Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 123 references

Nucleation beyond Equilibrium: Fronts Control Invasion in Bistable Ecosystems

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper derives a nucleation theory for bistable reaction-diffusion systems with vector, non-conserved order parameters that holds out of equilibrium, showing that classical nucleation formulas survive once free-energy differences and…

desk verdict A substantial extension of CNT to vector non-conserved fields via front speed and diffusivity; the spectral-gap assumption and fitted offsets are the main reservations, but the core result is credible and worth refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05251 v1 pith:EFDFHK5B submitted 2026-08-05 cond-mat.stat-mech physics.bio-ph

Victor Lequin , Giulio Biroli , Camille Scalliet This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mechphysics.bio-ph MSC 35K5760H1582C3192D25 PACS 05.40.-a64.60.Q87.23.Cc
keywords nucleationbistabilitynon-equilibriumLotka-Volterrareaction-diffusionfrontsquasipotentialclassicaltheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to answer a question no general theory has answered: how does a fluctuation-driven droplet of one stable state invade another in a bistable system whose dynamics violate detailed balance and whose order parameter is a vector of coupled abundances? It derives, from the stochastic reaction-diffusion dynamics, the quasipotential governing nucleation in two limits, near the binodal where invasion proceeds by fronts, and near the spinodal where the metastable state is about to lose stability. The central claim is that the mathematical structure of Classical Nucleation Theory survives: the front speed $c$ takes the role of the bulk free-energy difference $\Delta\phi$, the front's curvature response $D$ takes the role of the surface tension $\gamma$, and the front mobility $g$ enters the activation barrier. The payoff is a concrete prediction for the two-species Lotka-Volterra model: at fixed competitive advantage, stronger interspecific competition makes invasion exponentially harder, because fronts develop a depletion region invisible to scalar descriptions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the flat front $u_{\mathrm{fr}}$ together with its linearization $\mathcal{L} = D\partial_x^2 + J(u_{\mathrm{fr}})$ about that front. Translational invariance makes $\mathcal{L}$ singular, with a zero mode $-\partial_x u_{\mathrm{fr}}$; the paper fixes the front's frame of reference by imposing the solvability condition $\langle \delta u_0, \delta u \rangle = 0$ with $\delta u_0$ in the kernel of the adjoint $\mathcal{L}^\dagger$. Projecting the perturbed field equation onto $\delta u_0$ eliminates the internal deformation $\delta u$ and yields the effective interface equation, with $c$ coming from the integrated driving force, $D$ from curvature coupling, and $g$ from the noise overlap. This projection is the step that transfers the vectorial, non-equilibrium structure of the field into three scalar coefficients, and it is the step that reduces nucleation to a one-dimensional barrier crossing.

What would settle it

Numerically diagonalize the linearized front operator $\mathcal{L}$ around a flat front in a vector reaction-diffusion system with a non-gradient reaction term; if the gap $\Lambda_2 - \Lambda_1$ between the translational mode and the next eigenmode closes as parameters approach the spinodal or strong competition, the front is not gapped and the solvability projection that yields $c_{\mathrm{tot}} = c - D\kappa + \sqrt{2Tg}\,\xi$ breaks down.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes a dictionary between equilibrium and non-equilibrium nucleation. For a general class of stochastic reaction-diffusion systems with a non-conserved vector order parameter, it shows that a flat front between the two stable states is coarse-grained into an effective interface whose motion is $c_{\mathrm{tot}} = c - D\kappa + \sqrt{2Tg}\,\xi$, where $c$ is the flat-front speed, $D$ its response to curvature, and $g$ the noise mobility. Coarse-graining the droplet radius onto a one-dimensional Langevin equation restores detailed balance for the collective variable $R$, so the invasion probability obeys Arrhenius' law with quasipotential $U(R) = \frac{S_d}{g} R^{d-1}\left(D - \frac{c}{d} R\right)$, critical radius $R_c = (d-1)D/c$, and barrier $U_c = \frac{(d-1)^{d-1} S_d D^d}{d\, g\, c^{d-1}}$. Close to the spinodal, the same large-deviation calculation yields a universal nucleus shape controlled by a single eigenvector of the Jacobian and a barrier scaling as $\epsilon^{(d_c-d)/2}$ with $d_c = 6$ for cubic nonlinearities. Applied to the Lotka-Volterra competition model, the theory predicts that fronts carry a depletion region whose width and depth set the front speed and mobility, and that in two dimensions the invasion probability from a small inoculum scales as $\ln p \propto -(a+b-2)/(a-b)$.

