REVIEW
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Gaussian mixture model clustering algorithms for the analysis of high-precision mass measurements
read the original abstract
The development of the phase-imaging ion-cyclotron resonance (PI-ICR) technique for use in Penning trap mass spectrometry (PTMS) increased the speed and precision with which PTMS experiments can be carried out. In PI-ICR, data sets of the locations of individual ion hits on a detector are created showing how ions cluster together into spots according to their cyclotron frequency. Ideal data sets would consist of a single, 2D-spherical spot with no other noise, but in practice data sets typically contain multiple spots, non-spherical spots, or significant noise, all of which can make determining the locations of spot centers non-trivial. A method for assigning groups of ions to their respective spots and determining the spot centers is therefore essential for further improving precision and confidence in PI-ICR experiments. We present the class of Gaussian mixture model (GMM) clustering algorithms as an optimal solution. We show that on simulated PI-ICR data, several types of GMM clustering algorithms perform better than other clustering algorithms over a variety of typical scenarios encountered in PI-ICR. The mass spectra of $^{163}\text{Gd}$, $^{163m}\text{Gd}$, $^{162}\text{Tb}$, and $^{162m}\text{Tb}$ measured using PI-ICR at the Canadian Penning trap mass spectrometer were checked using GMMs, producing results that were in close agreement with the previously published values.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.