Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 64 references

State transitions in land-vegetation systems emerge at Paris Agreement warming levels in CMIP6

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Applying an automated detection workflow to CMIP6, this paper claims that most modeled land-vegetation state transitions begin at global warming levels of 2°C or below, within the Paris Agreement target range.

desk verdict A useful, candid CMIP6 land–vegetation transition catalogue, but the Paris-onset headline rests on an unvalidated breakpoint fit that needs reframing or validation. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07325 v1 pith:EP2AP24B submitted 2026-08-07 physics.ao-ph

classification physics.ao-ph
keywords CMIP6land-vegetationstatetransitionsstrongnonlinearsurprisesAmazondiebackpermafrostthawglobalwarminglevelsSSPscenarios
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper applies an automated detection algorithm to the full CMIP6 ensemble under five SSP emission scenarios and claims that 47 land-vegetation state transitions, grouped into nine categories, begin to unfold at global warming levels at or below 2°C in most cases. If true, this means that several model-projected reorganizations of the land biosphere are already triggered within the Paris Agreement temperature corridor, even if their full development requires more warming. The study also offers mechanistic explanations: Amazon dieback versus greening depends on whether precipitation decline translates into near-surface soil moisture loss faster than CO2 fertilization can compensate, and the dieback-prone models are those with dynamic vegetation. The catalogue includes both abrupt shifts and more gradual state transitions, which earlier studies largely missed.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the Strong Nonlinear Surprise (SNS) detection workflow, previously validated on ocean and sea-ice variables, adapted here to land-vegetation fields with a newly developed onset metric. Candidate regions of at least $10^{6}$ km2 are selected, then tested against formal criteria for abrupt changes (criteria i and ii) and gradual state transitions (criterion vi), and finally grouped into cases and categories. The onset year is estimated by fitting two- or three-segment piecewise-linear models with free breakpoints, selecting between them by Akaike Information Criterion, and requiring the transition slope to differ clearly from its neighbors ($|a_2-a_1|>2|a_1|$); repeating this over sliding windows of 20 to 50 years converts the onset year into a probability distribution over global warming levels, which is then averaged from individual time series up to category level.

What would settle it

Re-run the exact SNS workflow on unforced piControl segments of the same models and count how often the slope-change criterion $|a_2-a_1|>2|a_1|$ flags a transition; the paper's claim predicts that few or none of the nine categories' onset PDFs appear in control runs, whereas a high false-positive rate would undermine the 2°C-onset result. Alternatively, a ramp-down experiment in which the identified transitions fully reverse would show that they are not the persistent state transitions the catalogue assumes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that, across CMIP6 SSP scenarios, the majority of identified strong nonlinear surprises in land-vegetation systems have onset warming levels at or below 2°C relative to 1850-1880, with onset frequency peaking between 1 and 2°C; two Amazon dieback categories are the exception, beginning around 5°C and 2.2°C respectively. The paper further finds that the Amazon dieback-greening contrast traces to precipitation-driven soil moisture loss: models with dieback experience either larger absolute precipitation declines or ones that translate more efficiently into near-surface soil moisture loss, while in greening models CO2 fertilization wins out where soil moisture loss stays weak, and trees with dynamic vegetation models all die back whereas prescribed-vegetation models all green. In the Arctic, boreal forest expands and permafrost thaws when above-zero monthly temperatures persist for more than about five months per year, and the study identifies additional transitions in snow cover, Asian biomass, and eastern North American leaf area.