Load-bearing premise

The whole binodal calculation assumes that a vector bistable system has a unique front that is linearly stable and gapped, meaning the translational zero mode is isolated from the rest of the relaxation spectrum; the paper states this is taken for granted, as in the scalar case, and supports it only by numerical simulation of one model.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Invasion probability from an inoculum of radius $R_0$ is $p(R_0) \propto \exp[-(U_c - U(R_0))/T]$, so the critical radius and barrier are computable from three front measurements: speed, curvature response, and mobility.
  • Near the spinodal, the critical nucleus aligns with the soft eigenvector of the Jacobian and the nucleation barrier vanishes with the universal scaling $\epsilon^{(d_c-d)/2}$, with $d_c = 6$ for cubic terms.
  • In the Lotka-Volterra model, the front develops a depletion region where $u+v$ falls below carrying capacity; at fixed competitive advantage $a-b$, stronger competition (larger $a+b$) slows fronts, enlarges the critical radius, and suppresses invasion exponentially.
  • Confinement reduces the critical nucleus to an elongated two-arc shape when domain size drops below twice the unconfined critical diameter, with a sharp limiting size $L_{\mathrm{lim}}$ below which nucleation is homogeneous.
  • The theory reduces exactly to classical nucleation theory at equilibrium, recovering the energy barrier $E(R) = S_d R^{d-1}\left(\gamma - \Delta\phi\, R/d\right)$ from the front dictionary.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the droplet-radius Langevin equation always satisfies one-dimensional detailed balance, the restored time-reversal symmetry is an artifact of coarse-graining the single collective variable; the MAP and relaxation path may still differ in the internal front profile $\delta u$, which could be probed experimentally by tracking the abundance dip during a nucleation event.
  • The same front-based dictionary suggests a testable microscopic route to negative effective 'surface tension' $D$ in active or non-reciprocal systems: if the front's curvature response changes sign, stable nuclei rather than unstable critical droplets form, a hallmark recently discussed in conserved active systems and now predicted for non-conserved vector fields.
  • The prediction $\ln p \propto -(a+b-2)/(a-b)$ is directly testable in engineered killer-yeast communities by raising toxin production of both strains symmetrically, which the paper identifies as increasing $a+b$ at fixed $a-b$; measuring invasion probability as a function of $a+b$ would confirm or falsify the exponential suppression.
  • The spinodal universality, derived via an effective single-eigenvector reduction, should also appear in the statistics of extinction times in well-mixed metacommunities near the loss of stability, a regime where demographic noise cannot create individuals from zero abundance.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a nucleation theory for stochastic reaction-diffusion systems with a non-conserved vector order parameter, without detailed balance. Near the binodal, the authors coarse-grain the field dynamics onto a stochastic interface equation for front motion, Eq. (34), and derive a quasipotential U(R) = (S_d/g) R^{d-1}(D - cR/d) whose structure mirrors classical nucleation theory: the front speed c plays the role of the free-energy difference and the diffusivity D that of the surface tension. Near the spinodal, they reduce the escape problem to one soft eigenmode and obtain a universal scaling U_c ~ ε^{(6-d)/2}. The theory is tested against shrinking-dimer and GMAM computations of the quasipotential in the two-species Lotka-Volterra competition model, and is used to obtain the ecological prediction ln p(R0) ~ -(a+b-2)/(a-b) for the invasion probability of a small inoculum in two dimensions.

Significance. If the results hold, this is an important extension of nucleation theory to non-equilibrium, multi-component systems, with a concrete and testable ecological prediction. The paper is also notable for what it does not hide: the central singular-perturbation derivation is presented in detail, the numerical methods are extensive and the code is promised to be available, and the recovery of classical CNT from the general formulas in Sec. IV A 4 is a genuine check of internal consistency. The spinodal calculation is parameter-free and agrees with numerical quasipotentials over a wide range, which is a substantive strength. The main limitations are the unproven spectral-gap assumption for vectorial fronts, the fitted additive constant in the binodal quasipotential, and the unproven claim that the spinodal action is exactly the leading-order quasipotential rather than an upper bound. These issues do not invalidate the central idea but they do mean that the paper's strongest claims are not yet established with full rigour.

