claims a high-order asymptotic expansion at spatial infinity for the velocity field generated by Gaussian-localized L^∞ initial data: the leading part is a finite sum of derivatives of the Laplacian fundamental solution with coefficients given by moments of u⊗u, and the remainder is O(|x|^{-2d-1}). The proof is built on a vorticity Gaussian-inheritance argument, polynomial decay estimates for u and ∇u, a Poisson-potential representation of the bilinear term, and a Taylor-expansion argument for the singular convolution. The key internal engine is Proposition 3.7, which gives a parameterized version of the expansion for solutions satisfying |u|+√(νt)|∇u| ≤ h(t)⟨x⟩^{-p}.

Significance. If the statement of Theorem 1.2 is corrected, the paper constitutes a substantial contribution: it improves the first-order spatial asymptotics of Brandolese-Vigneron to higher order and extends the validity up to the maximal lifespan. The vorticity Gaussian-inheritance result appears to be new and is a clean separation between the velocity and vorticity formulations. The proof strategy is self-contained and does not fit parameters to force the expansion; the coefficients are moments of the solution itself, and the key cancellation in Lemma 3.11 is elegant and correctly isolates the leading convolution term. The polynomial-decay framework of Section 3 is also a useful tool beyond the Gaussian case.

major comments (2)

[Theorem 1.2, Remark 4, Proposition 3.7] The displayed theorem is inconsistent with the engine of the paper. Theorem 1.2 sums |α|=0,...,d-1 and claims a remainder O(|x|^{-2d-1}). However, Proposition 3.7 gives R_1=O(|x|^{-d-N-1}). For Gaussian data one has p=d+1, so the admissible range is N<d+1; choosing N=d-1 gives R_1=O(|x|^{-2d}), not O(|x|^{-2d-1}). To obtain O(|x|^{-2d-1}) one must choose N=d, but then the expansion contains the |α|=d term -∇∂^α K^{ij}(x)∫_0^t M^{ij}_α(s)ds, which decays exactly like |x|^{-2d-1}; its coefficient is not identically zero for generic Gaussian-localized divergence-free data. Thus Theorem 1.2 as stated does not follow from Proposition 3.7. The theorem should either sum to |α|=d and state the remainder as O(|x|^{-2d-1}) (with the caveat that this is an approximation, not an asymptotic expansion in the strict o(last-term) sense), or keep the sum to d-1 and weaken the remainder to O(|x|^{-2d}). R
[Section 3.3, Proposition 3.5] The gradient decay estimate (3.24) is load-bearing: it is used in the uniform bound (3.39), in the remainder estimates (3.41)-(3.42), and in Lemma 3.10. Yet the proof is not written: the text says it is 'an almost verbatim repeat of the proof of Proposition 3.4' and leaves it to the reader. Given that the entire expansion depends on this bound, the proof should be supplied in full, or at least the necessary modifications should be detailed in an appendix. This is not merely a cosmetic omission.

minor comments (3)

[Section 3.2] The proof of Proposition 3.3 is headed 'Proof of Proposition 3.2'; the label should be corrected.
[Abstract] There is a typo: 'don not' should be 'do not'.
[Section 3.4, Lemma 3.11 proof] In the computation of the moments M_β(τ), the summation bounds after interchanging the β-sum and the γ-sum are written in a way that is ambiguous for even N'. Please clarify the integer range, e.g. with explicit floor notation, to avoid a possible indexing error.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained a priori analysis with minor proof-completeness gaps.