Load-bearing premise

The detection thresholds and piecewise-linear fits correctly distinguish genuine forced state transitions from noise and internal variability in the model output; if the flagged breakpoints are artifacts of smoothing, thresholds, or natural variability, the onset-warming-level claim collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Under higher SSP scenarios, the identified transitions often begin in the last decades of the historical record or the first decades of the scenario period, but only high-warming pathways continue long enough afterward for the transitions to complete; keeping warming low leaves most transitions incomplete or undetected.
  • Permafrost thaw in the CNRM and NorESM families is consistently associated with the threshold of roughly five above-zero months per year, which could serve as a regional early-warning indicator.
  • Amazon dieback in this ensemble appears only in dynamic-vegetation models, while greening appears only in prescribed-vegetation models, implying that model structural uncertainty matters as much as scenario uncertainty for projecting Amazon fate.
  • Onset warming levels are systematically lower than the warming levels of steepest change for every category, so the paper's headline result refers to the beginning of transitions, not their completion.
  • Deforestation is deliberately excluded as a land-use forcing, so the reported Amazon warming levels likely underestimate the real-world risk that combines climate and direct human disturbance.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the onset metric is correct, the first 1-2°C of global warming is the window in which multiple modeled land-vegetation systems begin changing, which argues for monitoring and adaptation efforts concentrated in that near-term period rather than waiting for higher warming.
  • The paper explicitly notes that its detected transitions cannot be equated with dynamical-systems tipping points because reversibility is untested; targeted ramp-up and ramp-down experiments, such as those in the TIPMIP protocol, would be the direct way to test whether these are persistent state shifts or recoverable responses.
  • The dynamic-vegetation versus prescribed-vegetation dichotomy in the Amazon results raises the possibility that multi-model assessments that average over both types mask a structural split: if dynamic vegetation is more realistic, dieback risk may be understated in ensemble means.
  • The onset PDFs identify specific years and warming levels where observational early-warning signals would be most valuable, connecting this catalogue to ongoing efforts to anticipate transitions rather than only record them.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper applies the automated Strong Nonlinear Surprise (SNS) detection workflow of Angevaare and Drijfhout (2025) to CMIP6 land-vegetation variables (leaf-area index, tree cover, soil moisture, snow fraction, etc.) under five SSP scenarios, identifying 47 state-transition cases grouped into 9 categories spanning the Amazon, Africa, the boreal zone, permafrost regions, snow-cover regions, Asia, and eastern North America. For each case the authors estimate the global-warming level of onset and of steepest change using a piecewise-linear breakpoint fit, and they analyze the driving mechanisms with moisture-budget diagnostics. The central claim, stated in the abstract and Section 3.5, is that the onset of the majority of identified categories occurs at or below 2°C global warming, within the Paris Agreement range.