major comments (3)
  1. [IV A 1 and IV A 2] The derivation of the reduced interface equation (34) and hence of the quasipotential (45) relies on the operator L_b having an isolated zero eigenvalue with a spectral gap. In Sec. IV A 1 the authors explicitly state that uniqueness, linear stability and the gap are 'taken for granted' and supported only by numerical simulation of the Lotka-Volterra model; the sole spectral evidence presented is the binodal example a=b=2 in Fig. 9. This does not cover the parameter regimes used for the headline prediction, in particular the near-neutral limit a,b→1, where the front width diverges as (a+b-2)^{-1/2} (Eq. B4) and the gap presumably closes as 1/w^2, and the strong-competition limit where the front develops a two-scale structure (A varying on scale √D, ξ on scale √(D/(a+b))). If the gap closes or additional soft modes appear, the projection onto the single zero mode is not the correct reduced dynamics, and Eqs. (34), (45) and (90) do not follow. The authors should either provide a proof or a systematic numerical verification of the gap and of the absence of other near-zero modes across the (a,b) range used, or restrict the claimed domain of validity.
  2. [IV C 1 and VII B 1] The binodal quasipotential comparison in Fig. 16 uses Eq. (72), U_c = K/ε^{d-1} + U, with K computed from the front profile independently of the GMAM data, but the constant U is fitted to the GMAM data (U = -0.60), and the demographic-noise offset U'(R0) in Eq. (88) is also fitted. The paper explicitly acknowledges in Sec. IV C 1 that the front-creation contribution has not been computed analytically. Thus the numerical validation establishes the predicted ε-dependence with an adjustable additive constant, not the absolute value of the nucleation barrier. For Eq. (90), the exponent is set by the parameter-free coefficient Λ, so the exponential suppression with (a+b-2)/(a-b) is on solid ground, but the absolute invasion probability retains a fitted offset per noise model and inoculum radius. The text should state precisely which predictions are parameter-free and which require the fitted U or U'(R0); ideally the additive constant should be derived or at least bounded.
  3. [IV B 3] The derivation of the spinodal quasipotential (70) claims that restricting the action to trial paths u = u*_+ + δu_1 e_1 gives the leading-order exact value of the quasipotential, 'not an upper bound', because excursions along stiff directions yield sub-leading contributions. However, no estimate of these contributions is provided, and the non-equilibrium nature of the dynamics means that the minimizer of the Freidlin-Wentzell action could in principle mix modes and produce a lower action than the single-mode path. The numerical agreement in Fig. 16 is encouraging, but the analytical claim is stronger than what is proved. The authors should either supply the action estimate for the transverse modes or soften the statement to a variational upper bound that is numerically observed to be tight.
minor comments (4)
  1. [IV A 4] There is a typo: 'equilbrium' should be 'equilibrium' in the sentence 'Since the front dynamics are the same for equilbrium and non-equilibrium field dynamics'.
  2. [IV B 3] The symbol T is used both for the noise amplitude (Section II) and for the rescaled time in Eq. (65) and the surrounding text; this overloaded notation is confusing and should be changed, for instance to τ.
  3. [VI C] The front width w is defined in words as the distance between the positions where v_fr = 0.9 and u_fr = 0.9; a concise formula or a clear reference point (e.g., the center x=0) would improve reproducibility.
  4. [IX] The data availability statement contains a placeholder URL (https://zenodo.org/XXX); a working link should be provided before publication.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the front-based nucleation mapping is derived from the model and tested against independent GMAM quasipotential computations; the few fitted additive offsets are disclosed and do not determine the predicted scalings.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is self-contained. In Sec. IV A the paper linearizes Eq. (1) around a flat front, imposes the solvability condition Eq. (33), and obtains the effective front speed Eq. (34) with c and g defined by Eqs. (35)-(36). The quasipotential Eq. (45) follows from the resulting one-dimensional Langevin dynamics Eq. (40), and the critical-nucleus barrier Eq. (47) is then an algebraic consequence. None of these steps defines the target quasipotential U_c in terms of itself: the coefficients are computed from the model's front profiles and linearized operator, not from the GMAM nucleation data. The paper states this explicitly for the Langevin comparison: 'The constant K for Langevin noise, denoted K l, is calculated using Eqs. (35), (47) and (80) using the profile of the front found numerically but independently of the data from the GMAM algorithm.' The same holds for the demographic-noise coefficient K_d used in the headline invasion scaling Eq. (90), whose dimensionless prefactor Lambda is obtained analytically in Appendix B. The constants U and U' in Eqs. (72) and (88) are fitted to the GMAM points, as the paper discloses ('The constant U is fitted using the points from the GMAM calculations close to the binodal'), so the absolute offset in the barrier is not predicted; however, an additive offset cannot force the predicted 1/epsilon and 1/(a-b) dependence against which the GMAM data are compared, so this is a disclosed limitation rather than a circular reduction. Self-citations in the paper (e.g., Refs. [1] and [103]) are contextual and are never used as the load-bearing justification for the nucleation theory. The assumption that vectorial fronts are unique, linearly stable and gapped is an unproved spectral premise supported by direct numerics, and is a correctness risk if the gap closes, but it is not a circularity because it is not imported from the authors' own prior results. The spinodal calculation invokes the external theorem of Muratov and Vanden-Eijnden, and the numerical GMAM benchmarks provide an independent check. Overall, the derivation does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The main theoretical input from prior literature is the Freidlin-Wentzell action and classical front perturbation theory. The paper's own assumptions are the gapped-front property and a one-mode spinodal ansatz; two fitted offset constants enter the numerical comparison. No new particles, forces or fields are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • U (binodal front-creation offset) = -0.60 for (a+b)/2=1.75, Langevin noise
    Offset in the quasipotential accounting for creation of fronts; fitted to GMAM data close to the binodal, not derived analytically (Sec. VII B 1, Eq. 72).
  • U'(R0) (demographic noise offset) = -23 for R0=10 sqrt(D)
    Offset in the quasipotential for demographic noise, fitted to GMAM data (Sec. VII C, Eq. 88).
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Vector fronts exist, are unique, linearly stable and gapped, with an isolated translational zero mode
    Invoked in Sec. IV A 1 ('existence ... taken for granted', 'We assume ... unique, linearly stable and gapped'); load-bearing for the solvability condition and the effective interface equation Eq. (34).
  • domain assumption Near the spinodal the critical nucleus is controlled by a single soft eigenvector of the Jacobian, with amplitudes scaling as delta u1 = epsilon U1 and delta ui = epsilon^2 Ui, and generic cubic nonlinearity
    Sec. IV B 2; relies on Muratov's theorem for d < 6 and the genericity condition partial^2_11 f_{psp,1} != 0.
  • standard math Weak noise limit T to 0 so the Freidlin-Wentzell action gives the leading exponential and Ito/Stratonovich conventions coincide
    Sec. II A 1 and III B; standard large-deviation framework for stochastic differential equations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nucleation beyond Equilibrium: Fronts Control Invasion in Bistable Ecosystems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EFDFHK5B

@misc{pith2026260805251,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nucleation beyond Equilibrium: Fronts Control Invasion in Bistable Ecosystems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EFDFHK5B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05251}
}
read the original abstract

Bistability, the existence of two alternative stable states with distinct basins of attraction, is common across ecology and many other biological, chemical, and physical systems. In spatially extended systems, the invasion of one state by the other proceeds through nucleation, the fluctuation-driven growth of a droplet beyond a critical size. Classical Nucleation Theory (CNT) quantifies this process using the energy landscape, but this description relies on detailed balance, the condition of microscopic reversibility that holds at equilibrium. Ecological dynamics generally violate detailed balance and are described not by a single scalar field but by several coupled, non-conserved abundances--a vector order parameter--for which no general nucleation theory exists. Here we derive such a theory for reaction-diffusion systems with a non-conserved vector order parameter, valid both close to the binodal, where invasion proceeds through propagating fronts, and close to the spinodal, where the metastable state loses stability. Extensive numerical computations of the quasipotential confirm the theory in both regimes. We show that the mathematical structure of CNT survives out of equilibrium, once energetic quantities are replaced by dynamical properties of fronts: the front speed plays the role of the bulk free-energy difference between phases, and the diffusivity that of the surface tension. Applied to the two-species Lotka-Volterra model, an archetypal system of bistable ecological antagonism, our theory shows that strong interspecific competition generates a pronounced depletion region within fronts, where the total abundance falls well below carrying capacity. This vectorial structure, invisible to a scalar description based on species frequency alone, makes invasion exponentially harder as competition strengthens at fixed competitive advantage--a prediction testable in microbial systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.05251 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Nucleation in equilibrium and non-equilibrium systems. Microscopic models, whether equilibrium (blue), like the Ising [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Illustration of Freidlin–Wentzell theory. (a) Deter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Nucleating droplet in the Lotka–Volterra model. An [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (14 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Flow of the droplet radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The critical nucleus has a circular shape (dashed). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Numerical procedure to calculate the quasipotential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Principle of the shrinking dimer algorithm. (a) Origi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) Long-time behavior of the well-mixed Lotka–Volterra model as a function of inter-species interactions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Front in the LV system on the binodal ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Shape of the fronts joining the two stable states [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Front width [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Susceptibility [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Critical nuclei in the Lotka–Volterra model found [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Effect of confinement on the shape of the critical nu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Quasipotential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_16.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. (a) Mobility [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_18.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: (b), for which we find Λ = 14π(9−2 √ 3) 3 225(3+√ 3) ≈ 7.0 (ap￾pendix B). This holds for any initial radius much smaller than the critical radius but larger than the front width w, as is the case for the choice R0 = 10√ D used in our simulations. Thus, at fixed compet…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

