Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Simulations of Incompressible MHD Turbulence

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0012491 v2 pith:EDWZLCC7 submitted 2000-12-23 astro-ph

classification astro-ph
keywords turbulencewavesperpfieldalfvenalongalphamagnetic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We simulate incompressible MHD turbulence in the presence of a strong background magnetic field. Our major conclusions are: 1) MHD turbulence is most conveniently described in terms of counter propagating shear Alfven and slow waves. Shear Alfven waves control the cascade dynamics. Slow waves play a passive role and adopt the spectrum set by the shear Alfven waves, as does a passive scalar. 2) MHD turbulence is anisotropic with energy cascading more rapidly along k_perp than along k_parallel, where k_perp and k_parallel refer to wavevector components perpendicular and parallel to the local magnetic field. Anisotropy increases with increasing k_perp. 3) MHD turbulence is generically strong in the sense that the waves which comprise it suffer order unity distortions on timescales comparable to their periods. Nevertheless, turbulent fluctuations are small deep inside the inertial range compared to the background field. 4) Decaying MHD turbulence is unstable to an increase of the imbalance between the flux of waves propagating in opposite directions along the magnetic field. 5) Items 1-4 lend support to the model of strong MHD turbulence by Goldreich & Sridhar (GS). Results from our simulations are also consistent with the GS prediction gamma=2/3. The sole notable discrepancy is that 1D power law spectra, E(k_perp) ~ k_perp^{-alpha}, determined from our simulations exhibit alpha ~ 3/2, whereas the GS model predicts alpha = 5/3.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Sub-sonic compressible magnetohydrodynamic turbulence I. Alfv\'enic and fast-magnetosonic injection, amplitude dependence, and compressibility effects

    physics.plasm-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In decaying sub-sonic MHD turbulence simulations, the amplitude and plasma beta, not the injection wave type, set the turbulent density fluctuation level, while curvature and mirror statistics change dramatically with...

  2. Intermittent, Reflection-Driven, Strong Imbalanced MHD Turbulence

    physics.plasm-ph 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new phenomenological model predicts structure-function, spectrum, and parallel-length scalings for intermittent, reflection-driven imbalanced MHD turbulence, matching Parker Solar Probe data.

Pith tools