full rationale

The paper's derivation is a self-contained a priori analysis. Theorem 1.2 is derived from Proposition 3.7, which rests on the polynomial decay estimates (3.32) obtained from Propositions 3.2/3.4/3.5 and on the convolution expansion Lemma 3.11. The expansion coefficients M^{i,j}_\alpha(t) are defined as moments of the solution itself and are produced by Taylor-expanding the singular kernel K^{i,j}; they are not fitted to match the target remainder, and no external data are imported. The Gaussian-vorticity result (Theorem 1.1) is a forward estimate, not used as an input to the velocity expansion. There are no self-citations and no imported uniqueness theorem; prior work (BV07, KR11, MT24) is cited only for comparison and improvement, not as load-bearing evidence. The reader/skeptic flags—Proposition 3.5's proof being sketched as an 'almost verbatim repeat' of Proposition 3.4, and the apparent mismatch between Theorem 1.2's sum to |\alpha|=d-1 and Remark 4's instruction to take N=d in Proposition 3.7—concern proof completeness and internal presentation rather than circularity: the omitted |\alpha|=d term in Proposition 3.7 decays like |x|^{-2d-1}, so it is compatible with the stated O(|x|^{-2d-1}) remainder, and the sketched gradient bound is an omitted verification, not a fitted input or self-referential reduction. Accordingly no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities or fitted constants are introduced. The central claims rest on standard PDE machinery (local well-posedness, heat-kernel estimates, weak-strong uniqueness) and on the localization assumptions on the data. The only tunable parameter in a final theorem is δ in the vorticity bound; no number is fitted to make the expansion work.

free parameters (1)

δ
Arbitrary parameter in (0,1] in Theorem 1.1 controlling the Gaussian width margin; the constant Cδ blows up as δ→0, so the exact δ=0 limit is not attained.

assumptions (6)

standard math Kato local well-posedness and weak-strong uniqueness for L∞-based mild solutions of (1.1) and (1.2).
Used in Definitions 1-2 and throughout to define maximal lifespan and regularity classes.
standard math Heat-kernel L1 derivative estimates (3.4)-(3.7), semigroup identity (2.1), and Young's inequality.
The engine for all iterative estimates in Sections 2 and 3.
standard math Fundamental solution identities: -ΔΓ=δ0, Δ∂²_{i,j}Γ=0 away from the origin, and Lemma 3.1's integration by parts with trace boundary term.
Lemma 3.1 is used to pass to the Poisson-potential mild form (3.9); the cancellation in Lemma 3.11 uses harmonicity away from 0.
domain assumption Gaussian localization (1.6)/(1.7) and polynomial localization (3.1)/(3.32) with p>d/2+1.
The main theorems are conditioned on these data classes; the expansion needs p≥d+1 for the |x|^{-2d-1} remainder.
standard math Riesz-transform boundedness on L^q and Sobolev embedding to pass from vorticity to velocity bounds.
Invoked in Section 2 before defining maximal lifespan and for the ∥u∥_{L∞} bound from ω∈L^{d+1}.
standard math Appendix B: ∇u∈L¹(0,T;L∞) for L∞ mild solutions, a BKM-type regularity statement.
Needed to justify differentiating the mild formula and applying pointwise gradient arguments.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High Order Asymptotic Expansion at Infinity for Strong Solutions to Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ECDEKNCA

@misc{pith2026260722146,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High Order Asymptotic Expansion at Infinity for Strong Solutions to Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ECDEKNCA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.22146}
}

abstract

We discuss an interesting distinction between the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations (the velocity equations) and its vorticity form in whole space. We show that if the initial vorticity has a Gaussian bound then the bound is inherited up to the maximal lifespan of the strong solution. However, it turns out that the velocity equations don not share the same property. In fact, $L^p$-strong solutions to the velocity equations arising from ``well-localized" initial value generally behave at infinity like derivatives (of order $\geq3$) of the fundamental solution of Laplacian. To show this, a clean expansion up to maximal lifespan is derived : \begin{align} u(x,t)=-\nabla\sum_{|\alpha|=0}^{d-1}\frac{(-1)^{|\alpha|}}{\alpha !}\partial^\alpha\partial_{i,j}^2\Gamma(x)\int_0^t{\rm M}_{\alpha}^{i,j}(s){\rm d}s+O\big(|x|^{-2d-1}\big)\nonumber \end{align} where ${\rm M}_{\alpha}^{i,j}(t):=\int_{\mathbb R^d}y^\alpha u^i(y,t)u^j(y,t){\rm d}y$ and $\Gamma$ is the fundamental solution of Laplacian. This improves the first order expansion given by L. Brandolese and F. Vigneron \cite{BV07}.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

137 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

[1]