Significance. If the detection and onset-dating methodology is sound, this is a valuable systematic catalogue of modeled land-vegetation state transitions, complementing expert-elicitation and idealized-scenario studies with a multi-model, multi-scenario assessment. The paper is transparent about its workflow, makes the detection code publicly available, and is unusually candid about limitations (e.g., the inability to distinguish rate-induced tipping from committed-realized dieback in Section 3.1.4, and the caveat that detected transitions are not necessarily reversible tipping points in Section 4). The physical mechanism analyses, particularly the Amazon precipitation-soil-moisture-vegetation contrast and the permafrost thaw analysis, are carefully reasoned and add process-level value. However, the headline Paris-warming-level claim rests entirely on the onset-year estimator in Section 2.2, which is not validated against known breakpoints or control runs; this is the load-bearing weakness that determines the paper's overall reliability.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.2, Eqs. (1)–(2)] The acceptance criterion |a2−a1| > 2|a1| is relative to the background slope a1, so for quasi-stationary pre-transition series (a1 ≈ 0) any post-transition drift, however gradual, satisfies the inequality. The paper itself reports that this criterion 'discards none' of the SNS time series, which means it is non-binding for the present sample and provides no protection against spurious breakpoints arising from low-frequency internal variability or a gradual forced trend. Since the onset year t1 from this fit is the foundation of the warming-level PDFs and the central Paris-level claim, the authors should validate the estimator on synthetic series with known breakpoints and on piControl runs to quantify false-positive onset detections; without such validation the claimed 'onset at or below 2°C' is not supported.
  2. [§2.2 and §3.5] The onset PDF is constructed by assigning equal probability to every year within a w-year window centered on t1, for w = 20–50 years, and then mapping those years to global-mean warming levels. Because t1 is already the earliest departure point of the transition, this windowing smears probability toward earlier years and hence toward cooler global-mean temperatures than the fitted t1 itself implies. In the early-to-mid 21st century, when warming is steep, a 10–25 year smearing corresponds to several tenths of a degree, which is exactly the difference between the reported '≤2°C' result and a null result. The authors should quantify the sensitivity of the category-level onset distributions to this smearing by, for example, recomputing them with point-mass t1 (no window) and with narrower windows.
  3. [Abstract and §3.5] The headline statement that the majority of categories begin at or below 2°C is derived from the same fitted breakpoints that are used to define and select the SNS events. The warming-level PDF is therefore not an independent test of Paris-level onset; it is, by construction, centered on the detector's t1. The authors should demonstrate that the result is robust to the subjective choices in the detection pipeline—the AIC improvement threshold of 2, the slope-change acceptance threshold, the minimum region area, and the window sizes—and should report the distribution of t1 values relative to known times of forcing change (e.g., the scenario branch point). This would address the circularity concern directly.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§4] The word 'summerizes' in the first paragraph of Section 4 is a typo and should read 'summarizes'.
  2. [§3.1.1] The statement in Section 3.1.1 that regional warming is '~18 K over the dieback region' is surprisingly large and should be clarified: is this the end-of-century regional temperature increase in UKESM1-0-LL under SSP5-8.5, and how does it compare to the global mean for that model?
  3. [Figure 12b] The category-level warming-level distributions are displayed as box-and-whisker plots, which obscures the multimodality that the text describes for categories B and F; showing the underlying PDF curves (or violin plots) would make the discussion of secondary peaks and early onsets more transparent.
  4. [Supplementary Table S3] Table S3 is extremely long (dozens of per-member, per-scenario entries per case); consider condensing it to a summary table with per-case ranges and moving the full per-member table to a data repository, as the current format is unwieldy for readers.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the SNS detection method is imported from separately released, code-available prior work, and the warming-level onset claim is a transparent post-hoc summary of fitted onset years rather than a prediction equivalent to its inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is not circular in the sense defined here. The SNS detection workflow is taken from Angevaare and Drijfhout (2025), a separate method paper whose code is publicly available and which was previously developed and validated on ocean, sea-ice, and atmospheric variables; this qualifies as independent support under the review rules, even though the author lists overlap. The new contribution is the onset-year estimator of Section 2.2, which fits piecewise-linear breakpoints to already-identified SNS time series and converts the fitted t1 values into warming-level PDFs via the scenario temperature record. That is a diagnostic summary of model output, not a prediction statistically forced by a fitted parameter that was trained on the claimed outcome. The statement that the acceptance criterion 'discards none' because every SNS must by definition depart from linear behaviour is a candid admission that the slope-change filter is vacuous for this sample, but it does not make the absolute warming-level result equivalent to the detector's definition: t1 is still estimated from the data, and the majority-at-or-below-2C claim could in principle have failed if the fitted breakpoints had fallen later. Similarly, the sentence that onset occurs 'by construction' at an earlier year and lower warming than steepest change is a disclosed property of the two metrics, and the paper does not use that ordering alone to justify the Paris-level claim. The physical mechanism attributions are independent diagnostic analyses, and the permafrost and boreal categories are externally corroborated by cited literature. The main concerns about the onset estimator are validation gaps and statistical robustness, not circularity, so no circular step is charged and the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the SNS detector thresholds from the authors' earlier method paper, the transfer of those thresholds to vegetation fields, the stationarity of piControl variability, and the manual separation of land-use forcing. The onset warming-level distributions depend on arbitrary acceptance thresholds in the piecewise-linear fit. No new physical entities are introduced; the paper reuses existing CMIP6 variables and an existing detection framework.