123 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    V to obtain the critical nucleus as a function of interaction parametersaandbin the Lotka–Volterra model

    Critical Nuclei in Infinite Space We use the numerical methods presented in Sec. V to obtain the critical nucleus as a function of interaction parametersaandbin the Lotka–Volterra model. We show the resulting critical nuclei in Fig. 14, for parame- 22 FIG. 14. Critical nuclei in the Lotka–Volterra model found using the shrinking dimer algorithm and regime...

  2. [2]

    So far, we have increased the numerical domain size to ensure that it remains larger than the critical nucleus (as in Fig

    Effects Of confinement We have shown that the critical nucleus grows very large close to the binodala=b. So far, we have increased the numerical domain size to ensure that it remains larger than the critical nucleus (as in Fig. 14). However, exper- iments are often confined to a finite, fixed domain [96]. What happens when the parameters are such that the...

  3. [3]

    (20) gives only the leading exponential scaling of the nucleation probability in the weak-noise limit

    Prefactor to the Nucleation Probability Eq. (20) gives only the leading exponential scaling of the nucleation probability in the weak-noise limit. The prefactor can also be computed in the weak-noise limit, in close analogy with the Eyring–Kramers prefactor, al- though an additional contribution appears because the steady-state distribution is not Boltzma...

  4. [4]

    Generalizations The approach we developed here applied beyond the specific model of Eq. (1). Close to the binodal, the es- sential requirement for our coarse-graining procedure to hold is the existence of a stable, gapped front. One may also include different diffusion coefficients for each order- parameter component, encoded by a diffusivity matrix Dij∆u...

  5. [5]

    We choose 1 2 (a+b) = 1.75 as a rep- resentative regime where neither the neutral or strong competition approximations apply

    Agreement Between Theory and Numerical Calculations Starting with a fixed value of 1 2 (a+b), we varya−b and numerically compute the value ofU c using the GMAM algorithm. We choose 1 2 (a+b) = 1.75 as a rep- resentative regime where neither the neutral or strong competition approximations apply. The numerical re- sults are shown in Figure 16, together wit...

  6. [6]

    The coefficientK l governing the nucleation rate, see Eq

    Ecological Discussion We now vary the competition strength 1 2 (a+b) along the binodal. The coefficientK l governing the nucleation rate, see Eq. (72), is a joint function of the susceptibil- ity and of the mobility for Langevin noiseg l, which in dimension two reads Kl =π D2 glχ . (86) The mobility for Langevin noise,g l, is plotted as a function of 1 2 ...

  7. [7]

    This holds for any initial radius much smaller than the critical radius but larger than the front width w, as is the case for the choiceR 0 = 10 √ Dused in our simulations

    ≈7.0 (ap- pendix B). This holds for any initial radius much smaller than the critical radius but larger than the front width w, as is the case for the choiceR 0 = 10 √ Dused in our simulations. Thus, at fixed competitive advantagea−b, increasing the overall competition strengtha+bmakes invasionexponentiallyless likely. The magnitude of the effect is set b...

  8. [8]

    F ronts Simulations of Eq. (1) were performed using an explicit Euler finite differences scheme with Neumann boundary conditions and a symmetric three-point stencil for the laplacian operator, usingN= 2048 spatial nodes and a time step of dt= 10 −4. The spatial length of the sim- ulation window was chosen much greater than the front width, as low asL= 40 ...

Show all 123 references
  1. [9]

    The fieldVin the SDA evolves with a timescale thrice as fast asu, which empiri- cally ensures good performance of the algorithm

    Critical Nucleus We use an explicit Euler scheme to implement the shrinking dimer algorithm. The fieldVin the SDA evolves with a timescale thrice as fast asu, which empiri- cally ensures good performance of the algorithm. Except for Figure 15, we use a square domain with sizeL...

  2. [10]

    For most simulations,N= 512, especially close to the binodal where the critical nucleus is large, as explained in Sec

    Quasipotential Each image was simulated with periodic boundary con- ditions and a semi-implicit pseudo-spectral method on a square lattice of sizeN 2. For most simulations,N= 512, especially close to the binodal where the critical nucleus is large, as explained in Sec. V C. Fo...

  3. [11]

    Neutral Limit Asa, b→1, Eq. (B1) simplifies to the equation for Fisher fronts −c dA dx =D d2A dx2 +A(1−A) (B3) with boundary conditionsA(x→ ±∞) = 1 and under the constraintA(x)⩾0, which only has the solution A(x) = 1. Then, Eq. (B2) can be solved by [56] ξ(x) = tanh x w , w= r...

  4. [12]

    Shape of Fronts Whena=b→+∞, it may be seen self-consistently thatξvaries on much smaller scales thanA

    Strong Competition Limit a. Shape of Fronts Whena=b→+∞, it may be seen self-consistently thatξvaries on much smaller scales thanA. In fact,ξ varies on scalesO p D/(a+b−2) as above. There- fore, in Eq. (B1),ξ 2(x)≈ξ 2(±∞)≈1 almost every- where, except in a thin region aroundx= ...