Yoshikazu Giga and Tsutomu Kambe , date-added =. Commun. Math. Phys. , pages =
[2]

Eugene Wayne , date-added =

Thierry Gallay and C. Eugene Wayne , date-added =. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , pages =
[3]

Yoshiko Fujigaki and Tetsuro Miyakawa , date-added =. SIAM J. Math Anal. , number =
[4]

Ana Carpio , date-added =. SIAM J. Math Anal. , number =
[5]

Cannone and C

M. Cannone and C. He and G. Karch , date-added =. Preprint , title =
[6]

Russian Journal of Mathematical Physics , number =

Peter Topalov , date-added =. Russian Journal of Mathematical Physics , number =
[7]

International Mathematics Research Notices , number =

Robert McOwen and Peter Topalov , date-added =. International Mathematics Research Notices , number =
[8]

Lorenzo Brandolese , date-added =. Math. Ann. , pages =

Show all 137 references

[9]

Schonbek , date-added =

Maria E. Schonbek , date-added =. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , number =
[10]

Lorenzo Brandolese and Fran. J. Math. Pures Appl. , pages =
[11]

Schonbek , date-added =

Tetsuro Miyakawa and Maria E. Schonbek , date-added =. Mathematica Bohemica , number =
[12]

Journal of the London Mathematical Society , number =

Michael Wiegner , date-added =. Journal of the London Mathematical Society , number =
[13]

Mathematische Zeitschrift , pages =

Tetsuro Miyakawa and Ryuju Kajukiya , date-added =. Mathematische Zeitschrift , pages =
[14]

Schonbek , date-added =

Maria E. Schonbek , date-added =. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , number =
[15]

Schonbek , date-added =

Maria E. Schonbek , date-added =. Comm. Partial Differential Equations , number =
[16]

Amrouche and V

C. Amrouche and V. Girault and M. E. Schonbek and T. P. Schonbek , date-added =. SIAM J. Math Anal. , number =
[17]

Igor Kukavica and Ednei Reis , date-added =. J. Differential Equations , number =
[18]

Dobrokhotov and A.I

S.Yu. Dobrokhotov and A.I. Shafarevich , date-added =. Russ. J. Math. Phys. , number =
[19]

Igor Kukavica and J. J. Torres , date-added =. Comm. Partial Differential Equations , number =
[20]

Igor Kukavica and J. J. Torres , date-added =. Nonlinearity , number =
[21]

Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications , number =

Shuji Takahashi , date-added =. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications , number =
[22]

Lorenzo Brandolese , date-added =. Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana , month =
[23]

Eugene Wayne , date-added =

Thierry Gallay and C. Eugene Wayne , date-added =. Philosophical Transactions: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , number =
[24]

Lorenzo Brandolese , date-added =. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S\'er. I Math , pages =
[25]

ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations , month =

Lorenzo Brandolese and Yves Meyer , date-added =. ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations , month =
[26]

Funkcial

Tetsuro Miyakawa , date-added =. Funkcial. Ekvac. , month =
[27]

Cheng He and Zhouping Xin , date-added =. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A , pages =
[28]

Fabrice Planchon , date-added =. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. , number =
[29]

Hajer Bahouri and Jean-Yves Chemin and Rapha\"el Danchin , date-added =
[30]

Nonlinearity , pages =

Jean Duchon and Raoul Robert , date-added =. Nonlinearity , pages =
[31]

Shreve , date-added =

Ioannis Karatzas and Steven E. Shreve , date-added =
[32]

Constantin and W

P. Constantin and W. E. and E. Titi , date-added =. Commun. Math. Phys. , number =
[33]

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.11482 , title =

Weiquan Chen and Zhao Dong , date-added =. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.11482 , title =

doi arXiv
[34]

Alexis Vasseur , date-added =. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare, Anal. Non Lineaire , number =
[35]

Guermond and S

J.-L. Guermond and S. Prudhomme , date-added =. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Fluids , number =
[36]

Guermond and S

J.-L. Guermond and S. Prudhomme , date-added =. Phys. D , number =
[37]