free parameters (5)
  • Minimum SNS region area threshold = 10^6 km2
    Adopted from Angevaare and Drijfhout (2025); sets which localized transitions are detectable, for example Parry et al. (2022) Amazon dieback cases are excluded by construction. Section 2.1.
  • Detection thresholds for criteria (i), (ii), (vi) = not stated in paper, referred to method paper appendix
    Abruptness, bimodality, and state-transition thresholds determine which cases enter the catalogue; the MRI-ESM2-0 case (Section 3.2.2) mentions a 5 or 10 times larger than standard deviation criterion, but exact values are not reproduced here.
  • Onset slope-change acceptance threshold = |a2-a1| > 2|a1| (and analogous for third regime)
    Section 2.2, Eq. (1)-(2): determines whether the fitted breakpoint t1 is accepted as an SNS onset; if this threshold is arbitrary, the onset warming-level distributions shift.
  • AIC improvement threshold for 3-segment versus 2-segment fit = delta AIC > 2
    Section 2.2, Eq. (3): conventional but arbitrary; changes which time series are treated as having a second breakpoint and affects onset estimates.
  • Sliding window sizes w = 20 to 50 years
    Section 2.2: the steepest-change and onset PDFs assign equal probability over the window; window choice directly sets the spread of warming-level distributions.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption CMIP6 model trajectories are representative of real land-vegetation state dynamics
    The entire catalogue is built from CMIP6 output; Section 4 itself cites Lee and Hohenegger (2024) showing that coarse models may overstate land-atmosphere coupling, so this assumption is load-bearing and contested.
  • domain assumption SNS criteria from Angevaare and Drijfhout (2025) transfer to land-vegetation variables without re-validation
    Section 2.1 applies criteria (i), (ii), and (vi) to lai, mrso, treeFrac, snc, and baresoilFrac; thresholds were designed and validated for ocean, sea-ice, and atmospheric variables, and exact values are not stated in this paper.
  • domain assumption piControl internal variability is stationary and representative
    Criteria (i) and (vi) compare jump magnitudes and start-to-end changes to piControl variability; non-stationary low-frequency variability would change false-positive rates.
  • domain assumption Land-use forcing can be manually separated from natural response
    Section 2.1 removes cases attributable solely to land-use forcing by manual inspection; only one African case is cross-checked against 4xCO2, so manual curation is load-bearing for several categories.
  • ad hoc to paper Piecewise-linear fit is an adequate model of transition onset
    Section 2.2 fits 2- or 3-segment linear regimes with free breakpoints and an AIC threshold; this is an ad hoc choice not derived from physical transition theory, and smoothing with running means can create breakpoints.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of State transitions in land-vegetation systems emerge at Paris Agreement warming levels in CMIP6." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EP2AP24B

@misc{pith2026260807325,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: State transitions in land-vegetation systems emerge at Paris Agreement warming levels in CMIP6},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EP2AP24B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07325}
}
abstract

Using an automatic detection workflow applied to the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) ensemble under future emission scenarios, we identify 47 abrupt and more gradually developing state transitions in the land-vegetation component of the Earth system, classified into 9 categories. Over the Amazon, we find state transitions via vegetation dieback alongside greening cases; the contrast between them is traced primarily to differences in precipitation: models showing dieback experience either a larger absolute decline in precipitation, or one that translates more efficiently into soil moisture loss, particularly near the surface, while in greening models the CO$_2$ fertilization effect wins out where the soil moisture loss remains weaker. The precipitation decline in dieback-prone models appears driven through a weakening of moist convection. Across these Amazon cases, models with dynamic vegetation undergo dieback, whereas greening is confined to models with prescribed vegetation distributions. African cases include greening over eastern-central Africa and the Congo basin, and an abrupt soil-moisture drying also over the Congo. At high latitudes, boreal forest expands, while permafrost thaws once the regional above-zero temperatures persist for more than half the year. Additional categories cover transitions to a reduced snow-cover state over northeastern North America, increased vegetation biomass near the Tibetan Plateau and southeastern Asia, and increased leaf-area index over the northeast Northern America. Of particular concern, a global warming of 2$^\circ$C or below, within reach of the Paris Agreement targets, is already enough to trigger the onset of the majority of the identified categories in CMIP6.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.07325 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Temporal evolution (10-year running mean) of leaf-area index and bare-soil fraction; corresponding spatial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Temporal evolution (10-year running mean) of tree fraction; corresponding spatial extent is shown in (b). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Temporal evolution (10-year running mean) of leaf-area index for different models; corresponding spatial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Temporal evolution (10-year running mean) of bare-soil fraction; corresponding spatial extent is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Temporal evolution (10-year running mean) of leaf-area index for couple of models; corresponding spatial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Temporal evolution (10-year running mean) of soil moisture; corresponding spatial extent is shown in (b). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Temporal evolution (10-year running mean) of vegetation-related parameters for couple of models; corre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) Temporal evolution (10-year running mean) of total soil moisture for couple of models; corresponding spatial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (a) Temporal evolution (10-year running mean) of snow-area fraction for couple of models; corresponding spatial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (a) Temporal evolution (10-year running mean) of land-vegetation-related variables for couple of models; [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (a) Temporal evolution (10-year running mean) of leaf-area index for a family of CanESM5 models; corre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: (a) Global map of all Strong Nonlinear Surprises (SNSs) identified in this study. Uppercase and lowercase [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and Folke, Carl and Walker, Brian , title =