  5. [13]

    V. Ros, F. Roy, G. Biroli, G. Bunin, and A. M. Turner, Generalized Lotka-Volterra Equations with Random, Nonreciprocal Interactions: The Typical Number of Equilibria, Physical Review Letters130, 257401 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Lopes, D

    W. Lopes, D. R. Amor, and J. Gore, Cooperative growth in microbial communities is a driver of multistability, Nature Communications15, 4709 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    J. E. Ferrell, Self-perpetuating states in signal trans- duction: positive feedback, double-negative feedback and bistability, Current Opinion in Cell Biology14, 140 (2002)

    2002

  8. [16]

    C. Tan, P. Marguet, and L. You, Emergent bistability by a growth-modulating positive feedback circuit, Nature Chemical Biology5, 842 (2009)

    2009

  9. [17]

    B. M. Pettit Estell and M. Schuster, Population-level bistability inPseudomonas aeruginosaquorum sensing, mBio16, e01713 (2025)

    2025

  10. [18]

    Russew and S

    M. Russew and S. Hecht, Photoswitches: From Molecules to Materials, Advanced Materials22, 3348 (2010)

    2010

  11. [19]

    Wilhelm, The smallest chemical reaction system with bistability, BMC Systems Biology3, 90 (2009)

    T. Wilhelm, The smallest chemical reaction system with bistability, BMC Systems Biology3, 90 (2009)

    2009

  12. [20]

    Coleman,Aspects of Symmetry: Selected Erice Lec- tures, 1st ed

    S. Coleman,Aspects of Symmetry: Selected Erice Lec- tures, 1st ed. (Cambridge University Press, 1985)

    1985

  13. [21]

    P. G. Debenedetti,Metastable Liquids: Concepts and Principles(Princeton University Press, 2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Clark Di Leoni, A

    P. Clark Di Leoni, A. Alexakis, L. Biferale, and M. Buzzicotti, Phase transitions and flux-loop metastable states in rotating turbulence, Physical Re- view Fluids5, 104603 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    S. Strogatz,Nonlinear dynamics and chaos: with appli- cations to physics, biology, chemistry, and engineering, second edition, first issued in hardback ed., A Chap- man & Hall book (CRC Press, Boca Raton London New York, 2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    J. A. Kuznecov,Elements of applied bifurcation theory, fourth edition ed., Applied mathematical sciences No. volume 112 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    McNally, E

    L. McNally, E. Bernardy, J. Thomas, A. Kalziqi, J. Pentz, S. P. Brown, B. K. Hammer, P. J. Yunker, and W. C. Ratcliff, Killing by Type VI secretion drives genetic phase separation and correlates with increased cooperation, Nature Communications8, 14371 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    Giometto, D

    A. Giometto, D. R. Nelson, and A. W. Murray, An- tagonism between killer yeast strains as an experimen- tal model for biological nucleation dynamics, eLife10, e62932 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    Lewis and P

    M. Lewis and P. Kareiva, Allee Dynamics and the Spread of Invading Organisms, Theoretical Population Biology43, 141 (1993)

    1993

  20. [28]

    J. D. Murray,Mathematical Biology(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1989)

    1989

  21. [29]

    M. C. Cross and P. C. Hohenberg, Pattern formation outside of equilibrium, Reviews of Modern Physics65, 851 (1993)

    1993

  22. [30]

    Vansaarloos, Front propagation into unstable states, Physics Reports386, 29 (2003)

    W. Vansaarloos, Front propagation into unstable states, Physics Reports386, 29 (2003)

    2003

  23. [31]

    Engen, O

    S. Engen, O. Bakke, and A. Islam, Demographic and Environmental Stochasticity-Concepts and Definitions, Biometrics54, 840 (1998)

    1998

  24. [32]

    J. W. Cahn and J. E. Hilliard, Free Energy of a Nonuni- form System. III. Nucleation in a Two-Component In- compressible Fluid, The Journal of Chemical Physics 31, 688 (1959)

    1959

  25. [33]

    Langer, Theory of the condensation point, Annals of Physics41, 108 (1967)

    J. Langer, Theory of the condensation point, Annals of Physics41, 108 (1967)

    1967

  26. [34]

    Langer, Statistical theory of the decay of metastable states, Annals of Physics54, 258 (1969)

    J. Langer, Statistical theory of the decay of metastable states, Annals of Physics54, 258 (1969)

    1969

  27. [35]

    Cates and C

    M. Cates and C. Nardini, Classical Nucleation Theory for Active Fluid Phase Separation, Physical Review Let- ters130, 098203 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    Zakine, E

    R. Zakine, E. Simonnet, and E. Vanden-Eijnden, Unveil- ing the Phase Diagram and Reaction Paths of the Ac- tive Model B with the Deep Minimum Action Method, Physical Review Letters133, 038301 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    M. O. Lavrentovich and D. R. Nelson, Asymmetric Mu- tualism in Two- and Three-Dimensional Range Expan- sions, Physical Review Letters112, 138102 (2014)

    2014

  30. [38]

    Tanaka, H

    H. Tanaka, H. A. Stone, and D. R. Nelson, Spatial gene drives and pushed genetic waves, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences114, 8452 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    M. O. Lavrentovich and D. R. Nelson, Nucleation of antagonistic organisms and cellular competitions on curved, inflating substrates, Physical Review E100, 042406 (2019)

    2019

  32. [40]

    D. W. Oxtoby, Homogeneous nucleation: theory and experiment, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter4, 7627 (1992)

    1992

  33. [41]

    P. G. Debenedetti,Metastable Liquids : Concepts and Principles, Physical Chemistry: Science and Engineer- ing (Princeton University Press, New Jersey :, 2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    Karthika, T

    S. Karthika, T. K. Radhakrishnan, and P. Kalaichelvi, A Review of Classical and Nonclassical Nucleation The- ories, Crystal Growth & Design16, 6663 (2016)

    2016

  35. [43]

    Chatzittofi, N

    M. Chatzittofi, N. Ziethen, C. Nardini, and M. E. Cates, Nonequilibrium nucleation theory for noncon- served fields: from active matter to population dynam- ics (2026), arXiv:2606.18911

    2026 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Ziethen, M

    N. Ziethen, M. Chatzittofi, M. E. Cates, and C. Nar- dini, Nucleation and time-reversal symmetry break- ing in nonconserved scalar field theories (2026), arXiv:2607.05194

