REVIEW 1 cited by
Tighter bounds lead to improved classifiers
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The standard approach to supervised classification involves the minimization of a log-loss as an upper bound to the classification error. While this is a tight bound early on in the optimization, it overemphasizes the influence of incorrectly classified examples far from the decision boundary. Updating the upper bound during the optimization leads to improved classification rates while transforming the learning into a sequence of minimization problems. In addition, in the context where the classifier is part of a larger system, this modification makes it possible to link the performance of the classifier to that of the whole system, allowing the seamless introduction of external constraints.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Supervised Fine Tuning on Curated Data is Reinforcement Learning (and can be improved)
SFT on curated data is a lower bound on a sparse-reward RL objective, and an importance-weighted variant, iw-SFT, tightens the bound and beats plain SFT on AIME 2024 and GPQA.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.