    Scheffer, Marten and Carpenter, Stephen and Foley, Jonathan A. and Folke, Carl and Walker, Brian , title =. Nature , volume =. 2001 , doi =

  2. [2]

    and Brovkin, Victor and Carpenter, Stephen R

    Scheffer, Marten and Bascompte, Jordi and Brock, William A. and Brovkin, Victor and Carpenter, Stephen R. and Dakos, Vasilis and Held, Hermann and van Nes, Egbert H. and Rietkerk, Max and Sugihara, George , title =. Nature , volume =. 2009 , doi =

  3. [3]

    and Lenton, Timothy M

    Boulton, Chris A. and Lenton, Timothy M. and Boers, Niklas , title =. Nature Climate Change , volume =. 2022 , doi =

  4. [4]

    2026 , journal =

    Tropical forest loss causes observed reductions in downwind tropical precipitation , author=. 2026 , journal =

  5. [5]

    Boers, Niklas and Marwan, Norbert and Barbosa, Henrique M. J. and Kurths, J. A deforestation-induced tipping point for the South American monsoon system , volume =. Scientific Reports , number =. doi:10.1038/srep41489 , id =

  6. [6]

    and Ciais, Philippe , date =

    Tao, Shengli and Wigneron, Jean-Pierre and Chave, Jerome and Tang, Zhiyao and Wang, Zhiheng and Zhu, Jiangling and Guo, Qinghua and Liu, Yi Y. and Ciais, Philippe , date =. Little evidence that Amazonian rainforests are approaching a tipping point , volume =. Nature Climate Change , number =. doi:10.1038/s41558-023-01853-8 , id =

  7. [7]

    and Bathiany, Sebastian and Lenton, Timothy M

    Brovkin, Victor and Brook, Edward and Williams, John W. and Bathiany, Sebastian and Lenton, Timothy M. and Barton, Michael and others , title =. Nature Geoscience , volume =. 2021 , doi =

  8. [8]

    and Held, Hermann and Kriegler, Elmar and Hall, Jim W

    Lenton, Timothy M. and Held, Hermann and Kriegler, Elmar and Hall, Jim W. and Lucht, Wolfgang and Rahmstorf, Stefan and Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim , title =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =. 2008 , doi =

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    Contribution of

    Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of. 2021 , pages =

  2. [10]

    and Marotzke, J

    Lee, J.-Y. and Marotzke, J. and Bala, G. and others , title =. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , publisher =. 2021 , doi =

  3. [11]

    R. B. Alley and J. Marotzke and W. D. Nordhaus and J. T. Overpeck and D. M. Peteet and R. A. Pielke and R. T. Pierrehumbert and P. B. Rhines and T. F. Stocker and L. D. Talley and J. M. Wallace , title =. Science , volume =. 2003 , doi =

  4. [12]

    and Gilmore, Elisabeth A

    Kopp, Robert E. and Gilmore, Elisabeth A. and Shwom, Rachael L. and Adams, Helen and Adler, Carolina and Oppenheimer, Michael and Patwardhan, Anand and Russill, Chris and Schmidt, Daniela N. and York, Richard , date =. `Tipping points'confuse and can distract from urgent clima...

  5. [13]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =

    Sybren Drijfhout and Sebastian Bathiany and Claudie Beaulieu and Victor Brovkin and Martin Claussen and Chris Huntingford and Marten Scheffer and Giovanni Sgubin and Didier Swingedouw , title =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =. 2015 , doi =

  6. [14]

    Armstrong McKay and Arie Staal and Jesse F

    David I. Armstrong McKay and Arie Staal and Jesse F. Abrams and Ricarda Winkelmann and Boris Sakschewski and Sina Loriani and Ingo Fetzer and Sarah E. Cornell and Johan Rockström and Timothy M. Lenton , title =. Science , volume =. 2022 , doi =

  7. [15]

    and Aksenov, Y

    Loriani, S. and Aksenov, Y. and Armstrong McKay, D. I. and Bala, G. and Born, A. and Chiessi, C. M. and Dijkstra, H. A. and Donges, J. F. and Drijfhout, S. and England, M. H. and Fedorov, A. V. and Jackson, L. C. and Kornhuber, K. and Messori, G. and Pausata, F. S. R. and Rynd...