    2026 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Pomeau, Front motion, metastability and subcriti- cal bifurcations in hydrodynamics, Physica D: Nonlin- ear Phenomena23, 3 (1986)

    Y. Pomeau, Front motion, metastability and subcriti- cal bifurcations in hydrodynamics, Physica D: Nonlin- ear Phenomena23, 3 (1986)

    1986

  38. [46]

    C. W. Gardiner,Handbook of stochastic methods: for physics, chemistry and the natural sciences, Springer series in synergetics No. 13 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 32 1983)

    1983

  39. [47]

    N. S. Goel, S. C. Maitra, and E. W. Montroll, On the Volterra and Other Nonlinear Models of Interact- ing Populations, Reviews of Modern Physics43, 231 (1971)

    1971

  40. [48]

    M. E. Hibbing, C. Fuqua, M. R. Parsek, and S. B. Pe- terson, Bacterial competition: surviving and thriving in the microbial jungle, Nature reviews microbiology8, 15 (2010)

    2010

  41. [49]

    A. D. Dean, M. J. Horsburgh, and B. Vasiev, Toxin- mediated competition in weakly motile bacteria, Jour- nal of Theoretical Biology480, 205 (2019)

    2019

  42. [50]

    M. I. Freidlin and A. D. Wentzell,Random Perturba- tions of Dynamical Systems, Grundlehren der math- ematischen Wissenschaften, Vol. 260 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012)

    2012

  43. [51]

    P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin, Theory of dynamic critical phenomena, Reviews of Modern Physics49, 435 (1977)

    1977

  44. [52]

    P. W. Bates and P. C. Fife, The Dynamics of Nucle- ation for the Cahn–Hilliard Equation, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics53, 990 (1993)

    1993

  45. [53]

    C. B. Muratov and X. Zhong, Threshold phenomena for symmetric decreasing solutions of reaction-diffusion equations, Nonlinear Differential Equations and Appli- cations NoDEA20, 1519 (2013)

    2013

  46. [54]

    C. B. Muratov and X. Zhong, Threshold phenomena for symmetric-decreasing radial solutions of reaction- diffusion equations, Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems37, 915 (2017)

    2017

  47. [55]

    Bouchet and J

    F. Bouchet and J. Reygner, Generalisation of the Eyring–Kramers Transition Rate Formula to Irre- versible Diffusion Processes, Annales Henri Poincar´ e17, 3499 (2016)

    2016

  48. [56]

    A. J. Bray, Theory of phase-ordering kinetics, Advances in Physics51, 481 (2002)

    2002

  49. [57]

    J. W. Cahn and J. E. Hilliard, Free Energy of a Nonuni- form System. I. Interfacial Free Energy, The Journal of Chemical Physics28, 258 (1958)

    1958

  50. [58]

    J. D. Gunton, Homogeneous Nucleation, Journal of Sta- tistical Physics95, 903 (1999)

    1999

  51. [59]

    J. F. Lutsko, How crystals form: A theory of nucleation pathways, Science Advances5, eaav7399 (2019)

    2019

  52. [60]

    Y. Wu, T. Philippe, A. Graini, and J. Lam, Nonclas- sical Nucleation Pathways in Liquid Condensation Re- vealed by Simulation and Theory, Physical Review Let- ters136, 017101 (2026)

    2026

  53. [61]

    Unger and W

    C. Unger and W. Klein, Nucleation theory near the clas- sical spinodal, Physical Review B29, 2698 (1984)

    1984

  54. [62]

    C. B. Muratov and E. Vanden-Eijnden, Breakup of Uni- versality in the Generalized Spinodal Nucleation The- ory, Journal of Statistical Physics114, 605 (2004)

    2004

  55. [63]

    Touchette, The large deviation approach to statisti- cal mechanics, Physics Reports478, 1 (2009)

    H. Touchette, The large deviation approach to statisti- cal mechanics, Physics Reports478, 1 (2009)

    2009

  56. [64]

    M. I. Dykman, E. Mori, J. Ross, and P. M. Hunt, Large fluctuations and optimal paths in chemical kinetics, The Journal of Chemical Physics100, 5735 (1994)

    1994

  57. [65]

    Elgart and A

    V. Elgart and A. Kamenev, Rare event statistics in reaction-diffusion systems, Physical Review E70, 041106 (2004)

    2004

  58. [66]

    Our convention ensures thatU u∗ coincides withE for equilibrium dynamics close tou ∗

    In the mathematical literature, the Freidlin–Wentzell action is often defined with a factor 1/2 rather than 1/4. Our convention ensures thatU u∗ coincides withE for equilibrium dynamics close tou ∗

  59. [67]

    H¨ anggi, P

    P. H¨ anggi, P. Talkner, and M. Borkovec, Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after kramers, Rev. Mod. Phys.62, 251 (1990)

    1990

  60. [68]

    McKean, Nagumo’s equation, Advances in Mathe- matics4, 209 (1970)

    H. McKean, Nagumo’s equation, Advances in Mathe- matics4, 209 (1970)

    1970

  61. [69]

    P. C. Fife, Asymptotic analysis of reaction–diffusion wave fronts, The Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathe- matics7, 389 (1977)

    1977

  62. [70]

    M. M. Tang and P. C. Fife, Propagating fronts for com- peting species equations with diffusion, Archive for Ra- tional Mechanics and Analysis73, 69 (1980)

    1980

  63. [71]

    R. A. Gardner, Existence and Stability of Travelling Wave Solutions of Competition Models: A Degree The- oretic Approach, Journal of Differential Equations , 343 (1982)

    1982

  64. [72]

    Hosono and M

    Y. Hosono and M. Mimura, Singular perturbation ap- proach to traveling waves in competing and diffusing species model, J. Math. Kyoto Univ.22, 435 (1982)

    1982

  65. [73]

    Conley and R

    C. Conley and R. Gardner, An application of the gen- eralized morse index to travelling wave solutions of a competitive reaction-diffusion model, Indiana Univer- sity Mathematics Journal33, 319 (1984)