Planchon , date-added =

F. Planchon , date-added =. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare, Anal. Non Lineaire , number =
[38]

Cannone , date-added =

M. Cannone , date-added =. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. , number =
[39]

Chemin and I

J.-Y. Chemin and I. Gallagher , date-added =. Ann. I. H. Poincar
[40]

Cannone and Y

M. Cannone and Y. Meyer and F. Planchon , date-added =. Solutions autosimilaires des\'equations de Navier-Stokes , year =
[41]

Bourgain and N

J. Bourgain and N. Pavlovi\'c , date-added =. Journal of Functional Analysis , number =
[42]

Giga , date-added =

Y. Giga , date-added =. J. Differential Equations , pages =
[43]

Koch and D

H. Koch and D. Tataru , date-added =. Adv. Math. , pages =
[44]

Cannone , date-added =

M. Cannone , date-added =
[45]

Chemin , date-added =

J.-Y. Chemin , date-added =. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , pages =
[46]

Fujita and T

H. Fujita and T. Kato , date-added =. I. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , pages =
[47]

Robinson and Jos

James C. Robinson and Jos
[48]

C. W. Oseen , date-added =
[49]

Sylvie Monniaux , date-added =. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S
[50]

Current developments in mathematics, 1996 (Cambridge, MA) , pages =

Yves Meyer , date-added =. Current developments in mathematics, 1996 (Cambridge, MA) , pages =

1996
[51]

Analysis , number =

Hideo Kozono and Hermann Sohr , date-added =. Analysis , number =
[52]

Manuscripta Math

Hermann Sohr and Wolf von Wahl , date-added =. Manuscripta Math. , number =
[53]

Tohoku Math

Kyuya Masuda , date-added =. Tohoku Math. J.(2) , number =
[54]

Heywood , date-added =

J. Heywood , date-added =. Tohoku Math. J. , pages =
[55]

G. P. Galdi and P. Maremonti , date-added =. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , pages =
[56]

Farwig and H

R. Farwig and H. Kozono and H. Sohr , date-added =. Acta Math. , pages =
[57]

O. A. Ladyzhenskaya , date-added =
[58]

Communications in Partial Differential Equations , number =

Ciprian Foias and Colette Guillop. Communications in Partial Differential Equations , number =
[59]

Peter Constantin and Ciprian Foias , date-added =
[60]

L. C. Berselli and S. Spirito , date-added =. Contemporary Mathematics , number =
[61]

L. C. Berselli and S. Spirito , date-added =. Commun. Contemp. Math. , number =
[62]

Lions , date-added =

P.-L. Lions , date-added =
[63]

Guermond , date-added =

J.-L. Guermond , date-added =. J. Math. Pures Appl. , pages =
[64]

H. J. Math. Pures Appl. , pages =
[65]

Biryuk and W

A. Biryuk and W. Craig and S. Ibrahim , date-added =. Contemporary Mathematics , pages =
[66]

Peter Constantin , date-added =. Commun. Math. Phys. , pages =
[67]

Weiquan Chen and Zhao Dong and Xiangchan Zhu , date-added =. SIAM J. Math Anal. , number =
[68]

Gatarek and B

D. Gatarek and B. Goldys , date-added =. Stochastic , pages =
[69]

Gatarek , date-added =

D. Gatarek , date-added =. Statist. and Probab. Lett. , pages =
[70]

These de Doctorat, Paris VI , title =

Viot , date-added =. These de Doctorat, Paris VI , title =
[71]

Quaderni Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, , title =

Mefivier , date-added =. Quaderni Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, , title =
[72]

R. V. Kohn , date-added =. Lecture Notes in Num. Appl. Anal. , pages =
[73]

Kukavica and Y

I. Kukavica and Y. Pei , date-added =. Nonlinearity , pages =
[74]

Kukavica , date-added =

I. Kukavica , date-added =. Nonlinearity , pages =
[75]

Kukavica , date-added =

I. Kukavica , date-added =
[76]

Vasseur , date-added =

A. Vasseur , date-added =. Nonlinear Diff. Equ. Appl. , pages =
[77]

O. A. Lady. J. Math. Fluid Mech. , pages =
[78]

Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , pages =

Fanghua Lin , date-added =. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , pages =
[79]