  8. [16]

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.15188118 , url =

    Lenton, Timothy and Armstrong McKay, David and Loriani, Sina and Abrams, Jesse and Lade, Steven and Donges, Jonathan and Buxton, Joshua and Milkoreit, Manjana and Powell, Tom and Smith, Steven R and Zimm, Caroline and Bailey, Emma and Dyke, James and Ghadiali, Ashish and Laybo...

  9. [17]

    and Boulton, Chris and Dennis, Donovan P

    Lenton, Timothy and Milkoreit, Manjana and Willcock, Simon and Abrams, Jesse and Armstrong McKay, David and Buxton, Josh and Donges, Jonathan and Loriani, Sina and Wunderling, Nico and Alkemade, Floor and Barrett, Mike and Constantino, Sara and Powell, Tom and Smith, Steven R....

  10. [18]

    A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , year=

    Canny, John , journal=. A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , year=

  11. [19]

    Edge Detection Reveals Abrupt and Extreme Climate Events

    Sebastian Bathiany and Johan Hidding and Marten Scheffer. Edge Detection Reveals Abrupt and Extreme Climate Events. Journal of Climate. 2020. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0449.1

  12. [20]

    Terpstra, Sjoerd and Falkena, Swinda K. J. and Bastiaansen, Robbin and Bathiany, Sebastian and Dijkstra, Henk A. and von der Heydt, Anna S. , title =. AGU Advances , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2025AV001698 , year =

  13. [21]

    O'Neill, B. C. and Tebaldi, C. and van Vuuren, D. P. and Eyring, V. and Friedlingstein, P. and Hurtt, G. and Knutti, R. and Kriegler, E. and Lamarque, J.-F. and Lowe, J. and Meehl, G. A. and Moss, R. and Riahi, K. and Sanderson, B. M. , TITLE =. Geoscientific Model Development...

  14. [22]

    and Stouffer, Ronald J

    Taylor, Karl E. and Stouffer, Ronald J. and Meehl, Gerald A. , title =. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , volume =. 2012 , doi =

  15. [23]

    and Senior, Catherine A

    Eyring, Veronika and Bony, Sandrine and Meehl, Gerald A. and Senior, Catherine A. and Stevens, Bjorn and Stouffer, Ronald J. and Taylor, Karl E. , title =. Geoscientific Model Development , volume =. 2016 , doi =

  16. [24]

    EGUsphere , volume=

    Catalogue of Strong Nonlinear Surprises in ocean, sea-ice, and atmospheric variables in CMIP6 , author=. EGUsphere , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

  17. [25]

    and Betts, Richard A

    Cox, Peter M. and Betts, Richard A. and Jones, Chris D. and Spall, Steven A. and Totterdell, Ian J. , date =. Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model , url =. Nature , number =. 2000 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1038/35041539 , id =

  18. [26]

    Van Nes and Marten Scheffer , title =

    Marina Hirota and Milena Holmgren and Egbert H. Van Nes and Marten Scheffer , title =. Science , volume =. 2011 , doi =. https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1210657 , abstract =

  19. [27]

    and Basso, Luana S

    Gatti, Luciana V. and Basso, Luana S. and Miller, John B. and Gloor, Manuel and. Amazonia as a carbon source linked to deforestation and climate change , journal =. 2021 , doi =

  20. [28]

    2021 , doi =

    Executive Summary of the. 2021 , doi =

  21. [29]

    Quantifying Environmental Drivers of Future Tropical Forest Extent

    Peter Good and Chris Jones and Jason Lowe and Richard Betts and Ben Booth and Chris Huntingford. Quantifying Environmental Drivers of Future Tropical Forest Extent. Journal of Climate. 2011. doi:10.1175/2010JCLI3865.1

  22. [30]

    Falloon, P. D. and Dankers, R. and Betts, R. A. and Jones, C. D. and Booth, B. B. B. and Lambert, F. H. , TITLE =. Biogeosciences , VOLUME =. 2012 , NUMBER =