    1984

  66. [74]

    Mimura and P

    M. Mimura and P. C. Fife, A 3-component system of competition and diffusion, Hiroshima Mathematical Journal16, 189 (1986)

    1986

  67. [75]

    Kan-on, Parameter Dependence of Propagation Speed of Travelling Waves for Competition-Diffusion Equations, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis26, 340 (1995)

    Y. Kan-on, Parameter Dependence of Propagation Speed of Travelling Waves for Competition-Diffusion Equations, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis26, 340 (1995)

    1995

  68. [76]

    Kan-on, Existence of standing waves for competition- diffusion equations, Japan Journal of Industrial and Ap- plied Mathematics13, 117 (1996)

    Y. Kan-on, Existence of standing waves for competition- diffusion equations, Japan Journal of Industrial and Ap- plied Mathematics13, 117 (1996)

    1996

  69. [77]

    Guo and Y.-C

    J.-S. Guo and Y.-C. Lin, The sign of the wave speed for the Lotka-Volterra competition-diffusion system, Com- munications on Pure and Applied Analysis12, 2083 (2013)

    2013

  70. [78]

    Kan-On, Fisher wave fronts for the Lotka-Volterra competition model with diffusion, Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications28, 145 (1997)

    Y. Kan-On, Fisher wave fronts for the Lotka-Volterra competition model with diffusion, Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications28, 145 (1997)

    1997

  71. [79]

    Lucia, C

    M. Lucia, C. B. Muratov, and M. Novaga, Linear vs. nonlinear selection for the propagation speed of the so- lutions of scalar reaction-diffusion equations invading an unstable equilibrium, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics57, 616 (2004)

    2004

  72. [80]

    Gallay, Local stability of critical fronts in nonlinear parabolic partial differential equations, Nonlinearity7, 741 (1994)

    T. Gallay, Local stability of critical fronts in nonlinear parabolic partial differential equations, Nonlinearity7, 741 (1994)

    1994

  73. [81]

    Faye and M

    G. Faye and M. Holzer, Asymptotic stability of the critical Fisher–KPP front using pointwise estimates, Zeitschrift f¨ ur angewandte Mathematik und Physik70, 13 (2019)

    2019

  74. [82]

    P. C. Fife,Dynamics of Internal Layers and Diffusive Interfaces(Society for Industrial and Applied Mathe- matics, 1988)

    1988

  75. [83]

    C. M. Bender and S. A. Orszag, Advanced mathemati- cal methods for scientists and engineers. 1: Asymptotic methods and perturbation theory (Springer, New York, NY, 2009) nachdr. ed., num Pages: 593

    2009

  76. [84]

    E. J. Hinch,Perturbation Methods, 1st ed. (Cambridge University Press, 1991)

    1991

  77. [85]

    Kado and S

    Y. Kado and S. Sasa, Microscopic Cutoff Dependence of an Entropic Force in Interface Propagation of Stochas- tic Order Parameter Dynamics, Physical Review Letters 132, 057101 (2024). 33

    2024

  78. [86]

    S. M. Allen and J. W. Cahn, A microscopic theory for antiphase boundary motion and its application to an- tiphase domain coarsening, Acta Metallurgica27, 1085 (1979)

    1979

  79. [87]

    Coullet, Localized patterns and fronts in nonequilib- rium systems, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos12, 2445 (2002)

    P. Coullet, Localized patterns and fronts in nonequilib- rium systems, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos12, 2445 (2002)

    2002

  80. [88]

    Dinelli, J

    A. Dinelli, J. O’Byrne, A. Curatolo, Y. Zhao, P. Sollich, and J. Tailleur, Non-reciprocity across scales in active mixtures, Nature Communications14, 7035 (2023)

    2023

  81. [89]

    Costantini and F

    G. Costantini and F. Marchesoni, Asymmetric Kinks: Stabilization by Entropic Forces, Physical Review Let- ters87, 114102 (2001)

    2001

  82. [90]

    Caballero and M

    F. Caballero and M. E. Cates, Stealth Entropy Produc- tion in Active Field Theories near Ising Critical Points, Physical Review Letters124, 240604 (2020)

    2020

  83. [91]

    C. P. Brangwynne, C. R. Eckmann, D. S. Courson, A. Rybarska, C. Hoege, J. Gharakhani, F. J¨ ulicher, and A. A. Hyman, Germline P Granules Are Liquid Droplets That Localize by Controlled Dissolution/Condensation, Science324, 1729 (2009)

    2009

  84. [92]

    C. P. Brangwynne, Phase transitions and size scaling of membrane-less organelles, Journal of Cell Biology203, 875 (2013)

    2013

  85. [93]

    Tjhung, C

    E. Tjhung, C. Nardini, and M. E. Cates, Cluster Phases and Bubbly Phase Separation in Active Fluids: Reversal of the Ostwald Process, Physical Review X8, 031080 (2018)

    2018

  86. [94]

    M. E. Cates and E. Tjhung, Theories of binary fluid mixtures: from phase-separation kinetics to active emul- sions, Journal of Fluid Mechanics836, P1 (2018)

    2018

  87. [95]

    C. A. Weber, D. Zwicker, F. J¨ ulicher, and C. F. Lee, Physics of active emulsions, Reports on Progress in Physics82, 064601 (2019)

    2019

  88. [96]

    Zwicker, The intertwined physics of active chemical reactions and phase separation, Current Opinion in Col- loid & Interface Science61, 101606 (2022)

    D. Zwicker, The intertwined physics of active chemical reactions and phase separation, Current Opinion in Col- loid & Interface Science61, 101606 (2022)

    2022

  89. [97]

    Bauermann, S

    J. Bauermann, S. Laha, P. M. McCall, F. J¨ ulicher, and C. A. Weber, Chemical Kinetics and Mass Action in Coexisting Phases, Journal of the American Chemical Society144, 19294 (2022)

    2022

  90. [98]