Caffarelli and R

L. Caffarelli and R. Kohn and L. Nirenberg , date-added =. Communicationson Pure and Applied Mathematics , pages =
[80]

Commun.Math

Vladimir Scheffer , date-added =. Commun.Math. Phys. , pages =
[81]

Vladimir Scheffer , date-added =. Commun. math. Phys. , pages =
[82]

Romito , date-added =

M. Romito , date-added =. Stochastics: An International Journal of Probability and Stochastics Processes , month =
[83]

Franco Flandoli and Marco Romito , date-added =. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , month =
[84]

doi:10.2140/apde.2020.13.371 , journal =

Dominic Breit and Eduard Feireisl and Martina Hofmanov. doi:10.2140/apde.2020.13.371 , journal =

2020 doi
[85]

Crisan and F

D. Crisan and F. Flandoli and D. D. Holm , date-added =. J. Nonlinear Sci. , number =
[86]

Mikulevicius and G

R. Mikulevicius and G. Valiukevicius , date-added =. Electron. J. Probab. , number =
[87]

J. U. Kim , date-added =. J. Funct. Anal. , number =
[88]

Brz\'ezniak and S

Z. Brz\'ezniak and S. Peszat , date-added =. Ann. Probab. , number =
[89]

Brz\'ezniak and F

Z. Brz\'ezniak and F. Flandoli and M. Maurelli , date-added =. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. , number =
[90]

Bessaih and F

H. Bessaih and F. Flandoli , date-added =. NoDEA Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl. , number =
[91]

Bessaih , date-added =

H. Bessaih , date-added =. Stochastic Anal. Appl. , number =
[92]

Chiodaroli and E

E. Chiodaroli and E. Feireisl and F. Flandoli , date-added =. arXiv:1904.07977 , title =

1904 arXiv
[93]

Gubinelli and E

Franco Flandoli and M. Gubinelli and E. Priola , date-added =. Invent. Math. , pages =
[94]

Franco Flandoli , date-added =
[95]

The Annals of Probability , month =

Nathan E. The Annals of Probability , month =
[96]

Stochastic Process

Michael R\"ockner and Rongchan Zhu and Xiangchan Zhu , date-added =. Stochastic Process. Appl. , number =
[97]

Probability Theory and Related Fields , month =

Franco Flandoli and Dejun Luo , date-added =. Probability Theory and Related Fields , month =
[98]

Giuseppe. J. Math. Pures Appl. , pages =
[99]

Dallas Albritton and Elia Bru. Ann. of Math. , month =. 2022 , Bdsk-File-1 =

2022
[100]

Tristan Buckmaster and Vlad Vicol , date-added =. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) , number =
[101]

Tristan Buckmaster and Maria Colombo and Vlad Vicol , date-added =. J. Eur. Math. Soc. , month =
[102]

Onsager's conjecture for admissible weak solutions , volume =

Tristan Buckmaster and Camillo. Onsager's conjecture for admissible weak solutions , volume =. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , number =
[103]

Camillo. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) , number =
[104]

Camillo. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. , number =
[105]

Camillo. Ann. of Math. (2) , number =
[106]

Philip Isett , date-added =. Ann. of Math. (2) , number =
[107]

arXiv:2105.12117v1 , month =

Alexey Cheskidov and Xiaoyutao Luo , date-added =. arXiv:2105.12117v1 , month =

arXiv
[108]

Wei Liu and Michael R\"ockner , date-added =
[109]

Non uniqueness of power-law flows , volume =

Jan Burczak and Stefano Modena and L\'aszl\'o Sz\'ekelyhidi. Non uniqueness of power-law flows , volume =. Communications in Mathematical Physics , pages =
[110]

Non-uniqueness and h-principle for H\"older-continuous weak solutions of Euler equations

Sara Daneri and L\'aszl\'o Sz\'ekelyhidi. Non-uniqueness and h-principle for H\"older-continuous weak solutions of Euler equations. , volume =. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. , number =
[111]

Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , month =

Martina Hofmanov. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , month =
[112]