  23. [31]

    Pugh, T. A. M. and Jones, C. D. and Huntingford, C. and Burton, C. and Arneth, A. and Brovkin, V. and Ciais, P. and Lomas, M. and Robertson, E. and Piao, S. L. and Sitch, S. , title =. Earth's Future , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF000935 , year =

  24. [32]

    Parry, I. M. and Ritchie, P. D. L. and Cox, P. M. , TITLE =. Earth System Dynamics , VOLUME =. 2022 , NUMBER =

  25. [33]

    Managed ecosystems and CO2: Case studies, processes, and perspectives , pages=

    Evapotranspiration, canopy temperature, and plant water relations , author=. Managed ecosystems and CO2: Case studies, processes, and perspectives , pages=. 2006 , publisher=

  26. [34]

    and Lawrence, David M

    Kennedy, Daniel and Swenson, Sean and Oleson, Keith W. and Lawrence, David M. and Fisher, Rosie and Lola da Costa, Antonio Carlos and Gentine, Pierre , title =. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001500 , year =

  27. [35]

    Nature Geoscience , year =

    Pithan, Felix and Mauritsen, Thorsten , title =. Nature Geoscience , year =. doi:10.1038/ngeo2071 , publisher =

  28. [36]

    Skinner and Christopher J

    Christopher B. Skinner and Christopher J. Poulsen and Robin Chadwick and Noah S. Diffenbaugh and Richard P. Fiorella. The Role of Plant CO2 Physiological Forcing in Shaping Future Daily-Scale Precipitation. Journal of Climate. 2017. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0603.1

  29. [37]

    Journal of Climate , volume=

    Diagnostic computation of moisture budgets in the ERA-Interim reanalysis with reference to analysis of CMIP-archived atmospheric model data , author=. Journal of Climate , volume=. 2013 , doi=

  30. [38]

    Dekker, S. C. and Groenendijk, M. and Booth, B. B. B. and Huntingford, C. and Cox, P. M. , TITLE =. Earth System Dynamics , VOLUME =. 2016 , NUMBER =

  31. [39]

    Schuur, E. A. G. and McGuire, A. D. and Sch. Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback , url =. Nature , number =. 2015 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1038/nature14338 , id =

  32. [40]

    and Abbott, Benjamin W

    Turetsky, Merritt R. and Abbott, Benjamin W. and Jones, Miriam C. and Anthony, Katey Walter and Olefeldt, David and Schuur, Edward A. G. and Grosse, Guido and Kuhry, Peter and Hugelius, Gustaf and Koven, Charles and Lawrence, David M. and Gibson, Carolyn and Sannel, A. Britta ...

  33. [41]

    and Soden, Brian J

    Held, Isaac M. and Soden, Brian J. , title =. Journal of Climate , year =

  34. [42]

    Journal of Climate , year =

    Chadwick, Robin and Boutle, Ian and Martin, Gill , title =. Journal of Climate , year =

  35. [43]

    Best, M. J. and Pryor, M. and Clark, D. B. and Rooney, G. G. and Essery, R. L. H. and M. The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description -- Part 1: Energy and water fluxes , journal =. 2011 , volume =

  36. [44]

    and Fisher, Rosie A

    Lawrence, David M. and Fisher, Rosie A. and Koven, Charles D. and Oleson, Keith W. and Swenson, Sean C. and Bonan, Gordon and Collier, Nathan and Ghimire, Bardan and van Kampenhout, Leo and Kennedy, Daniel and Kluzek, Erik and Lawrence, Peter J. and Li, Fang and Li, Hongyi and...