    Bauermann, G

    J. Bauermann, G. Bartolucci, J. Boekhoven, F. J¨ ulicher, and C. A. Weber, Critical Transition between Intensive and Extensive Active Droplets, Physical Review X15, 041027 (2025)

    2025

  91. [99]

    Fausti, E

    G. Fausti, E. Tjhung, M. Cates, and C. Nardini, Cap- illary Interfacial Tension in Active Phase Separation, Physical Review Letters127, 068001 (2021)

    2021

  92. [100]

    Kayser, C

    J. Kayser, C. F. Schreck, Q. Yu, M. Gralka, and O. Hal- latschek, Emergence of evolutionary driving forces in pattern-forming microbial populations, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 373, 20170106 (2018)

    2018

  93. [101]

    Giometto, D

    A. Giometto, D. R. Nelson, and A. W. Murray, Phys- ical interactions reduce the power of natural selection in growing yeast colonies, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115, 11448 (2018)

    2018

  94. [102]

    Zhang and Q

    J. Zhang and Q. Du, Shrinking Dimer Dynamics and Its Applications to Saddle Point Search, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis50, 1899 (2012)

    2012

  95. [103]

    W. E, W. Ren, and E. Vanden-Eijnden, String method for the study of rare events, Physical Review B66, 052301 (2002)

    2002

  96. [104]

    W. E, W. Ren, and E. Vanden-Eijnden, Simplified and improved string method for computing the minimum energy paths in barrier-crossing events, The Journal of Chemical Physics126, 164103 (2007)

    2007

  97. [105]

    Heymann and E

    M. Heymann and E. Vanden-Eijnden, Pathways of Max- imum Likelihood for Rare Events in Nonequilibrium Systems: Application to Nucleation in the Presence of Shear, Physical Review Letters100, 140601 (2008)

    2008

  98. [106]

    W. E, W. Ren, and E. Vanden-Eijnden, Minimum action method for the study of rare events, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics57, 637 (2004)

    2004

  99. [107]

    Zakine and E

    R. Zakine and E. Vanden-Eijnden, Minimum-Action Method for Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions, Physi- cal Review X13, 041044 (2023)

    2023

  100. [108]

    Copeland, C

    R. Copeland, C. Zhang, B. K. Hammer, and P. J. Yunker, Spatial constraints and stochastic seeding sub- vert microbial arms race, PLOS Computational Biology 20, e1011807 (2024)

    2024

  101. [109]

    Leung and R

    K. Leung and R. K. P. Zia, Geometrically induced tran- sitions between equilibrium crystal shapes, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General23, 4593 (1990)

    1990

  102. [110]

    Neuhaus and J

    T. Neuhaus and J. S. Hager, 2D Crystal Shapes, Droplet Condensation, and Exponential Slowing Down in Simu- lations of First-Order Phase Transitions, Journal of Sta- tistical Physics113, 47 (2003)

    2003

  103. [111]

    Schrader, P

    M. Schrader, P. Virnau, and K. Binder, Simulation of vapor-liquid coexistence in finite volumes: A method to compute the surface free energy of droplets, Physical Review E79, 061104 (2009)

    2009

  104. [112]

    L. G. MacDowell, Computer simulation of interface po- tentials: Towards a first principle description of com- plex interfaces?, The European Physical Journal Special Topics197, 131 (2011)

    2011

  105. [113]

    Sarfati, J

    L. Sarfati, J. Tailleur, and F. Van Wijland, From bulk to interface dynamics, in and out of equilibrium (2026), arXiv:2605.16503

    2026 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Garc ´ ıa-Bayona and L

    L. Garc ´ ıa-Bayona and L. E. Comstock, Bacterial antag- onism in host-associated microbial communities, Science 361, eaat2456 (2018)

    2018

  107. [115]

    Bucci, S

    V. Bucci, S. Bradde, G. Biroli, and J. B. Xavier, Social interaction, noise and antibiotic-mediated switches in the intestinal microbiota, PLoS computational biology 8, e1002497 (2012)

    2012

  108. [116]

    N. Li, B. Zuo, S. Huang, B. Zeng, D. Han, T. Li, T. Liu, Z. Wu, H. Wei, J. Zhao, and J. Wang, Spatial het- erogeneity of bacterial colonization across different gut segments following inter-species microbiota transplan- tation, Microbiome8, 161 (2020)

    2020

  109. [117]

    D. R. Amor, C. Ratzke, and J. Gore, Transient invaders can induce shifts between alternative stable states of microbial communities, Science Advances6, eaay8676 (2020)

    2020

  110. [118]

    Al-Hiyasat, D

    A. Al-Hiyasat, D. W. Swartz, J. Gore, and M. Kar- dar, Spatiotemporal noise stabilizes unbounded di- versity in strongly-competitive communities (2026), arXiv:2602.13423

    2026

  111. [119]

    Fruchart, R

    M. Fruchart, R. Hanai, P. B. Littlewood, and V. Vitelli, Non-reciprocal phase transitions, Nature592, 363 (2021)

    2021

  112. [120]

    Y. Avni, M. Fruchart, D. Martin, D. Seara, and V. Vitelli, Nonreciprocal Ising Model, Physical Review Letters134, 117103 (2025)

    2025

  113. [121]

    Y. Avni, M. Fruchart, D. Martin, D. Seara, and V. Vitelli, Dynamical phase transitions in the nonre- ciprocal Ising model, Physical Review E111, 034124 34 (2025)

    2025

  114. [122]

    es- cher cycles

    J. Sch¨ uttler, R. L. Jack, and M. E. Cates, Nonre- ciprocal dynamics with weak noise: aperiodic “es- cher cycles” and their quasipotential landscape (2025), arXiv:2512.08210

    2025

  115. [123]

    Lequin, G

    V. Lequin, G. Biroli, and C. Scalliet, Nucleation beyond equilibrium: Fronts control invasion in bistable ecosys- tems, Github, 2026, https://zenodo.org/XXX

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.