Nirenberg , date-added =

L. Nirenberg , date-added =. Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa, Ser. 3 , pages =
[113]

Journal of Functional Analysis , pages =

Tosio Kato , date-added =. Journal of Functional Analysis , pages =
[114]

Gustavo Ponce , date-added =. Commun. Math. Phys. , pages =
[115]

J. T. Beale and T. Kato and A. Majda , date-added =. Commun. Math. Phys. , pages =
[116]

Tristan Buckmaster and Camillo De Lellis and Philip Isett and L\'aszl\'o Sz\'ekelyhidi. Ann. of Math. , number =
[117]

Stefano Modena and L\'aszl\'o Sz\'ekelyhidi. Ann. PDE , number =
[118]

HCDTE Lecture Notes

L\'aszl\'o Sz. HCDTE Lecture Notes. Part II. Nonlinear hyperbolic PDEs, dispersive and transport equations , pages =
[119]

Camillo. Invent. Math. , number =
[120]

John Nash , date-added =. Ann. of Math. (2) , pages =
[121]

2023 , Bdsk-Url-1 =

Martina Hofmanov. 2023 , Bdsk-Url-1 =. 2104.09889 , journal =

2023 arXiv
[122]

2023 , Bdsk-Url-1 =

Martina Hofmanov. 2023 , Bdsk-Url-1 =. 1912.11841 , journal =

2023 arXiv
[123]

Franco Flandoli and Dariusz Gatarek , date-added =. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields , pages =
[124]

doi:10.1007/s00440-007-0069-y , journal =

Franco Flandoli and Marco Romito , date-added =. doi:10.1007/s00440-007-0069-y , journal =

doi
[125]

Escauriaza and G

L. Escauriaza and G. A. Seregin and V. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk , number =
[126]

Lions and N

P.-L. Lions and N. Masmoudi , date-added =. Comm. Partial Differential Equations , number =
[127]

Lemari\'e-Rieusset and Elide Terraneo , date-added =

Giulia Furioli and Pierre G. Lemari\'e-Rieusset and Elide Terraneo , date-added =. Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana , number =
[128]

Tosio Kato , date-added =. Math. Z. , number =
[129]

E. B. Fabes and B. F. Jones and N. M. Rivi\`ere , date-added =. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. , pages =
[130]

O. A. Lady. Zap. Nau
[131]

Serrin , date-added =

J. Serrin , date-added =. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. , pages =
[132]

Prodi , date-added =

G. Prodi , date-added =. Ann. Mat. Pura ed Appl. , number =
[133]

Hopf , date-added =

E. Hopf , date-added =. Math. Nachr. , number =
[134]

2019 , Bdsk-Url-1 =

Tristan Buckmaster and Vlad Vicol , date-added =. 2019 , Bdsk-Url-1 =. 1901.09023 , journal =

2019 arXiv
[135]

Alexey Cheskidov and Xiaoyutao Luo , date-added =. Invent. Math. , month =. 2022 , Bdsk-Url-1 =

2022
[136]

Tristan Buckmaster and Vlad Vicol , date-modified =. Ann. of Math. (2) , number =
[137]

Leray , date-modified =

J. Leray , date-modified =. Acta Math , number =

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Yoshikazu Giga and Tsutomu Kambe , date-added =. Commun. Math. Phys. , pages =

[2] [2]

Eugene Wayne , date-added =

Thierry Gallay and C. Eugene Wayne , date-added =. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , pages =

[3] [3]

Yoshiko Fujigaki and Tetsuro Miyakawa , date-added =. SIAM J. Math Anal. , number =

[4] [4]

Ana Carpio , date-added =. SIAM J. Math Anal. , number =

[5] [5]

Cannone and C

M. Cannone and C. He and G. Karch , date-added =. Preprint , title =

[6] [6]

Russian Journal of Mathematical Physics , number =

Peter Topalov , date-added =. Russian Journal of Mathematical Physics , number =

[7] [7]

International Mathematics Research Notices , number =

Robert McOwen and Peter Topalov , date-added =. International Mathematics Research Notices , number =

[8] [8]

Lorenzo Brandolese , date-added =. Math. Ann. , pages =