  37. [45]

    and Viovy, N

    Krinner, G. and Viovy, N. and de Noblet-Ducoudr. A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere-biosphere system , journal =. 2005 , volume =

  38. [46]

    Shevliakova, Elena and Malyshev, Sergey and Mart. The Land Component LM4.1 of the GFDL Earth System Model ESM4.1: Model Description and Characteristics of Land Surface Climate and Carbon Cycling in the Historical Simulation , journal =. 2024 , volume =

  39. [47]

    Geophysical Research Letters , volume =

    Yoon, Arim and Hohenegger, Cathy , title =. Geophysical Research Letters , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL110503 , year =

  40. [48]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =

    Junhong Lee and Cathy Hohenegger , title =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =. 2024 , doi =

  41. [49]

    Science Advances , volume =

    Nils Bochow and Niklas Boers , title =. Science Advances , volume =. 2023 , doi =

  42. [50]

    Global warming overshoots increase risks of climate tipping cascades in a network model , url =

    Wunderling, Nico and Winkelmann, Ricarda and Rockstr. Global warming overshoots increase risks of climate tipping cascades in a network model , url =. Nature Climate Change , number =. 2023 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1038/s41558-022-01545-9 , id =

  43. [51]

    Deforestation-induced drying lowers Amazon climate threshold , volume =

    Wunderling, Nico and Sakschewski, Boris and Rockstr. Deforestation-induced drying lowers Amazon climate threshold , volume =. Nature , number =. doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10456-0 , id =

  44. [52]

    and Good, P

    Ben-Yami, M. and Good, P. and Jackson, L. C. and Crucifix, M. and Hu, A. and Saenko, O. and Swingedouw, D. and Boers, N. , title =. Earth's Future , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF003959 , year =

  45. [53]

    van Westen and Michael Kliphuis and Henk A

    René M. van Westen and Michael Kliphuis and Henk A. Dijkstra , title =. Science Advances , volume =. 2024 , doi =

  46. [54]

    and Molina, Maria J

    Guo, Yaru and Hu, Aixue and Meehl, Gerald A. and Molina, Maria J. and Li, Hui and Bellomo, Katinka and Rosenbloom, Nan , date =. Nature Communications , title =. 2026 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1038/s41467-026-73200-2 , id =

  47. [55]

    Burke, E. J. and Zhang, Y. and Krinner, G. , TITLE =. The Cryosphere , VOLUME =. 2020 , NUMBER =

  48. [56]

    ob, F. and Fr\

    Jones, C. and Bossert, I. and Dennis, D. P. and Jeffery, H. and Jones, C. D. and Koenigk, T. and Loriani, S. and Sanderson, B. and S\'ef\'erian, R. and Wyser, K. and Yang, S. and Abe, M. and Bathiany, S. and Braconnot, P. and Brovkin, V. and Burger, F. A. and Cadule, P. and Ca...

  49. [57]

    2025 , month = oct, note =

    Guo, Chuncheng and Yang, Shuting and Schiller-Weiss, Ilana and others , title =. 2025 , month = oct, note =. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7830432/v1 , howpublished =

  50. [58]

    Geophysical Research Letters , volume=

    Marine boundary layer clouds at the heart of tropical cloud feedback uncertainties in climate models , author=. Geophysical Research Letters , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

  51. [59]

    Nature Climate Change , volume=

    Climate goals and computing the future of clouds , author=. Nature Climate Change , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

  52. [60]

    IEEE transactions on automatic control , volume=

    A new look at the statistical model identification , author=. IEEE transactions on automatic control , volume=. 1974 , publisher=

  53. [61]

    and Myers, Timothy A

    Zelinka, Mark D. and Myers, Timothy A. and McCoy, Daniel T. and Po-Chedley, Stephen and Caldwell, Peter M. and Ceppi, Paulo and Klein, Stephen A. and Taylor, Karl E. , title =. Geophysical Research Letters , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085782 , year =

  54. [62]

    and Jones, Colin G

    Sellar, Alistair A. and Jones, Colin G. and Mulcahy, Jane P. and Tang, Yongming and Yool, Andrew and Wiltshire, Andy and O'Connor, Fiona M. and Stringer, Marc and Hill, Richard and Palmieri, Julien and Woodward, Stephanie and de Mora, Lee and Kuhlbrodt, Till and Rumbold, Steve...

  55. [63]

    Committed terrestrial ecosystem changes due to climate change , url =

    Jones, Chris and Lowe, Jason and Liddicoat, Spencer and Betts, Richard , date =. Committed terrestrial ecosystem changes due to climate change , url =. Nature Geoscience , number =. 2009 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.1038/ngeo555 , id =

  56. [64]

    2010 - 2015 , address =

    Cartopy: a cartographic. 2010 - 2015 , address =

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.